Did she even read the 72-page complaint, 59-page motion for a TRO, and two-dozen exhibits?
A guest post from Professor Seth Chandler.
The Court "hand[s] the President the most unitary, meaning also the most subservient, administration since Herbert Hoover (and maybe ever)."
In the span of a single day, Chief Justice Roberts continues his attempts at moderation for the sake of moderation without any actual reasoning.
And we still do not know exactly why ACB recused.
"[U]pon the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . . . the Government/Respondents, including all those acting for them or on their behalf, are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from removing Petitioners in such cases from the continental United States"
Did Roberts really think he could lob bombs at the elected branches and face nothing in return?
"DACA and work authorization should be available to those renewing and those newly applying for DACA in the 49 states other than Texas"
KBJ found the representative's vote would not "impact the outcome" of any vote; ditto for KBJ's dissent.
Chief Justice Roberts and his colleagues owe Judge Hendrix an apology.
"I worry that the disrespect they have been shown will not inspire continued respect for the judiciary, without which we cannot long function."
"Justice Alito’s dissent gets it right: James Hendrix handled the Alien Enemies Act case commendably."
Our expectations must be much higher for the unaccountable Supreme Court than the popularly-elected President.
None of the usual rules will apply when the ACLU says there is an emergency.
The remedy would not involve Rule 23.
A response to questions from Justices Kagan and Barrett.
There are eight, and possibly nine votes against Trump on the merits. But the Court is far too fragmented on the injunction issue.
Presented at the Orlando Federalist Society Chapter.
Vance mentions Justices Thomas and Alito as exhibiting this courage, but none of the Trump appointees.
Nearly a month has elapsed since the ACLU's very good Friday.
If the Court's can't coalesce on a single rationale, we might see a redux of Department of Regents.
High School Students from Oregon and Texas argued before a panel of three federal judges and visited the United States Supreme Court.
There are certainly five votes on the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, but there are not five votes about nationwide injunctions.
More than 100 days into the new administration, the Foreign Emoluments Clause returns to the fore.
The Justice was "emphatic" that his papers would be available only fifty years after his death.
Comparing Navy Seals and Shilling.
I offer five tips on how you can get a TROLP bobblehead.
My personal account of the Section 3 litigation.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks