Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Taxes

60% of Americans Agree Taxes Are Too High. Here Are 4 Other Reasons To Hate the Tax System.

A noncomprehensive list

Meagan O'Rourke | 4.15.2026 6:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
tax-2026-v1 | Internal Revenue Service/GCapture/Dreamstime
(Internal Revenue Service/GCapture/Dreamstime)

Happy Tax Day, if such a thing can exist. Today marks the last day that most Americans can file their taxes with Uncle Sam or else face financial consequences.

For most people, tax filing is stressful and messy. And even though average refunds are expected to significantly jump thanks to the GOP's sprawling tax bill from last year, nearly 60 percent of Americans say taxes are still too high, according to a new Gallup poll. But the burden of paying taxes is more than monetary. Here are four other reasons to loathe tax season.

 

1. Filing Taxes Can Cost Significant Resources

In addition to spending about $290 on out-of-pocket costs, the average American dedicates 13 hours of their time filing an individual tax return, according to the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. Americans can thank their government for this. As Reason's Joe Lancaster noted in 2024, "The amount of effort and expense required is due to the tax code's complexity." Since 1955, the length of the documents detailing the federal tax code and regulations has increased by about 144,500 words a year, according to estimates by the Tax Foundation.

 

2. What Counts as 'Income' May Surprise You

The government's desire for your money knows no bounds. If you did your civic duty by reporting for jury duty, you have to pay taxes on the jury duty income and report it on the "other" income section of your 1040 form. If you sell stamps and make a profit from your philatelic activities, you need to report those capital gains to the IRS. Even working with a travel agency can cost you: If you organize a tour for a big group through an agency, and the agency throws in a complimentary tour, it's not free. You have to report the value of the tour as income. Reward money earned from giving the police a hot tip must be counted as income and taxed by the government. If you profited from illegal activities or stole something, Uncle Sam wants to know about it. There is, however, a notable exception to reporting illegal goods. If you return a stolen item within a year, you do not have to report its value as income.

 

3. Taxes Are Wielded as Tools of Social Engineering

As Reason Contributing Editor Veronique de Rugy notes, "The tax code is neither fair nor neutral. It punishes and rewards all sorts of behaviors based on what government officials decide is good or bad." Depending on a couple's income levels, getting married could increase or decrease a couple's tax bill. Child tax credits, which have now increased to $2,200 per child under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, favor parents over childless adults by design. The tax code has not only attempted to impact family planning, but major purchases, too. During the Biden administration, taxpayers were incentivized to buy electric cars with generous tax credits that could reduce a filer's tax liability come tax season. The credits have since expired.

 

4. The System Hides Government Spending

Under the withholding system, employers withhold income taxes from paychecks and send them to the government to finance spending initiatives. While this might reduce someone's liability, it also insulates taxpayers from understanding the full breadth of the federal government's spending. Before the withholding system, Americans paid their income taxes in a lump sum, which forced taxpayers to reckon with the crushing cost of government (although income taxes were much lower back then). Then, during World War II, a group of Treasury Department economists, including Milton Friedman, created the withholding system to raise taxes during wartime. Friedman later told Reason that it was a "great mistake" to keep the withholding system during peacetime, and he wished he could have abolished it after the war.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Cash Is King

Meagan O'Rourke is an associate editor at Reason.

TaxesIncome taxBig GovernmentFederal AgenciesFiscal policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (65)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

    Taxation is theft!

    1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

      So name a country that doesn't tax? People that want no taxes but have all they want will have to wait for heaven.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        The USA *before* the [Na]tional So[zi]alist invasion.
        Next dumb question.

        1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

          Not very well informed are you. I remember learning about the whiskey rebellion in American history. I am pretty sure the whiskey tax was long before socialism.

          1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

            "Oh look everyone!" ... Excise and Tariffs paying for National Defense! /s
            As the Union of States was created to do...
            How did I know you'd pull that bunny excuse out of your hat of BS?
            Next dumb excuse.

            1. charliehall   2 months ago

              Another ignorant statement from an idiot. When excises and tariffs were enacted in 1789, there was no navy and the only army was a tiny group of soldiers guarding supplies at West Point, the only military base in the country.

              1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

                Thus there was NO significant taxation.
                And today taxation in that category (National Defense) is only 13% of total tax.
                Speaking of 'ignorance' how did you manage to miss that 87% of taxing for [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism]?

        2. charliehall   2 months ago

          Yet another ignorant statement from an idiot. There were taxes everywhere in colonial America starting with the earliest colonization. Head taxes, property taxes, excise taxes, even export taxes which would be banned under the US Constitution. George Washington was in arrears on his property taxes when he was elected President. Before 1800 there were tariffs, excise taxes, and property taxes enacted by the federal government.

          1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

            Needless to mention "the colonies" weren't yet the USA.

            From which the NO Individual income tax duty was initiated ...
            "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes" ... "all ***Duties, Imposts and Excises*** shall be uniform throughout the United States"

            It wasn't until 1913 when [D]emon-craps instituted not only the Individual Income Tax 16th Amendment but also the Federal Reserve Act to launch the [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire.

      2. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

        Taxes are likely inevitable, doesn't make them any less theft.

        1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

          I'd argue that bound by "The Peoples" law over their government, tax would be just US Citizen dues.

          But what we have today is by every definition 'armed-theft' (i.e. STEALING just to benefit others).

          And of course it'll be the leftarded to try and equate the 'illegal' with the 'legal'.
          It has literally been their main mantra for the last decade.

      3. charliehall   2 months ago

        Saudi Arabia. But it has a Socialist oil industry.
        Somalia. But it doesn't have a government.

    2. Rick James   2 months ago

      Unless it's not regressive!

  2. docduracoat   2 months ago

    As a physician, I am in the top 10% of earners.
    I have an accountant and he finds me all the legal ways to reduce my taxes.
    Hiring more IRS employees to go after “ the rich” is useless as I and my doctor friends are all on the allowed side of the line.

    Going after the plumbers and house cleaners and air conditioning guys who ask for cash payment is where the money will be found.

    Those 87,000 armed IRS agents Biden wanted would be knocking on the blue collar workers doors

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      This. Think Musk and Gates are using TurboTax and cheating? They've got a small army of accountants and tax lawyers who make sure everything is done correctly, so going after them is unlikely to yield much.

      Then you've got a million waitresses and gig workers not claiming their tips, contractors working for cash, 1/3 of EITC payments are for kids that never existed, people just not filing. Not to mention the 150,000 or so federal employees who owe about $2B in back taxes.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Sorry, but the correct answer is that anyone who is rich is cheating, and violating the progressive moral code.

  3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    But 80% want to RAISE taxes...on other people, of course, not themselves, never themselves.

    1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

      That is fundamental to the US. We know taxes are needed and we know someone else should really be paying them.

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        But where's the limit?

        How much tax is too much?

        1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

          Where is the limit? Well the limit is really an abstract value. In some cases the limit is what will people accept. Sin taxes are the best example here and if the sin taxes go too high people will often switch to the black market for products. Overall taxes should be enough to cover government expenses. If taxes are leveled appropriately to government expenses, people will then have to decide if a service is worth the expense. When expenses are put on the national debt people are getting below cost services and often feel no need to reduce government expenses.

          1. See.More   2 months ago

            . . . If taxes are leveled appropriately to government expenses, people will then have to decide if a service is worth the expense. . .

            What if, Federal programs were funded by scratch-off lottery tickets; each program gets its own "game" card; programs' funding comes solely from sale of their corresponding "game" cards; individuals cannot be coerced into purchasing Fed program "game" cards; and if a program is not funded, it is scrapped?

            That is truly voluntary and people can literally vote for the programs they want with their wallets.

            1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

              A scratch off lottery ticket would likely just shift taxes to poor people who actually buy lottery tickets. But how about this idea. Congress funds, or is expected to fund, 12 appropriation bills that I list below. What if you submit your taxes, which is the same amount as always, but you can submit what percentage of your taxes go into each appropriation bill.

              1.Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA
              2.Commerce, Justice, Science
              3.Defense
              4.Energy and Water Development
              5.Financial Services and General Government
              6.Homeland Security
              7.Interior, Environment
              8.Labor, Health and Human Services, Education
              9.Legislative Branch
              10.Military Construction, Veterans Affairs
              11.State, Foreign Operations
              12.Transportation, Housing and Urban Development

              1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

                OR. Maybe the USA has a supreme law that LIMITS the taxpayer bill (purpose) inherently LIMITING the $ that can be STOLEN from all people.

                This isn't hard at all. It was literally discovered in 1787 if only the criminal minds would honor the peoples law.

              2. See.More   2 months ago

                But how about this idea. . .

                Nah. Still taxation legalized plunder. And it proves my point about not being able to conceive of a means of funding government without coercion.

            2. B G   2 months ago

              We'd have some of the best funded federal "no-kill" animal shelters in the world, and probably no roads or bridges.

        2. B G   2 months ago

          In the view of most "progressives" whatever they're paying themselves is "too much" and whatever is being paid by anyone making > 2-3% more than they do "isn't paying their fair share"...

          The thing that technically keeps the "fair share" dogma from being a lie is that as long as they refuse to quantify what's "fair", there's no basis by which to evaluate its veracity. Empty platitudes aren't technically either true or false, because the very concept requires at least some kind of substance in the statement which could be in some way compared to objective reality. How can anyone prove that the people spouting that rhetoric don't actually believe nothing?

      2. See.More   2 months ago

        We know believe, because "we" cannot (or will not) conceive of any other fundraising model, that taxes are needed . . .

        FIFY

        Just because The State has pretty much always confiscated wealth to fund The State doesn't mean there isn't another way.

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      The only good tax is the one that taxes the other guy - Michael Bloomberg.

  4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Seems like just a year ago KMW, Boehm, and people like stg and sarc were demanding income taxes to be raised complaining about BBB.

  5. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

    60% of people don’t really pay taxes, so…

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      This. Remove the vote for those with negative tax or the problem will never be fixed.

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

        You can't take their vote away, that's tyrannical, but if we have to have an income tax it should be flat percentage with no loopholes and deductions.

    2. B G   2 months ago

      There's a difference between 50-60% of earners having an aggregate net tax liability of $0, and all of those people actually paying nothing.

      The people below some percentile for income (at least the adults in that range) have negative total liability because of "refundable tax credits" which exceed their hypothetical tax liability and as such, they get all of their withheld money back plus an additional "refund". When the "child tax credit" is increased, as it was during Covid, it's possible for even people who's gross income would be in the upper quintiles to end up with little or no actual net liability if they have a lot of kids.

      If you work up from the bottom, once you're through the people who have "negative tax owed", the people just above them owe nothing and above that they owe very little, and it takes until you reach the 50th-60th percentile before the sum total of taxes owed break even.

  6. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

    Americans are not paying too much in taxes. The fact that the national debt keeps rising is proof that taxes are not covering expenses. The fact is that Americans are getting a bargain because they get services at a discounted rate with a portion of the cost moved to the future.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Just 22% of their income or so on average. With half not paying income taxes.

      Youre not a moderate. Youre a parody.

      It isnt a bargain for anyone except your corrupt democrats who funnel it to their and their friends pockets. Fuck off.

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      How much taxes are you paying?

      1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

        I pay federal and state income tax, local property taxes, and sales taxes on purchases. I would add that I get a number of nice tax breaks I don't really need because I am well over 65 years old.

        1. charliehall   2 months ago

          I ride the Philadelphia transit system for free -- subways, streetcars, trolleybuses, conventional buses, commuter trains. Everywhere in southeastern Pennsylvania. Because I am 65. Even though I still have a really nice income. And I pay no taxes to Pennsylvania.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      If you begin with the retarded premise that the government has a moral obligation to supply all human needs and wants, then you might try to argue that taxes are too low.

      Otherwise (and if so) fuck off.

      1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

        The problem is that across the political spectrum people feel that government has a moral obligation to supply the human needs and wants of their particular ideology. The idea is that government cannot solve all the problems so it should limit itself to solving those problems I care about.

      2. charliehall   2 months ago

        Not a retarded presence. Many conservative philosophers have said that that obligation exists.

    4. Rick James   2 months ago

      You're 100% correct. We took in literally tens of millions of people, gave them free services, healthcare, housing, food stamps, rental assistance, pre-paid debit cards etc., and they pay 0 income tax.

      1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

        Except that is not the case except in you mind. Immigrants documented and undocumented are economically beneficial to the nation. On the other hand we spent billions to send four astronauts to circle the moon just for the entertainment it provided to us.

        1. Rick James   2 months ago

          One city:

          New York City and State have allocated significant funding to support immigrant communities, with the FY26 NYC budget totaling $115.9 billion and including $120 million for immigration legal services, nearly double the previous year's $65 million.

          This is why I support Mayor Mamdani's tax increases, unironically.

        2. Homer Thompson   2 months ago

          https://cis.org/Report/NonCitizen-Use-Welfare-Region-and-Country-Birth

        3. charliehall   2 months ago

          And even legal immigrants are ineligible for most of those government benefit programs. The nativist bigots won't tell you that.

    5. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      molly is not earnest guys. You cant let these kinds of posts rile you up. "she" is not a real person

    6. Homer Thompson   2 months ago

      spending has absolutely exploded post pandemic

      1. charliehall   2 months ago

        The big explosion in spending is Trump's war.

    7. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

      That's a ridiculous argument. Taxes are too high and spending is way too high. Your "bargain" is what has led to the most regressive tax in American history, namely inflation of the currency.

      If you gave a shit about poor people you would balance the budget and force the Fed to stop manipulating the money supply.

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

        Seconded.

  7. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    As a libertarian you should identified the most egregious downside of income taxes.

    The complete violation of all privacy. The government uses income tax as an excuse to monitor every dollar that moves. That's the real reason for it. Fedgov could be funded by tariffs but that doesnt allow for mass surveillance of everything we do.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Oh, it's no different than a credit reporting agency...

      And they're not regressive. The goal of a properly structure tax is not to increase liberty, but to have the least impact on the poors.

  8. Rick James   2 months ago

    2. What Counts as 'Income' May Surprise You

    It won't surprise THIS commenter, but there's another commenter here that I guarantee it will surprise.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Uncle Sam wants to know about it. There is, however, a notable exception to reporting illegal goods. If you return a stolen item within a year, you do not have to report its value as income.

      lol *snort*.

      But at least it's not regressive!

  9. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    What Counts as 'Income' May Surprise You

    Anyone who does their taxes by the book is an absolute fool. A useful idiot if you will.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      You will shortly be getting free room and board courtesy of the federal government.

  10. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    Humorously. The 'Tax System' is only 1/3rd of real Gov Taxation.
    The other 2/3rds is swept under rugs of deception tactics.
    Excise Taxes, Sales Taxes, Property Taxes, etc, etc, etc nobody tracks.

    Then there is the USD (funny money).
    100-years ago one dollar had 240-TIMES ( Yes, 240 x) the value it does today.

    If you want a fully comprehensive tax-cost you have to take what the Gov is spending.
    $12.8 Trillion (Fed + State + Local).
    Omit useless leaches to figure 'working' costs ($12.8T/163M).
    Which calculates out to $80,000/yr real 'value' the government is STEALING from ea/worker.

    Yeah. There is a reason the USA 'making' stuff is collapsing.
    Unless you have automation making stuff of 1M people the gov will rob you into poverty.
    True analysis (not BS) explains why everything sucks today.

    You just can't continue to STEAL everyone blind and expect a fruitful ends.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      " Property Taxes"

      Yet another ignorant statement. The federal government last enacted a property tax in 1861.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        "If you want a fully comprehensive tax-cost" ... "(Fed + State + Local)"
        Sorry BS'er. You've got nothing to point-out but your own illiteracy.

  11. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

    Anyone who is, or has been self-employed understands the full weight of their tax burden.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      Indeed because of the need to pay the entire Social Security and Medicare taxes. It is a big drain.

  12. Brian   2 months ago

    "Taxes Are Wielded as Tools of Social Engineering"

    Most of the federal government is wielded as a tool of social engineering.

  13. charliehall   2 months ago

    Those who think taxes are theft should emigrate to Somalia. No taxes. No government.

    Those who think taxes are too high are usually opposed to any cuts in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or National Defense. Those are the only federal programs large enough to matter.

    And the Trump Cult is getting a rude shock next year as rural hospitals close in droves thanks to Medicaid cuts.

    1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

      "rural hospitals close in droves" -
      How's that?
      Do you think 'Gun' THEFT is the only way anyone would ever pay for hospital service?
      And if that be the case obviously they didn't really need the service.
      So long as the taxes are CUT to the same measure; people have more $ to pay the hospital.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Comic: It's America's Founding Fake News Terrorist, Samuel Adams

Peter Bagge | From the July 2026 issue

The White House UFC Fight Is the Perfect Event for the Present, Not the Past

Billy Binion | 6.14.2026 6:00 AM

Your Uber Driver May Soon Be Unionized. At What Cost?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.13.2026 7:00 AM

Disillusioned Revolutionaries: Many Founders Died in Despair About the American Experiment

Matt Welch | From the July 2026 issue

Terrorists and Criminals Reportedly Got $37.5 Billion From COVID Relief and Other U.K. Aid Programs

Reem Ibrahim | 6.12.2026 5:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks