Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Self-Defense

Twin Falls Shooting Underlines the Need for Taking Self-Defense Seriously

Armed people at the scene of the crime fired on the attacker and drove him away.

J.D. Tuccille | 8.7.2026 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
A grainy photo of a man in a hat aiming a gun. | Lane Koehn
(Lane Koehn)

I recently wrote that more Americans than ever before are carrying firearms for protection, with about 30 percent of the population toting a gun in public at least some of the time. The reason for that growing commitment to armed self defense was underlined last Saturday when a gunman opened fire at an In-N-Out Burger in Twin Falls, Idaho, only to be driven off by people at the spot who were willing to fight back.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Armed Bystander Hailed as a Hero

"An armed bystander has been hailed as a hero after firing at a gunman during a shooting at an In-N-Out Burger restaurant in southern Idaho, with law enforcement saying it diverted the gunman and saved lives," Newsweek reported. "Jordan Salinas, 35, a healthcare worker from Kimberly, Idaho, was identified as the man who fired at the gunman."

Salinas was armed with a suppressed FN Five-Seven, which might make him the only person in the country to pick that unusual setup for everyday carry—though his actions may inspire others. Salinas was joined by Austin James, a former state trooper. James was wounded when he charged the shooter and helped drive him off. Also armed, James "intentionally didn't draw his weapon because he didn't want to be mistaken as the suspect by responding law enforcement," reports the Idaho Statesman.

Three people—Ashley Garibay, Christopher Claunch, and Dale Schultz—were murdered before the gunman retreated and took his own life. As awful as the crime was, quick response by those at the scene kept it from being a lot worse.

Deaths Minimized by Those Willing To Engage

"Perhaps the biggest lesson is that the presence of someone armed and willing to engage kept the death count under 10," commented John P. Correia, the founder of Active Self Protection, which educates people in matters of self-defense. Correia's observation after the Twin Falls incident builds on insights from firearms trainer Ed Monk, author of First 30 Seconds: The Active Shooter Problem, who argues that killers bent on mass murder must be met with defensive force within the first 30 seconds to avoid a double-digit body count.

Quick action by Salinas, the trooper, and James almost certainly kept a bad situation from becoming worse and far more deadly.

Correia added that the incident offers a couple of lessons. The first: "Carry your gun. You don't get to set the time and place of needing it, the perp does and he will only tell you about it at the last minute." He adds that "wherever you are present you need to be armed and willing to love your neighbor if the need arises to protect them from death at the hands of a madman."

That is, if a would-be mass murderer decides that the path from an inconsequential life to eternal fame lies over a stack of bodies of innocent people, waiting for the authorities to arrive and "do something" is more likely to benefit the killer than to protect potential victims. People are well advised to take responsibility for their own safety and that of those around them.

Trained To Respond

If you're going to respond to a threat, knowing what to do and how to do it effectively improves the odds of a good outcome. James presumably had training from the Idaho State Police, which includes Active Shooter Response in its academy's curriculum. Salinas also "began training seriously after a 2021 shooting at the Boise Towne Square mall" using a "four-step approach borrowed from the military" (apparently the OODA loop: observe, orient, decide, act) according to the Idaho Statesman. It's not clear if he worked with an instructor or on his own, but it was enough that he rose to the occasion in Twin Falls.

"The return fire drove the shooter from the drive-through, toward an open parking lot at the city's visitor center. Williams later died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound," noted the Statesman.

Law enforcement quickly recognized the effectiveness of the actions taken by people at the scene.

"I want to extend my deepest thanks to the off-duty trooper and the good citizen that engaged the shooter," Twin Falls County Sheriff Jack Johnson said at a Sunday press conference. "These people are true heroes in our community, and their actions diverted the shooter and no doubt saved many lives."

I've recommended in the past that people seek self-defense training that suits their abilities and willingness to act. My wife, son, and I have all trained at Arizona's Gunsite Academy. I've since worked with an independent trainer and I practice my skills with live ammunition approximately once each week and complement that with dry fire and a laser cartridge. Good quality training is available across the country from dedicated facilities as well as from trainers who work on their own.

All the training in the world won't do much good, though, if you're unarmed when somebody decides that it's a good day to go out in a blaze of infamy. That's why the roughly 30 percent of the population carrying firearms for self-defense is a nice start, but not the final word. It breaks down, according to the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), into 13.2 percent who "carry all/most of the time" and 16.6 percent "carrying sometimes/rarely." Those who carry intermittently will be able to respond when they are exercising their self-defense rights, but they'll be as unprepared as those who never carry if an attack occurs on a day when they leave their guns at home.

Being Prepared To Act Is Better Than Wishing It Wasn't Necessary

Notably, it doesn't appear that either the off-duty trooper or Salinas hit the In-N-Out shooter with their return fire. Unlike Elisjsha Dicken, who put down a mass shooter with long-distance shots at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Indiana, in 2022, the responders in Twin Falls seem to have driven off the murderer without striking him. It's best to hit the shooter when possible (Dicken, it should be noted, acted within 15 seconds), but suppressive fire can also be effective against a thug who unexpectedly discovers the meaning of "consequences."

Those who would disarm the American people have been losing ground for years as people increasingly embrace the practical and recreational aspects of shooting, as evolving technology makes it ever easier to manufacture weapons at home, and as the courts recognize the Constitution's Second Amendment protections for inherent self-defense rights.

It would be nice to live in a world in which acquiring self-defense skills and the means to implement them isn't necessary. But events in Twin Falls once again demonstrate that's not the world in which we live. It's best to be able to respond to threats than to wish they didn't exist.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Review: Feuding Neighbors Snoop on Their Enemies

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Self-DefenseMass ShootingsGunsGun OwnersConcealed CarryRight to carryFirearms LawFirearms Crimes
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    Still no motive....:/

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      The shortest route from an inconsequential life to eternal fame, so the shooter thought..I don’t recall what his name was

      1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

        If the media would just voluntarily refer to every one of these shooters as "Some Asshole" I bet we'd see an immediate drop in the incidence of these things.

        Just sayin'.

        1. Z Crazy   2 months ago

          How does this apply to gangland shootings?

          1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

            "Some assholes began shooting each other..."

            Oh wait. Maybe gangland shootings SHOULD be glorified so they'll kill each other off? Unless they hit innocent victims, then:

            "Some asshole gangster shot an innocent passerby when..."

            Still works, I guess... Probably not as effective...

          2. Wizard4169   1 month ago

            It doesn't. Gang shootings usually involve money or turf, not a quest for notoriety.

        2. mad.casual   2 months ago

          Covers the 'alleged' issue too. Even if somebody brought a gun to a Church or School and somehow pulled it out on accident or whatever, "Some asshole pulled a gun at a school."

        3. KiwiDude   2 months ago

          The christchurch mosque gunman killed 51, the Prime Minister asked the media to not name him.
          Not in a voldemort way but a fuck you, you aint getting famous off us
          Absolutely should be done each time

          1. d.b   1 month ago

            KiwiDude; David Crosby said almost that exact same thing after John Lennon was murdered. We have to stop making little pricks with three names famous.

    2. Wizard4169   1 month ago

      Mass shooters often lack any motive beyond a desire for fame, or at least notoriety.

  2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

    So is the plan to let more people out of prison yo provide more self-defense opportunities?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Only after defunding the police.

      1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

        Should that ever occur I’m really going to be strapped up wherever I go

      2. Wizard4169   1 month ago

        Not as dumb as Social, but still lame and tired.

    2. Wizard4169   1 month ago

      This is the stupidest thing I've read today, but the day is young.

  3. docduracoat   2 months ago

    The off duty police officer who responded deliberately did not bring his gun out of his car.
    He said he did not want to be shot by other first responders as a “man with a gun”.
    So he got shot in the arm by the terrorist with a gun.

    The hero citizen has previously published videos of himself practicing in the desert.
    He even already has a catchphrase taken from those videos.
    “Stay Frosty!”

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      The hero citizen has previously published videos of himself practicing in the desert.

      My understanding is that he is, or was, caregiver for his infirm brother and was present for a previous incident. While everyone else was seeking cover, he and his brother were left with fewer options. Lessons learned, he expanded his options. The way freedom is supposed to work.

    2. d.b   1 month ago

      "The off duty police officer who responded deliberately did not bring his gun out of his car.
      He said he did not want to be shot by other first responders as a man with a gun”.
      THE TAKEAWAY: Even pigs don't trust pigs.

  4. Grifhunter   2 months ago

    "The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the former cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."

    Col. Jeff Cooper

  5. MichaelK   2 months ago

    After reading this article, I was so confused that I asked for help.

    AI agent replied:
    You are not confused because you missed something. The Reason article is confusingly written and appears to blur together two different law-enforcement figures. Its own wording becomes internally inconsistent.

    Should I drop my subscription and just ask AI about what exactly happened when they mention something in the email?

    1. CE   2 months ago

      AI comprehension is around an 8th grade level right now, no wonder it couldn't keep up.

      1. MichaelK   2 months ago

        That's quite a funny answer. I've used it for 3+ years and know its flaws and strong sides exactly. Its description of what happened is much more precise than what is written in the article:

        Where Reason went wrong

        Here is the key problem. Reason writes:

        Salinas was “joined by Austin James, a former state trooper.”

        It then immediately explains that James didn't draw his weapon and was wounded while charging the shooter. But a few paragraphs later Reason says:

        “Quick action by Salinas, the trooper, and James…”

        That sentence plainly treats “the trooper” and “James” as two different people.

        And that latter formulation accords with the subsequent reporting: Salinas + unnamed off-duty trooper + James = three separate intervenors.

        There may be an additional wrinkle: James apparently had law-enforcement experience beyond his service with Twin Falls police, and some reports describe him as a former state trooper as well. But he was not the unnamed off-duty trooper whom police said returned fire.

        So if your question was, “How could the off-duty officer exchange fire if the article just told me that he intentionally didn't draw his gun?” — the answer is: he couldn't. Those statements refer to two different men. Reason did a poor job of making that distinction.

  6. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    [D]emon-craps are calling, "OMG! Take those 'Guns' away from law abiding heroes! What a disgrace!". /s

  7. CE   2 months ago

    Dems are always saying, "how come we never hear about a good guy with a gun stopping a mass shooting?" It's because fewer people die and it's not as big of a story nationally.

    Look up the Greenwood Park Mall shooting, from 2022 in Indiana.
    Never heard of it? That's because this happened:

    At 5:56:48 p.m. on July 17, 2022, the perpetrator began firing into the food court area of the mall...

    Fifteen seconds after the shooting began, Elisjsha Dicken, a legally-armed 22-year-old man from Seymour, engaged the shooter in a gunfight...

    From a distance of forty yards, Dicken fired ten rounds from a Glock 19 handgun, hitting the shooter eight times.

    1. Wizard4169   1 month ago

      I'm just thrilled Dicken didn't catch any shit for violating Greenwood Park's gun-free policy. Not that it ever stopped me either. Like the man said, better judged by twelve than carried by six. Lucky for me, I never needed to use it.

  8. Wizard4169   1 month ago

    Not sure what was the point of running away only to cap himself. Might as well go down blazing just in case you can take out one or two more. Then again, mass shooters aren't exactly famous for their rationality.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

AOC's World

Liz Wolfe | 9.22.2026 9:33 AM

Flock's Gunfire Alerts Raise a New Fourth Amendment Question

Del Schlangen | 9.22.2026 8:00 AM

Biden's Team Wanted War in the Middle East Without Owning It

Matthew Petti | 9.22.2026 7:30 AM

Brickbat: Unclipped

Charles Oliver | 9.22.2026 4:00 AM

Judge Blocks Warrantless ICE Construction Site Raids After Agents in Alabama Arrested a U.S. Citizen 3 Times

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.21.2026 3:24 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason