Trump v. Illinois is Robertsian faux minimalism at its worst.
AG James had a 100% chance of drawing a Democratic appointee, and drew a judge that the Ninth Circuit had to repeatedly reverse.
The Court denied the SG's application in Margolin v. NAJI but sent a clear signal to the lower court of what not to do.
The Meese Center is basically empty now.
John Malcolm and senior scholars move from Heritage to America Advancing Freedom.
I sent this letter this evening to Dr. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation.
The practice is not consistent.
Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh are still chewing over Justice Gorsuch's questions from the tariffs case.
Continuing the debate over liquidation from Bruen to Slaughter.
But what does "conclusive and preclusive" actually mean?
Judge Brian Murphy will likely be reversed by SCOTUS a third time in the same case.
Casey attempted to save Roe by rewriting it, but that compromise ultimately collapsed in Dobbs. Morrison attempted to save Humphrey's Executor by rewriting it, but that compromise will (likely) collapse in Slaughter.
Congress tried to claw back the FTC's powers in 1980 through a legislative veto, but Chadha rendered that "bargain" unconstitutional.
I write about Judge Wynn's decision to rescind his senior status because Trump won.
Purcell is appropriate because the outcome of the March midterm effectively settles the race.
In a SCOTUS first, Justice Kagan refers to "red and blue states" and implied that redistricting was a mark of "loyalty" to Trump.
Both cases attempted to hijack the Fourteenth Amendment to help one political party.
Brown, Milliken, and Judge Brown.
One of the few pieces of new information in the New York Times article raising "concerns" about the SG's Office.
An incomplete list of priceless artwork shared with the Justices.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks