Free Minds & Free Markets

Leave the Strand Alone!

Already a cultural landmark, the Strand is now asking New York City not to declare it one officially.

For book lovers, the Strand near Manhattan's Union Square is a more treasured landmark than the Empire State Building or the Statue of Liberty. The hallowed haunt was opened in 1927 by Lithuanian immigrant Benjamin Bass, who initially filled its shelves with his personal collection of titles. While the store can't match the convenience of Amazon, its patrons are invited to spend hours browsing in its narrow passageways. "Eighteen miles of books" (as the tote bags say) are stuffed into towering cases and every flat surface across four floors.

Already a cultural landmark, the Strand is now asking the city not to declare it one officially. The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission has proposed making it a protected building—but as store owner Nancy Bass Wyden, wife of Democratic Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, tells Reason's Nick Gillespie and Jim Epstein, the Strand has outlived its competitors by remaining "commercially nimble." Regulating the building to preserve it, Wyden explains, could end up destroying the cherished business inside.

Q: Talk about some of the enormous obstacles that your family has overcome to keep this East Coast temple of books open.

A: The store was founded by my grandfather, Benjamin Bass. It was one of 48 bookstores on "Book Row," and he struggled right off the bat because there was so much competition. Then the Depression hit, his wife died, and he ended up having to put my dad and his sister into foster care. He lived on a cot in the basement of the bookstore to survive.

Q: Books were important to him.

A: Books were his life. He went to Columbia but didn't have enough money to finish his degree, so he learned everything from reading.

Q: Book Row is now gone. How did the Strand survive?

A: The Strand survived through my grandfather's and my dad's hard work and their passion. For most of their lives, they worked six days a week, hardly took vacations, and were devoted to keeping the store alive.

My dad, to his credit, started working at age 13. Eventually he saved up all of his money to buy the building. He knew even at a young age that in order to survive in New York City, you have to own the real estate.

Q: Why are you opposed to the city landmarking the Strand?

A: The Strand is not going anywhere. There's no need to protect it. Our family's been a great steward of the building. Landmarking would add another component of government. You add bureaucracy, you add committees, you add people having opinions about what we should do inside the store as well as outside the store. And that does not allow me the flexibility to change with the retail book environment and to serve our customers.

Q: Assume the Strand's building gets designated a landmark, and then you want to renovate. What happens?

A: We already have to go through the Building Department. We already have to get a permit. We already have to get an architect and an engineer. With a landmark designation, we have to go ask this committee that also oversees a huge number of other buildings in New York, and that will get back to us whenever they feel like it with an answer.

It took us two years to just complete the front of the store without the additional layer of landmark status. When we did the restoration, we looked at the granite that was there before and we matched it. We did not need a committee to do that. We've operated the store for 91 years. We've been in this location for 65 years. We've owned the building for 20 years. We do not need their assistance.

Q: Do you worry that you're being selfish? Doesn't the Strand belong to New York?

A: The Landmarks Preservation Commission is not New York. In fact, we recently went to a public hearing about landmarking the Strand and the room was overflowing with people that were on my side.

Q: What do you think explains what the commission is trying to do? They probably like the arts and have shopped at the Strand. How do you explain their indifference to what you're saying?

A: Maybe they feel that they're helping me. I also think that sometimes people are in a position and they need to justify their own existence.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of Nancy Bass Wyden

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • speedylee||

    "A: Maybe they feel that they're helping me. I also think that sometimes people are in a position and they need to justify their own existence."


  • JeffreyL||

    You voted for these idiots. Enjoy the result, good and hard

  • a ab abc abcd abcde abcdef ahf||

    Wyden's wife? He's good on some things, but still a statist prick, and I find it hard to believe she doesn't support his policies in general. Not her fault she inherited a family business in NYC. Unless he lives in Oregon and ... well, none of my business, but still .... you don't get to pick and choose which parts of government harass you and which parts harass the people who deserve it. You support nannies with guns, you get nannies with guns.

  • Duelles||

    She understands government interference! I do wonder if her sensibilities can be imparted to her democrat husband. Conquer the world one Senator at a time. . . . Just a fantasy, I know

  • Hattori Hanzo||

    But...but...that shit I supported was supposed to be for the people. Not for me.

  • Sevo||

    Remember the woman who supported O-care and then got her new insurance bill? The one who said "I knew somebody was going to have to pay for it, but I didn't think it was me."?
    I do.

  • Echospinner||

    This is real. I know this.

    Forget the snark. This is the city purely blocking property rights.

    If you have enough to work the local government, as certain people can, but this old family bookstore is not Trump Tower.

    So her investment is emotional. She does not want to sell.

    As a lifelong reader, I get it.

    Been a long time since I have wandered the dusty bookshelves. Never regreted a minute of it. Younger people will not know what that was about.

    Always focus on the individual.

  • Sevo||

    "Always focus on the individual."

    I see nothing other than that.
    The individual is someone perfectly happy to use the government for her ends, and now that the government is used for someone else's ends, she's whining.
    Goose and gander; stuff it, lady.

  • williammartial50||

    Very well explained, thanks for sharing.

  • operagost||

    The ARROGANCE of this lady, to think she knows better than the government what to do with the city's book store! Because it is the city's, you know. It's in the city, so it's the city's. /s

    I'm sure she's very left-wing in her other opinions, though. Rarely does an entrenched city dweller ever become enlightened enough to see the big picture. Her husband is what passes for a moderate Democrat these days, being for free trade and legalization of cannabis but also for gun control.

  • Helvetica Standard||

    Am I supposed to feel bad for someone who voted this kind of stuff in? Something something having to lay in the bed you've made etc.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online