Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Movie Review: The Cloverfield Paradox

Space is not the place for J.J. Abrams’ stumbling franchise.

NetflixNetflixYou'll recall that at the end of 10 Cloverfield Lane, the previous entry in this sorta-franchise, an escaping Mary Elizabeth Winstead was on her way to Houston to…

Well, it doesn't matter what she was on her way to Houston to do, does it? Because in the same way that Lane had only the most tenuous connection to the 2008 Cloverfield, which launched this series, the latest installment—The Cloverfield Paradox—is essentially an unrelated story, based on a vagabond script that had been bouncing around for a while before being acquired by producer J.J. Abrams, who retrofitted it into his hazily conceived Cloverfield universe.

Apparently Abrams thought a brief shot of a ravening beastie tacked onto the end of the picture (sorry, spoiler-phobes) would be enough to make the Cloverfield connection. I think not, and apparently neither did Paramount Pictures, which decided to dump this long-gestating baby onto Netflix in exchange for a reported $50-million. This allowed the studio to save the untold bushels of money it would have had to spend on a theatrical release. It also enabled Netflix to score some high-profile publicity by airing the movie's first and only trailer during last Sunday's Super Bowl broadcast, and then releasing the whole movie online right after the game. So everybody's pretty happy, I guess. Except for those who've gotten suckered into watching this limp flick.

"Cloverfield," in this iteration, is the name of a space station orbiting high above the Earth. Down below, a worldwide energy shortage has set the community of nations at each other's throats. (The nature of the crisis isn't entirely clear; at least it's not global warming.) The only hope for humankind is a group of seven scientists onboard the space station (they're played by the over-qualified Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Daniel Brühl, David Oyelowo, and Zhang Ziyi, among others). These hotshots are charged with revving up a big particle accelerator that—once it gets going—will bring peace to the world by providing an endless stream of free energy, forever.

As if. In a TV transmission from Earth, we see a very worked-up talking head (Donal Logue) warning that there'll be a price to pay for "ripping open the membrane of space-time" and unleashing "chaos the likes of which we have never seen—monsters, demons, beasts from the sea." When he puts it that way, it does sound bad.

Logue's puffed-up pontificator is one of the hand-me-downs from the low-budget sci-fi films of the 1950s that have been such a charming part of the Cloverfield movies. Until now, Abrams and his various directors (here, Julius Onah) were doing an enjoyable job of rehabilitating this disreputable genre for a new era. But the fun has petered out. The Paradox plot has been too awkwardly repurposed for the Cloverfield universe—the focus-grouped seams are everywhere apparent. The abundant borrowings from earlier sci-fi pics—from 2001 to Alien to Sunshine—are a constant reminder that the filmmakers have come up with nothing new of their own. And the movie has its own energy problem: it's such a dull exercise, you become ever more aware of how much it drags.

The story? There's an arm-chewing spaceship bulkhead, and a matching chewed-off arm that wants a pen and paper. There's a Russian guy who's filled with worms, and an eerie blonde (Elizabeth Debicki) who turns out to be a traveler from another dimension. There's also a space fistfight, a space chick fight, and one crew member who announces—unnecessarily, you'd think— "I'm a physicist." Says another: "This dimension is eating us alive." Says yet another: "Logic doesn't apply to any of this." Unfortunately, that's the least of this movie's problems.

Photo Credit: Netflix

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    decided to dump this long-gestating baby onto Netflix

    Netflix: the new January.

  • JoeBlow123||

    JJ Abrams is a hack. I hope he disappears into the ether like M. Night Shymalan.

  • Citizen X - #6||

    Twist - Abrams was Shyamalan THE WHOLE TIME.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    These are three completely different types of movies tied together for some reason with the same name.

  • Rhywun||

    Another thing they have in common is my compelte lack of interest in watching them.

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    Skip Cloverfield. See Cloverfield Lane.

  • Rhywun||

    Well, the blurb about it does sound interesting. Gotta admit I didn't know a sequel existed.

  • Agammamon||

    You didn't read the article - it doesn't.

  • Rhywun||

    I did so read the article. OK, "sequel". Better?

  • StackOfCoins||

    10 Cloverfield Lane is a great movie until the last 10~ minutes. As far as I know, JJ is entirely responsible for that last 10 minutes.

    He really needs to stop sabotaging films.

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    It was serviceable.

  • JoeBlow123||

    Honestly, it was a good movie. I still dislike JJ Abrams with a fiery passion.

  • sarcasmic||

    Thanks for the warning.

  • Rhywun||

    There's an arm-chewing spaceship bulkhead, and a matching chewed-off arm that wants a pen and paper. There's a Russian guy who's filled with worms, and an eerie blonde (Elizabeth Debicki) who turns out to be a traveler from another dimension. There's also a space fistfight, a space chick fight, and one crew member who announces—unnecessarily, you'd think— "I'm a physicist."

    Sounds like there could be space vampires. Are there space vampires?

  • KL||

    To the movie's enormous detriment, there are in fact no space vampires.

  • Rhywun||

    Rats.

  • StackOfCoins||

    The space vampire genre is an untapped resource.

  • Rhywun||

    Well, once-tapped, amirite?

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    Give me time.

  • LynchPin1477||

    JJ Abrams should not be let around stories of any importance.

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    Because in the same way that Lane had only the most tenuous connection to the 2008 Cloverfield

    that's what made 'Lane' a much better movie than Cloverfield.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    I really can't figure out which film came first. I've read that this one was in the works before the first one, but then I've read here that this one is a repurposed movie or script.

  • prolefeed||

    This movie will steal time from your life. It's that bad.

  • DrZ||

    There may be something wrong with me. I watched it for nearly 15 minutes before bailing out.

    I think I need to consult with a professional.

  • Iheartskeet||

    Same. To my shame, it telegraphed it's dullness and stupidity almost immediately, yet I continued to watch. New rule: bail at the first mention of an energy crisis.

  • New Cassandra||

    I watched it last night. I demand the wasted 2 hours of my. Li life back.

  • JoeB||

    Zhang Ziyi? Is that the same Zhang Ziyi from Crouching Tiger...? Is she still smoking? Is she is she is she???

  • Telcontar the Wanderer||

    Naw, man, she finally quit! Vaping, man, I fuckin' tell ya: it's a goddamn miracle.

  • jelabarre||

    Hmmm, a giant particle-accelerator (presuming that's what the Manefestation Engine is) supplying enough energy for the whole world, and interdimensional aliens invading because of it. Thanks, but I'll watch Vividred Operation instead. Much more fun/lighthearted, if you don't mind the animators' obsession with the gluteus maximus.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online