Justice Barrett did not write Barrett v. United States, but other Justices wrote the majority opinion who shared a name with a party.
There is nothing originalist about Footnote Four, animus, and suspect classes. Let it go already.
Justice Gorsuch suggested that the West Virginia did not raise the clear statement rule, Justice Sotomayor countered that a substantive canon cannot be waived.
Hecox will not graduate in May, but such mootness could have arisen in King v. Burwell.
"I can roll with policy changes, but what I can't roll with is a tolerance or an overlooking of antisemitism or any form of bigotry."
I have. Conservative litigants are vilified. Liberal litigants are celebrated.
Justice Kagan ponders at great length about whether there can be an as-applied challenge based on the Equal Protection Clause.
They were not as combative as I would have expected, and maybe even not 6-3.
Justice Barrett is thinking about Chief Judge Pryor's holding that Mark Meadows could not remove the Georgia criminal prosecution to federal court.
The deadline is January 30.
80% of members at the American Historical Association conference supported a resolution about "the U.S.-sponsored genocide perpetrated by Israel in Gaza."
The exodus from Heritage continues.
The truth may be that the judges actually believe what they are writing. For the left, that truth is too hard to process, so they rely on the "auditioning" charge.
"The effect, if not purpose, of modern international law is to obstruct American conservative foreign policy."
"The leaders of the conservative think tank have abandoned its founding principles."
Under the clear statement rule, it likely will not.
Texas "may consider, in the future, returning to greater reliance on a multistate accrediting entity other than the ABA should a suitable entity become available."
The United States military is like a Denny's.
An issue left unresolved in Trump v. Illinois.
A Canadian judge held a 513-day trial, and ruled that the "indigenous Cowichan Nation holds 'Aboriginal title' over 800 acres of land."
Trump v. Illinois is Robertsian faux minimalism at its worst.
AG James had a 100% chance of drawing a Democratic appointee, and drew a judge that the Ninth Circuit had to repeatedly reverse.
The Court denied the SG's application in Margolin v. NAJI but sent a clear signal to the lower court of what not to do.
The Meese Center is basically empty now.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.
