Three decades later, the George H.W. Bush SCOTUS strategy finally has three votes.
The limiting principle presented in Lopez would likely not meet her threshold.
I'm holding my breath on his predictions in Allen and Brackeen.
Justice Gorsuch v. Justice Thomas in Brackeen.
Scalia was right: "The only thing that will 'confine' the Court's holding is its sense of what it can get away with."
Justices Gorsuch and Alito have diametrically opposite perspectives on Indian Tribes
Justice Thomas would place the burden on the government, and follow a presumption of liberty.
133 pages down to 30 pages.
Does the special counsel "seek to avoid distracting fights"?
"To be clear, we mean no disrespect to either of these fine academics but their views on this matter are idiosyncratic."
He coulda been a contender.
"Of particular interest are historical gun regulations applicable to intoxicated or impaired individuals."
He probably thinks the Court is about him.
Justice Scalia would be rolling over in his grave.
Or, Sweet Home Alabama.
"The Court declines to be the first in generations to force a literal reading of the Clause's text."
A thorough originalist analysis of the "so-called Spending Clause" that casts Thiboutout in doubt.
Pharma has a "choice": Negotiate with HHS or pay $10 million "tax" per day.
Bragg’s argument may harm Trump in the removal case, but in the long run, this argument could help Trump in future political disqualification-related litigation under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Attorney General Ken Paxton faces a likely impeachment.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks