MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Welcome to the 2018 Government Shutdown!

Democrats draw line in the sand over DACA; Senate goes back to the drawing board.

LEIGH VOGEL/UPI/NewscomLEIGH VOGEL/UPI/NewscomThe federal government is on track to shut down for the first time since 2013 after the Senate failed to pass a 30-day continuing resolution (CR) late Friday. On the one-year anniversary of Donald Trump taking the oath of office, Washington produced a result that the president and leaders from both major political parties claimed vociferously to oppose.

Barring a last-minute miracle, the shutdown will begin at midnight, though many parts of government will continue functioning and "essential" employees will stay on the job. The National Zoo's Panda Cam, though, will be turned off.

The House passed a CR bill on party lines Thursday (it would have added about $30 billion to the national debt, by the way), but Senate Democrats, using leverage of a threatened filibuster, withheld support because the stopgap measure did not address the unresolved status of immigrants previously protected under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Needing 60 votes, the GOP managed only 50 (Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had yet to cast his ballot as of publication), with a handful of red-state Democrats and rebellious Republicans (including Rand Paul and Mike Lee) crossing party lines.

During the hours running up to the vote, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) was summoned to the White House by Trump, who delayed a planned weekend trip to his Mar-o-Lago resort in Florida. As he left the meeting, Schumer told reporters he and the president "discussed all of the major issues" and "made some progress, but we still have a good number of disagreements." Subsequent negotiations failed to produce a deal, as senators took turns, often with large visual aids, trying to brand the impasse as either #TrumpShutdown or #SchumerShutdown.

After spending years blasting congressional Republicans as obstructionists who would rather shut down the government over their pet issue than work with the president on broad legislation, Democrats decided to use what little congressional power they currently have to...shut down the government over their pet issue rather than work with the president on broad legislation.

Trump and the Republicans, however, played their own supporting role, chiefly via their steadfast opposition to any kind of immigration deal being attached, even though the DACA clock runs out in early March, and congressional negotiators had been close to an agreement last week, before the erratic president blew that up. As Shikha Dalma pointed out earlier today, a recent Fox News poll found that 86 percent of Americans favor permanent legal status for DACA recipients and 79 percent favor a path to citizenship. However, those numbers erode when the price of achieveing those status is a government shutdown.

Both parties are terrible, Congress is at this point congenitally irresponsible, and Friday demonstrated to anyone unlucky enough to watch C-SPAN that the pathologies corroding the legislative branch won't be reversed any time soon.

A 30-day continuing resolution—or, gods have mercy on us, a five-day continuing resolution (something Schumer reportedly floated on Friday to avoid a shutdown)—would not solve any of these problems. It wouldn't solve any of the government's serious long-term spending problems either. One-third of the way into the fiscal year, there is no federal budget and—starting at midnight—there is no government either, except for all those many functions that the feds will not shut down. Congratulations, America!

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Migrant Log Chipper||

    Polls, schmolls, team blue is fucking retarded choosing to die on this hill.

  • OpenBordersLiberal-tarian||

    Do you think that many people will remember this in November? I'm still confident Democrats will take the House.

  • Rich||

    I suppose it depends on whether the government is still shut down then.

  • Sevo||

    "I'm still confident Democrats will take the House."
    In watching (or sort of trying not to watch) the news leading up to 11/9/16, I'm pretty sure my prediction was HRC at something over 300 EC votes. Cringing.
    In talking with a money management guy this week, he asked who I thought was gonna take the mid-terms. Told him I was sticking with my losing predictions and the Ds would do it! With the same result. Stated/Revealed preferences.
    The Dow is at record highs; reducing the expected regs will do that. Unemployment at historic lows; similar reasons. Profits returning to the US as a result of that tax bill. People are going to see the take-home pay increase for the same reason.
    Trump Derangement Syndrome remains at a high infection level (Right, Old Mex and Jerryskids? You might seek treatment), but money matters.
    If Trump can keep this up, it'll take the return of FDR to get him out of office.
    And the D's have, uh, lemme think....

  • Michael Hihn||

    His disapproval is the worst of any President EVER (only been measured since Truman)
    Stock markets are soaring all over the world. Ours is not the highest,

    I'm pretty sure my prediction was HRC at something over 300 EC votes. Cringing.

    (lol) Hillary would have won the EC if only 29,000 votes changed ... in tree states COMBINED.
    How much damage did Comey and the Russians need to influence 29,000 votes?

    (Now awaiting a new barrage of foul-mouth insults)

  • Rebel Scum||

    "His disapproval is the worst of any President EVER"

    Hihn still believes polls that have largely been found to be a farce. Hihn does not think critically.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Hihn still believes polls that have largely been found to be a farce.

    FOX NEWS IS A FARCE!
    Who knew?

  • Philadelphia Collins||

    Hillary 'gross negligence' Clinton will be going to jail for violating the Espionage Act. Obama can't protect her any more.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Who's gonna protect Trump?

  • Unibro||

    Hihn...The guy who admitted he was a pedophile?

    That Hihn?

  • Terry Bull||

    Yes, the same Hihn.

  • Unibro||

    Yeah, I read the posts, he didn't even attempt to deny it, he just accepted that he was outed and pretended it didn't matter.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Yeah, I read the post

    You guys are TOTAL psychos.
    Not just cyber-bully thugs.

    Thanks again for proving me correct


    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101212
    (Now awaiting a new barrage of foul-mouth insults)

    (snort)

  • Unibro||

    And you're an admitted pedophile, no one cares what you think. You're a sick old joke.

  • BestUsedCarSales||

    What happened?

  • Brightly||

    Team blue is betting the polls are correct and will hurt the republicans. This is a very cynical play on their part.

    Team red was willing to make huge compromises, but cannot be expected to essentially sacrifice their platform because the Dems are babies.

  • damikesc||

    Team Blue has the problem of the polls showing them bleeding their support out significantly.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Team Blue has the problem of the polls showing them bleeding their support out significantly.

    Democrats have a RECORD HIGH on what's called the generic poll.
    And have been sweeping every election .. the HUGE upset in Wisconsin this past week.
    American dissatisfaction with government is also at record highs.

    Say hi to Alex Jones!

  • Deven||

    I'd be interested to see a graph of the generic poll, specifically around election time.

    Seems to me the R's usually do poorly until they start spending money on elections. They do not have the benefit of the MSM in their pocket the rest of the year.

    Which goes to show how shite the Democrat Platform is. They depend on and receive constant propaganda to their benefit, and have still managed to lose badly for the past decade.

    I don't see it changing, no matter how much wishful thinking, or polls. The Democrats have nothing to offer the vast majority of America. They are elitist, authoritarian, statists who sneer at the common man, and they are found out every election.

  • Michael Hihn||

    I'd be interested to see a graph of the generic poll, specifically around election time.

    After today, it could be worse.

    Which goes to show how shite the Democrat Platform is. They depend on and receive constant propaganda to their benefit, and have still managed to lose badly for the past decade.

    ACA and Obama vs Tribal legend?

    Left - Right = Zero

  • Unibro||

    "After today, it could be worse."

    Nope.

    "New NBC Poll: Democrat Advantage on Generic Congressional Ballot Falls from +11 to +6"

  • Michael Hihn||

    "After today, it could be worse."

    Nope.

    (snort) Today's not over yet.
    Your exact quote appears only on wacko websites
    And the actual poll confirms your own wackiness.

  • Unibro||

    "Your exact quote"

    Who cares?

    We about the quote about a poll? What kind of idiot posts that and thinks they have a point? It doesn't change the results.

    "only on wacko websites"

    I always loved that fallacy. Apparently even a man of your towering intellect falls for it.

    "And the actual poll"

    You mean the NPR/Marist poll? And the poll you quoted supports my claims, and the quote.

    So,you are too stupid to realize how polls work ( the DAY ISN'T OVER!! HE SAID THAT!!) too stupid stupid to read a poll you quote, and too stupid to realize that multiple pollsters exist.

    But other than that, nice job. Argue with the poll that proves you're a liar n the future, you're too stupid for me to bother with

  • Yes to No!||

    hihn, I see you're a gibbering idiot, but your link proves he was right and you are wrong

  • Michael Hihn||

    but your link proves he was right and you are wrong

    Liar

  • Unibro||

    Anyone can read it, and, how would you know anyway, you're too ducking stupid to even get the right poll.

    Post the numbers asshole.

  • Michael Hihn||

    "And the actual poll"

    You mean the NPR/Marist poll?

    The poll you cited.

    "After today, it could be worse."

    the DAY ISN'T OVER!! HE SAID THAT!!)

    It's not "after today yet."

    and too stupid to realize that multiple pollsters exist.

    I linked to the poll you cited, which you obviously never clicked.

  • Unibro||

    "I linked to the poll you cited"

    Lol, no you illiterate fuck, you dIdn't.

    "The poll you cited."

    the NPR /Marist poll. You illiterate fake Hihn fuck.

    "It's not "after today yet."

    He STILL doesn't understand why he is being laughed at for this.

    "I linked to the poll you cited"

    No, YOU STUPID ILLITERATE PEDOPHILE YOU DID NOT. I CITED THE NPR MARIST POLL. I HAVE TOLD YOU THAT.

    How fucking stupid can you be that you are posting polls you don't understand? And when told which poll it is, repeatedly insist "nu uh!" Like a good damned child, then stupidly substituting another poll that ALSO SAYS YOURE WRONG.

    NPR MARIST. READ THAT, THEN GET SOMEONE SMARTER THAN YOU TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU.

  • Drake||

    EVERY election? Is that why Obama was elected twice and Billary got more more votes than Trump? Not that that matters *practically*, mind you, but we're talking numbers here.

    As far as that whole common man thing goes, it was TRUMP that got elected, NOT some average Republican douche like Jeb or Romney. He won by taking states the Dems haven't lost in three decades, and he only won those by barebone margins. He also just barely lost Minnesota, for that matter.

    Still impressive though, given how long the Dems held them and by such large numbers. He had to drill through alot of support just to get what he got, so that's big enough by itself. None of the others could've done it, that's for damn sure. And that's the whole point: Trump's a total outlier.

    Trump won the Rust Belt because he ran on protectionism, plain and simple. Hillary was the free-trade corporatist neocon and they were sick of her. All the blue-wall states he took were the same ones he AND Bernie took in the primaries, and on trade they're virtually identical. Hillary was totally shut out.

    Fact is, Trump beat the bitch because he out-lefted her on trade, period. THAT'S what they voted for up there. Without that he wouldn't be President, and if he abandons protectionism he's screwed, period.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Trump got over twice as many "anti" votes than any other President, win or lose.
    That means two things
    1) They voted against Hillary, not for him.
    2) Bernie would have beat him easily.

    Hillary was the least-trusted candidate ever.
    Trump was second from the bottom.

  • BigT||

    As long as he talks protectionism and the economy hums, no one will care and the Rs will do well.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Until November. Voters are not as stupid as you seem to assume.

  • Hillary Clinton||

    Democrats have a RECORD HIGH on what's called the generic poll.

    Great! I love that poll, the same people have me up by 50 points!

  • Michael Hihn||

    Great! I love that poll, the same people have me up by 50 points!

    How many moons circle your planet?

  • Rich||

    Barring a last-minute miracle, the shutdown will begin at midnight, though many parts of government will continue functioning and "essential" employees will stay on the job. The National Zoo's Panda Cam, though, will be turned off.

    Serious question: Are animals in the Zoo considered "essential"? More precisely, if the government shuts down will they be fed, or must they wait for back feed?

  • Migrant Log Chipper||

    Senate pages won't be busy for a while, they can set up an Animeals table at Kroger and beg for critter chow.

  • Red Tony||

    They're cute and people like them. Therefore, they're inessential because that's the only way we can show the American people how necessary government is.

  • Mark22||

    It's only the federal government that's being "shut down". They don't provide a lot of important services other than defense, and defense has a lot of financial breathing room.

  • Deven||

    Which makes you wonder how my fed taxes are 5 times higher than my state taxes.

  • Migrant Log Chipper||

    Our august Senator Tester won't be helped by this come November despite his half hearted musings. OTOH, team red has assembled an uninspiring slate of challengers, even in a red state like MT. Heidi Ho won't be helped much next door, though.

  • Unlabelable MJGreen||

    Well, they don't call Democrats the Stupid Party for nothing.

    They were always the Stupid Party, right?

  • Red Tony||

    The Evil Party is the one in power, because they use their power for evil. The Stupid Party is the one out of power, because if they weren't stupid, they'd be in power.

  • Rich||

    a recent Fox News poll found that 86 percent of Americans favor permanent legal status for DACA recipients and 79 percent favor a path to citizenship.

    "Permanent legal status" and "path to citizenship" were clearly defined, right? RIGHT?!

  • Mark22||

    Here is what they should ask: "How many thousands of dollars would you be willing to pay extra to legalize DACA recipients? (a) $0, (b) $1000/year, (c) $2000/year, (d) $4000/year, (e) $10000/year?

  • Agammamon||

    I think path to legal status is good - who cares about 'permanent' or a 'path to citizenship'. Seriously, outside of the local level - which can make its own rules about who can vote in city council elections - does it really matter outside of the margins who you vote for?

    Its going to be someone from the Evil or Stupid parties in office anyway.

  • Earth Skeptic||

    That's what I would like to see: official legal status but short of full citizenship. The can stay, live within the law, pay taxes, etc. But not vote.

    And this would challenge Democrats and progressives: are they really trying to provide compassion, or just looking for votes?

  • Deven||

    They'd probably take it. Would give them ammunition to attack Republicans, and the immigrant kids will vote Dem at a higher rate anyway.

    In other words, it is just about stupid enough for Republicans to agree.

  • Unibro||

    "and the immigrant kids will vote Dem at a higher rate anyway"

    If you say so. I see nothing to indicate that is anything but Dem wishful thinking.

  • vek||

    Ummm, every group that isn't white native born Americans votes heavily Democratic. That's a fact. That is one of my main problems with immigration period, including from Europe. You can blame all the legal immigrants for half of how things have shifted so far left in the past few decades. If we had had less immigration we'd still be having more middle of the road/pragmatic Democrats like 90s Bill Clinton running the show instead of these hardcore leftist loons. More immigrants is a guaranteed shift to the left politically. Anyone who doesn't get that is living in la la land.

  • BigT||

    Legal, not voting will be called second class citizenship. And the ratchet will move one more notch

  • Michael Hihn||

    Toward liberty

  • shortviking||

    I hope the illegal alien votes team blue gets from all this makes up for the numerous legal voters they will lose.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    And the Rethuglican wet dream comes to pass, hurting the most vulnerable Americans.

    Please, Mueller: stop the terror that is Sir Drumpfstein.

  • shortviking||

    Rethuglican! Drumfph! So edgy!

  • Red Tony||

    The worst part is the misspelling. It's RethugliKKKian, dammit!

  • Sevo||

    "Rethuglican! Drumfph! So edgy!"
    Not sure whether IB is just plane stupid or attempting sarc. If it is the latter, the joke is worn out.
    Either way, stupidity.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    Why do you cuck the Drumpfsprocket so hard?

  • Trigger Warning||

    The masturbation euphemisms are really coming into their own.

  • Unibro||

    Devon, IB does good work being a parody, and you're a stupid humorless fuck. Stop pretending the world has to accommodate you and your old man TANTRUMS.

    Now, because you can't help yourself, post your stupid old man tantrum response.

  • OpenBordersLiberal-tarian||

    MAGA = Mueller Ain't Going Away!

    I have faith in him.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    He's our only hope.

  • Sevo||

    Two idiots who deserve each other.

  • Unibro||

    Jesus Christ, you're the worst fucking troll here.

  • Michael Ejercito||

    I was unaware illegal aliens were Americans?

  • Mark22||

    Illegal migrants are not "vulnerable Americans", they aren't Americans at all.

  • Mock-star||

    Yeah, a good many of them are. If they are from Mexico, Canada, or any of the Central or South American countries, they are American. /pendant

  • I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn||

    Do you still chant "Donald Trump KKK, Racist, Sexist, anti-gay" on the daily? I bet you brush your tooth to that don't you? Your tears have been delicious the last 12 months

  • Michael Hihn||

    Name anyone more despicable, morally, than Ron Paul, who brags that he sponsored legislation that would have forbidden SCOTUS to even CONSIDER any appeals to DOMA -- even SLAVES had access to the courts

    And HERE, scum.

    "I supported the Defense of Marriage Act, ... I have also cosponsored the Marriage Protection Act, which would remove challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act from the jurisdiction of the federal courts"

    And you defend that. Shame on you.

  • Red Tony||

    Um, Pol Pot? Che Guevarra? Vince Neil? Mao Zedong?

  • Michael Hihn||

    The only people more despicable than Ron Paul are TOTAL dictators, according to Red Tony!
    Thanks for proving my point!

  • Red Tony||

    Since when is Vince Neil a dictator?

  • Michael Hihn||

    His name was bullshit. You still lose

  • Unibro||

    "The only people"

    Where did anyone but you say only, you disgusting fucking pedophile?

  • Unibro||

    Notice how, despite being compelled by his mental illness to respond to any post sometimes even months later, he skipped mine because he knows no one but his old sick ass said "only".

  • Michael Hihn||

    The only people more despicable than Ron Paul are TOTAL dictators, according to Red Tony!

    Where did anyone but you say only, you disgusting fucking pedophile?

    Unlike you, I'd never say Vince Neil is worse than Ron Paul..

    One more time for the mentally deranged: The only people more despicable than Ron Paul are TOTAL dictators, according to Red Tony!

    Unibro insists that a SINGER is worse than Ron Paul.
    Bullies and aggressors B stupid.

  • Red Tony||

    He is worse than Ron Paul. This disproves your statement that "the only people more despicable than Ron Paul are TOTAL dictators, according to Red Tony", as I merely listed off four people that are worse than Ron Paul, one of whom was Vince Neil. The fact that you blatantly and remorselessly mischaracterize my statements does nothing but out you as one of the bullies you claim to oppose.

  • Michael Hihn||

    He is worse than Ron Paul.

    A FUCKING SINGER?
    What did he do that's worse than denying people the defense of their Constitutional rights.?

    This disproves your statement that "the only people more despicable than Ron Paul are TOTAL dictators, according to Red Tony",

    Assertions are not proof

  • Red Tony||

    You put words in my mouth, I proved to you that no, I never actually said that. I never said "the only people more despicable," you asked for anybody more despicable and I provided four people. Furthermore, I never said that only violent dictators are more despicable; rather, I named three dictators and Vince Neil, all of whom are more despicable. You are asserting that I made certain statements, and I am showing that I didn't make these statements at all; rather, you are deliberately falsely quoting me to try and avoid admitting that you were wrong.

    Also, Vince Neil killed his friend in a drunk driving accident. So yeah, despicable.

  • Unibro||

    So nowhere. Thanks, I won.

  • Mark22||

    even SLAVES had access to the courts

    Honey, baby, for us gay folks not being able to marry is an inconvenience, but it isn't like slavery. Leaving marriage up to the states would have been fine with me.

    Gay marriage has been mostly a political distraction; an issue that progressives, fascists, socialists, theocrats, and other statists and totalitarians get their bases riled up with.

    Name anyone more despicable, morally, than Ron Paul

    Plenty of people qualify for that distinction, including you.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Exposing Matk22's bullshit AGAIN!
    First, correct his fucking lie on what said (sneer)

    Name anyone more despicable, morally, than Ron Paul, who brags that he sponsored legislation that would have forbidden SCOTUS to even CONSIDER any appeals to DOMA -- even SLAVES had access to the courts


    Honey, baby, for us gay folks not being able to marry is an inconvenience, but it isn't like slavery.

    I never said it was, sweetcakes

    Leaving marriage up to the states would have been fine with me.

    How does that equate with stripping people of access to courts to defend fundamental rights?

    Name anyone more despicable, morally, than Ron Paul

    Plenty of people qualify for that distinction, including you.

    Only when you lie about what he did. I do understand your total shame. But not your lies and bullying

    Try again, sugar pie
    (smirk)

  • Unibro||

    You're still worse. Cry more about it.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Unibro|1.20.18 @ 4:02PM|#
    You're still worse.

    WHEN did I try to deny anyone access to the Judiciary .. to defend their constitutional rights? ... which YOU now sanction too!

    Cry more about it.

    Jamming it up his ass is not crying, stalker

  • Unibro||

    Cry more.

  • Procyon Rotor||

    Jamming it up his ass is not crying, stalker

    You really are fixated on the jamming of things up asses, aren't you? Maybe Freud wasn't as wrong as I've always heard.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Maybe Freud wasn't as wrong as I've always heard.

    Your mind is in the gutter.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Your mind is in the gutter.

    Says the Dumbfuck Hihnsano obsessed with assplay.

  • CE||

    Name anyone more despicable, morally, than Ron Paul

    Oh, I don't know, everyone in Congress who voted to invade Iraq?

  • Michael Hihn||

    How did that strip citizens of their constitutional rights?
    Or do you hate "fags" as much as he does?

  • I'm Not Sure||

    "Barring a last-minute miracle, the shutdown will begin at midnight, though many parts of government will continue functioning and "essential" employees will stay on the job."

    Essential employees will stay on the job to keep government functioning? Okay. One question though- why are there any other government employees to begin with?

  • shortviking||

    Just like last time, the "shutdown" only exposes how utterly bloated government is.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Just like last time, the "shutdown" only exposes how utterly bloated government is.

    How so?

  • Red Tony||

    Alright, I'll assume you're asking in good faith. It exposes how bloated government is in that we have non-essential employees–and these non-essential employees are often performing duties that have absolutely nothing to do with the welfare of the country. When they say "non-essential" they don't me "well, let's send some of these homefront soldiers on vacation without pay", they mean "well, I guess we won't have a tour guide for a national park". Furthermore, these non-essential employees make up about a sixth of the federal workforce, which means that one of every six federal employees is non-essential and is just gobbling up tax money.

  • Sevo||

    Don't bother.
    Mike is a fucking idiot who should be ignored.
    Mike, take your meds, sit down and STFU.
    Go away; quit making an ass of yourself.

  • Michael Hihn||

    You have no answer again?

  • Unibro||

    "Don't bother.
    Mike is a fucking idiot who should be ignored."

    Pot. Stupid whiny Bay area news spamming 50 year old insult dropping kettle who should have swallowed a shotgun years ago.

  • Michael Hihn||

    You get nasty when you cannot answer

  • Unibro||

    You get nasty around children, you admitted it.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Liar.
    Psycho
    Bully
    Aggression
    Stalking

  • Unibro||

    "What are, things Michael Hihn does in every thread?"

  • Michael Hihn||

    Defends from aggressions by cyber-bullies and psychos.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Cries like a bitch about mean words.

  • Michael Hihn||

    How many times can you fuckup on one page?

    Cries like a bitch about mean words.

    If the victim of assault calls them out as bullies, thugs and bulshitters ... get this ... it's CRYING!
    Imagine all those whiny Jews at Auschwitz.
    The candy-ass niggers getting lynched.
    Or their own mother objecting to being gang-raped by Muslims.

    Verbal Aggressiveness
    ...A personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the self-concepts of other people instead of, or in addition to, their positions on topics of communication ... Verbal aggressiveness is thought to be mainly a destructive form of communication

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    Cyberbullying
    The act of bullying someone through electronic means (as by posting mean or threatening messages about the person online)

    The sick fucks keep "pretending the abuse is not happening."
    Left - Right = Zero

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Crybaby bitch Dumbfuck Hihnsano crying like a bitch again.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    It exposes how bloated government is in that we have non-essential employees

    Umm, no. Every sizable corporation has non-essential employees .. meaning not necessary for the survival and/or minimum functioning.

    All organizations have essential and non-essential FUNCTIONS -- which means essential and non-essential EMPLOYEES. At your workplace, are there any jobs that could be laid off for a week, without damaging your employer? Does that mean "bloat?"

    –and these non-essential employees are often performing duties that have absolutely nothing to do with the welfare of the country.

    Ditto for corporations. The SURVIVAL of an organization is different form OPERATING it at full potential.

    When they say "non-essential" ... they mean "well, I guess we won't have a tour guide for a national park".

    Proves my point, thank you. The tour guide is not ESSENTIAL for the SURVIVAL of the park --- especially if it's closed during the shutdown. Or should we sell the park?

    Furthermore, these non-essential employees make up about a sixth of the federal workforce, which means that one of every six federal employees is non-essential and is just gobbling up tax money.

    Again, confused on what non-essential means, or how it's defined. Like the tour guide, Or a janitor.


    Anything else?

  • I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn||

    Yes- we are $20+ trillion in debt, until we have that under control, non-essential employees need to become permanently unemployed and their non-essential job eliminated.

    Your example and comparison to the private sector is hollow. Corporations are different than a government unit. Corporations, when they are up to their eyeballs in debt will cut non-essential jobs to lower costs. Governments don't have to do that. When we have a shutdown, those employees will get backpay once the dust settles and the public has been "shown the pain" of not accepting whatever Big Gov issue that causes the shut down.

    It's a great day to be a libertarian!

  • Michael Hihn||

    Corporations, when they are up to their eyeballs in debt will cut non-essential jobs to lower costs.

    Already ridiculed in what you responded to

    Again, confused on what non-essential means, or how it's defined

  • Unibro||

    "Umm, no. Every sizable corporation "

    Government isn't a corporation, and only an imbecile or a pedophile would use such a stupid comparison.

    You lose.

  • Michael Hihn||

    It exposes how bloated government is in that we have non-essential employees

    Umm, no. Every sizable corporation has non-essential employees .. meaning not necessary for the survival and/or minimum functioning.

    Government isn't a corporation, and only an imbecile or a pedophile would use such a stupid comparison.

    Only a fucking psycho would lie about what I said, while cyber-bullying

  • Unibro||

    "Only a fucking psycho would lie about what I said"

    Good thing it was a cut and paste quote then

  • Michael Hihn||

    Good thing it was a cut and paste quote then

    Only a fucking psycho would lie about what I said, while cyber-bullying

  • Unibro||

    "Only a fucking psycho would lie about what I said, while cyber-bullying"

    Like you did?

    I win. Good thing it was a cut and paste quote.

  • Mark22||

    All organizations have essential and non-essential FUNCTIONS -- which means essential and non-essential EMPLOYEES.

    Well, and a temporary federal "government shutdown" is basically the same as a budget cut, which forces the executive branch to focus on funding the essential employees and not pay the non-essential employees.

  • Michael Hihn||

    You finally got one right.
    The dumbfucks want to close down the national parks and statue of liberty!

  • I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn||

    Welcome back, Mike, it's been a little boring the last week without you. Hugs and kisses!

  • Michael Hihn||

    STILL too cowardly to use your name???

  • Unibro||

    He's not proud of being a pedophile like you are.

  • CE||

    Everyone deemed "non-essential" should be laid off permanently.

  • Michael Hihn||

    One question though- why are there any other government employees to begin with?

    Because it's crackers to slip a rozzer, the dropsy in snide.
    Also Consent of the Governed and Will of the People.
    Anything else?

  • Red Tony||

    Ooh, we got a Brit in the house! And old Brits battle with the rapping!

    I gotta go to bed, so let's make this fast, Hihn. I'll take thirty-two, you take thirty-two, and then everyone else decides the winner. Let's DO IT.

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Sevo||

    "#HihnsanoSoFragile"
    Good one!
    Hey, Mike, did the Koch brothers tell you to stuff your screen-shots up your ass?

  • Red Tony||

    Not mine, I think Red Rocks used it around Christmas. Either way, I've picked it up and I plan to USE IT.

    Now bring it, Michael. I know you can't resist a rap battle.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Hey, Mike, did the Koch brothers tell you to stuff your screen-shots up your ass?

    Off your meds again?

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Off your meds again?

    Shit your Depends again?

  • Sevo||

    Mike,
    YOU were the one who was going to show screen prints of bullying to the Kochs. And now you ask if I'm off my meds?
    Let me repeat:
    Did the Kochs tell you to stuff your screen shots up your ass Mike? Did they laugh at you? Did they show kindly concern and ask if you were getting treatment?
    Fuck off, you tired piece of shit.

  • Michael Hihn||

    YOU were the one who was going to show screen prints of bullying to the Kochs. And now you ask if I'm off my meds?

    One more time.
    1) I SAID that. Over a year ago.
    2) For assholes and bullies like you,
    3) Now YOU can show the world how bat-shit crazy you are ... entirely on your own.

    The original version -- over a year ago -- I also said I had met with Charles Koch on this, regularly, and discussed you explicitly.

    That makes you self-revealed jackass., AGAIN and

    Fuck off, you tired piece of shit.

    ... a bully and aggressor
    a/k/a thug. ... for over a year of stalking, much as we see here

    (yawn) Boldface and ridicule in defense of repeated assaults and aggressions .. here .. and for over a year.

    (sneer)

  • Red Tony||

    Aw, rap battle time, lay it on the line
    I drop you quick with my knifelike rhymes
    You can't believe the hype, well the hype is here
    Welcome to your nightmare, taste the fear
    Of a man with a plan to get down and rap
    Against screams of aggression and the stench of crap
    I'm talking 'bout you, not about your wife
    She's a very pretty woman and she's very nice
    You oughta treat her better, take her out to lunch
    It'll be a bit harder when your mind I crunch
    With my whacked-out words that cut to the bone
    When I'm done you'll wish that I'd used sticks and stones
    Your logic is tragic there's nothing there
    Just screaming and dreaming that someone cares
    About your endless rants that never have a point
    You've done too much coke, siddown and have a joint
    Maybe chilling out a little would be good for you
    Because Hihn I gotta tell you what you're doing ain't cool
    You scream and you bark and you belch and you squeal
    Trying to force everybody to kneel
    Before your twisted logic and your ludicrous lies
    Has a haze of madness settled on your eyes?
    Ad hominem, misquote, fallacious reasoning
    Sound and fury, signifying nothing
    Sending out links leading back up the page
    Going menopausal, flying into a rage
    You yell about bullies and persecution
    Then spank it while thinking of the Final Solution
    You never prove your point, did you ever have one?
    I think it's pretty clear who's winning, son
    I weave and I duck, my wit is agile
    You're a lumbering hippo, #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Michael Hihn||

    What does that have to do with Consent of the Governed and Will of the People?

  • Michael Hihn||

    gotta go to bed, so let's make this fast, Hihn. I'll take thirty-two, you take thirty-two, and then everyone else decides the winner. Let's DO IT.

    What does that have to do with Consent of the Governed and Will of the People?

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Is that what you call the nurses who change out your colostomy bag?

  • Michael Hihn||

    What does that have to do with Consent of the Governed and Will of the People?

    Is that what you call the nurses who change out your colostomy bag?

    No
    (snort)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    So those are the other two personalities you haven't set up sock puppet accounts for.

  • Michael Hihn||

    What does that have to do with Consent of the Governed and Will of the People

    What does that have to do with Consent of the Governed and Will of the People

    How many times will you insist that these are the names of two people ... Will of the People ... Consent of the Governed?

    Is "Liberty and Justice for All" a married couple on your planet?

  • Unibro||

    Get help, you old disgusting pedo.

  • Michael Hihn||

    What does that have to do with Consent of the Governed and Will of the People?

  • CE||

    The will of the people as expressed by their representatives in Congress? Or as mind-read by lifetime-appointed judges?

  • Michael Hihn||

    The will of the people as expressed by their representatives in Congress? Or as mind-read by lifetime-appointed judges?

    Yep.
    We're allowed to disagree with you!

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Oh, so Liberty and Justice for All are the nurses who change your Depends, thanks for clearing that up.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Thanks for proving how fucking crazy you are ... pasting slogans versus solid facts ... so you can avoid thinking ... wracked with raging hatred.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano pastes slogans while crying like a bitch about someone pasting slogans.

    U mad, bitch?

  • Michael Hihn||

    U mad, bitch?

    That was ridicule.
    So is this.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano can't stop crying about mean words.

  • gormadoc||

    If the rest of us all consented and willed it would you stop treating CSS like a cheap whore?

  • Michael Hihn||

    I don't need your permission.
    For anything.
    And it's not even called CSS.

    Now, what is your quarrel with "Consent of the Governed" and/or "Will of the People?"

  • gormadoc||

    No, you don't need it.

    Why is the consent and will of others sufficient to require others to force money from me for non-essential services? In other words, why do I need their permission to not pay?

  • Michael Hihn||

    THIS!

    Why is the consent and will of others sufficient to require others to force money from me for non-essential services? In other words, why do I need their permission to not pay?

    (laughing) OE MORE TIME "governments define their JUST laws by the consent of the governed."

    Do we believe you or ... Ayn Rand, Thomas Jefferson and several centuries of natural law?

  • gormadoc||

    I think the Founders didn't intend for us to have as many government programs or personnel as we do. Many of these programs are justified through ridiculously stretched readings of the Constitution, such as the laws regarding Interstate Commerce.

    I know that Ayn Rand wanted a voluntary system and not compulsory taxation. She's in clear conflict with the Constitution there.

    Let's say that you've demonstrated that consent is necessary for the support of these laws. I don't see how you've shown that consent is sufficient. Prohibition was legal and had widespread consent, but I don't think it should have been law merely because of that.

  • Michael Hihn||

    I know that Ayn Rand wanted a voluntary system and not compulsory taxation. She's in clear conflict with the Constitution there.

    What you "know" is wrong..

    15. GOVERNMENT FINANCING IN A FREE SOCIETY by Ayn Rand (Virtue of Selfishness)

    Any program of voluntary government financing is the last, not the first, step on the road to a free society - the last, not the first, reform to advocate.

    ... the process of liberation cannot be accomplished overnight. . But still, a gradual process is required—and any program of voluntary government financing has to be regarded as a goal for a distant future."

    Clear now?

    I don't see how you've shown that consent is sufficient

    Your next sentence shows your error.

    Prohibition was legal and had widespread consent, but I don't think it should have been law merely because of that.

    Unless you're an emperor ... what YOU think is totally irrelevant.

    Review
    1) You REJECT Ayn Rand, Thomas Jefferson, our founders and several centuries of Natural Law.
    2) You FAIL to suggest an alternative.

    By what right do you deny people the right to form or make voluntary associations?

  • Unibro||

    "1) You REJECT Ayn Rand"

    OMFG HE REJECT AYN RAND!!! THATS....nothing.

    She wasn't even a libertarian you stupid fuck.

  • Michael Hihn||

    You REJECT Ayn Rand, Thomas Jefferson, our founders and several centuries of Natural Law.

    She wasn't even a libertarian you stupid fuck.

    I never said she was. Neither were Jefferson or our Founders.

  • gormadoc||

    So let's say we're at the last step on the road to freedom: Rand vs. Founders on taxes. They're in clear disagreement. Besides, Rand would have been unhappy with paying for so much government. I don't know why you're so happy to do so while extolling Rand.

    Straight question: was Prohibition good law?

    I don't reject others' rights to voluntary association; my problem with compulsory taxes is that it isn't voluntary. One problem with Prohibition is that it restrictions voluntary association.

  • Michael Hihn||

    I don't know why you're so happy to do so while extolling Rand.

    I merely proved that you're full of shit. With a link to her writing,.

    Straight question: was Prohibition good law?

    Of course not, Why would you ask?

    I don't reject others' rights to voluntary association; my problem with compulsory taxes is that it isn't voluntary.

    Of course they are.

  • Unibro||

    "I never said she was"

    I never said you did you stupid old fuck.

  • gormadoc||

    Some of the weird shit you type makes it look like you're trying to abuse CSS. If it's just HTML then my apologies.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Some of the weird shit you type makes it look like you're trying to abuse CSS. If it's just HTML then my apologies.

    I only use it in self-defense of bullying ...

    ... or totally wacko comments REJECTING our fucking constitution, Ayn Rand, Thomas Jefferson, Our Founders and several centuries of natural law ... a/k/a ridicule

    In your case ... BOTH! (sneer)

  • gormadoc||

    I see you accept apologies gracefully.

  • Michael Hihn||

    I see you accept apologies gracefully.

    (snort) You apologized for fucking up HTML -- repeated the personal insult -- AND CALL THAT AN APOLOGY!!

    While PISSING ON Consent of the Governed, Will of the People, Ayn Rand, Thomas Jefferson, the Founding Fathers and several centuries on Natural Law, because .... you won't always get YOUR way!

    Keep confirming your authoritarian mentality ... which proves my point even greater than I could possibly do alone.

    I look back through the thread and count how many of your type have sneered at Will of the People, Consent of the Governed, Ayn Rand, Thomas Jefferson, the Founding Fathers and several centuries of Natural Law.
    Pathetic

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Not as pathetic as your stroke-outs, Hihnsano.

  • Michael Hihn||

    That makes FIVE times that Red Rock Racist has sneered at Consent of the Governed and Will of the People.

    And he even assumed they were people's names!
    TWICE!

    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101271

    (cyber-bullies b kinda dumb)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    That makes FIVE times that Dumbfuck Hihnsano cried like a bitch about mean words. He's even too stupid to understand a joke!

    (crybaby bitches b kinda dumb)

  • Michael Hihn||

    Copies my style. Fucks up AGAIN

    That makes FIVE times that Dumbfuck Hihnsano cried like a bitch about mean words

    If the victim of assault calls them out as bullies, thugs and bulshitters ... get this ... it's CRYING!
    Imagine all those whiny Jews at Auschwitz.
    The candy-ass niggers getting lynched.
    Or their own mother objecting to being gang-raped by Muslims.

    Verbal Aggressiveness
    ...A personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the self-concepts of other people instead of, or in addition to, their positions on topics of communication ... Verbal aggressiveness is thought to be mainly a destructive form of communication

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    Cyberbullying
    The act of bullying someone through electronic means (as by posting mean or threatening messages about the person online)

    The sick fucks keep "pretending the abuse is not happening."
    Left - Right = Zero

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Crybaby bitch Dumbfuck Hihnsano crying like a bitch again.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • JoeBlow123||

    Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, he is amoral and wrong about everything. We need to get rid of everything he wrote and turn his monument into a dumpster.

  • Michael Hihn||

    REPEAL THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE!
    Would that make us a British colony again?

    Do YOU join Red Rocks in ALSO denying ... Ayn Rand, The Founders and several centuries of Natural Law?

  • Unibro||

    "Do YOU join Red Rocks in ALSO denying ... Ayn Rand"

    The shtty fiction writer? Yeah, her books SUCKED and her ideas were stupid. No wonder you seem crazy, you bought into fiction like it was real.

    Spoiler : Spice doesn't actually exist, or give you Super powers and there is no such thing as discworld.

  • JoeBlow123||

    The Deceleration of Independence was a document written by slavers for slavers. It should be invalid. REPEAL. Furthermore, natural law is the law of imperialists and capitalists. Fake law is more like it.

    I seriously dont know how people still believe these things written by old white men who were almost all slave owners and imperialists. There is nothing libertarian to sticking to outmoded old documents.

  • Michael Hihn||

    There is nothing libertarian to sticking to outmoded old documents.

    You have no alternative, just whining. You're just another authoritarian, probably Rothbardian.

  • Michael Hihn||

    There is nothing libertarian to sticking to outmoded old documents.

    Libertarians would challenge you -- How are the ideas and principles "outmoded?"
    Actually, 90% of people who passed US History would issue the same challenge.

  • gormadoc||

    How is dissatisfaction with the large expanse of Leviathan authoritarianism? Where did I claim to be authoritarian or support authoritarianism?

    Seriously, Consent of the Governed is necessary but not sufficient for just rule. India is governed through large widespread consent but it would be ridiculous to pretend India is ruled justly. This stipulation allows for less government, not more.

    To borrow your aggressive, bullying, language, why do you piss on James Madison and the Bill of Rights? The point of the Bill of Rights is to constrain the Will of the People, by guaranteeing that it cannot endanger certain rights.

    [I]n a Government modified like this of the United States, the great danger lies rather in the abuse of the community than in the legislative body. The prescriptions in favor of liberty ought to be levelled against that quarter where the greatest danger lies, namely, that which possesses the highest prerogative of power. But it is not found in either the executive or legislative departments of Government, but in the body of the people, operating by the majority against the minority.
  • Unibro||

    you're that dude who wrote a novel to hide the fact that he was trivially wrong. No one cares what you think.

  • Michael Hihn||

    you're that dude who wrote a novel to hide the fact that he was trivially wrong.

    You're drooling again.
    Or still.

  • Unibro||

    Shut the fuck up retard, I wasn't talking to you. learn how to use the god damned internet.

  • Michael Hihn||

    You're drooling again.
    Or still.


    Shut the fuck up retard, I wasn't talking to you. learn how to use the god damned internet.

    (snort) You were a drooling retard, regardless of who you were talking to.
    Still are, bully,

  • Michael Hihn||

    How is dissatisfaction with the large expanse of Leviathan authoritarianism? Where did I claim to be authoritarian or support authoritarianism?

    When you try to control all Americans.

    Seriously, Consent of the Governed is necessary but not sufficient for just rule.

    Take it up with Jefferson and the Founders.

    India is governed through large widespread consent but it would be ridiculous to pretend India is ruled justly.

    There you go again. Now you want to rule India also.

    To borrow your aggressive, bullying, language, why do you piss on James Madison and the Bill of Rights? ANOTHER fuckup

    The point of the Bill of Rights is to constrain the Will of the People, by guaranteeing that it cannot endanger certain rights.

    Now you even confuse the people with the government. The 9th Amendment will drive you insane!

    You're entitled to invent your own preferred government. But you have no power to impose to on anyone else.

  • Mark22||

    Also Consent of the Governed and Will of the People

    You seem to take that to mean "consent of the majority of the governed and the will of the majority of the people". That's the fascist view of how democracy should work; it is not a prescription for a free and just society.

  • Michael Hihn||

    ANOTHER FUCKUP! by Mark22!

    You seem to take that to mean "consent of the majority of the governed and the will of the majority of the people".

    Like Jefferson and the Founders ... and all those dumbasses in every state that ratified the Constitution.

    That's the fascist view of how democracy should work

    Authoritarians like you defend MINORITY rule.
    But are too fucking stupid to know that's what you just did.

    Tell us your alternative, CHUMP

    This topic seems to have attracted every authoritarian thug and bully in the commentariat.
    Bellowing blowhards.

  • Mark22||

    Like Jefferson and the Founders ... and all those dumbasses in every state that ratified the Constitution.

    Far from it. US democracy strongly rejects majoritarianism; instead, it is based on representative and deliberative government, subsidiarity, and enumerated powers.

    Those are concepts that you as a fascist don't understand, Michael Hihn.

  • Michael Hihn||

    DENIES Consent of the Governed ... endorsed by Thomas Jefferson and our Founders.
    DENIES THE CONSTITUTION HAD TO BE RATIFIED.
    IGNORANT OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

    http://www.ushistory.org/decla.....index.html
    "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, "

    CONFUSES CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED WITH MAJORITARIANISM

    Left - Right = Zero

  • Michael Hihn||

    Mark is a conservative troll, which is fine, but ...
    He's the faction that destroyed the conservatism ... and the party .,.. of Goldwater and Reagan. How could anyone fuck up our founding so stupidly, as he does here? I'll show you.

    Look closely. All he has is slogans ,.. memorized slogans .... like "a Republic not a Democracy" .. which is true, bue ... he lacks any intellectual capacity to UNDERSTAND the words, so ... he has no idea where to paste them ... that's what trolls do, paste slogans .... so applies them in total backwards contexts ... and thus bellows that majoritarianism somehow means the majority never ratified the Constitution! ... and the Declaration CANNOT say "consent of the governed" because ... he has NO IDEA what THOSE words mean either!

    Now, it's possible for even highly intelligent people to start down the wrong path ... and we all do it, but ... ALARMS go off when we wind up thinking something so goddamn stupid ... but Mark has insufficient intellectual capacity to grasp the slogans he pastes.

    Essentially, he's like the robotic trolls who run round pasting "How I made $6,000 per minute by simply jacking off turtles while naked."

    Also his fellow trolls.also a deadly faction, but the one that killed libertarianism.
    Also bellowing Gomers ... also jacking off turtles.

  • PTSD||

    So, I'll still get my mail. The military's still on duty (albeit unpaid). And I can visit Yellowstone. I really don't see a downside.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    How hard do you expect the military to fight unpaid?

    By the time this is over, Putin will have invaded and taken over, just as Heir Drumpsflaggen plannned all along.

  • Sevo||

    "Heir Drumpsflaggen"
    Satire? Sarc?
    Given IB's history, I'm guessing stupidity.

  • Red Tony||

    His bitching is incomprehensible. He's like Hank Phillips only he occasionally makes sense and he doesn't harbor a giant hateboner for all religion.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    All religions aren't bad.

    Just Christfags.

  • Michael Hihn||

    How hard do you expect the military to fight unpaid?

    They have food, lodging and weapons. Anything else?

  • Sevo||

    Fuck off, mike.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Anything on topic?

  • Agammamon||

    Uhm, where do you think that food comes from? 90% of it is prepared and served by civilians.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Uhm, where do you think that food comes from?

    Why do you think that matters, in the slightest?

    90% of it is prepared and served by civilians.

    Do the soldiers still get fed?
    Then ... THAT is how they fight!
    Thank you for supporting my response

  • I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn||

    No one supports you, don't kid yourself

  • Michael Hihn||

    NOW the sick fuck creates a new handle ... to commit bullying and aggression all down the page

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Now Dumbfuck Hihnsano cries his eyes out...about another poaster because Words Are Violence!

  • Michael Hihn||

    Now Dumbfuck Hihnsano cries his eyes out...about another poaster because Words Are Violence!

    Nobody said words are violence, Aggressor (lol)

    Verbal Aggressiveness...A personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the self-concepts of other people instead of, or in addition to, their positions on topics of communication ... Verbal aggressiveness is thought to be mainly a destructive form of communication

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    Cyberbullying
    The act of bullying someone through electronic means (as by posting mean or threatening messages about the person online)

    (sneer)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano cries like a bitch about aggression, claims nobody said words are violence!
    (sneer)

    The act of bullying someone through electronic means

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Red Tony||

    Michael Hihn in a nutshell:

    Says "Nobody said words are violence."
    Proceeds to define words as abuse.
    Claims that he's not defining words as violence even though that is the implication of his posts.
    Caps it off through verbal hostility that includes abuse of boldface and sneering–abuse which he pretends is nonexistent.

  • Michael Hihn||

    THEY RUN IN A PACK ... LIKE WILD DOGS!

    BEND OVER

    Says "Nobody said words are violence."

    NOBODY DID!

    Proceeds to define words as abuse.

    1) Not my definitions
    2) It's how the words are USED, Skippy.

    HERE WE GO!!!

    Claims that he's not defining words as violence even though that is the implication of his posts.

    Only if ...
    a) You're as fucking stupid as Red Rocks
    b) AFTER SEEING DEFINITIONS THAT PROVE YOU'RE BAT-SHIT CRAZY!

    Can he get MORE stupid? ....

    Caps it off through verbal hostility that includes abuse of boldface and sneering–abuse which he pretends is nonexistent.

    Self-defense ... from the aggression you REFUSE TO ACCEPT ... AFTER SEEING THE DEFINITIONS.

    I'm not sure this works but a google search for verbal aggression returns TEN MILLION LISTINGS, all jammed up your ass.

    AND YOU PROVED ME CORRECT!!

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    cyber-bullies b psycho

    (boldface in self defense of aggression by a PROVEN cyber-bully)

  • Red Tony||

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Hillary Clinton||

    #Hihneyhurts

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano gurgles his assplay fetish, cries like a bitch about mean words some more.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    cries like a bitch about mean words some more.

    (snicker)

    If the victim of assault calls them out as bullies, thugs and bulshitters ... get this ... it's CRYING!
    Imagine all those whiny Jews at Auschwitz.
    The candy-ass niggers getting lynched.
    Or their own mother objecting to being gang-raped by Muslims.

    Verbal Aggressiveness
    ...A personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the self-concepts of other people instead of, or in addition to, their positions on topics of communication ... Verbal aggressiveness is thought to be mainly a destructive form of communication

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    Cyberbullying
    The act of bullying someone through electronic means (as by posting mean or threatening messages about the person online)

    The sick fucks keep "pretending the abuse is not happening."
    Left - Right = Zero

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Crybaby bitch Dumbfuck Hihnsano crying like a bitch again.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    He calls THAT crying .... (smirk)

  • Red Tony||

    Wait, your tantrums get worse?

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano burps out copypasta while crying like a bitch.

    (chortle)

  • Get To Da Chippah||

    At least this time there will be few casualties because most everyone is already dead from the rollback of Net Neutrality, the Trump tax cuts, and the repeal of the Obamacare individual mandate.

  • shortviking||

    I think Lindsay Graham is leading some kind of sermon on the floor of the senate

  • Sevo||

    Is this like one of those group superstition gatherings on a football field?

  • I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn||

    Is he offering up fellatio? I hear that's how he compromises in Washington

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    We'll be lucky if most of the population doesn't die.

    If we didn't need government, we wouldn't have it. Therefore, the body count will be tremendous. QED.

  • Sevo||

    I LIKE the image.

  • SIV||

    The National Zoo's Panda Cam, though, will be turned off.

    MAGA, Motherfuckers, MAGA

    Still not tired of WINNING

  • Chipper Morning Baculum||

  • Mark22||

  • lap83||

    I'm afraid to know what your targeted Google ads look like after your many searches for SIV's likeness

  • Michael Hihn||

    Trump crowed that he'd sign anything they passed, even if he didn't like it.
    He was presented a BIPARTISAN plan..
    He killed it. His cognitive testing had absolutely nothing to do with his raging mental instability.

  • Sevo||

    Fuck off, Mike. You do not need to make a bigger ass of yourself.
    Take your meds, sit down and go away. You are an embarrassment to humanity.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    Left plus Right equals SHJT FUCK BALZZZZZ!!!1!1!1!1

  • I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn||

    And what do you have to say about your raging mental instability?

  • Michael Hihn||

    I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn|1.20.18 @ 7:15AM|#
    And what do you have to say about your raging mental instability?

    Perfect Irony!

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano won't be able to stop himself from responding to this!

  • Michael Hihn||

    Perfect irony!

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano won't be able to stop himself from responding to this!

    FUNNIER irony!

  • Red Tony||

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Michael Hihn||

    Jammijng it up your ass ... four times ... is not fragile
    STOP WHINING

  • Red Tony||

    Okay now you're just getting rapey on us. That's verbal aggression, cyberbullying, and given how you seem to view it as a bad thing, homophobia. I mean, geez, Hihn, why are you such a bully?

  • Unibro||

    #inyourhihney

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    See? Dumbfuck Hihnsano just can't stop himself!

    It's not ironic, it's just an easy prediction!

  • Deven||

    Trump made the mistake of thinking they'd come to him in good faith. They didn't, and he told them to fuck off, as he should have.

  • Michael Hihn||

    TOTAL bullshit.

    HE said he'd even take a separate bill on DACA

    HE said he'd sign whatever Congress sent him,

    THEN REVERSED HIMSELF AND DEMANDED A WALL!

    Schumer offerted the wall for DACA ... and Trump STILL refused.

    Left - Right = Zero

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    So the FBI and the DEA and every other government enforcement agency hung up their weapons, the military withdrew from 171 countries, it's lights out in the capitol? Taxes aren't being collected, levied, regulations not being enforced?

  • Mark22||

    Sounds good to me!

  • Michael Hihn||

    But bullshit, nevertheless.

  • Tony||

    Republicans who control every branch of government... played a supporting role in this.

    What a partisan fuckhole this place can be.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    Partisans are the worst people. Absolute worst.

  • Tony||

    No but hypocrites might be.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    Harrumph!

  • Red Tony||

    Dammit Past Me why you gotta have no self awareness?

  • Brightly||

    But they lack a supermajority. They build this thing into the Constitution and senate rules where you can't rule without the consent of the minority except in cases of overwhelming majority.

    And the GOP was the one prepared to make DACA permanent, but the Dems were not willing to overhaul our policy towards chain migration and drop the lottery in favor of a merit immigration system.

    Dems shut this thing down.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    You might find more comfort in Dalma posts.

  • Rebel Scum||

    They needed 60 votes in the Senate. Tony can't count.

    " What a partisan fuckhole this place can be."

    Sometimes it can be quite a shithole. But mostly bc of proggie a-holes like you. Have a nice day and try not to lose your mins. #govtshutdownmagedon

  • CE||

    Both sides are to blame. But some of us think the shutdown is an improvement.

  • Aloysious||

    gods have mercy on us

    Mercy isn't here, man.

  • Mark22||

    As Shikha Dalma pointed out earlier today, a recent Fox News poll found that 86 percent of Americans favor permanent legal status for DACA recipients and 79 percent favor a path to citizenship

    Not entirely coincidentally, 80% of Americans don't pay any net taxes, so what do they care about letting in millions of people who will be a net drain on the budget?

  • gormadoc||

    DACA only pertains to 800,000 people, which is not millions.

    And what budget? Tax reform is a net drain, yet we should celebrate that. DACA has made illegal immigrants more active and productive in our economy.

  • damikesc||

    DACA only pertains to 800,000 people, which is not millions.

    The press is indicating that protecting the "Dreamers" equates to over 3M, not 800,00.

  • Mark22||

    DACA only pertains to 800,000 people, which is not millions.

    There are 3.6 million "Dreamers"; 2.8 million of those Dreamers were simply smart enough not to sign up for DACA. And you can be certain that Democrats will push for citizenship, followed by sponsoring parents and relatives, even if this legislation says none of that is going to happen. That's in addition to all the naturalization and family sponsorship resulting from marriage and children.

    And what budget? Tax reform is a net drain, yet we should celebrate that. DACA has made illegal immigrants more active and productive in our economy.

    The vast majority of Dreamers will never be "active and productive" enough in our economy to pay for the costs they impose on tax payers. Furthermore, adding a large group of people like that to our economy means that lowering taxes or cutting entitlements becomes even less likely in the future than it is now, even though those are absolutely necessary if we want to have a stable country in the long term. And their kids are not going to be substantially better than their parents because Hispanics in the US view themselves as a separate group, again encouraged by Democrats and progressives.

  • gormadoc||

    "Dreamers" is separate, though. And nonexistent right now. Wringing hands over that is silly. Besides, Dreamers would have better education than your average immigrant anyway; it's a retirement to have finished high school or its equivalent.

    How do you know that they won't offset their benefits in taxes? I don't believe it's as obvious as you assume. While it may be true in the short term, I doubt it will be in the long term. In the 2nd generation, Hispanic immigrant families go from ~$30k to $40k. The rate-of-increase decreases after that but they keep approaching native-born incomes. Statistics on Hispanics as a whole is skewed down because there are a lot of 1st generation immigrants.

    Perhaps Hispanics haven't been seduced by the left so much as pushed away by the right. The overly-sensational claims about Mexican immigrants over the last election cycle has disturbed a lot of them. It certainly hasn't helped them assimilate. Even with that, almost 2/3rds of 2nd generation Hispanics regard themselves as Americans; the same for 2nd generation Asians.

    I think it's flat-out insane to say that they won't do better than their parents. It's why their parents came here; usually for the education and to escape very authoritarian governments. Both of these contribute heavily to better outcomes.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Perhaps Hispanics haven't been seduced by the left so much as pushed away by the right. The overly-sensational claims about Mexican immigrants over the last election cycle has disturbed a lot of them.

    Hispanics have voted majority Democrat for generations. This isn't some new development because Republicans weren't all-in on Reagan's amnesty.

  • gormadoc||

    They have been voting Democrat, but most were personally fairly centrist. Democrat Hispanics have been pushed further left by Republican rhetoric over a couple of decades now. They had a chance with abortion when it was a hot topic, but they really didn't take advantage of it enough.

  • Unibro||

    Just admit you were wrong on the numbers, fabricated a stupid distinction to hide it, and have now gone to increasingly ridiculous lengths to ignore it.

    Then fuck off.

  • gormadoc||

    Dreamers and DACA aren't the same. Would it kill you too learn the difference or is it easier to be ignorant?

  • Unibro||

    No one is saying they are. Would it kill you to admit you are too stupid to comprehend what you're discussing?

  • Unibro||

    "Bu bu but... DREAMER ACT!!!"

    Said the stupid person who thinks that is why they are called that now.

  • Mark22||

    Democrat Hispanics have been pushed further left by Republican rhetoric over a couple of decades now.

    They have been "pushed left" because Democrats said "we'll give you lots of free stuff and let you bring in your relatives" while Republicans have said "you need to make it on your own and we want immigrants that make a net positive contribution to the US".

    So, you're right: if both parties turned into socialist sell-outs and both parties advocated Hispanic racism, then they could split the Hispanic vote. Fortunately, they don't both do that.

  • chemjeff||

    Democrats said "we'll give you lots of free stuff and let you bring in your relatives" while Republicans have said "you need to make it on your own and we want immigrants that make a net positive contribution to the US"..

    That's not how I see it.

    Democrats say "we'll give you free stuff and let you bring your relatives"
    Republicans say "we'll give you free stuff but we will lecture you about it and also threaten to deport your relatives"

    In what universe are Republicans actually opposed to the welfare state?

  • Michael Hihn||

    In what universe are Republicans actually opposed to the welfare state?

    Mark22, .. like Trump ... blames everybody else ... and ... wait for It.

    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101769
    DENIES CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED AS ENDORSED BY JEFFERSON AND OUR FOUNDERS.
    DENIES THE CONSTITUTION HAD TO BE RATIFIED
    IGNORANT OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
    CONFUSES RATIFICATION WITH MAJORITARIANISM

    Typical alt-right goober

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Jobs held by Hispanic US citizens and green card holders are the ones most likely to be lost to illegals. People wonder why Trump did better with Hispanics than Romney. They shouldn't wonder.

  • Michael Hihn||

    And Obama is a Muslim.

  • Unibro||

    So, you posted that ducking stupidity just to hide the fact that you were wrong on the DACA numbers?

    Great, we have another John guys. Go find something else to do while he bloviates instead of just admitting he was wrong.

  • gormadoc||

    No, 800,000 is the DACA numbers. 3 million is the Dreamers Act. The media calls the DACA people Dreamers because they're stupid. They aren't the same thing (Dreamers Act never passed) and the shutdown is about DACA.

  • Unibro||

    And my post is about you being wrong, which you still won't admit.

  • Unibro||

    And JUST TO BE COMPLETELY CLEAR. THIS

    "Dreamers Act never passed"

    Has nothing to do with anything.

    "THE DREAMERS ACT NEVER PASSED! THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DREAMERS! I HAVE DECREED THIS! REALITY DOES NOT MATTER"

    Well, stupid fuck, no one was calling them DREAMERS because they mistakenly thought the act passed.

    "The media calls the DACA people Dreamers because"

    Doesn't matter. It's what they call them. Your opinion, and the dreamer act, do NOT MATTER.

  • gormadoc||

    They're two different things. Even if they call the DACA people Dreamers it doesn't automatically make all Dreamers covered by DACA. Like squares and rectangles.

  • gormadoc||

    Give me a good source that says that there are 3 million DACA enrollees.

  • Unibro||

    No one ever said it did you fucking retard.

  • Mark22||

    the shutdown is about DACA.

    That is incorrect. The shutdown was triggered because Democrats didn't get a deal on the Dreamers. The "it's only 800000" is a deliberate misrepresentation of the numbers by people pushing the Democratic agenda.

    And don't try to fool people: even if the deal were DACA only, that simply wouldn't stand, either in the courts or legislatively. Any deal will almost immediately get expanded to all Dreamers, then to their parents, then to all couples who have had children born in the US. We are talking many millions of people even before those individuals start sponsoring more family members from abroad.

    So cut the "it's only 800000 people" crap.

  • CE||

    I don't understand why right wing Christian Republicans don't greatly prefer pro-life Christian Mexican immigrants over Muslim refugees from countries that may try to plant terrorists in the outflow.....

  • Mark22||

    Your confusion is easy to explain: you are confusing "gay libertarian atheist immigrants" with "right wing Christian Republicans". Whether that's because you're ignorant or because you're a Soros-paid professional shill, I don't know.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Mark22
    Whether that's because you're ignorant or because you're a Soros-paid professional shill, I don't know.

    MARK22 CALLING SOMEONE IGNORANT!!!!

    You MUST check the link .. to believe anyone on earth is crazy enough to

    1) Deny "consent of the governed" endorsed by Jefferson and the Founders
    2) Deny the Constitution had to be ratified
    3) Be so totally clueless about our Declaration of Independence

    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101769

    Actually, the ENTIRE alt-right made the same fuckup

  • ace_m82||

    Yeah, about that whole "consent of the governed"... This is what Hihn means by that:

    http://reason.com/reasontv/201.....e-will-die

    Government only exists to protect the "right" to choose your ruler, no other rights:

    Me: Government isn't compatible with individual rights (unless there is 100% consent).
    Hihn: INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS MEANS 0.0001% CAN OVERRULE THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
    THAT'S DICTATOR RIGHTS, SLAVER. YOUR 'RIGHT' IS TO LEAVE.

    …INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY'ALLOWS THEM TO RESIGN ...FUCKING LEAVE

    Me: By 'liberty' you mean the liberty to leave when they take all you have, enslave you, and kill you?
    Hihn: BEFORE – UNLESS YOU'RE EVEN CRAZIER.

    Government is apparently voluntary as well:

    "Government - like Kiwanis, dumfuck -- is a VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION.
    ITS MEMBERS AGREE, FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY -- TO JAIL THEMSELVES FOR REFUSING TO PAY THE DUES."

    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7100385

    "Don't like it? EMIGRATE."

    "See .. government DEFENDS rights."

    So... yeah... feel free to ridicule him on that. Wanting "consent of the governed" is pretty evil if the "governed" want to steal from and kill you!

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    pro-life Christian Mexican immigrants

    Hispanic women have abortions at a far lower rate than black women, but a far higher rate than white women. I'd hardly call them "pro-life".

  • Michael Hihn||

    Only whites can be pro-life?

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano sees stats, thinks that only whites can be pro-life.

  • Michael Hihn||

    No stats. His words.
    Stats are numbers.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano doesn't know how to Google.

  • Mark22||

    How do you know that they won't offset their benefits in taxes? In the 2nd generation, Hispanic immigrant families go from ~$30k to $40k. The rate-of-increase decreases after that but they keep approaching native-born incomes. Statistics on Hispanics as a whole is skewed down because there are a lot of 1st generation immigrants.

    You answered your own question: the Dreamers won't offset their costs in taxes. Neither will the second generation. Even if several generations down the line they did, that wouldn't change the fiscal impact for many decades to come.

    "Approaching native born incomes" is not enough in any case, since native born Americans aren't pulling their weight on average either. Now, we can't deport American citizens, but we certainly shouldn't add to the problem.

  • gormadoc||

    ITT: People engaging trolls while believing they're serious.

  • Unibro||

    You're not serious?

  • Ecoli||

    This is the most intelligent post in response to this Reason article.

    This guy recognizes the importance of your family and home. He recognizes the importance of earning a living, and being happy.

  • CE||

    More time with your family? So the webcams want couples now too?

  • XM||

    Trump undoubtedly demanded a lot of things - ending chain migration, diversity visa, erecting the wall, implementing nationwide e-verify, etc.

    But what would have been the minimum requirement for at least a stay of deportation and work waivers? Funding for his beautiful wall? Ending sanctuary city policies? 15% increase in merit based immigration?

    If I was a parent of a DACA kid, I would have been ok with a stay of deportation for the wall, straight up. The kids get to stay in school or work, but they can't vote or qualify for welfare. If DACA families were part of this discussion, they would have made more concessions than the democrats.

    The dems aren't interested in a resolution or a piecemeal approach, for obvious reasons. That's why they tried to lump in the Haitians and El Salvadorans, even though some of them apparently have 2 more years until they can be deported. Why not save the DACA kids first from deportation and work from there? Trump WANTED to make a DACA deal of some sort. His fans at Breitbart were not pleased.

    I wonder if Paul Ryan and Mcconnell can try to push through a deal on straight party vote like they did with the tax reform. Cook something up that Trump will find palatable and go with it.

  • Qsl||

    The specifics aren't that important though as this is purely political posturing; the question is does the gambit work or not?

    It's a wild, wacky political world where the dems seem to get the most traction by over-reacting, and repubs waffle at their platform. Can't say how this affects those who aren't strongly in either camp, but my suspicion is the rhetoric dems used in the past will come back to haunt them. This will be great fodder for the next round of elections.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    The winner will be determined by how NBC Nightly News frames the shutdown for their viewers.

  • JeremyR||

    At the end of the day, the Democrats want to import as many socialists as possible, thus they want unlimited immigration from Latin America, which overwhelmingly supports it.

    So making a deal to keep a million socialists as opposed to letting in an unlimited number isn't going to fly for them.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    At the end of the day, the Democrats want to import as many socialists as possible, thus they want unlimited immigration from Latin America, which overwhelmingly supports it

    Kind of makes you wonder about open-borders libertarians, doesn't it?

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Some of them are sincere, however dogmatic, who would rather see our republic fall to pieces than violate a single iota of their first principles.

    Others are just stooges for the Chamber of Commerce type crony capitalists and/or the Beltway elites. The ones who are given a corporate-funded bullhorn are more likely to be this kind.

  • chemjeff||

    What makes you think that immigration will lead to the republic falling into pieces?

    Did Irish Catholic immigration lead to the death of the Republic? How about Eastern European immigration? Italian immigration? In their day, those were the "shithole" places after all.

    We are currently living through a rerun of the periodic spasms of anti-immigrant sentiment that pop up in American history from time to time. The Trumpists are just a modernized version of the Know-Nothings from the 1850's. Like all movements based primarily in ignorance, fear and paranoia, it will pass eventually.

  • Unibro||

    "What makes you think that immigration will lead to the republic falling into pieces?"

    The cost.

  • Unibro||

    Until you discuss immigration and the real cost, you sound like an idiot.

    The idea that you are making an accurate comparison falls apart because you intentionally ignore that the nanny state is vastly different than it was in any of the time periods you mention.

    Which does NOT mean I want to keep the nanny state or that I enjoy americans on welfare either. Save that tired fucking response, it never made any sense anyway.

    It just means the costs are different and you are ignoring them to pretend your analogy isn't garbage.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    We didn't have a welfare state during the era of European immigration. We also had a fast-growing industrial economy that was starving for labor.

    And TBH, government has grown at a much faster rate since mass immigration began, compared to the era before, so one could argue that even European immigration actually helped tear the republic apart.

  • chemjeff||

    It is actually an open question whether immigration costs more than the benefits.

    http://econofact.org/do-immigr.....yers-money

    It is not automatically true that immigrants are a net drain on the economy.

  • chemjeff||

    And if you look at it, it appears that the biggest public expense of immigration is not the food stamps or subsidized housing, it's the public education of the kids of immigrants. And we have seen great strides in privatizing the public education complex in recent years. Charter schools and vouchers and homeschooling are all real things now.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    In the long term the biggest public expense is the spending voted for by the people illegals and their spawn elect.

  • Unibro||

    That's all beside the point. The point was, you attempt to make a comparison to times when the cost was significantly different, when those periods tell us nothing useful about immigration in the current economic climate. The analogy fails because of this.

    Whether the cost is a net plus or minus is a different question.

  • Unibro||

    And just to be clear again we all know that you will both attempt to reinforce your analogy and comparisons, because you literally cannot fathom that you are making invalid comparisons, and then you will come down on the side of it doesn't cost that much anyway.

    No one really considers you a faithful debater, so don't bother, your comparison fails, but you will never accept it.

  • chemjeff||

    Oh this is too funny. You are the one arguing in bad faith while accusing me of the same. You simply assert "invalid comparison!" because it is not a *perfect* comparison. Of course it is not a perfect comparison. I never said it was. But just because it is not a *perfect* comparison doesn't mean we can't learn some lessons from it. First and foremost, that large amounts of immigration don't necessarily lead to "the republic falling into pieces". Are the costs different between the different eras in history? Yes they are. I never argued otherwise. (Why you got all bent out of shape because I didn't read your mind and predict that this was going to be your main concern before you even answered the question, I don't know.) Perhaps you would like to present some evidence that this cost differential is the determining factor, in light of the link that I posted showing that whether immigration is a net benefit or a net cost *in the current economic climate* is still an open question even among the experts. But you don't really care, your goal here is just to tear down me personally and try to discredit my argument by attacking the person. Sure, whatever. Go ahead and keep spreading the narrative that immigrants are welfare leeches and drains on the economy and attack anyone who presents factual information to the contrary. That seems to be the general strategy of the immigration restrictionists.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    The Trumpists are just a modernized version of the Know-Nothings from the 1850's. Like all movements based primarily in ignorance, fear and paranoia, it will pass eventually.

    Comparing the country as it was in the 1850s to how it is today is sheer fucking ignorance. We have far more people, a much larger welfare state, and an actual imperial foreign policy, all things that our dramatically lower-scaled nation in the 1850s didn't possess. And even at that, mass immigration in those years had a dramatic effect on the nation's culture and policy. It led to Manifest Destiny-style land grabs to absorb all the newcomers, and in the later years, the rise of labor union populism and socialist government programs.

    Anyone claiming that mass immigration won't change the economic or social nature of the host country is too stupid to take seriously. They're too busy shoveling food from a taco truck into their pieholes and chanting "diversity is our strength" bullshit mantras to be concerned about it, because they think they'll never have to deal with the social or economic consequences that arise from what they're pimping. They don't have to send their kids to school with immigrants who are barely literate in their own language, much less English, so why should they give a shit, as long as Lupe continues to slop a burrito on their plate when they visit the hole in the wall diner?

  • Michael Hihn||

    OH MY GOD ... ANOTHER fucked up assault by a Trumpster brain!!!

    The Trumpists are just a modernized version of the Know-Nothings from the 1850's. Like all movements based primarily in ignorance, fear and paranoia, it will pass eventually.

    Comparing the country as it was in the 1850s to how it is today is sheer fucking ignorance.

    BWAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAA He didn't.
    He compared two groups of people ... and .... WAIT FOR IT ,,.,

    EXPLICITLY STATED "MODERNIZED VERSION"

    SO .... YOU ... PROVED YOURSELF A KNOW-NOTHING ,,,AS CHARGED.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Crybaby bitch Dumbfuck Hihnsano crying like a bitch again.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • BigT||

    'Some of them are sincere, however dogmatic, who would rather see our republic fall to pieces than violate a single iota of their first principles.'

    No, first principles include property rights, which clearly is not compatible with open borders.

  • Michael Hihn||

    No, first principles include property rights, which clearly is not compatible with open borders.

    How so?
    (lol)

  • CE||

    You mean millions of pro-life, pro-family Christian immigrants are automatically going to vote Democrat? Why is that?

  • Mark22||

    If I was a parent of a DACA kid, I would have been ok with a stay of deportation for the wall, straight up. The kids get to stay in school or work,

    Geez, man, wake up and stop swallowing the propaganda. Less than 0.5% of the "Dreamers" are under 16. The vast majority are over 21. Very few of them are dependent on their parents.

    No matter what the deal is on DACA or "Dreamers", their parents ought to be deported and permanently banned from the US. That, at least, should be a condition of any deal.

  • summiwap||

    Why Should govt shut down? how to delete gmail account

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    How long does a shutdown have to last before the country starts saving money?

  • Rockabilly||

    Democrats need more voters by any means necessary.

  • Jerryskids||

    If the shutdown results in all non-essential employees being sent home, why is Congress still in session?

  • damikesc||

    As Shikha Dalma pointed out earlier today, a recent Fox News poll found that 86 percent of Americans favor permanent legal status for DACA recipients and 79 percent favor a path to citizenship. However, those numbers erode when the price of achieveing those status is a government shutdown.

    So, people support it if it has no impact on their lives. Which indicates support could not be more shallow than it is. Trump best stand firm on this.

  • Chipper II||

    Which one of them said we needed a "good shutdown"? Which one of them asked a bipartisan group of Senators to come up with legislation and he "would sign it"? There are enough bipartisan votes in the House and Senate to pass DACA relief but the leadership in the Republican party refuses to allow that vote. Tom Cotton and Mark Meadows are chiefly responsible for sinking the bipartisan agreement that Trump said he would sign. Cotton and Meadows are beholden to the racist and violent people who dominate comment sections on right-wing websites.

  • jimolivi@icloud.com||

    Eric & Matt, my favorite part of this article: "Both parties are terrible."

  • Brett Bellmore||

    Both parties are terrible, but only one of them shut down the government over a demand to *change* the law in a way the legislature had already rejected.

  • Rebel Scum||

    Did the government shut down? I can't tell.

  • Rebel Scum||

    I guess Team Blue cares more about illegal aliens than American citizens. Also, one thing I'd like to see out of this is for Trump to fire all the "non-essential" employees we are sure to hear about. "Non-essential" should equal "not employed". I know I know, wishful thinking is wishful.

  • Dick Puller, Attorney at Law||

    Speaking of what goes around, comes around Max Boot gets trolled, and doesn't like it!

    What makes these immigration cheerleader types so thin-skinned, anyway?

  • Ken Shultz||

    "As Shikha Dalma pointed out earlier today, a recent Fox News poll found that 86 percent of Americans favor permanent legal status for DACA recipients and 79 percent favor a path to citizenship. However, those numbers erode when the price of achieveing those status is a government shutdown."

    The law isn't determined by people who are too stupid, lonely, or elderly to screen their calls properly or by people who have the time or inclination to talk to pollsters. I'm convinced people who care enough to talk to pollsters for more than two seconds are the same personality types who are predisposed to wanting to be liked by strangers--so they tell the pollsters what they think the pollsters want to hear.

    We have this thing called the Constitution, which Dalmia seems to love to ignore, and it says our laws are determined by elected representatives and signed by the president. Those reports on polls make it seem like America is one big single member district, but it actually doesn't matter if 99% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts all agree on something. What matters is how 2% of the people in Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin vote.

  • Eman||

    "we have this thing called the constitution". oh, you mean that piece of paper that was written by dead racists? it's 2018.

  • Ken Shultz||

    Poe's law

  • Ken Shultz||

    First term presidents often provoke a backlash against their party in the first midterm election after they're elected--see the Gingrich revolution in '94 and the Tea Party election in 2010 for examples. Congressional Republicans are in the cross-hairs anyway because of Trump for that reason--no matter what they do. However, neither Trump nor the Republican leadership have anything to fear from dancing with ones who brought 'em to the dance . . .

    Caving on immigration is likely to lose the Republicans their most enthusiastic support--and that's true regardless of how anybody feels about immigration. If they'd managed to replace ObamaCare, they'd be wiping their feet with the Democrats--in the districts that matter most.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    First term presidents often provoke a backlash against their party in the first midterm election after they're elected

    Two examples do not make a trend. There were very specific reasons for those "backlashes", the AWB in 1994 and Obamacare in 2010. Indeed the GOP made significant gains in Congress in Bush II's first midterm in 2002.

  • Red Tony||

    I'm curious but too lazy to look it up: how did H.W. do in his midterm, and how'd Reagan's first midterm go? Because an explanation that I've heard tossed out for W.'s improvement was that 9/11 was hot and the Republicans hammered home the idea that the government had to be supported in the War on Terror.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    That's probably a good explanation for 2002, but that's the point - it wasn't due to the stage of the president's term in office, it was due to specific events.

    1982 went badly for the GOP, they lost the Senate. This was probably due to the very bad recession at the time. In 1990 the GOP lost a little bit but not much.

    If you were looking for a pattern, it could be that when one party wins back the presidency based on the unpopularity of the party previously in power, it often has a lot of victories in districts normally aligned with the other party. Two years later most of those districts go back to their usual alignment, creating the appearance of a "backlash" against the new president.

    Such a "tsunami election" definitely happened with Obama, Clinton, and Reagan, but not with Bush II or Trump (GOP lost seats when they were elected).

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Year: HouseGOPDiff SenateGOPDiff
    1974: -49 -4
    1976: -1 +1
    1978: +15 +2
    1980: +34 +12
    1982: -26 0
    1984: +15 -2
    1986: -5 -8
    1988: -2 -1
    1990: -8 +1
    1992: +9 +2
    1994: +54 +9
    1996: -3 +2
    1998: -4 0
    2000: -2 -2
    2002: +8 +2
    2004: +3 +4
    2006: -30 -6
    2008: -21 -8
    2010: +63 +6
    2012: -8 -2
    2014: +13 +9
    2016: -6 -2

  • Ken Shultz||

    Why did you include midterms that weren't the first midterm after a new president was elected?

    Why did you only include one party?

    2010: Obama - Democrat

    House: -63 Democrats

    Senate: - 6 Democrats

    2002: George W. Bush - Republican

    House: + 8 Republicand

    Senate + 2 Republicans

    1994: Bill Clinton - Democrat

    House: -54 Democrats

    Senate -8 Democrats

    1990: George H. W. Bush - Republican

    House: -8 Republicans

    Senate -1 Republican

    1982: Ronald Reagan - Republican

    House: -26 Republicans

    Senate -0 Republicans

    1982: Jimmy Carter - Democrat

    House: -15 Democrats

    Senate -3 Democrats

    1974*: Gerald Ford - Republican

    House: -48 Republicans

    Senate -4 Republicans

    1970: Richard Nixon - Republican

    House: -12 Republicans

    Senate +1 Republicans

    1966: Lyndon Johnson - Democrat

    House: -47 Democrats

    Senate -3 Democrats

    The trend continues all the way back through the first Taft midterm in 1910, with the only significant outliers being Bush's first midterm in 2002, in the wake of 9/11, and FDR's first midterm in 1932, in the worst of the Great Depression.

    Go back before 1914, and you're even going before senatorial suffereage and the 17th Amendment.

    If you think the president's party doesn't usually suffer a backlash in the first midterm after a president is elected, then you're wrong.

  • Red Tony||

    Thanks to both Mouse and Shultz for the information and breakdown! It was helpful to see that there is indeed a trend, although the extremity of this trend varies. Thanks!

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Because you need the other elections for context. You don't think that the results of the election 2 years prior (or 6 years prior for the Senate) have a correlation with the current election?

    If there's a snake in your back yard, and all you know is that it's a snake, it's probably not a bad idea to pick it up and move it somewhere else, as very few snakes in North America are venomous.

    But if you know the snake has red, yellow, and black bands on it, that causes the probabilities to flip and makes it a very bad idea to pick up the snake.

    To sum up, the details of a situation are more important than vague patterns followed by situations that happen to be like the current one in one way.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Or if we express it as combination of presidential election year and midterm immediately following, that shows that most of the time there really isn't much movement because these balance out. Exceptions for Watergate, AWB/Hillarycare, Iraq War, and Obamacare cycles.

    Years: PresHouseDiff PresSenDiff
    60-62 -25 +2
    64-66: -10 -1
    68-70 -7 +6
    72-74: -36 -6
    76-78: -14 -3
    80-82: +12 +12
    84-86: +10 -10
    88-90: -10 0
    92-94: -63 -11
    96-98: +7 -2
    00-02: +6 0
    04-06: -27 -2
    08-10: -42 +2
    12-14: -5 -7

  • Ken Shultz||

    "Two examples do not make a trend. There were very specific reasons for those "backlashes", the AWB in 1994 and Obamacare in 2010. Indeed the GOP made significant gains in Congress in Bush II's first midterm in 2002.

    That was about 9/11.

    The Democrats offered no serious opposition to Bush after 9/11 and even long after we invaded Iraq in 2003. There wasn't any reason to expect a backlash against a president in 2002 who was leading a country in what was effectively a defensive war before everything got complicated. Being attacked on 9/11 unified the American people.

    Oh, and trends are trends even despite outliers.

    The trend of the president's party losing seats in his first midterm election after he's elected extends back to at least the Taft administration in 1910.

    https://tinyurl.com/y7me5y5h

    Feel the wrongness.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    right, because politics in 1910 is somehow comparable to that in 2018.

    Anyway, that's an artifact of a different phenomenon. Note that they're discussing ALL midterm elections on that page. Most presidential election years, the winning presidential party also gains seats in Congress, expanding into districts usually held by the other party. The next election, those districts are likely to revert to the non-presidential party that usually holds them.

    But when you have the rare president who comes into office while his party loses seats (e.g. Bush 2 and Trump) that phenomenon reverses.

  • Ken Shultz||

    You're off in left field somewhere. I have no idea what you're talking about. It doesn't seem to have anything to do with anything I wrote.

    "First term presidents often provoke a backlash against their party in the first midterm election after they're elected"

    That's what I wrote. It's a fact--not an opinion.

    And the relationship between them isn't hard to understand either. If Congress is a check on the president's power, then voting for the part out of the White House makes perfect sense if you disagree with what the president is doing.

    I'm not even saying anything controversial, here. Just pointing to facts, like "three is between two and four". Maybe you were unfamiliar with the facts? Regardless, the facts are what they are--whether or not you're familiar with them or even whether you understand them. And the fact is that the president's party generally loses seats in the first midterm after he takes office . . .

    Yes, there are always reasons why people oppose the new president. And the voters usually find them--whatever they are--with the only significant exceptions being 9/11 and the Great Depression. Unless something like that happens between now and November, the Republicans are running against the wind. If they desert the swing state voters who put them in power and Trump in office, they'll be in an even worse position.

  • Ken Shultz||

    That's an analysis of the facts. It's disputable.

    The facts are indisputable. And a trend is a trend specifically because it exists despite an outlier, AKA "the exception that proves the rule".

  • Deflator Mouse||

    "First term presidents often provoke a backlash against their party in the first midterm election after they're elected"

    That's what I wrote. It's a fact--not an opinion.

    That's not a fact. You've offered no evidence that first term presidents have any inherent tendency to provoke a backlash. Other effects are sufficient to explain the midterm election stats (which apply to all midterms, not just first-term prez midterms).

    If you're saying "Trump is provoking a backlash" then OK, let's discuss that claim. But pointing to Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Ronald Reagan doing it has no bearing on the 2018 election.

  • gormadoc||

    Check this out.

  • Hank Phillips||

    Truth to tell, it's hardly changed at all. The only difference is that then the communo-fascist variants of Socialism had not demonstrably been shown to be death camps. Now we've seen where that goes. But the same lay altruist v. religious altruist shouting match has hardly changed at all--except for Atlas being published and Nolan forming the party.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    And of course you can't really dismiss 2002 as a blip due to 9/11 while ignoring the phenomena that gave rise to 2010 (Obamacare), 1994 (Hillarycare/AWB), and 1982 (blue collar recession).

  • Eman||

    the panda cam downtime is really gonna be a blow to the gorilla channel *shakes head sadly*. I'm not angry so much as disappointed.

  • Longtobefree||

    So exactly how does the camera qualify for turn off?
    If the government is shut down, who is there to turn off the camera?
    Left on, the camera causes no additional personnel expense, but sending someone to turn it off is expensive.
    Must be a bit of political logic.

  • Deven||

    Remember when Obama ended the wet foot, dry foot policy for Cubans?

    That tells you all you need to know about the Democrats; they don't give a shit about immigrants, they just want their votes.

  • chemjeff||

    We are led by idiots.

  • Unibro||

    You got elected to something?

  • ScottK||

    An allegory:

    I hold the power. You wish you did, but you don't. Sucks to be you.

    In our negotiations, I demand that you sidle over to me next to this Big Wall, and bow down to me. You decline, saying all men are created equal in the eys of The Creator or some such nonsense. I respond that bowing down is really very, very important to me, and if you can't do it I will shoot your dog. You respond that shooting the dog will not benefit me, and offer some other things instead. But I don't want those other things, I want you to bow down and I give you one last, best chance to give me what I prefer. You decline, and I shoot your dog.

    Whose fault is it that the dog is dead, and what does this allegory say about power in general? (If uncertain, perhaps there is a neighborhood high school kid who can help).

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Why are you bothering to negotiate if you "hold the power"?

  • ScottK||

    Observance of rules requiring negotiation. I could change the rules, but I'm not a mean person.

  • Unibro||

    So, you don't actually hold any power

  • Brian||

    I think it says you're a dick.

    Did I win?

  • Deflator Mouse||

    If McConnell had any balls he would have the Senate vote on a rule change to remove the 60-vote cloture requirement for continuing resolutions. This is getting ridiculous.

    In the 2013 shutdown the GOP actually controlled one house of Congress, and the Dems said they should get the hell out of the way and do as Obama said.

    Now the voters have drubbed the Dems out of both houses and the presidency, but the Dems still demand to dictate policy? Fuck no. Let them campaign on how dangerous it is to prevent 41 senators from shutting down the govt on their own.

  • Michael Hihn||

    If McConnell had any balls he would have the Senate vote on a rule change to remove the 60-vote cloture requirement for continuing resolutions.

    He hasn't DESTROYED his party yet?

  • Tony||

    Breaking: then-Senator Barack Obama used a shell corporation to pay off a porn actress whom he fucked in order to keep her silent just days before the 2008 election.

    Reason libertarians, beltway media, Republican moral crusaders: *yawn*, I'm sure.

  • Unibro||

    Why do I care?

  • Brian||

    I'm sure making excuses for the Clintons for decades has nothing to do with everyone's modern, progressive sexual values.

  • Incomprehensible Bitching||

    #metoo

  • Red Tony||

    ...did he fuck her to keep her silent days before the election, or fuck her days before the election and pay her off to stay silent, or did he fuck her way before the election and then pay her off days before the election?

    Bonus question: how did she keep from laughing when he took his pants off?

  • Ecoli||

    Tony, Barack Obama is gay. He was fucking his flamboyant hairdresser, not some actress who smells of spoiled fish.

  • Palin's Buttplug||

    Only a faggot like you would know that.

  • Hillary Clinton||

    And it's the hicks you live around that are classless...

  • Tony||

    Have you seen the jeans he wears? He cannot be gay.

  • Rebel Scum||

    Mom-jeans are totally gay.

  • Red Tony||

    No they're not. Trust us on this.

    They're ugly and you could argue that he wears them in order to closet, but mom jeans aren't gay.

  • Unibro||

    In this thread, Hihn and Sevo shit everywhere, leading many to think they are the same poster.

    Instead of the two worst bed shutting retards on the internet.

    I mean, fuck, Hihn actually came on here and lied about meeting a Koch and discussing Sevo. No shit.

  • Ken Shultz||

    That's actually inspired me to go read Hihn's posts. I gotta see that.

  • Ken Shultz||

    Okay, so this was in a different thread?

    Somebody please link to this!

    Hihn claims to have discussed Sevo with one of the Koch brothers?!

    Link please.

    Pretty please.

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    Well, since you asked nicely...

  • Sevo||

    Ken, look upthread to 10:24 AM.
    Didn't bother to save a link from the original Hihn-non-vintage whine, but there were many telling him to get lost, and that's when he *threatened* to take screen shots (so we couldn't go back and change things, I guess; paranoia has many effects) AND SHOW THEM TO THE KOCH BROTHERS!!!! (all caps, bold, many punctuations, and (sneers).
    As I recall, I told him to please do so, since I presume the Kochs are of at least normal intelligence and they'd either laugh or suggest he get assistance (assuming he has the ability to speak with them at all). So now we get this (supposed) result where I am singled out!
    I cannot believe it! That tired piece of crap *claims* he discussed me specifically! I'm HONORED!
    A couple of months ago, I passed on a thread featuring Hihn's bullshit and someone else took the honors as the WORST BULL ON THE INTERNET EVER!!!!!!!!!!!
    But I guess I got it back.
    Oh, and Unibro; go fuck yourself.

  • Ken Shultz||

    That's freaking hilarious.

  • Sevo||

    I tried a response to Hihn's 'comments'. Really, I did. I tried a couple of times.
    His response to the earlier comment was such as to offer no possible rational reply. If anyone can make sense of that word salad, I'd love to see it.
    Mike, you've now set new records for imbecility.

  • Sevo||

    "In this thread, Hihn and Sevo shit everywhere, leading many to think they are the same poster."

    Uh, no. What sort of a idiot are you to even imagine so? But thanks for the mention; 'just don't misspell my name!'
    When it became obvious early on that this was a hihn-fected thread, it was worth not wasting time here. By actual count this makes eleven posts.
    Pretty sure the worst retard Unibro beats that total by many times. Are you and turd the same poster?

  • Hillary Clinton||

    ". Are you and turd the same poster?"

    "Unibro|1.20.18 @ 2:35PM|#

    In this thread, Hihn and Sevo shit everywhere, leading many to think they are the same poster.

    Instead of the two worst bed shutting retards on the internet.

    I mean, fuck, Hihn actually came on here and lied about meeting a Koch and discussing Sevo. No shit."

    ...?...

    Seriously? You like...can't see it's Unibro at the top where the name is? Where it clearly says the name of the person you're responding to? In normal letters that are clear and readable?

    Yes Sevo, I think it might be the same poster. Very perceptive. Well done Hercule.

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    "Turd" = Palin's Buttplug in Sevo-ese, IIRC.

  • Sevo||

    Hillary Clinton|1.21.18 @ 3:44AM|#
    "[...]
    Seriously? You like...can't see it's Unibro at the top where the name is?"

    Wooosh!

  • Michael Hihn||

    For once I agree with Sevo.
    "Hillary" is crazy as a loon.
    Then again, so is Sevo
    So it's kinda funny,

  • Pete in Sioux Falls||

    The Michael Hihn posting here isn't the real Michael Hihn. I spoke to him and we had a chuckle over it.

    Regards,

    Pete

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    Michael Hihn: the David Lynch/Monty Python collaboration we didn't know we were waiting for.

  • Unibro||

    I don't find this at all surprising frankly.

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    So, what's this business about (the commenter claiming to be) Hihn being a pedophile, or something? Link, source?

  • Unibro||

    It's in a thread he shat on a week ago or something.

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    Well, I'm not going looking for that shit. Link? Anybody?

  • Michael Hihn||

    One of the dumbfucks launched a mindless assault ... then declared if I defended myself I was admitting to be a pedophile that has sex with animals -- the fuckwad thinks he can alter reality by merely drooling ... on top of being a cyber-bully!

    That's like saying if Unibro has used "shat" that he BRAGS of sucksing Donald Trump's cock,
    Yes, they ARE that crazy.

  • Red Tony||

    ...so do ya got a link to that or what?

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Michael Hihn||

    I GET TO RIDICULE RED TONY AGAIN

    Red Tony|1.20.18 @ 11:00PM|#
    ...so do ya got a link to that or what?

    (sneer)

    I am garbage|1.18.18 @ 2:05AM|#
    At least you admit you have a problem. ((I didn't))
    Any rep!y is an admission that you are a pedophile.

    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7097888

    Your ilk are all alike

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

    If the victim of assault calls them out as bullies, thugs and bulshitters ... get this ... it's CRYING!
    Imagine all those whiny Jews at Auschwitz.
    The candy-ass niggers getting lynched.
    Or their own mother objecting to being gang-raped by Muslims.

    Verbal Aggressiveness
    ...A personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the self-concepts of other people instead of, or in addition to, their positions on topics of communication ... Verbal aggressiveness is thought to be mainly a destructive form of communication

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    The sick fucks keep "pretending the abuse is not happening."
    Left - Right = Zero

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano continues being a crybaby bitch.

  • Red Tony||

    ...wouldn't it have been easier to just not reply rather than force-feed everyone a CSS salad that makes you look like a sneering asshole pedophile?

    I mean just because somebody replies to you doesn't mean you have to reply to them.

    Also why you being racist against Muslims?

    #HihnsanoIsABigot
    #HihnsanoIsABully
    #HihnsanoBoldfaceOveruse

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Michael Hihn||

    ...wouldn't it have been easier to just not reply rather than force-feed everyone a CSS salad that makes you look like a sneering asshole pedophile?

    Self-defense, bully.. Made an ass out of you!
    And also jammed the pedophile slander down your throat

    What kind of fucking psycho lies about the comment, still visible, directly above him?

  • Red Tony||

    Um. You.

    You're the one who does that.

    Like constantly. On a regular basis. You intentionally alter posts when you quote them in a manner easily detected by going and looking at the still-visible comment that often barely resembles what you claim was said.

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Michael Hihn||

    Is that how I jammed the pedophile thing down your throat?

    I provided proof of your lie. You have no more than another snit fit assertion.. as fucked up as the one on pedophile. Bellowing Blowhards B Bullies.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    And also jammed the pedophile slander down your throat

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano thinks altering his favorite insult is going to fool people into thinking he isn't into getting pegged.

  • gormadoc||

    Just this thread or over the whole site?

  • Unibro||

    ^found the sock master

  • Brian||

    Is the real Michael Hihn bat shit crazy, too?

  • gormadoc||

    If his handle/link is a real site, then he might be a little weird (normal for libertarians) but not bat shit insane.

  • Brian||

    I am disappoint.

  • gormadoc||

    He doesn't like ObamaCare and clearly only the institutionalized don't like it.

    It's mandated to be awesome.

  • Michael Hihn||

    See how how fucking crazy the bullies are
    http://libertyissues.com/archive.htm

    That's an index of my PUBLISHED political writing. Look especially to Taxes, Health Care and New Federalism (smirk)

  • Unibro||

    Does it really matter? they're both of literally no consequence to anyone.

  • Mark22||

    Go to his website and judge for yourself. You can also look up more information about him; he seems to be an elderly man living in fairly poor circumstances with not much of a career or accomplishments.

  • Hillary Clinton||

    The truth hurts the most.

  • Michael Hihn||

    The truth hurts the most.

    That's why I enjoyed exposing Mark's bullshit.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Mark22
    Go to his website and judge for yourself

    Undeniable proof of Mark22's insanity is at http://libertyissues.com/index.htm
    Especially check taxes, health care and New Federalism. Don't wet your shorts laughing at thugs like Mark.

    (snort)

  • Red Tony||

    So is the (snort) supposed to emphasize your piggishness, or just that your sinuses need clearing?

    #HihnsanoSoFragile

  • Michael Hihn||

    So is the (snort) supposed to ...

    ... express my joy at calling out a stalking bully. bullshitter

    (snort)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga

    Cyberbullying
    The act of bullying someone through electronic means (as by posting mean or threatening messages about the person online)

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Crybaby bitch Dumbfuck Hihnsano crying like a bitch again.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    He calls THAT crying!!!

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano cries like a bitch, claims he isn't crying like a bitch.

  • Mark22||

    Undeniable proof of Mark22's insanity is at http://libertyissues.com/index.htm

    Yes, Hihn contributed to making the Libertarian party the great success that it is today. His LinkedIn page is also remarkably short.

    As I was saying "he seems to be an elderly man living in fairly poor circumstances with not much of a career or accomplishments".

  • Michael Hihn||

    Called out as a psycho, Markk 22 CHANGES HIS ASSAULT

    Undeniable proof of Mark22's insanity is at http://libertyissues.com/index.htm

    Yes, Hihn contributed to making the Libertarian party the great success that it is today.

    DIVERSION. FAiL.

    His LinkedIn page is also remarkably short.

    DIVERSION. FAIL SHAMELESS

    MARK22 ALSO GOT HUMILIATED ON OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT.
    TO DEFEND THAT FUCKUP ... CHECK THE LINK, IT'S UNBELIEVABLE

    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101816

    1) DENIES that "consent of th e governed" was endorsed by Jefferson and our Founders
    2) DENIES THE CONSTITUTION HAD TO BE RATIFIED!
    3) IGNORANCE of our Declaration of Independence

    Bullies B Blowhards

    (Response in defense of bullying by a stalker for over 6 months. Punishment for humliating him, always in defense of aggression?)

    Left - Right = Zero

  • Michael Hihn||

    Behold the "mind" iof Mark22 (snicker)

    His LinkedIn page is also remarkably short.
    As I was saying "he seems to be an elderly man living in fairly poor circumstances with not much of a career or accomplishments".

    So, because I don't even use LinkedIn -- the sparse page ALONE causes Mark to conclude,, "he seems to be an elderly man living in fairly poor circumstances with not much of a career or accomplishments".

    THAT is hatred out of control
    WHERE IS EVEN THE HINT OF A BRAIN?
    The same stupidity listed just below at 1.21.18 @ 3:15AM (in case it gets interrupted)

    Left - Right = Zero.

    (posted in self-defense)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Undeniable proof throughout this thread that Dumbfuck Hihnsano is a crybaby bitch.

  • Michael Hihn||

    The run in a pack. Like wild dogs. (smirk)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano shitposts. Like a crybaby bitch. (grin)

  • Mark22||

    So, because I don't even use LinkedIn -- the sparse page ALONE causes Mark to conclude,, "he seems to be an elderly man living in fairly poor circumstances with not much of a career or accomplishments".

    There are no accomplishments on your libertyissues.com page and no accomplishments on your LinkedIn page. Hence, I conclude that you seem to have no accomplishments. You're welcome to correct that perception by listing actual accomplishments.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Stalking cyber-bully makes fool of self AGAIN .... even crazier!

    There are no accomplishments on your libertyissues.com page

    PERSONAL AGGRESSION. IT'S A WEB ARCHIVE, WHICH MEANS INACTIVE
    Ad hominem .. because you made a TOTAL ASS OF YOURSELF on the ISSUES
    Again (sneer)

    and no accomplishments on your LinkedIn page. Hence, I conclude that you seem to have no accomplishments.

    PERSONAL AGGRESSION.
    Ad hominem .. because you made a TOTAL ASS of yourself on the ISSUES

    You're welcome to correct that perception by listing actual accomplishments.

    Fuck off, thug.
    You were PUBLICLY Humiliated on the ISSUES. Made a TOTAL ASS of yourself,
    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101819

    1) DENIES that "consent of the governed" was endorsed by Jefferson and our Founders
    2) DENIES THE CONSTITUTION HAD TO BE RATIFIED!
    3) IGNORANCE of our Declaration of Independence

    How can ANYONE be so STUPID on ELEMENTARY History and Civics?
    (Dumb attack by typical thug from the authoritarian right.)

    (Tone and boldface AGAIN self-defense of aggression by a cyber-bully stalking me for over six months ... just as crazy as here)

    NO SHAME. No conscience. Pathetic

  • Hank Phillips||

    Hihn makes the mistake of arguing with mystics and sockpuppets. In clinical circles one talks about the pathetic wretches for the edification of innocent bystanders--if at all. If he had better training in handling multiple assailants there'd be calico and gingham everywhere. Better to focus on methods of causing looters to repeal bad laws.

  • Michael Hihn||

    I already did that. The archive of my writing is here.
    http://libertyissues.com/archive.htm

    What have you done?.

    Hihn makes the mistake of arguing with mystics and sockpuppets

    I correct your errors -- like I just did for got -- and challenge them to do likewise ..,. as I just did for you.

    P.S. Everything at that link was published, publicly -- not just the web -- except one.

  • Deflator Mouse||

    Are you the real Pete in Sioux Falls?

  • Ecoli||

    I think "she" is actually Sue in St. Petersburg.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Did you giggle when you typed that?

  • BestUsedCarSales||

    I'm the stupidest person here. As when I first opened the article and saw 300+ comments, my first thought was "Oh, I bet some good discussion is going on."

  • Aloysious||

    The first thing I did was scroll to the bottom to see if GILMORE italicized the thread. The second thing I did was control+F'd Hihn. 101 matches. This should be a beaut.

  • Michael Hihn||

    control+F'd Hihn. 101 matches

    78% are self-defense from stalking, aggression and cyber-bullying. They seem to be circling like a pack of wild dogs today.

    FEEL the raging hatred

    One .. unibro ... created a new handle, logged on and posted 54 comments (so far) for the sole purpose of stalking and attacking me. That is one VERY sick dude. (The alt-right(

    If the victim of assault calls them out as bullies, thugs and bulshitters ... get this ... it's CRYING!
    Imagine all those whiny Jews at Auschwitz.
    The candy-ass niggers getting lynched.
    Or their own mother objecting to being gang-raped by Muslims.

    They even high-five each others' assaults. SICK fucks,

    RIGHTWING snowflakes are IDENTICAL to leftwing ones. Assault, assault, assault. Shout down ALL different views, It's the only way they can feel manly,
    Just like Trump.
    Sad!

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    RIGHTWING snowflakes are IDENTICAL to leftwing ones. Assault, assault, assault. Shout down ALL different views, It's the only way they can feel manly,

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahah

    (snicker) Like this, chump

    Verbal Aggressiveness
    ...A personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the self-concepts of other people instead of, or in addition to, their positions on topics of communication ... Verbal aggressiveness is thought to be mainly a destructive form of communication

    Verbal hostility, or in other words, verbal harassment or abuse is basically a negative defining statement told to or about you or withholding a response and pretending the abuse is not happening.

    Cyberbullying
    The act of bullying someone through electronic means (as by posting mean or threatening messages about the person online)

    "pretending the abuse isn't happening"
    (snort)

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    (laughing)

  • Michael Hihn||

    And a poor loser too!
    Quite a mess

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Crybaby bitch Dumbfuck Hihnsano crying like a bitch again.

    Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha

  • Michael Hihn||

    The poor loser goes back to getting his ass kicked here
    http://reason.com/blog/2018/01.....nt_7101796

    So repeats the identical fuckup that was jamemd down his throat there.

    Because cut-and-paste

    Hatred + Revenge = Cyber-bullying.

  • Red Tony||

    If hatred and revenge when put together lead to cyberbullying as you claim
    And since you're full of hatred
    And because it appears that you respond to every post with a desire for revenge, an interpretation that is given some credence by the fact you frequently make statements about verbally assraping your enemies (or, on the less disturbing side, jamming their arguments down their throats)
    Then it stands to reason that you yourself are a bully.

  • Michael Hihn||

    Self-defense. The attacker does not dictate the response of his victims.
    Again,. I provide proof, you do more personal attacks.

  • Red Rocks White Privilege||

    Dumbfuck Hihnsano gets his ass kicked throughout the thread, tries to pretend he isn't a crybaby bitch.

  • GILMORE™||

    ""The first thing I did was scroll to the bottom to see if GILMORE italicized the thread.""

    I only do that to people I love.

  • Sevo||

    Now, where's the coverage of the "Trump's a Big Poopyhead" marches?

  • chemjeff||

    This thread really needs some levity.

    Don't Leave Home Without Your Poop Knife

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    More relevant to our interests.

    Don't get your hopes up- if you RTFA it turns out the mom is a total pussy. Libertarian moment, pushed back another day.

  • chemjeff||

    Yeah, too bad. Mom should have sent her to work in the monocle factory.

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    You have to start teaching them about "unpaid internships" sometime.

  • Mark22||

    A Type 3 or 4 on the Bristol Stool Scale... healthy!

  • Sheryl01||

    Nice!

  • Hank Phillips||

    As Bill Murray would say: "I'm gonna miiiiiss those guys!"

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online