The limiting principle presented in Lopez would likely not meet her threshold.
I'm holding my breath on his predictions in Allen and Brackeen.
Justice Gorsuch v. Justice Thomas in Brackeen.
Scalia was right: "The only thing that will 'confine' the Court's holding is its sense of what it can get away with."
Justices Gorsuch and Alito have diametrically opposite perspectives on Indian Tribes
Justice Thomas would place the burden on the government, and follow a presumption of liberty.
133 pages down to 30 pages.
Does the special counsel "seek to avoid distracting fights"?
"To be clear, we mean no disrespect to either of these fine academics but their views on this matter are idiosyncratic."
He coulda been a contender.
"Of particular interest are historical gun regulations applicable to intoxicated or impaired individuals."
He probably thinks the Court is about him.
Justice Scalia would be rolling over in his grave.
Or, Sweet Home Alabama.
"The Court declines to be the first in generations to force a literal reading of the Clause's text."
A thorough originalist analysis of the "so-called Spending Clause" that casts Thiboutout in doubt.
Pharma has a "choice": Negotiate with HHS or pay $10 million "tax" per day.
Bragg’s argument may harm Trump in the removal case, but in the long run, this argument could help Trump in future political disqualification-related litigation under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Attorney General Ken Paxton faces a likely impeachment.
