MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

After 27 Years, Golf Drawings Helped Clear a Convict of Murder

Valentino Dixon has been proclaiming his innocence for decades. After a golf magazine brought attention to his case, people started to listen.

Cacrov/Dreamstime.com Screenshot/WGRZCacrov/Dreamstime.com Screenshot/WGRZ

The last time 48-year-old Valentino Dixon was a free man, two of his three daughters were infants. His grandchildren wouldn't be born for decades, and he had yet to meet the woman who's now his wife.

A lot has changed in the 27 years Dixon was behind bars for a murder he didn't commit. But yesterday, when he emerged from Erie County District Court in Buffalo, N.Y., Dixon was just glad to finally be free.

It hasn't been easy for Dixon, who was victimized by a broken criminal justice system at seemingly every turn. It took a golf magazine, a group of undergraduate students, and years of proclaiming his innocence for a judge to finally listen, even though the man who actually committed the murder has confessed multiple times over the years. Here's how it all unfolded:

In the early morning hours of August 10, 1991, Dixon was at a street party in Buffalo. At one point, an argument over a girl turned violent, and 17-year-old Torriano Jackson was shot to death with an automatic weapon. Police got a tip that the killer was Dixon, who was facing drug charges at the time but was out on bail, The Washington Post reports.

In the following days, Dixon said he was innocent, as did multiple eyewitnesses. But the most important witness was LaMarr Scott, a friend of Dixon's who confessed to the shooting. "I don't want my friend to take the rap for something that I did," he told WGRZ at the time.

Scott also confessed to police, but later went back on his testimony, telling a grand jury that Dixon was indeed the shooter. Dixon was found guilty and sentenced to 38 years-to-life. But it was far from a fair trial.

For one thing, the lead detective investigating the case didn't testify. "Show me a case where a lead detective doesn't testify in a murder trial," Dixon told WGRZ.

Moreover, Dixon's public defender didn't call to the stand two witnesses who could back up his story, as prosecutors had accused them of perjury. Three people testified that Dixon pulled the trigger, but as the Post notes, none of them were particularly reliable.

One had previously told police he didn't know if it was Dixon, one was the victim's friend and one later told an investigator his testimony was coerced by prosecutors, according to the motion to vacate [Dixon's conviction].

So Dixon went to prison, where he started to pass the time by drawing. One day, Attica Correction Facility's warden brought him a photograph of the 12th hole at Augusta National Golf Club, where the Masters Tournament is played every year. Since paint brushes weren't allowed in the prison, Dixon used colored pencils to draw his own version of the 12th hole.

That was just the start. He got hold of a copy of Golf Digest magazine and started drawing more pictures based on the photos inside. Though he'd never played golf, the drawings helped him cope with his situation. "The guys can't understand," he told the magazine. "They always say I don't need to be drawing this golf stuff. I know it makes no sense, but for some reason my spirit is attuned to this game."

Eventually, he contacted Max Adler, Golf Digest's editorial director, sending him not only his drawings but also his case file. In 2012, Golf Digest published a lengthy profile on Dixon. At long last, people were listening to what he had to say.

Among those who took notice were a group of Georgetown University undergraduate students participating in a "Prison Reform Project." The students tracked down witnesses and worked with Dixon's new defense attorney, Donald Thompson, who represented him pro bono. They discovered crucial information that prosecutors had not passed on to Dixon's public defender: his clothes had tested negative for gunpowder.

Earlier this year, Thompson filed a motion to vacate Dixon's conviction.

To solidify the case, Thompson needed to prove that someone else had committed the murder. That's where Scott comes in. After testifying against Dixon decades ago, Scott went back to his original story: that he was the real killer. In interviews with WGRZ, he admitted to the murder in 2004, and again earlier this year.

For the past 25 years, Scott has been serving a life sentence for an unrelated attempted murder conviction. In court yesterday, he pleaded guilty to Jackson's murder. "There was a fight. Shots were fired. I grabbed the gun from under the bench, switched it to automatic, all the bullets shot out. Unfortunately, Torriano ended up dying," he said.

Dixon was cleared of killing Jackson, though since the murder weapon was his, the conviction for criminal possession of a weapon stood. Still, he was allowed to go free, since that conviction only carries a maximum sentence off 15 years.

Now, Dixon will finally get to make up for lost time with his mother, grandmother, children, and grandchildren. He also wants to visit his former pen pal and current wife, Louise, who lives in Australia. "It's the greatest feeling in the world," Dixon told the Buffalo News.

Regarding his long-term plans, Dixon says he'd like to work in New York's criminal justice reform movement.

The movement as a whole could use his help. At the national level, there are countless cases of people going to prison after being wrongfully convicted, many of which Reason has covered. As Reason's Scott Shackford reported last year, 166 inmates were exonerated and released from prison in 2016, including 52 people who had been wrongfully accused of murder.

In terms of Dixon's case, Thompson probably couldn't have put it any better. "[I]t's probably an indictment of the criminal justice system that the best investigation of this case at that point was done by Golf Digest," the attorney told the Post.

CORRECTION: The previous version of this post stated that Dixon has four daughters, when in fact he has three.

Photo Credit: Cacrov/Dreamstime.com Screenshot/WGRZ

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    The criminal justice system does not like to admit fallibility. People might lose faith. A few innocent lives ruined is a small price to pay to keep credibility.

  • dchang0||

    RE: "A few innocent lives ruined is a small price to pay to keep credibility."

    And in socialism/communism, millions of innocent lives can be and were extinguished to try to maintain gov't credibility. Yet, people never seem to learn to stop calling for bigger, more powerful gov't.

  • Cynical Asshole||

    Yet, people never seem to learn to stop calling for bigger, more powerful gov't.

    Something something... "not real Socialism..." mumble mumble... "this time we'll get it right..."

  • ||

    The "law enforcement mentality" = guilty until proven innocent beyond all doubt (and that doubt DOESN'T have to be reasonable. For example, notice how prosecutors insist a person is guilty, even after DNA exonerates. According to them, they never get the wrong guy. Why? There is no need to be accountable, so their job is not at risk. Perhaps their self-esteem would suffer, or their conscience would haunt them. After all, they steal years of a person's life, sometimes all. If they "bend" the law a bit doing it, how could they live with that...unless they part of the 2% who are sociopaths. That would explain how an intelligent person could take such an irrational position time after time.

  • chemjeff radical individualist||

    Glad to see justice finally served.

  • Michael S. Langston||

    As someone once said, justice late is justice denied.

  • ||

    That was a Supreme Court Justice, "justice delayed is justice denied".

  • Cynical Asshole||

    "[I]t's probably an indictment of the criminal justice system that the best investigation of this case at that point was done by Golf Digest," the attorney told the Post.

    Men in Black had it wrong: tabloids aren't the best investigative journalism on the planet, Golf Digest is.

  • Hank Phillips||

    Hey, Tiger Woods!

  • Hank Phillips||

    In Texas, juries are subliminally instructed that black + pothead = guilty. Exercise of Second Amendment rights under the local version of Kristallnacht gun control would make that an aggravated guilty. New York juries evidently see crime in second amendment rights rather than the killing of persons.

  • Earth Skeptic||

    Yup. Male, black, druggie, and at a party IN THE STREET! Those people are always guilty.

  • BestUsedCarSales||

    Huh, I always just thought Dave Chappelle's block party was a laugh riot, not a regular one.

  • Unicorn Abattoir||

    since the murder weapon was his, the conviction for criminal possession of a weapon stood.

    In other words, no legal settlement on the bad conviction for murder?

  • ||

    "Torriano Jackson was shot to death with an automatic weapon"

    "since the murder weapon was his, the conviction for criminal possession of a weapon stood."

    So he had a Class III FFL? Odd..

  • JeremyR||

    No, but apparently it was actually fully automatic.

    I had a cousin who had one for his fishing boat. Not that hard to get if you know the wrong people.

  • ||

    Since the 2nd A. emphatically states "shall not be infringed", and restricting weapons in any way "infringes", do you think that the rulers can violate the "highest law" by criminalizing full auto? And then carry full auto? What message does that send? "We make and break any law we want."
    Of course, a few don't mind being enslaved, and most of the rest are "willfully blind" to it.
    However, I expect more of "Reason" readers.

  • operagost||

    Cuz nothing gets you to your limit faster than emptying a 50 round drum into the water in 1.2 seconds.

  • Uncle Jay||

    Freeing innocent people from prison sets a dangerous precedent.
    America needs more people, not less people, in prison if we are to maintain our status of the nation with the most people incarcerated.
    Its a record worth defending.
    Plus, we need to keep the prison-industrial complex going to ensure the kind, understanding and sadistic prison staff is employed.
    What was Thompson thinking?

  • Gaear Grimsrud||

    " They discovered crucial information that prosecutors had not passed on to Dixon's public defender: his clothes had tested negative for gunpowder."
    Of course the prosecutor was indicted. No? Disbarred? Censured? Re-elected for the next 20 years and now drawing a fat pension?

  • Michael Ejercito||

    Where is Spike Lee when you need him?

  • Curly4||

    And this happened in one of the bluest states that is so color blind unlike the red states which are all racists.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online