Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Sex Trafficking

Feds Convict Elderly Bar Owner Who Allowed Prostitution Upstairs as 'Sex Trafficking Ring Leader'

FBI says Hortencia Medeles-Arguello, 71, "should have known" some of the women were being controlled by pimps.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 4.27.2015 12:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Las Palmas/Facebook
(Las Palmas/Facebook)

Las Palmas/Facebook

The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" columnist, Glenn Kessler, recently tackled human trafficking numbers, cautioning readers to "be wary" of these slippery statistics.* Because "modern slavery" (as advocates like to call it) flies under the radar, real numbers are relatively scarce, notes Kessler. But it's not just a paucity of data that complicates things: "the numbers can vary dramatically depending on the definition—and increasingly, the definition has been stretched."

This seems apropos to mention in light of the FBI's most recent "sex trafficking conspiracy" bust. In an April 24 press release, the agency trumpeted the federal jury conviction of "sex trafficking ring leader" Hortencia Medeles-Arguello, a 71-year-old Houston woman who goes by the nickname "Tencha."

Arguello "has been found guilty on all counts for her leadership role in a 16-defendant sex trafficking conspiracy," the FBI reported. "The verdict was returned today following a 10-day trial and approximately four hours of deliberations. She is the 14th defendant to have been convicted. 13 others have pleaded guilty, while two remain at large. This is believed to be the first sex trafficking case of this magnitude tried in the United States." 

The federal jury found Arguello guilty of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, conspiracy to harbor aliens, aiding and abetting to commit money laundering, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. She will be sentenced in July and faces life in prison. The feds also seized $2.5 million in assets from Arguello and her alleged associates.

So who is this apparent criminal mastermind, and how did she oversee an enterprise involving at least 13 sex-traffickers and countless trafficking victims?

Well, she owned a bar. And she didn't ask too many questions about what people were doing in rented rooms upstairs. 

Under federal anti-trafficking law, anyone who recruits, harbors, transports, provides, obtains, maintains, or benefits financially from someone forced into sex or labor can be charged with human trafficking. Knowing the victim is being trafficked is not a requirement, so long as prosecutors contend that someone acted "in reckless disregard" of this fact. 

At Arguello's trial and in the FBI press release, the focus is on "the horror of the ordeal" that victims, including undocumented immigrants from Mexico, suffered. "Testimony revealed that pimps recruited the young girls by convincing them they were in love, making threats to their families as well as threatening the girls themselves," states the FBI. 

But it doesn't minimize the suffering of these victims to be honest about the scope of this trafficking enterprise. The thread linking all these cases together is simply Arguello's establishment, Las Palmas II, a place where an array of individual actors—including willing sex workers and women who were being victimized by individual, unaffiliated pimps—engaged in commercial sex. The FBI contends that Arguello "should have known" that some of those selling sex in her establishment "were either underage or victims of the beatings by their pimps."

I obviously can't tell you whether Arguello should have known some of these women were being forced. But regardless, she was hardly masterminding some sort of organized smuggling and sexual exploitation ring, which is how federal prosecutors are portraying this. I'm not necessarily saying she's blameless, but that the realities of sex-trafficking cases are almost never as black and white as law enforcement officials would have them seem. 

While Arguello was convicted of sex trafficking, there were no such convictions for the individuals who actually recruited, assaulted, forced into prostitution, and kept money from victims. "The folks who actually did the sex trafficking and the sexual assaults were already sentenced based on favorable plea deals," Arguello's lawyer, Ali Fazel, told My San Antonio. He believes the charges against Arguello are politically motivated.

"They have a 'special' task force dedicated to human trafficking," Fazel said. "If you look the pimps up on this case you will notice they all got 60 months or something like that and none for the offense of sex trafficking," he continued. "So they need to make sure they have something to show folks in D.C. how they are working on the trafficking, justify budget issues."

* My favorite statement on this comes from a 2006 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report calling the U.S. State Department's human trafficking numbers into question. These estimates, GAO noted, were "in doubt because of methodological weaknesses, gaps in data, and numerical discrepancies. For example, the U.S. government's estimate was developed by one person who did not document all his work." [Emphasis mine.]

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Two Gay Men Apologize, Face Boycotts for Talking to Ted Cruz

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Sex TraffickingSex CrimesConspiracy TheoriesFBISex Work
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (33)

Latest

Federal Reserve Defers to Donald Trump by Cutting Interest Rates by 25 Points

Jack Nicastro | 12.10.2025 5:21 PM

The MAHA Administration Bails Out Big Seed Oil

Christian Britschgi | 12.10.2025 4:25 PM

The DOJ Says It Will Challenge Unconstitutional Gun Policies. Maybe It Should Stop Defending Them.

Jacob Sullum | 12.10.2025 3:35 PM

Trump Says China Didn't Buy Soybeans While Biden Was President. Here's What the Data Show.

Eric Boehm | 12.10.2025 2:20 PM

Trump Will Let Nvidia Sell Chips to China—but the Feds Will Get 25 Percent of the Profits

Tosin Akintola | 12.10.2025 11:44 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks