Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Reason Roundup

Illegal To Defund NPR?

Plus: Judge stops Trump's ballroom, Iran announcement incoming, NASA takes steps to go back to the moon, and more...

Peter Suderman | 4.1.2026 9:31 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An illustration of an NPR tote bag on fire | Illustration: Lex Villena; Jakub Gojda
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Jakub Gojda)

You can't defund NPR? Last May, President Donald Trump issued an executive order on "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media." 

The order targeted the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which at the time doled out funds to National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Trump's order directed the CPB to cease funding to NPR and PBS.

Trump's reasoning for the order was quite explicit: "Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage." 

Yesterday, a U.S. district judge said the ruling was illegal. The judge, Randolph Moss, ruled that Trump had violated the First Amendment with the order because it amounted to punishment for politically disfavored speech. 

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The judge said the order "clearly crosses the line" into something like politically motivated censorship. "The message is clear," Moss wrote. "NPR and PBS need not apply for any federal benefit because the president disapproves of their 'left-wing' coverage of the news." Trump's order, the judge wrote, amounted to government "retaliation" for speech.

There were several things to like about Trump's initial executive order. It noted that today's media market "is filled with abundant, diverse, and innovative news options," and it declared that "government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence." 

These are good points, and my colleagues at Reason have been making a similar case for many, many years. On the merits, there was never a good argument for taxpayer funding of public media. 

But as Reason's Jesse Walker wrote last year, there were some genuine legal questions about whether Trump had the authority to defund public media through executive order.

And Trump's criticism of NPR's coverage of him made the executive order look like an act of personal pique rather than a speech-neutral decision not to fund a government program. Moss wrote that the text of the executive order, along with other public statements, made it "difficult to conceive of clearer evidence that a government action is targeted at viewpoints that the president does not like and seeks to squelch."

As is sometimes the case, Trump did the right thing—but not in the ideal way. 

Practically, however, the ruling won't have much of an impact. Shortly after Trump's order was issued, Congress pulled about $500 million from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which then shut down. So at least in the short term, the ruling is moot. 


Strictly ballroom. That wasn't the only loss Trump faced in court yesterday. Separately, a federal judge said that Trump could not proceed with the construction of his planned White House ballroom until the $400 million project was approved by Congress. 

The project is being funded with private donations that have been routed through the National Park Service. But even still, Judge Richard Leon said, Trump had exceeded his authority to proceed with the project unilaterally. Congress, he said, must explicitly authorize construction. 

As I noted yesterday, Trump's ballroom plans have been criticized, with multiple media reports saying that some mostly unnamed architects are worried the ballroom plan was rushed through with insufficient review and oversight. Some of the stated concerns had merit, like stairs going nowhere and oddly placed windows and bathrooms. 

But while this project isn't exactly typical, and public buildings are obviously different than private developments, it's at least a little bit telling that one of the chief complaints about the project was that it was insufficiently bogged down in bureaucratic process and public review. It's almost like the delays are the point. 

In any case, the judge says the ball, or rather the building, is now in the legislature's court: "The President," the judge wrote, "may at any time go to Congress to obtain express authority to construct a ballroom and to do so with private funds." 

Congress? Act? I suppose there's a first time for everything. 


Scenes from Washington, D.C.: For years, Tail Up Goat was hailed as one of D.C.'s best restaurants. But the Adams Morgan establishment closed and is now set to reopen with a new name and new concept from the same owners. The new restaurant will be called Rye Bunny—and instead of a full-service, sit-down restaurant, it will be a counter-service spot, almost like your local deli, except with high-end fare. 

There's reason to suspect that this is a response to escalating labor costs in the District. The owners have talked about how dicey Tail Up Goat's finances were, even with the good reviews. The new establishment is designed to be different. "From the restaurant's perspective, the model is far more economically viable because they need nearly half as many front-of-house employees as they did before," reports Washingtonian. (Front-of-house employees are waiters, bussers, and the like.)

D.C. has a great food scene, but restaurants have struggled in recent years, with a record number of closings last year. And at least part of the struggle has been the costs imposed by the city via changes to the way restaurants are required to compensate tipped workers. Yes, some of those changes have been paused, though not fully rolled back. But owning and operating a restaurant is tough in the best of times, and D.C.'s government has mostly made it more expensive and more onerous.

For more, watch Justin Zuckerman's excellent 2024 documentary on why some D.C. restaurant workers prefer a lower minimum wage. 


QUICK HITS

  • Trump will address the nation about Iran tonight.

TUNE IN: Tomorrow night at 9PM ET, President Trump will give an Address to the Nation to provide an important update on Iran.

— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) March 31, 2026

  • Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says regime change has already occurred in Iran. 
  • And an Iranian official says the Strait of Hormuz will reopen, just not for America.
  • New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, whose campaign was powered by social video, now says that city agencies may use TikTok. 
  • The Artemis II launch, which will take astronauts near the moon, is set for today. This will supposedly pave the way for an actual moon landing in the near future. The rocket being used for the launch is 322 feet tall. 
  • Congress is going after prediction markets.
  • The Supreme Court said that Colorado could not ban "conversion therapy" for gay and transgender minors. The state's law "censors speech based on viewpoint," wrote Justice Neil Gorsuch. 
  • "If Gen Z's general disinterest in religion persists, American society will only secularize further." On the supposed religious revival in America.
  • The decline in marriage is real. But it's concentrated in working-class women, not the ambitious strivers who populate trend pieces. 
  • There's a new trailer for this summer's forthcoming Supergirl movie. For all you 1990s comic book nerds, it even shows off Lobo. Holy guacamole!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: NASA's Artemis Program Is a Monument to Government Waste. It Can Only Go Up From Here.

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupNPRMediaWhite HouseSpaceMoonMinimum Wage
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (236)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    You can't defund NPR?

    Wait till they try to eliminate the surgeon general position.

  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    The decline in marriage is real. But it's concentrated in working-class women, not the ambitious strivers who populate trend pieces.

    Girl boss needs to dominate someone at home too.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Yelling at ambitious young women won’t boost marriage
      It’s men, especially less educated ones, who would need to change.
      Matthew Yglesias

      Days since Matt Yglesias reference: 0

      Also, never mind that the trend and his stance align perfectly with the hypergamy/feminist delusion. It's the guy with a steady high 5-figure, low 6-figure job who just wants a wife, a house, and some kids' fault for not being more attractive to working-class women who are looking for someone 6 ft. tall, with 6 pack abs, and high 6-figure income who is supportive of her desire to occasionally hop into bed with a horned gorilla, werewolf, and centaur at the same time. Because that's how Melinda Gates got to where she is.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        Hey! Sex work is real work.

      2. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

        The subtle nuance in the article is to show the girl bosses that getting married young has some merit. It's low key because more and more these girl bosses are discovering that though it is possible to conceive children later, the percentages go down, sometimes dramatically. Why was fertility treatment such a hot spot for Dems in the last election cycle? Cuz these 30 somethings are either less fertile or froze early eggs. In both cases The Science in for the assist.

        The rest of them are finding out men aren't all that interested in their 'need to lead' and that the office 9-5er job that most end up with doesn't fill that hole in the soul that suddenly yearns to nurture. Being a mentor is not a strength for women. The trope of an older woman helping a younger one succeed behind her rarely appears anywhere. They just fight the patriarchy alone to succeed. Even back in the grey days of Hollyweird they understood.

        Feel sorry for the lot of them.

        1. mad.casual   2 months ago

          It's low key because more and more these girl bosses are discovering that though it is possible to conceive children later, the percentages go down, sometimes dramatically.

          One dimensional thinking fed to them by the DNC. The chances go down, the probability or degree of success is *also* diminished both by artifacts of IVF, physical aging, *and* the prioritization of work.

          Don't trust The Science. If you must, trust but verify.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Tomorrow night at 9PM ET, President Trump will give an Address to the Nation to provide an important update on Iran.

    A “mission accomplished “ moment?

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      That will tank defense stocks.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        You're armed with the best puns.

  4. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    The rocket being used for the launch is 322 feet tall.

    SpaceX wins the rocket measuring contest.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      It is girth that counts.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Thought it was the motion.

        1. mad.casual   2 months ago

          I thought space travel was just a metaphor for beating your wife.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The judge said the order "clearly crosses the line" into something like politically motivated censorship.

    It's political motivations all the way down.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      But npr and media has said many times that npr is I dependant and has no political agenda

      1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

        They have also said they don't need government funding.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Your speech is violence, my speech must be gov funded.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Separately, a federal judge said that Trump could not proceed with the construction of his planned White House ballroom until the $400 million project was approved by Congress.

    DC's HOA has entered the fray.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      Now do obama basketball court

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        And nixon’s bowling alley.

        1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          Not to mention the Kennedy Sex Tunnels, along with, in order of national embarrassment: the Truman Cocaine Lounge, the McKinley Hooker Dump and the Lincoln Slave Colosseum (he didn't free them all).

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

            What about the Clinton porno libraries ?

            1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

              Spb posted a link to that once

          2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            But Trump is a monster, like Hitler, but even Hitler cared about Germany or something.

            1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

              If Hitler were around in today
              Nyt "noted painter, vegetarian, and animal rights enthusiast found dead

              1. HorseConch   2 months ago

                They would be begging for better gun laws due to him being a victim of gun violence.

              2. mad.casual   2 months ago

                Defender of open borders and champion of globalism.

            2. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

              Why doesn't Trump build a series of bunkers like a normal Dictator?

          3. charliehall   2 months ago

            Slavery in the District of Columbia was outlawed in 1862 by Act of Congress. Lincoln signed the bill into law April 16, 1862, and it took effect immediately. Slaveowners were compensated. Those DC slaveowners were the only ones in the US ever to be compensated when slavery was outlawed. April 16 is an official holiday in DC and the federal government observes it, too, often affecting the due date for tax returns, because if April 16 falls on a weekend, it is observed on the nearest weekday.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              Haha. Moron.

            2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

              Such a Jerry

              1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                New official nickname: jerryhall.

              2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Charlie is a dumber version of Jerry.

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      I love that there aren't HOAs where I live in NYC. I get to have a house on land without grass!

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        An HOA by any other name?

        Condo and Co-op boards are functionally the same thing.

        ""Why Are HOA Fees so High in NYC?""
        https://www.realtyhop.com/blog/monthly-fees-nyc/

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    D.C. has a great food scene, but restaurants have struggled in recent years, with a record number of closings last year.

    Fortunately cocktail parties are free.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Didnt they import food trucks??

  8. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    … and instead of a full-service, sit-down restaurant, it will be a counter-service spot, almost like your local deli, except with high-end fare.

    If I wanted to stand in line and order at the counter, I would eat at the food truck.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says regime change has already occurred in Iran.

    Rubio.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Rubicon?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Ru-fi-o! Ru-fi-o! Ru-fi-oooooooo! Ru-bi-o! Ru-bi-o! Ru-bi-ooooooo!

    3. charliehall   2 months ago

      Replaced by one that is even more hostile. Mission accomplished!

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Cite?

      2. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

        what is more hostile than seeking to use a nuke on the US?

        1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          Misgendering someone?

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

            Misuse of equity cards in Canada is all the rage now.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              Is it anything like Magic the Gathering?

    4. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Some people have trouble telling "those people" apart.

  10. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

    Judge Richard Leon said, Trump had exceeded his authority to proceed with the project unilaterally.

    Your Honor, you have a call from Iran.

    ...importers on line 2...

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Yeah, but he doesn’t have any experience in building construction.

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Is the call from Obama's phone or pen?

      1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        Obama's on the phone with Libya...not to be confused with the labia that was on Clinton's phone.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Something something Big Mike...

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

            He said labia not phallabia.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...President Trump will give an Address to the Nation to provide an important update on Iran.

    A trivial update would be more fun.

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      I think you'll be pleased then.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    And an Iranian official says the Strait of Hormuz will reopen, just not for America.

    NO FAT CHICKS

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      NO WHALES IN MY HORMUZ

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        NO GIRLZ

    2. Rick James   2 months ago

      What about the Gays of Hormuz? What about them?

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Who needs roofs!

        https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/091/750/eba.jpg

      2. Dillinger   2 months ago

        >>What about them?

        the Bobbitt or the Catapult

  13. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    The judge, Randolph Moss, ruled that Trump had violated the First Amendment with the order because it amounted to punishment for politically disfavored speech.

    Funding any media is punishment agianst all other media not being funded (and who is forced to pay for the funding to begin with). There is no constitutional mandate to fund media what so ever. It is all unconstitutional and must end.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, whose campaign was powered by social video, now says that city agencies may use TikTok.

    The workers are probably on it all day anyway.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      I work in a NYC office. The computers are all behind firewalls. They can't even use Zoom.

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        I work in a NYC office. The computers are all behind firewalls. They can't even use Zoom.

        You have to leave your phone at the door, I guess, huh?

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          All of the sudden everything makes sense.

          1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

            Yes, I called chuck as being a government parasite long ago. It’s obvious.

            Unless he’s a parody…… hmmm….

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Emptying the garbage cans is tough work, right? Maybe one day, they'll trust you with a broom. Maybe; you got a bad case of STUUUPID.

      3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        If it's like my staff, it's phones not computers.

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      Let me guess, it's because the mayor loves to make Tik Toc videos and wants all his people to see them.

  15. Ajsloss   2 months ago

    Trump will address the nation about Iran tonight.

    On April Fools Day? The Fake News Christmas?

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Fake News Festivus for the rest of us.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        These people have got a lot of problems with those people, and now we're gonna hear about it:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5GoJT8yeUE

  16. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

    Not getting money from government violates your speech rights?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Losing federal dollars is like rape!

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Deep Thoughts with Sarc.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        You get over it though.

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Last I checked, NPR was having no trouble speaking.

  17. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    It is well established that 1A prevents the government from withholding funds based on the content of speech.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      What if the government withheld funds because it’s broke?

    2. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      But the government funding a relentlessly ideologically partisan "Public Radio" network is not a violation of free speech, somehow?

      1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        The government funds ideological speech all the time.

        1. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

          That did not answer the question I asked, did it?

          And it brings up the conclusion that you believe the speech you favor has a "right" to access the taxpayer's wallets.

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Shut the fuck up commie scum.

    4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      I swear you find a way to be more retarded every day.

    5. Rick James   2 months ago

      It can give you funds because of your speech, but it can't take it away? Makes sense.

      1. HorseConch   2 months ago

        It can usher in illegal aliens but it can't deport them. Pretty much standard activist leftist judge action.

      2. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        You bring up a point that MAGAs completely miss. The government can not deny discretionary funds, or privileged based on illegal motivation. For example, the government can refuse to fund olive promotional activity because olives are disgusting devil berries, but not because the producer is a minority.

        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

          You are fucked in the head.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Lol. Just more and more retarded.

          Partisan leftists earned those dollars through partisan means, so you cant take it away.

          Yes. Government can end programs you retarded shit.

        3. Rick James   2 months ago

          But... it CAN promote olives BECAUSE they're ambrosia, but the next administration can't take it away because they suck?

          You do realize that the reason NPR GOT funds was because their speech was favorable?

        4. Rick James   2 months ago

          Bottom line, you can't tell me that the government funded an Olive packing plant because they liked the shape of the jars.

        5. Ben of Houston   2 months ago

          If this was not done in the middle of one of the largest and best publicized attempts at downsizing the government in the history of the country, I might agree with you.

          It was not just the PBS and NPR news divisions that were cut. It was part of widespread cuts across the board. To state that the primary motivation is political is to ignore every other action done in the first half of 2025.

          I am not denying the fact that political motivations exist that cannot be utilized. I am stating that they are being applied absurdly and counterfactually in what appears to be transparently political attempt to restore funding to a political ally.

          In short, it is the court that is acting in an illegal criminal context, not Trump.

  18. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Even Kagan is tired of KBJs retarded dissent.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kagan-turns-liberal-ally-jackson-footnote-jab-over-free-speech

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Remember, Susan Collins, Mitt Romney, and Lisa Murkowski voted to confirm this retard.

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      KBJ was being an activist, not a judge.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        KBJ was a DEI hire that they knew would mindlessly rubber stamp the DNC agenda. Nothing more.

    3. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      " I fear that the people of this country will get burned," Jackson said. "Before now, licensed medical professionals had to adhere to standards when treating patients: They could neither do nor say whatever they want.""

      She is arguing here, that the standard with which medical professionals should be operating, is that when an obvious boy says he is a girl, you should agree, and if a boy says hes feels like a girl but its gender dysphoria and it bothers him, you should also tell him no, he's a girl.

      She is arguing that the guidance from WPATH which was shown to be disastrous, should be the standard treatment in the medical field, and that deviation should be criminal.

      She is arguing that what they found in the CASS study should be treated as heresy essentially.

      This lady is a zealot activist, maybe the worst we have ever seen on the court

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        And I believe she has previously made a pretty much contradictory argument in a case where a state banned transing of minors.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        She can't even define "woman"...

    4. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Seems like this one should get a very distinct asterisk in the record books: 8-1*

      *The lone dissenting judge is not a biologist and cannot define what a woman is.

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        Which, by the way, was a definitionally transphobic remark.

        She thought she was walking a careful line, but she crossed it and crossed it hard. I always reference Kagan's remarks when discussing this issue in that biology is THE ONLY thing that determines male and female.

  19. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    The NBA. Where beating up your baby mama is just a suspension. But quoting scripture is conduct detrimental to a team.

    https://thefederalist.com/2026/03/31/nba-protects-players-accused-of-violent-crimes-while-targeting-christians-for-saying-christian-things/

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      NBA needs attention hardcore ... they also sent Chuck Barkley out to stump for the immigants on TNT

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Charles has become my kids' favorite broadcast personality right behind Kent Brockman.

        "It's not complicated, it's just basketball." is used in the same sarcastic context as the Staples "That was easy." catchphrase.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          when we had Sixers season tix in the 80s he was the nicest dude on the court to the kids he would chat with us & rain 3s in pre-game

  20. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    SAVE Act is 4 times more popular than congress.

    https://thefederalist.com/2026/03/31/save-act-is-4-times-more-popular-than-congress/

    1. HorseConch   2 months ago

      I don't buy it. It has to be at least 6x.

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        Give it a week.

  21. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    California forced to pay 4.5M after losing case that strictly tells them schools cant transition kids in secret. Parents have a say.

    https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/california-ordered-pay-45-million-after-losing-lawsuit-against-gender

    1. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      Reason seems to be choosing to ignore, as much as possible, the totalitarian excesses of the political aspects of the LGBTQ+ movement and their allies in the Democrat Party.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        They throw the best cocktail parties.

        Fake intellectuals who pretend they are reliving the days of the enlightenment with "deep" discussion while shit faced.

        1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

          Whenever I think of Reasonistas at DC cocktail parties I can't help think of that scene in "Burn After Reading." A comedy of errors. Tragic ending. It's all there.

          The pre-2016 take on the Russians was also amusing, for what it's worth.

      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        In fairness, Reason isn't the only place that seems to have dropped the LGBTQIA+ advocacy like it was a bag full of crazy cat ladies, dicks, and assholes.

        You know the particular loss either really, really hurts or really wasn't close to their hearts when there is no "You owe us amnesty."

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

          It ends up that a lot of people pushing it are really just nasty people that demand you see things their way and will hate you for disagreeing. How long did we really expect that to last?

          Look how Daphne Dorman was treated on social media from the LGBT crowd simply because of her being a friend of Dave Chappell. And the LGBT crowd tried to blame it on Chappell.

          1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

            Because the nature of the left is an ideological purity testing cult, they keep turning on their moderates.

            Cis-white gay dudes might as well be KKK members to these people if they say the slightest thing that deviates from party mantra. They have no tolerance for anything but full on virtue signaling to the cult

            1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              My cis-white gay best friend, who votes for Democrats and has for years, recently sought my advice on a handgun purchase, then proudly sent me pics of his new Glock. We'll have a range-day here at the farm next time he visits.

          2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            It ends up that a lot of people pushing it are really just trying to justify fucking children.

        2. Marshal   2 months ago

          The amusing aspect of this trend is that those who now reject the absurd retain the hatred and disdain they formed for people who recognized it all along.

          Ultimately there's only one conclusion to draw from all the nonsense: leftists are losers completely devoid of ideas. Their only contribution is performance art demonstrating their political loyalty, which naturally they believe should be rewarded with lifetime sinecures at public expense.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Koch isn’t paying for libertarian analysis. Or even honesty.

  22. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Poor ENB.

    https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/supreme-court-strike-down-colorado-law-banning-conversion-therapy-lgbt-minors

    1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      They even got the liberal justices, save the retarded KBJ.

      That lady is seriously unsalvageable. Arguing that deviation from proven-wrong leftist orthodoxy is malpractice and also not covered under free speech. Stalin levels of bad

  23. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "The Supreme Court Rejects Ideological Orthodoxy Masquerading as Public Health"

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2026/03/the-supreme-court-rejects-ideological-orthodoxy-masquerading-as-public-health/

    "Chiles arose from yet another effort by Colorado to ban dissent from “LBGTQ+” ideology, which was yet again defeated by a legal team from Alliance Defending Freedom. A state law bans licensed counselors from engaging in “conversion therapy” with minors, on penalty of fines and loss of license. The law is flagrantly one-sided: It applies only to therapy that aims to resolve gender dysphoria or to reduce homosexual attraction, while permitting state-favored counseling in favor of gender transition and homosexuality. It is coercive and destructive of parental authority: While blue states have schemed to let public schools “socially transition” kids without telling their parents, Colorado won’t even let the disfavored therapists talk to minors when both the minor and the parent consent. It is speech-specific: Unlike red-state bans on irreversible surgeries and puberty-blocking drugs, the law applies to purely talk-based therapies. And it is harmful as well: Most children and teens suffering gender dysphoria can outgrow the problem and learn to live in their bodies; talking through their problems can help.

    The Court called this what it is: discrimination against a particular viewpoint. As Gorsuch wrote, “Colorado may regard its policy as essential to public health and safety. Certainly, censorious governments throughout history have believed the same. But the First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.” Even Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, emphasized that “the case is textbook. The law distinguishes between two opposed sets of ideas—the one resisting, the other reflecting, the State’s own view of how to speak with minors about sexual orientation and gender identity.” To Kagan’s credit, she added that this is just as bad when her own side does it: “It does not matter what the State’s preferred side is.”

    And then there is the lone dissenter, Justice Jackson, who, in this case defers to State police power to uphold progressive ideology.

    "...who opened by urging that there is “no right to practice medicine which is not subordinate to the police power of the States,” "

  24. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Old white no kings protestors remain racist.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/03/no-kings-protesters-explanation-of-low-black-turnout-triggers-outrage/

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Lmao!

    2. BYODB   2 months ago

      Prick a far left liberal and you'll find a racist that thinks minorities need white saviors to show them the light just about every time.

      Just note how they treat black people they don't agree with and you'll notice their tolerance only goes as far as their lockstep ideological agreement.

      SPBP is basically the poster child for that exact brand of nonsense.

    3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      The King of England is making a trip to the US. Are they going to protest that?

    4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      From the link:
      “If anybody’s gonna get arrested here, it’s gonna be a black person. It is not safe for them and they don’t need to participate. We need to walk in their name.”
      National Lampoon was put out of business; overtaken by events. The Bee is next.

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        The Bee has it covered with NotTheBee.

    5. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      “If anybody’s gonna get arrested here, it’s gonna be a black person. It is not safe for them and they don’t need to participate. We need to walk in their name.”

      That’s just priceless. And how expectedly condescending. The democrats have done a great job turning their racism from antagonistic to paternalistic. Yet without detracting from it.

  25. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Yep, right there in the Costitution somewhere: "Taxes must be used to support a biased, government-controlled news source".
    Pretty sure, but I can't find it in my copy.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Judges run the executive now.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Israel has had a real problem with leftist judicial tyranny for a long time now. We need to nip this in the bud and de-Boasberg our judiciary now.

  26. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "The Supreme Court said that Colorado could not ban "conversion therapy" for gay and transgender minors. "

    Like "assault weapons", "conversion therapy" is a phrase used by the Left to demonize something they ideologically demand should not legally exist. Maybe not the best term to use.

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Cult deprogramming would be more appropriate.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      To be fair, they demand conversion therapy all the time. See LGTB and Trans cults.

      1. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

        Yes, but they don't call it that.

    3. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      Conversion therapy is well understood by all to what it is. In addition it is also child abuse.

      As for "assault weapon", that is a bit more murky but there are weapons that clearly are and are not. A bolt action rifle is not an assault weapon. An AR and AK are.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Stay away from children you perverted commie scum.

      2. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

        That is just a bald-faced lie.

        "Colorado won’t even let the disfavored therapists talk to minors when both the minor and the parent consent. It is speech-specific: Unlike red-state bans on irreversible surgeries and puberty-blocking drugs, the law applies to purely talk-based therapies. And it is harmful as well: Most children and teens suffering gender dysphoria can outgrow the problem and learn to live in their bodies; talking through their problems can help."

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          It's always important to remember that commies see lying for the cause as a virtue.

          1. Marshal   2 months ago

            The better way to understand them is to recognize "lying" or any evaluation of process is simply irrelevant. There is only one question to leftists and that is "does it increase our power". That's why they contradict themselves so often and don't care that they do.

        2. Zeb   2 months ago

          That's the craziest part. They are legislating that something that is obviously a mental problem be treated as if it is a physical problem (which can't be cured, even if it were a physical problem).

    4. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      Its marxist language creep, as always.

      They muddy the waters by trying to say being against illegal immigration is against ALL immigration.

      They call any attempt to treat gender dysphoria "conversion therapy", trying to get people to think of some camp where a gay kid is clockwork-oranged and tortured, rather than getting very needed counseling about their problem.

      1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        It is the MAGAs who claim to be against illegal immigration yet their actions show them to be against all immigration.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Or they don't all have the same opinion on the topic, commie scum.

        2. Super Scary   2 months ago

          You literally just did the thing Mike was talking about.

        3. Zeb   2 months ago

          Some are certainly against some legal immigration (like overuse of H1B, for example). I haven't seen more than a few weirdos who are against all immigration.

        4. Marshal   2 months ago

          Left wingers can't refute the right's actual arguments so they pretend those arguments are different.

  27. charliehall   2 months ago

    Congress can defund NPR. And it basically did.

    Trump is trying to claim powers that he isn't given in the Constitution.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Nope. Try again retard.

      Walz +8

  28. Rick James   2 months ago

    Yesterday, a U.S. district judge said the ruling was illegal. The judge, Randolph Moss, ruled that Trump had violated the First Amendment with the order because it amounted to punishment for politically disfavored speech.

    Did Reason just discover that you can get a federal district judge to literally rule on anything?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Doubtful. Likely the NYT or wapo criticized it, so they chose to in this one instance.

    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Suderman came so close...

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Just wait until they realize that operating a state-backed, at both the federal and state level, affiliate network isn't exactly free speech *or* free association.

      To be clear, I don't mean stand around and wait. Go about whatever else it is you're doing. More recognize that, after years of "bake the cake" they're moving towards the realization that not *everything* is free speech at sub-glacial/ocean-level-rising speed.

  29. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

    “We allow our reverence for truth to get in the way of cooperating and getting things done.”

    Katherine Maher, CEO of NPR

    Now that’s where I want my tax $ going; to a news organization whose leader shut up and get out of my way

  30. mtrueman   2 months ago

    "today's media market "is filled with abundant, diverse, and innovative news options,"

    It's not that diverse. There's corporate funded news options and a government funded news option. Now there's only corporate funded news options.

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Misconstrueman still gets his news from cable.

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Curious what you include in corporate funded news options. Seems to me there are quite a few independent options these days that do excellent reporting and commentary.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        *grabs popcorn*

      2. Dillinger   2 months ago

        such as?

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          I'll leave it to you to make your own judgements. I'm just saying that if you are still getting your news from CNNBABCBSFOXETC and think you are informed at all, you are missing a lot.

          1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

            Did I catch a niner in there?

          2. mtrueman   2 months ago

            You're being very harsh on networks. We have a president who lies strait faced to the camera every time he appears. 'Iran is begging for a ceasefire,' is a recent example. Why don't the networks call him to account? I'm not sure it's bias or lack of independence, but rather decorum and deference, the same reasons they call him Mr. President rather than Mr. Trump, Don, or anything else. He's clearly out of his depth but the networks are determined to pretend they admire the emperors new clothes.

            All in all they are not doing too bad a job. They are showing us the unraveling of an empire, something that has taken hundreds of years in the past, but now the progress can be seen on a daily basis. Hour by hour, even.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              We have a president who lies strait faced to the camera every time he appears.

              Is Obama back already?

              Obamacare will save the "typical" family 2,500 a year. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor.

              1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                Obama was an absolute amateur when it came to unraveling the American empire. Biden was better, supporting Israel's genocide in Gaza, but neither can hold a candle to the work that Trump is doing. He's talking now of abandoning the Gulf and all those generous Monarchs with their plane gifting ways.

                1. Marshal   2 months ago

                  Obama was an absolute amateur when it came to unraveling the American empire.

                  That's not relevant since the issue was "lies".

                  The truth is that Trump learned to be Trump by adopting the left's tactics, so it's hysterical when left wingers complain about his beating them with their own tactics. We all notice however that they never give up their own lying, they only demand a return to the previous status quo where they openly lie and propagandize while criticizing others for doing so.

                  1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                    The issue is the empire is falling apart. The lies come with the territory. Saying it ain't so doesn't change that. Why the heck are you harping on Obama, a mediocre president who hasn't been in power for over a decade?

                    The fall of the Egyptian Empire thousands of years ago is an interesting example. It was never made explicitly clear but evident in documents spread over centuries which detailed military victories which were increasingly insignificant and increasingly closer and closer to the Capital. So boring, right? Meanwhile we're getting the goods on an hourly basis, with video.

                    " when left wingers complain about his beating them with their own tactics."

                    I am not complaining. I'm enjoying the show. As I said before, when else are you given the chance to see the collapse of an empire in real time? And I support Trump's efforts to bring down Israel, close US bases in the Gulf, Europe, South Korea and Japan. My main criticism of Trump is that he could have easily done that without needlessly murdering Iranian school children or committing other war crimes. So selfish.

        2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Have you not heard of prissy v?

      3. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "Curious what you include in corporate funded news options."

        All of them. CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX, CNN and even PBS, though it's not through advertising. They are all highly selective in what news they show. Tiktok is now seen as a weapon by the notoriously censorious Israelis. Youtube bans news outlets like Russia Today and Iran's Press TV. Facebook is the same or similar.

        The nice thing about PBS though is not the news, which can be entertaining. I enjoyed the McLaughlin Group on PBS. It was extremely biased, none of the hosts made any effort to hide their biases, though there were some occasional stabs at even handedness, typically the most boring parts of the program. It's the higher quality programming and lack of commercial breaks. Shows like Blackadder and Monty Python first appeared on PBS.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND 2 hours ago
          Misconstrueman still gets his news from cable.

        2. Zeb   2 months ago

          OK, so not substack or twitter or the many other places where you can find independent reporting and commentary. A lot of it is crap and not all is truly independent, but I still say it's an improvement over the "legacy media" you list being the only game in town.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            "OK, so not substack or twitter or the many other places where you can find independent reporting and commentary. "

            I don't follow substack, twitter or many other sources. They may be independent, but I doubt they are unbiased, which was the complaint against PBS. The legacy media is basically the only game in town. You'll see at Reason, there is little in the way of news stories that aren't linked to the major newspapers in New York and Washington. These are also biased, evident in the stories that are not chosen to be covered, and other editorial decisions.

            I used to use Twitter and found its coverage of events like storms or earthquakes very timely and valuable. Once it was valuable or giving on the spot coverage to conflicts like Gaza. These days twitter, instagram, youtube, facebook routinely censor expressions of political support or memorializing the dead. They also publish incitements to kill or harm Palestinians that the legacy media has always refrained from doing.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              "I don't follow substack"

              Lmao.

            2. Zeb   2 months ago

              Of course they are biased. Just like pretty much every news source. In my opinion, better to have the bias up-front.

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "...Now there's only corporate funded news options..."

      Which:
      1) Don't have the guns
      2) Are not coercing you to fund their efforts.
      But to the imbecilic Truman, they were sorta the same.
      Remember:
      mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
      "Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."

    4. Marshal   2 months ago

      Imaging claiming that every product you use is the same because they are all produced by "corporations". Your house, toothpaste, streaming service, computer, favorite food, etc. and therefore it's all the same. This is the level of thought in FantasyLand.

      1. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "Imaging claiming that every product you use is the same because they are all produced by "corporations"

        There's media funded by corporations, and there once was media that received public funding. There was diversity, in other words.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          Remember:
          mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
          "Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."

          trueman is the 'owner' of smug and stupid.

        2. Marshal   2 months ago

          That's what I said, the character of everything is determined by the type of entity which creates it. You can tell this is true by noting the words house and toothpaste mean the same thing.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            I'm not sure what you're driving at. I urge you to read my comments again carefully. I'll do my best to answer any questions you might have about them.

            If you are arguing that news from corporate sponsored sources is unbiased and independent, then concentrate on that rather than trying to score juvenile debating points.

            1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

              "...I'm not sure what you're driving at..."

              We know. You're an idiotic piece of shit whose mommy once said you weren't.
              She lied; you're an imbecile.

            2. Marshal   2 months ago

              I'll do my best to answer any questions you might have about them.

              I don't have any questions, which you can tell because I didn't ask you a question. I have mockery for people who are so immersed in marxist propaganda they cannot speak coherently.

              1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                "I don't have any questions,"

                I just thought you might think you would lose face if you had to admit you couldn't follow my comment. I tried to offer you a 'safe space' where you could honestly confront your lack of understanding, knowing you wouldn't be mocked. Everyone here appreciates all the effort you put into defeating Marxism wherever you find it.

  31. Rick James   2 months ago

    D.C. has a great food scene, but restaurants have struggled in recent years, with a record number of closings last year. And at least part of the struggle has been the costs imposed by the city via changes to the way restaurants are required to compensate tipped workers. Yes, some of those changes have been paused, though not fully rolled back.

    Too local.

  32. Rick James   2 months ago

    As is sometimes the case, Trump did the right thing—but not in the ideal way.

    Reason: WE LIKE CUTTING SPENDING, BUT NOT WHEN YOU'RE MEAN ABOUT IT!

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Better take:
      We like cutting spending but we like non-dictatorial methods even more.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Lying Jeffy supports tax funded leftist propaganda.

        He also likes BBC, which is ironic given his feelings for children.

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        But you like unconstitutional methods right? That's what Clinton used to balance the budget, the line item veto.

      3. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

        "dictatorial methods" == the executive branch leader running the executive branch. Got it.

      4. Marshal   2 months ago

        We like cutting spending but we like non-dictatorial methods even more.

        Who is "we"? The comment addresses Reason, is he so delusional he thinks he's part of Reason?

        Regardless, what a fraud. The Obama unilaterally created a campus sex Stasi and Jeffey's only contribution has been to minimize the most illiberal institution in modern America.

        In fact the only difference between Trump's use of executive power and Dems over the last 3 plus decades is that the courts oppose Trump instead of assisting Dems.

      5. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        You don t like cutting spending at all. You’re a liar, and a Sorosite Marxist who has historically been on the predator friendly side of every issue related to sexual abuse and mutilation of children. That you come here after years of spouting such vile drivel expecting to have civil discourse with any decent person is laughable. You are reviled by all but the most evil of people (other democrats).

        So really, fuck off pedo.

    2. Super Scary   2 months ago
  33. Rick James   2 months ago

    The project is being funded with private donations that have been routed through the National Park Service. But even still, Judge Richard Leon said, Trump had exceeded his authority to proceed with the project unilaterally. Congress, he said, must explicitly authorize construction.

    He should put a safe injection site inside. (if you know you know)

  34. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Judge stops Trump's ballroom

    there's no law saying T can privately fund White House improvements and there's no law saying T can't, so I'm saying T can't. ~~ Judge Dick Leon

  35. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>And an Iranian official says the Strait of Hormuz will reopen, just not for America.

    willful blindness is never an attractive quality in an author

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      American ships rarely go though the Strait of Hormuz.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        ya. everyone but Pete seems to know

  36. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>this summer's forthcoming Supergirl movie.

    the stupid loudmouth actress already tanked it with her stupid loud mouth

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Yeah, but Lobo! The Main Man!

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        do I need to watch the trailer?

  37. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>On the supposed religious revival in America.

    if your demons are stronger than your prayers please seek help.

  38. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The rocket being used for the launch is 322 feet tall.

    It's not the size of your rocket it's how mad you make libertarians by using it.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Whatever gets me my hand phaser with disintegrate setting in a timely manner.

  39. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...And Trump's criticism of NPR's coverage of him made the executive order look like an act of personal pique rather than a speech-neutral decision not to fund a government program..."

    Only to TDS-addled steaming piles of lying shit like Suderman.

  40. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    the imbecile KJB is pure entertainment if it weren't so sad to watch the fall of the republic in real time. She is the harbinger of the future court. All justices will simply be party apparatchiks shortly. This goes for right and left.

  41. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    The NPR funding question is really straightforward.

    Are you a bolshevik who wants to use taxpayer money to have the government generate extreme left-wing propaganda for the purposes of manufacturing consent of the masses to your bolshevism? then yes, you support NPR.

    If not, you don't support NPR. It's that simple.

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      |-----------------------------NPR---Center--------------------------------------------------------------MAGA--|

      "NPR is extreme left wing."

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Bullshit:
        I-NPR(outright lefty lies)----------CNN----------CENTER-----------MAGA----FOX-I

        I-INTELLIGENT-------------------RETARDED-------------------------------------------MG-I

        Fuck off and die, asswipe.

      2. Super Scary   2 months ago

        Man, you are both stupid and dishonest. A bold combination.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Give him to the Canadians so they euthanize him.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        It only seems centrist to a debauched Marxist retard faggot, such as yourself. To humans, especially humans with intelligence, NPR is far left.

        M’kay?

  42. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    The birthright citizenship question is a conundrum for rational thinkers because who in their right find would support unfettered limitless granting of citizenship to anyone who happens to be inside your border at time of giving birth?
    No country on earth does this or ever has.
    It's clearly a process ripe for abuse.

    What is the real reason you would favor it? get emotional and fiery over the argument?

    There's only one reason. You want to import the rest of the world to turn america into something else than what it is now. That's it. That' the only reason.

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      The US has been importing the rest of the world since before it's founding and has always been changing. What makes the US of now so great that we must abandon 150 years of law to freeze it as it is? There are many many Americans who would love to see immigrants dilute evangelical communities. Evangelicals are worse for the US than immigrants.

      1. Marshal   2 months ago

        The US has been importing the rest of the world since before it's founding and has always been changing.

        This is the core of the left's lies. In the past America specifically imported people who agreed with the American ethos of freedom, self-sufficiency, and work. People who agree with this are still welcome, but the type of change they bring is minimal and welcome.

        Now however the left specifically privileges those who hate America and when they arrive leftists train them to hate America even more through the institutions they already control [media, academia, NGOs]. This is obviously a recipe for disaster which is exactly what leftists want. They're stupid enough they think a couple of decades of political power is worth being hung by the nearest crane when the third-worlders are numerous enough to take over.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          The commie scum wants to import more commie scum.

          1. Marshal   2 months ago

            Most of the imports aren't commies in any real sense, but then neither are commies. Both use government to control and loot their enemies while using the proceeds to reward their supporters.

            The difference is that third-worlders openly prioritize tribal, ethnic, and religious ties which means the white and black commies will mostly end up dangling from cranes.

    2. mtrueman   2 months ago

      " You want to import the rest of the world to turn america into something else than what it is now. That's it. That' the only reason."

      What's wrong with that? Things change. The cruelest law of the universe.

      1. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

        good god

        1. mtrueman   2 months ago

          When has America, or any other country for that matter, ever stopped turning into something other than it is now? Heraclitus told us long ago you can't put your foot in the same river twice. Weren't you listening?

          I agree it's a nasty trick of nature that things change. My advice: just accept it. Best way to avoid a spell in the gulag.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            My advice: Fuck off and die, asswipe.

          2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            My advice, kill yourself.

            Things change. And what kind of asshole are you to stand in the way?

  43. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    the sooner you understand that the consitution does not matter the better.

    It's all will to power. Whatever you think matters, you should support making that happen with whatever tortured reasoning is required to justify it in court. If you're against it, you should support whatever tortured reasoning or outright specious logic is required to declare it null. This is what everyone has been doing for 100 years now and if you think the constitution is a limiting factor to govt action you are not gonna make it.

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      Nope. There are many parts of the Constitution that are clear. 14A is one of them.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        MG.
        Is.
        Full.
        Of.
        Shit.

      2. Zeb   2 months ago

        A lot of people seem to think that it's clear. But they don't all agree on what it clearly says.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        It is clear. Birthright citizenship is not part of it.

      4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        BTW, opinions regarding the US Constitution from a 混蛋 can be properly ignored.
        Fuck off and die, shitstain.

  44. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

    Congress should've defunded NPR and PBS decades ago.
    I see no reason why a radio or a TV station should be massively subsidized by the American workers.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      If there ever was a reason, it was obsolete by the time cable TV became ubiquitous.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Even the nominal reason became "Mission Accomplished!" with the fall of the Berlin Wall.

    2. mtrueman   2 months ago

      "I see no reason why a radio or a TV station should be massively subsidized by the American workers."

      Lack of commercial breaks and quality of programming are two reasons you should look into. Why shouldn't workers subsidize quality TV, something they can easily and freely enjoy? They already subsidize ballet, opera, theater, museums, art galleries, marine corps, army and navy marching bands. And plenty more entertainments geared towards esoteric tastes.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        If they wanted that, a commercial source would gladly provide it at a profit. It would not have to be supplied at the point of a gun.
        More succinctly, you are full of shit.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Several streaming sources either don't have commercials or you can pay extra to skip them. Yes, he's full of shit.

  45. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    ?Honorable? judge said Not STEALING other people's money for a Gov-Ran press violates the 1A?

    Holy crap. How in the world does anyone flip words on their head like that?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Who's Laughing Now?

Charles Oliver | 6.1.2026 4:00 AM

Psychic Soldiers, Mind Readers, and Dolphin Drones: The Cold War's Weird Paranormal History

Arthur McFarlane | 5.31.2026 8:00 AM

The FCC Wants Warning Labels for Shows With 'Transgender' Content

Joe Lancaster | 5.31.2026 7:00 AM

Trump Loves Accusing Critics of Treason. U.S. Law Makes That Charge Hard To Prove—for Good Reason.

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2026 8:00 AM

Trump's Proposed $250 Bill Is Everything the Founders Despised

Billy Binion | 5.29.2026 4:47 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks