Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Iran

Just Don't Call It a War

Plus: AOC says you can't earn a billion dollars, Mythos, hantavirus, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 5.8.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Gridley (DDG 101), April 26, 2026. | US NAVY
(US NAVY)

U.S. and Iran exchange fire, but the official line is that it's not a resumption of the war.

This is obviously in the eye of the beholder, but it is probably good that war has rhetorically fallen out of favor to such a degree that the Trump administration is at least making noises in the direction of restraint.

Of course, reality matters more than rhetoric. Here's what's happening: Iran struck three American destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz, so the U.S. struck Iran's military facilities that had carried out the destroyer attacks. "U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) eliminated inbound threats and targeted Iranian military facilities responsible for attacking U.S. forces including missile and drone launch sites; command and control locations; and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance nodes," reads their statement. "CENTCOM does not seek escalation but remains positioned and ready to protect American forces."

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Project Freedom—President Donald Trump's plan to ensure safe passage for ships stuck in the strait, which safely got two ships out before provoking more Iranian ire—was stopped soon after it started. It's not clear what the fate of the mission will be, or how the U.S. military can work to help ships through the Strait of Hormuz.

"The U.S. military began quietly laying the groundwork for an operation to roll back Iran's influence over the strait in April, sending uncrewed sea drones into the area to scan for mines to help eventually establish a new safe shipping lane along the southern edge of the strait, according to defense officials," reports The Wall Street Journal. But there were critical problems with Trump's plan "for the destroyers to provide an antimissile umbrella, while U.S. helicopters would protect against Iranian attack boats." He may not have had sufficient firepower, given the ongoing blockade of Iranian ports. It doesn't seem like the operation ultimately made much of a dent, and Iran seems hellbent on continuing to reassert its dominance in the strait.

Tariff update: "A three-judge panel at the U.S Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled Thursday evening that Trump's 10 percent 'global tariff' is unlawful," writes Reason's Eric Boehm. "The president imposed those tariffs in February, just hours after the U.S. Supreme Court blocked Trump's attempt to use emergency powers to impose a sweeping set of tariffs on most imports." Trump attempted to use an obscure section of the Trade Act of 1974 that allows for the imposition of temporary tariffs if there are "large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits," which the U.S., crucially, does not have.

"That view was vindicated by the CIT," continues Boehm, "which ruled Thursday that the president cannot impose tariffs under Section 122 without that prerequisite."


Scenes from New York: I don't know what this means: "you can't earn a billion dollars." (I'm putting this in SFNY because the "I'm rich but I refuse to acknowledge it" shtick feels endemic to this place in particular and the people who come from it, as noted before.) I can think of plenty of ways to earn a billion dollars: Making something many millions of people want and are willing to pay for, that massively enriches (or extends, in the case of pharmaceuticals) their lives. And, logically speaking, how could one justly earn a few million dollars but not a billion? Where does the line get drawn and who gets to draw it? Is there any tier of judgment, decision making, or responsibility that warrants vastly more pay than any other?

AOC: "There's a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned. You can't earn a billion dollars. You just can't earn that. You can get market power, you can break rules, you can abuse labor laws, you can pay people less than what they're worth, but you can't earn… pic.twitter.com/tUi9xTlQ2B

— Marco Foster (@MarcoFoster_) May 7, 2026


QUICK HITS

  • Seems bad: "Salvadoran investigative outlet El Faro announced Thursday that two of its members' assets, including a bank account and property, were frozen, in what it denounced as an escalation of political persecution for its work exposing corruption in the government of President Nayib Bukele," reports the Associated Press.
  • "It feels so much like early COVID, particularly with public health authorities making very complacent remarks that 'it's not that transmissible, contact tracing will work, quarantine will work,'" writes software engineer Fernando Borretti on the hantavirus that's spreading, which originated on a cruise ship. "Complacency at the start, and severity at the end, is exactly why COVID was such a fuckup." It's interesting how many of the countries are handling their hanta cases: expecting self-isolation for up to 45 days, which seems like something nobody will actually follow through on, while other places like Singapore are way more intense about it. (The virus' long incubation period is part of what makes it so challenging.)
  • How do we feel about Mythos? (More here.)

Not a good day for team "Claude Mythos is just marketing hype." pic.twitter.com/bOP52VzAfw

— Timothy B. Lee (@binarybits) May 7, 2026

  • Relatedly, I would love to see someone excellent get hired by my friend Mike Solana to delve into what the people crafting these large language models (LLMs) actually believe.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: ATF Rule Changes Could Ease Restrictions for Gun Owners and Dealers

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

IranWarMiddle EastMilitaryTrump AdministrationVirusPublic HealthAlexandria Ocasio-CortezWealthReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (27)

Latest

Just Don't Call It a War

Liz Wolfe | 5.8.2026 9:30 AM

ATF Rule Changes Could Ease Restrictions for Gun Owners and Dealers

J.D. Tuccille | 5.8.2026 7:00 AM

Review: The Boring History for Sleep Podcast Mostly Delivers on Its Promise

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the June 2026 issue

Brickbat: Bad Day

Charles Oliver | 5.8.2026 4:00 AM

Federal Court: Trump's Newest Tariffs Are Also Illegal

Eric Boehm | 5.7.2026 6:06 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks