Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Jeff Bezos

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

The rich pay more than their "fair share."

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) is trotting out a familiar, false line of attack against Amazon founder and billionaire Jeff Bezos, who co-sponsored the Met Gala this year.

"If Jeff Bezos can drop $10 million to sponsor the Met Gala, he can afford to pay his fair share in taxes," she wrote on X.

What would it mean for Bezos to pay his fair share? Is his fair share more than $2.7 billion? Because that's how much he likely paid in taxes in 2024, according to Forbes.

Bezos' wealth largely consists of the stock he owns in Amazon. When he cashes in shares of stock, he pays taxes. That's how it works for everyone. It doesn't make sense to tax people based on the theoretical value of the stock they own; that would mean taxing unrealized gains, i.e., the projected value of the asset before it's sold. Even Rep. Ro Khanna (D–Calif.), a progressive and supporter of heavier taxation on billionaires, at one point understood that such a tax would discourage entrepreneurs from investing in their own companies and instead force them to sell off assets to private equity firms.

And what if the value of the company falls? Should the government pay back the money under such a scheme, or would an unrealized gains tax work in just one direction? This is obviously unworkable.

Moreover, the broader leftist notion—one made popular by Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.)—that the rich are paying less in taxes than everyone else is simply false. The U.S. tax code is extremely progressive: Lower-income people shoulder a significantly smaller tax burden than richer Americans. For federal income tax, the vast majority of revenue—upwards of 97 percent—is raised off the top half of income earners.

It's possible to further raise taxes on rich Americans, of course. New York City and California have proposed to do just that. They may find out, however, that the wealthy can only put up with so much pain before they flee to red states. That's because the federal government is already confiscating an obscene amount of money from them.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The People vs. CEQA

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Jeff BezosElizabeth WarrenPoliticsTax ReformTaxes
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (9)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Joe   5 hours ago

    "When he cashes in shares of stock, he pays taxes. That's how it works for everyone."

    Unless said shares were in a Roth IRA. See Thiel, Peter.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Stupid Government Tricks   55 minutes ago

      Then he's got a whole lot of taxes deferred to when he withdraws it. That's the whole point of IRAs. Maybe you need to look up Required Minimum Distributions too.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 hours ago

    This is why you can’t have chicks in office.

    Log in to Reply
  3. See Double You   4 hours ago

    If he's rich, he doesn't pay his fair share.

    Log in to Reply
  4. KiwiDude   4 hours ago

    "Elizabeth Warren's net worth is estimated to be between $7 million and $12 million as of 2025-2026". From AI

    Sound like she's not paying enough tax

    Log in to Reply
    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   4 hours ago

      And I think her net worth is much hirer, wealth being somewhat subjective. Force her to sell her home to prove it isn't worth a billion dollars.

      Log in to Reply
  5. Iwanna Newname   3 hours ago

    Folks on the public dole and low income people don't pay any federal taxes for government provided services. When are they going to pay their fair share?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Eeyore   3 hours ago

      If Obamacare could introduce a tax penalty for failure to buy health insurance - I think we could tax people for failure to work at least 40 hours a week. I'm glad they never enforced those penalties, but they could try changing their minds now that the exchange insurance companies are almost broke.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Social Justice is neither   1 hour ago

    Really depends on what he's doing. He could be funding his life by selling shares, he could do so by borrowing against the value of his shares and save the tax hit for a later time. Either way it would be dumb to demand more in taxes because of the consequences of punishing success.

    Also, anyone else find it funny millionaires with tax shelter companies are boycotting this because someone is more successful than they are.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Why the Courts Will 86 the Flagrantly Unconstitutional Charges Against James Comey

Jacob Sullum | 5.5.2026 11:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks