Historically, the Court issued opinions on Mondays after oral arguments concluded. But this Term, Thursday is the big day.
Seth Barrett Tillman and I discuss whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of the federal officer removal statute.
The majority leader, and everyone else, should listen to the voice of Godbey on single-judge divisions.
...for a particular draft opinion by CJ Roberts.
A synthesis of our prior writings on the meaning of “Office . . . under the United States.”
We were both protested by CUNY Law students.
Thomas assigned the majority to Justice Gorsuch, but he couldn't hold five all the way.
Download the edited version from the 2023 Barnett-Blackman supplement.
There are some parallels to late impeachment.
A synthesis of our prior writings, and clarification on the meaning of “Officers of the United States.”
RBG told Rosen that AMK wrote the Bush v. Gore PC, and Biskupic said a Justice likely leaked Dobbs wrangling to WSJ.
Unlike removal under the regular removal statute, removals under 28 U.S.C. § 1442 can be appealed
Justice Stevens rejected most Justice Scalia's revisions.
Mark Paoletta explains the details of Harlan Crow's purchase of the Thomas childhood home.
First stop for reporters: the Grutter and Gratz files.
Should the Justices choose a different petition where a Justice is recused?
"Universities and faculties in particular should take decisive action to prevent future Steinbachs and Eldiks from subverting the core principles of academic inquiry."
Will Eugene Scalia argue Murray v. UBS, after his father Antonin last argued in 1976?
Editors should withdraw any unpublished stories about judicial ethics to get a grip on reality.
Usually, "good" facts for a cert petition represent unfortunate human suffering.
Summer study-abroad programs are cushy vacations for students and boondoggles to attract elite faculty.
If you don't do what I want, "Congress will consider more prescriptive requirements."
If Justice Thomas is the intellectual leader of the Supreme Court, Justice Alito is its heart.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks