Should the Justices choose a different petition where a Justice is recused?
"Universities and faculties in particular should take decisive action to prevent future Steinbachs and Eldiks from subverting the core principles of academic inquiry."
Will Eugene Scalia argue Murray v. UBS, after his father Antonin last argued in 1976?
Editors should withdraw any unpublished stories about judicial ethics to get a grip on reality.
Usually, "good" facts for a cert petition represent unfortunate human suffering.
Summer study-abroad programs are cushy vacations for students and boondoggles to attract elite faculty.
If you don't do what I want, "Congress will consider more prescriptive requirements."
If Justice Thomas is the intellectual leader of the Supreme Court, Justice Alito is its heart.
Chatbots are a quantum leap from writing aids in the past, like a thesaurus, word processing, and spell check.
The inside-information largely trickled to a halt after 2020.
And good luck challenging the law. The Texas Senate passed an S.B. 8-like bulletproof bill for prayer in school.
Chief Judge Kimberly Moore cannot be the judge, jury, and executioner of her colleague.
If Justices Thomas and Alito are dissent, and Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett vote with the progressives, the Chief may join the majority to avoid having Justice Sotomayor make the assignment.
"If the ABA does not arrest its progressive lurch, the organization risks its own obsolescence."
Justice Kavanaugh's six-page majority opinion does not withstand scrutiny against Justice Thomas's 20-page dissent.
Justice Gorsuch raises the question that the majority elides.
"We should apply the highest ethical standards, not hypocritical double standards."
Guest Post on Chat GPT by Professor Seth Chandler (UH)
"The Institute will make a place for up to 15 Fellows who are law students, clerks, or lawyers and legal academics only a few years out of law school."
Justice Blackmun: "Viable is a good medical term, it isn't a legal term, but the lawyers have taken it over and the judges too."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks