Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Middle East

Strait Outta Commission

Plus: Tucker Carlson says the CIA is after him, and Reason mourns the loss of longtime staffer Brian Doherty.

Robby Soave | 3.16.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Trump | Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian/Newscom
Trump (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian/Newscom)

President Donald Trump has called on foreign countries that rely on oil from the Middle East to help reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Iranian forces have closed the strait to most ship travel, which has fallen by about 90 percent in recent days. Due to the threat of Iranian attacks, international shipping companies have ceased using the all-important passage, causing global oil prices to spike. Iranian authorities have declared that the strait is closed only to enemies of the regime.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump asked China, France, Japan, South Korea, and the U.K. to deploy ships to reopen the strait.

"In the meantime, the United States will be bombing the hell out of the shoreline, and continually shooting Iranian Boats and Ships out of the water," wrote Trump. "One way or the other, we will soon get the Hormuz Strait OPEN, SAFE, and FREE!"

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

China did not specifically respond to this request, according to The New York Times. The French governments indicated it would be unlikely to intervene until the situation in the region was less precarious. Trump spoke with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer about the matter on Sunday, but no concrete plan has emerged from that conversation. In other words, nobody seems particularly inclined to help.

American public opinion regarding the war with Iran is decidedly mixed, and it is likely to atrophy as casualties and costs mount. Higher gas prices will certainly not help the GOP as it heads toward midterms.

Nevertheless, the Trump administration is prepared to continue a major bombing campaign against the Iranian regime. The administration reportedly believes that Mojtaba Khamenei, the new leader of the country, is alive but wounded following the strikes that killed his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson claims that the CIA is out to get him. In a video posted on X, Carlson said he has learned that the CIA is preparing a criminal referral for the Justice Department on the basis that he is "acting as an agent of a foreign power." Carlson denies that is doing anything of a sort. The feds have not confirmed whether Carlson is the target of such an investigation.

When you discover the CIA has been reading your texts in order to frame you for a crime. pic.twitter.com/XgoluHw8EG

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) March 14, 2026

Carlson, an outspoken opponent of the Trump administration's bombing campaign against Iran, tried and failed to talk Trump out of the war. More broadly, he is a prominent leader of the noninterventionist faction of MAGA, which extracted the (now broken) "no new wars" promise from Trump when he ran for president in 2024.

According to Carlson, the CIA has read his text messages and monitored his conversations with Iranian officials, and on that basis is claiming that he is violating the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA). FARA requires lobbyists who work on behalf of foreign governments to publicly register that they do so. The requirement is selectively enforced: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is not registered under FARA, even though the group engages in political activity designed to defeat officials who, for instance, oppose giving military aid to Israel.

Weaponizing FARA against dissenters in the name of cracking down on foreign influence is a serious First Amendment concern. Reason's Matthew Petti has noted the ways such crackdowns can censor legitimate political speech. "Practically, the question is how to separate Americans being ordered or tricked by a foreign government from Americans doing things of their own accord," wrote Petti last year. "Philosophically, the question is whether stamping out 'foreign influence' is possible or desirable in a free society—especially one that is so heavily involved in the rest of the world."

It's hard to say what exactly is happening with Carlson, given that we don't even know for sure whether this CIA inquiry is real. But we should be very worried at the idea of the government reading American citizens' texts, disagreeing with their foreign policy views, and then branding them puppets of foreign adversaries. Washington cannot require public commentators to register themselves: The First Amendment precludes such a thing.

Moreover, it would be a huge double standard if the Israeli government's lobbyists within the U.S. were somehow exempt from declaring themselves as such but opponents of Israeli government lobbyists had to first ask the feds for permission to speak up.

Brian Doherty, an esteemed chronicler of the libertarian political movement who has worked for this magazine for more than three decades, died unexpectedly over the weekend. He was 57.

Doherty will be fondly remembered and sorely missed. I was part of the wave of college students who came upon libertarianism in the '00s, during Ron Paul's rise; Doherty was a vital source of information about the campaign and the broader movement it birthed. His writings helped connect me with the libertarian professional network: the Cato Institute, the Institute for Humane Studies, and Reason. He knew our movement's lore better than anybody else.

Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie have both published reminiscences at Reason about Brian's life and work. This is from Matt's piece:

"Libertarians talk a lot about freedom and responsibility. Brian embodied both," Reason Editor in Chief Katherine Mangu-Ward recalls. "His weird, colorful life—filled with comics and festivals and music and books—was a model of life lived freely and openly. And in his thinking, reporting, and editing, he was one of the most conscientious and responsible people I have ever met. A libertarian hero in every sense."

Spelunking in subcultures both libertarian and whimsical led to a lot of early discoveries that the normies only sussed out later. Doherty profiled New Hampshire's Free State Project way back in 2004, caught Seasteaders on their then-rise in 2009, and started covering Bitcoin in 2013. Though, as he ruefully admitted later, he knew about the groundbreaking crypto currency as early as July 2010 yet somehow neglected to cash in.

"Had I shelled out, say, $2,000 on this innovative, anti-inflationary currency even a lazy six weeks after I was introduced to it," he wrote, "today I would be sitting on 28,571 bitcoins, the equivalent at press time of over $212 million in cash." More like $2 billion now, but who's counting?

After news of his death broke, Doherty's work colleagues filled up a long Slack thread with fond memories of his deep-seated sense of tolerance, his garrulous laugh, his fury at personal technology, his sometimes elliptical prose style. A staffer once made a T-shirt from a typically verbose Dohertian Slack message: "I try not to assume that because crazy people with crazy beliefs believe or used to believe the things I believe for what I think are right and sane reasons, that that is a sign that I am crazy. But it's getting harder and harder I confess."

Last June, I had the pleasure of interviewing Doherty at FreedomFest about his views on libertarianism in the age of Trump. He was sharp and insightful as ever; I remember him sparring with an audience participant who demanded that he commit himself to the Trump agenda. Rest in peace.


Scenes from Washington, D.C.: It's been just warm enough to commence non-winter activities: grilling on the rooftop, jogging by river, and, of course, riding my e-scooter.


QUICK HITS

  • One Battle After Another won the Oscar for Best Picture at the Academy Awards last night.
  • Paul Ehrlich, author of the false prophecy The Population Bomb, has died.
  • Gen Z voters are turning on Trump over the Iran War.
  • Meanwhile, Trump is demanding that certain journalists who cast doubt on his war be "brought up on Charges for TREASON."
  • Megyn Kelly and Mark Levin have escalated their war of words; the words now include "micropenis."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Remembering Brian Doherty, Chronicler of and Participant in Wild and Wonderful Subcultures

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Middle EastIranWarOilOil pricesForeign PolicyMilitaryWorldTrump AdministrationPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (214)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    President Donald Trump has called on foreign countries that rely on oil from the Middle East to help reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

    How embarrassing.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Wait till they find out how expensive oil is when trump is in charge of the strait.

      1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

        Should they not have to pay for security services for their oil?

        These Euro countries think they should have everything handed to them./ What are they kings and queens?

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          They were too busy trying to but up ports near the Panama canal to control trade here, so they demand we pay for their security there.

        2. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

          Not when it was the US who created the problem.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            I know right. Not like Iran has been issuing threats since the 80s.

            What a retard you are.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              Tony hates America.

          2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            Not like the 混蛋 had more than one brain cell.
            Fuck off and die, asswipe.

          3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            Should they not have to pay for security services for their oil?

            ...We're here to introduce something called "protection money"...

            https://youtu.be/Yi8e4M3Us9A?t=79

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              And you’re here to perpetuate the incorrect idea that we continue to pay for the rest of the world. But then you don’t even believe in America’s sovereignty.

              1. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

                I'm sorry you're not able to grasp the core libertarian concept of individual sovereignty.

          4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Who exactly is attacking ships, you fucking retard?

            1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

              The US attacked far more Iranian ships then Iran has other ships. The US sank an Iranian navy ship that was unarmed.

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                And?

                Can I interest you in a lesson on the Barbary pirates?

              2. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

                If it was a naval vessel, then it was a valid military target, by definition. Whether it had any effective weapons is beside the point.

              3. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

                Iran has been attacking ships in the Gulf off and on for 47 years, you knownothing stooge

              4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                You are (or play) a cunt dumb beyond words.

              5. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Tony, your treasonous ant American propaganda is disturbing. Maybe you need a visit from Homeland Security.

          5. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            Well, Jimmy Carter did create the problem in the first place. Before he fucked everything up, Iran was an ally.

        3. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

          They are all queens.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Counterpoint... the myth he legalized microbrews.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    In the meantime, the United States will be bombing the hell out of the shoreline...

    A real estate crisitunity in the making.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

      It'll be Oprah and Maui all over again.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The French governments indicated it would be unlikely to intervene until the situation in the region was less precarious.

    How do you say lol in frog?

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      Je me rends

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Are we gonna do the Freedom Fries thing again?

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          When did we stop?!?

        2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          Fries are just utensils for eating ketchup.

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            You need better fries.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      When it comes to defending straights, I'd rather have an Iranian division in front of me than a French division behind me.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        Works for defending gays too.

      2. charliehall   2 months ago

        So said the Germans before the First Battle of the Marne.

        So said all of the continent of Europe except Portugal, Spain, and Russia before the French conquered them under Napoleon.

        So said Cornwallis before the Battle of Yorktown.

        Were it not for the French, you would be singing "God Save the King".

        And France is the only country in the world other than the US to have a modern nuclear powered aircraft carrier.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          And all those French people are dead. Long dead. Now they’re a bunch of losers and leftist cowards, just like you.

          No leftist should ever consider themselves qualified to lecture anyone about bravery. Especially you.

          Retard

  4. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Paul Ehrlich, author of the false prophecy The Population Bomb, has died.

    And now the population is a little smaller.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Crossing my fingers Michael Mann is next.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        You misspelled sullum

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          So Boehm is chopped liver?

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      What will Ehrlich think of the over-crowding in Hell?

    3. Agammamon   2 months ago

      Human average IQ just went up.

    4. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      If he had believed what he said, he would have killed himself decades ago.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Trump spoke with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer about the matter on Sunday, but no concrete plan has emerged from that conversation.

    Maybe he can promise to import all the Shi'ites when this is over.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      See below. Canada volunteered.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        MOAR FOOD TRUCKZ!

  6. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson claims that the CIA is out to get him.

    You know who else had US intelligence up his ass and also blamed the Jews for his country's ills?

    1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Mel Gibson?

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Cartman?

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Mayor Mamdani?

    4. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Ayatollah Khamenie?

    5. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Kanye?

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    According to Carlson, the CIA has read his text messages and monitored his conversations with Iranian officials...

    Wait. What?

    1. Ska   2 months ago

      You think those bow ties grow on trees?

    2. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

      And he knows this secret operation is happening, how?

      More trying to remain relevant and become more popular.

      Also, Carlson is not MAGA not that MAGA is anything more than America first policies to remove the democrat destruction which will result in the country being great again.

      1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        not that MAGA is anything more than America first policies

        How much kool Aid did you drink?

        *queue Kool-aid man busting through a flaming oil tanker*

        1. Square = Circle   2 months ago

          How much kool Aid did you drink?

          All of it.

        2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

          Make America Great =/= America First
          Where is the big disconnect?

        3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Quicktown Brix is all about America last, or not at all.

          Pinko

      2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        Is that not the default operating position ever since at least Snowden's revelations if not a decade prior?

  8. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Doherty will be fondly remembered and sorely missed.

    Unexpected and sad.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...and, of course, riding my e-scooter.

    OH MY GOD

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      If a Vespa is like a fat chick... is an e scooter like a...

      Never mind. Not going there with Robbie.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        You know what else provides electric stimulation?

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          1940s psychiatrists?

        2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

          Teasers?

        3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Dr. Frankenfurter?

        4. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          Capital punishment?

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Like Tony’s baseball sized vibrator?

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    One Battle After Another won the Oscar for Best Picture at the Academy Awards last night.

    Sure why not. Or maybe not sure why. I only saw half the nominees but this wasn't even the best of those but whatever.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      What's an "Oscar"?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        A small statuette given to pompous actors and directors who think their farts smell like unicorns and happiness, but that’s not important right now.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      At this point, the only way the Oscars viewership numbers could get any lower is if they held it on the field at halftime at the Superbowl.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Trying to make Bad Bunny look good?

    3. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      Which is an indication of the obnoxious politics of the Academy voters and the dire state of the movie industry.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Paul Ehrlich, author of the false prophecy The Population Bomb, has died.

    Finally did his part.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Now if only other globalists can follow suit.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Gen Z voters are turning on Trump over the Iran War.

    They love them some Mullah rule.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Progressives for medieval theocracy!

    2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      I know you're snark but I'll give it to the generation most likely to be impacted by another forever war would turn against anyone even coming close to that. Time will tell if it's another Maduro or another Rumsfeld "flowers in the streets" situation.

    3. charliehall   2 months ago

      Threatening to draft an entire generation into the military for a war that the US will likely lose is not a way to increase your popular support.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        You’re such a Marxist pussy. And incredible stupid. If people aren’t throwing you down the stairs already, then do it yourself. Maybe that will get through to you.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...Trump is demanding that certain journalists who cast doubt on his war be "brought up on Charges for TREASON."

    Now is not the time to be poisoning Gen Z against the effort, people.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Megyn Kelly and Mark Levin have escalated their war of words; the words now include "micropenis."

    Trump sent the left over the deep end. Was it he who did the same to the right? Or was it Charlie Kirk's death?

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Megyn Kelly has a micropenis?

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Hey, not all chicks can be hung like Michelle.

        1. tracerv   2 months ago

          That's Big Mike to you, bub.

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      When did Kelly and Levin become part of the Left?

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Just Kelly, dumbass.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Why am I the only one giving the newsletter any engagement today. Did the ides get everyone yesterday?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      What am I, chopped liver?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        YES.

    2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Everyone is filling out their women's NCAA bracket.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        I just wrote in the under for each game.

    3. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      sorry Fist you died and are now in hell.

      You get to respond to the dailies an unlimited amount of times, but no one else can see your quips

    4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Spring break for kids. Slept in.

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Jeffy must be busy.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Blame it on lingering DST lag.

  16. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Canada has seemingly become a safe have for IRGC leaders fleeing being targeted.

    https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/03/14/is-the-iranian-regime-relocating-to-canada-n4950644

    Meanwhile CNN is under question after being seen partying with Iranian officials.

    https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2026/03/13/cnn-officials-caught-celebrating-regime-iranian-embassy-uk

    Im also not shocked robby didnt include the Iranian statement that they are only targeting US and Israeli ships, meaning 99% of boats can go through the straights. Next up will reason post the AI generated pictures Iran is relying on? Iran is relying on western media to stoke fear as they cant actually control the straights. In 1987 and 1988 they used mine ships to close it down. Those ships were destroyed a week ago. But western media keeps helping Iran by pushing the fear.

    1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

      That and if Greek and Indian and China bound ships can pass then it is not mined.

    2. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      Canada does not have hostilities with Iran and they are free to control their borders as they wish.

      Iran's targeting of all ships is the only leverage they have.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Kinda like Argentina and the Nazis, er, "Swiss", in 1945, right?

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        They aren't targeting all ships. They backtracked retard Tony.

        Weird you post this after blaming the US above.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Not weird. Retarded.

      3. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        Canada has designated the Iranian regime as a terrorist organization.

        1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

          Which is wrong. Governmental agencies or militaries by definition can not be terrorists.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            Bullshit.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            So then the terrorist attacks Iran funds are all declarations of war right retard china tony?

            1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

              Yes. And if they attack civilian targets it is a war crime. Terrorism is a non-government group attacking a non-government group for political reasons.

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                So youre now saying Iran has always been at war with us. Correct?

              2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

                No, terrorism has a definition - the attack on noncombatants, especially civillians or civilian infrastructure, for intimidation, poltical, or religious purposes. Doesn't matter if it's an individual, a group, or a government doing it.

                1. Zeb   2 months ago

                  I prefer your definition. But most words have multiple definitions.

                2. charliehall   2 months ago

                  Such as the US attack on the school in Iran.

          3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Amazing. With each comment you prove yourself even more retarded.

          4. charliehall   2 months ago

            Iran has been sponsoring terrorism all over the Middle East for decades.

            The problem isn't that Iran needs regime change, it is that Trump had no clue how to pull it off and is even more in over his head today. Sadly the Trump Cult continues to defend him.

      4. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

        That was the reasoning behind German unrestricted submarine warfare in WWI. It spectacularly did not work out well for them.

        1. charliehall   2 months ago

          Even the German unrestricted submarine warfare didn't get the US into WW1. It took Zimmermann copping to his notorious telegram to Carranza -- probably the single biggest diplomatic error of the 20th century. The US had ten thousand soldiers in Mexico, having invaded the previous year. Carranza didn't hate the US, despite the invasion, which was the most incompetent US military action ever prior to the current one against Iran. Carranza had already forced it to withdraw before the US knew the contents of the telegram but Carranza had no interest in further war with the US.

          The British had been worried that the US might enter the war on the side of Germany because of US objections to the British naval blockade of Germany. The worry vanished when the Germans did their U Boat campaign. This is according to Winston Churchill.

          U Boat sinkings of two Mexican tankers in 1942 brought Mexico into WW2 on the side of the US. All from WW1 was forgiven and there was massive Mexican immigration to the US in order to replace the agricultural workers who had been drafted into the US military. Had MAGA been around then, it would have preferred for Americans to starve and to have lost the war.

          The US would conduct similar unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan in WW2, reducing Japan to starvation.

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      The plus side is it will be really easy to assassinate the IRGC leaders in Canada. Much easier than in the US.

  17. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Failed predictions from media economists like Boehm are now saying trump has simply been lucky their failed predictions didnt come true.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/media-says-gambling-trump-got-lucky-economy

    1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

      LMFAO. Of course they said that. When will these fools admit they were wrong?

      Perhaps if they stopped thinking themselves geniuses and ended the prediction game then they wouldn't look so stupid.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Just one step removed from apocalyptic cults who claim credit for preventing their predicted world-ending calamities because they prayed really, really hard.

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        "...When will these fools admit they were wrong?..."

        When you need ice skates in hell.

  18. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    In a story getting no attention, a man walked into an elementary school armed and in tactical gear.

    https://www.khou.com/article/news/crime/man-enter-spring-elementary-school-armed-court-docs-show/285-941acaf7-09c3-4666-b479-0a8dafed017b

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      "Kyle Najm Chris, also known as Muhi Mohanad Najm"

      I am sure Chris/Najm was just enjoying a peaceful stroll through the school.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        72 virgins story hour

    2. Minadin   2 months ago

      Muhi Mohanad Najm, 39, of Klein, was charged with possession of a prohibited weapon, a third-degree felony, which prohibits carrying weapons on school premises.

      1. charliehall   2 months ago

        The Second Amendment crowd will argue that that law should be held to be unconstitutional.

        I am in Indianapolis right now, a big pro gun state. Yet all the government buildings have warnings against bringing guns into them. The pro Second Amendment politicians are hypocrites. If they actually believed that more guns make you safe, they would be begging for citizens to bring their guns into the government offices and the state capitol. But Republicans have long been hypocrites on this; they banned Open Carry in California after the Black Panthers carried rifles into the State House in Sacramento. Ronald Reagan signed the ban into law.

    3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      He was just there for Terrorist Story Hour.

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      I heard Andrew Wilkow talking about that Friday on his radio show.

  19. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Platner is becoming more bold. Now defends his nazi tattoo.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15643773/liberal-senate-graham-platner-nazi-tattoo-maine.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=social-twitter_mailonline

    At first Platner apologized, saying he didn't realize the symbol was associated with Nazism, and promised he'd get it removed.

    But in an interview this week with news blog Zeteo, Platner pushed back, defending the tattoo as merely a 'skull-and-crossbones' and 'an eminently reasonable thing'.

    During the interview he also recommended the war movie Come and See, which prominently and repeatedly shows the similar 'Totenkopf' on Nazi uniforms.

    'Everybody should watch Come and See,' he said.

    The fact that the 1985 film is one of his favorites may undermine his claims that he didn't know the association of the symbol with Nazis.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      How long before Platner blames his tattoo on the Jooos?

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Asking for JFucked?

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      'Everybody should watch Come and See,' he said.

      The fact that the 1985 film is one of his favorites may undermine his claims that he didn't know the association of the symbol with Nazis.

      "May"? I'm not able to rightly comprehend... so the movie where this guy orders a woman who tries to flee with her child to be raped to insanity while her child is locked in a barn and burned alive made you think the totenkopf was... just another symbol?

      I saw the movie "Gaslit By My Husband" and assumed gaslighting may be a good thing.

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      “It’s going to be a maze”

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKsr-ZiaSaA

  20. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Leftist media does the norm means. Worries more about Islamophobia than the 4 Muslim terror attempts last week.

    https://gothamist.com/news/we-are-enough-after-islamophobic-attacks-mamdani-comforts-nycs-muslim-community

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      I say again:
      A phobia is an irrational fear.
      Islam will kill you if you don't submit.
      Fearing Islam is a rational act, not a phobia.

      1. charliehall   2 months ago

        I fear the Christians in the US more than the Muslims. Carlson, Owens, and Fuentes are targeting me.

    2. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      And even worse, the most dedicated propagandists either painted them as "Pennsylvania teens" who had their nice weather day ruined, or the attack as an "anti muslim attack on Mamdani"

      lamp posts, all of them

      1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

        Lamp posts with burned out bulbs, less than dim.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        We can start with tar and feathers (which often turns out fatal).

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Ah, I was hoping more for drawing and quartering.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Can't say quarter anymore. Ask mark Kelly.

  21. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Is Cuba next? Communist hq torched.

    Almost like passive pay off authoritarian approach to remain peaceful wasn't working the last few decades. Peace through strength is likely more effective.

    https://pjmedia.com/sarah-anderson/2026/03/14/night-8-erupts-cuban-protesters-torch-communist-party-hq-n4950640

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Meanwhile drew Holden goes through legacy media spin on the incidents.

      https://drewholden.substack.com/p/terrorisms-spin-doctors

    2. Ska   2 months ago

      It was amusing to see the top of the video captioned as Moron, Cuba.

  22. Yuno Hoo   2 months ago

    Paul Ehrlich, author of the false prophecy The Population Bomb, has died.

    Looks like he got one prediction correct.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'American public opinion regarding the war with Iran is decidedly mixed, and it is likely to atrophy as casualties and costs mount.'

    Are these the same people who prefer to pay mafia protection money instead of taking the risk to fight back?

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      Iran was not a threat to the US.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Sorry, but this retired effort is so patently wrong it must be deliberate. Do you get paid directly by the mullahs or through the Soros Foundation.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Fair, but Iran was obviously less of a risk to us before Trump and Bibi attacked them and all indications are this will be true for decades to come.

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

            Did they become a threat with trump or from trump?

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              When you argue from complete ignorance like Mike, reality is what you want it to be.

              The Alice in wonderland version of history.

              1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                Iran being more likely to attack Americans after Trump started a war by using the US armed forces to bombard them for over 2 weeks with missiles including a strike that killed ~250 girls in their school is "The Alice in wonderland version of history" argument from complete ignorance?

                Enjoy your delusions now because a hard rain a-gonna fall at the midterms.

                1. Marshal   2 months ago

                  That seems similar to the fact that we're more likely to attack them after they killed 240 of our marines, and after they attacked our embassy and help hostages for over a year.

                  But as usual the Blame America First crowd ignores their actions so they can solely blame us.

                  1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                    The question here isn’t “has Iran ever acted aggressively?” — obviously it has. The question is whether bombing Iran today makes Americans safer or increases the likelihood of retaliation going forward.

                    1. Marshal   2 months ago

                      Iran "acts aggressively", Trump "started a war". You can't help minimizing their actions.

                      Meanwhile not "starting" a war led to over 1,000 killed:

                      Iraq Conflict (2003–2011): The U.S. Department of Defense has stated that Iran-backed militias were responsible for the deaths of at least 603 American troops, representing roughly 17% of all U.S. combat fatalities in Iraq during that period.

                      Beirut Bombings (1983-1984): Iran-backed Hezbollah is responsible for the 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, which killed 241 American military personnel. Other attacks on the U.S. embassy and annex in Beirut during this time killed at least 19 more Americans.

                      October 7 Attacks (2023): Iran-backed Hamas terrorists killed at least 46 Americans during the October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel.

                      Khobar Towers Bombing (1996): An attack on U.S. airmen in Saudi Arabia, linked to Iran, killed 19 service members.

                      Ongoing Attacks: Between October 2023 and November 2024, more than 180 attacks by Iranian proxies against U.S. forces in the Middle East resulted in at least 3 additional U.S. service members killed.

                    2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      You're just policing my speech and attacking me for not being "patriotic" enough to use your preferred rhetoric while frame shifting away from the issue of discussion, i.e. will incidents like you pointed out be more or less likely now?

                    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                      "...You're just policing my speech and attacking me for not being "patriotic" enough.."

                      No, TDS-addled shitforbrains, you're being called on your obvious bullshit.
                      You are permitted to fuck off and die; please do so.

                    4. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      Iran "acts aggressively", Trump "started a war". You can't help minimizing their actions.

                      So, of your 1,000 bloody shirts:

                      A full 844 were killed in civil wars that the US didn't have the sense to stay out of.

                      Hamas take money from Iran, yes, but to act like Oct. 7 was somehow primarily an attack by Iran on the US is just . . . weird.

                      The one you can most directly hang on them is the Khobar Towers bombing from 30 years ago, but again - we had troops in harm's way and knew it.

                      Which brings me back to, if these are such urgent casus belli why did Trump work so hard to avoid war with Iran in his first term?

                    5. Marshal   2 months ago

                      You're just policing my speech

                      I've aways opposed propaganda, you minimize this as "policing speech" because you don't want people to recognize the clear relationship between things are described inaccurately to drive to the preferred conclusion. Once people accept that murdering 1,000 people should be characterized and therefore treated the same as cutting someone off in traffic the desired conclusion is proven.

                      Control of language is why the far left has been so successful in controlling our politics despite never being more than 10-15% of voters.

                    6. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      I’m suggesting realistic outcomes from known circumstances. Do you disagree? We don't know because you offer no rebuttal, instead making each response an attack on me, not my argument.

                    7. Marshal   2 months ago

                      making each response an attack on me,

                      It's a criticism of your tactic. That's why I'm not particularly interested in disputing the final outcome. There's no way to tell if they will kill fewer or more than ~1,000 Americans over the next 5 decades. But you refuse to forthrightly characterize events because you want people to believe your preference is the only real conclusion. A big part of this is pretending the number is 0 rather than 1,000 and this can be achieved by wrongly framing the conflict as beginning with Trump.

                    8. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      But I didn’t characterize the number as 0 or that this conflict began with Trump. I’m saying that when conflicts escalate from dormant hostility to active military strikes, there is a new risk of blowback. This is a real concern, not a rhetorical tactic.

                      You’re concerned that I acknowledge past Iranian actions. (I do.) I’m concerned about on what our military's actions today will make more likely tomorrow.

                    9. Marshal   2 months ago

                      This is a real concern, not a rhetorical tactic.

                      Of course it's a rhetorical tactic. Their history proves they kill our guys whenever they can, it's dishonest to claim future attacks only occur in response to Trump's attack.

                    10. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      Is Quixy is hiding behind the “you’re just attacking me” ploy. Becasie he lost the argument.

                      What a cowardly shitweasel. And he doesn’t even believe in America’s sovereignty. He’s a traitor.

                    11. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Of course it's a rhetorical tactic...It's dishonest to claim future attacks only occur in response to Trump's attack.

                      Now you're just left with a strawman and the irony of doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. More likely ≠ "only occur in response to Trump's attack."

                      Their history proves they kill our guys whenever they can,

                      Goddammit, Marshall. And I thought you were intelligent. But now you sink to the level of the homocidal-Nazi-insult-troll just above.

                      Do you remember how Iran responded to the bombing of their nuclear facility? We were warned and their nominal retaliation was designed to spare casualties. They took every opportunity to avoid this conflict dating all the way back to GWB, but Trump and Bibi kept poking their asshole until they shit.

                      Here. Learn something: Ron Paul's Giuliani moment.

                    12. Marshal   2 months ago

                      Fake QB:

                      instead making each response an attack on me, not my argument.

                      Real QB:

                      I thought you were intelligent.

                      Personal attacks are wrong and indicative the attacker has lost the debate, except when QB makes them.

                      They took every opportunity to avoid this conflict dating all the way back to GWB,

                      They didn't try very hard since they killed a thousand of our guys. But there's no Iran supporting propaganda he won't support. He interprets the same fact pattern, intermittent attacks with lulls between, as "trying not to fight" by Iran and warmongering by us. This is what happens when you start off with a defined conclusion, in this case America bad and Iran a victim, and try to fit the data to it rather than working forward from the data to a conclusion.

                    13. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

                      Every comment from me was trying to steer the debate back to the topic of discussion and every comment from you was trying to steer it back to me. You achieved your goal of irritating me to the point of getting a scathing personal attack of "I thought you were intelligent."

                      This is what happens when you start off with a defined conclusion

                      Which is exactly what you did by misinterpreting and being completely close-minded that I am saying "America bad and Iran a victim" despite being beat over the head with statements to the contrary. Do you project the same malice on Ron Paul when he says these same things?

                  2. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                    If what's going on now is retaliation for their attacks 45 years ago, why was Trump opposed to going to war with Iran right up until a few weeks ago?

                    Trump had a golden opportunity to go to war with Iran his first term, and he intentionally scuttled it. Why?

                    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      You know. I did not you peg you for an apologist. You were given the list of known attacks by Iran and its subsidies/proxies, yet here you pretend the last attack was 45 years ago.

                      Above you even try claiming Iranian proxies aren't proxies.

                      What the fuck is wrong with you?

                      Be against the attacks. Fine. But straight up denying reality to do so? Shows you realize your argument is weak as shit.

            2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Definitely from Trump.

          2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Typical pinko, the enemy is only a problem because we made them mad. Thats such a weak, idiotic argument, and total,y usluported bu history or current facts.

            What is a fact is the undeniable conclusion that you’re a gutless Marxist.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        A certain embassy takeover, a marine barracks bombing, and several other incidents say otherwise, Dr. Retard.

        1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

          Isolated incidents over the last 47 years does not make them an immediate threat.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Can you define isolated?

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              He really can’t. And if Tony is actually in America, Homeland Security should pick him up and interrogate him.

      3. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        Yeah, it's not like they've been planning nuclear holocaust for 4 decades and proudly boasting of it.

      4. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Here's a thought experiment: if your neighbor were firing his rifle every day in his back yard, at a target with your picture on it, while shouting "DEATH TO MOLLYGODIVA!", would you feel threatened?

        1. Square = Circle   2 months ago

          Now do the same scenario, except it's not your neighbor but someone on the literal opposite side of the planet.

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            Irrelevant. We have IT and jets and rockets and stuff that make the world small.

            1. Square = Circle   2 months ago

              We have IT and jets and rockets and stuff that make the world small.

              We do, but they don't.

              1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

                Yes, they do. Or did until recently.

              2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                Lol. Pathetic response.

              3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Yeah, they did. And enough material to make a dozen nuclear warheads to place on those missiles. The IRGC has to be exterminated.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            There is literally a post of their attacks above. And it wasn't even exhaustive. Yes. Pretend if you ignore shit it doesnt happen. Great argument.

  24. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Scenes from Washington, D.C.: It's been just warm enough to commence non-winter activities: grilling on the rooftop, jogging by river, and, of course, riding my e-scooter.'

    What, no immigrant food trucks, gay sex, or weed?

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Maybe "grilling on the rooftop" is some kind of code.

  25. JFree   2 months ago

    President Donald Trump has called on foreign countries that rely on oil from the Middle East to help reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Iranian forces have closed the strait to most ship travel, which has fallen by about 90 percent in recent days.

    This is a perfect example of crappy US/western media coverage. 'Reopen' is not remotely the objectively correct word to use. The Strait is open - for the first time in decades - to anyone who wants to pay in something other than dollars and who is not 'allied' with the US/Israel. But that requires Iran 'agreeing' to the passage. Pakistan, China, and even India have negotiated passage - and France and Italy are working on that. Korea and SouthEast Asia and others will likely try soon. IOW - what Iran is doing is a)trying to break reserve currency status of the dollar; b)trying to break the US 'alliances' with the Gulf countries; c)trying to keep everyone except US/Israel out of the war v Iran and d)trying to break existing sanctions against Iran (which is related to dollar as reserve currency.

    Everyone outside the US understands what is happening. It may not work - and Trump's approach to restoring dollar dominance and military hegemony may well work. But since the US (and maybe Western) media coverage (including Reason) is utter crap, its only value is to create useful idiots. Instead, Top Men will decide on such issues as to why the US will be in yet another war.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      ^ Many words to say "I'm a fucking ignoramus".

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Those wacky Jooos, right?

    3. JFree   2 months ago

      On the bright side - Trump is beginning to roll out the obvious alternative to his initial 'plan' re opening up the Strait.

      “They should come and they should help us protect it. You could make the case that maybe we shouldn’t even be there at all, because we don’t need it. We have a lot of oil. We’re the number one producer anywhere in the world times two.”

      Yes you could make that case Trump - and you just raised the trial balloon. What you haven't yet done is realize that the existing strategy itself is the failure. "Protecting the strait' is not at all about protecting oil flows - it is about protecting US alliances in the Middle East and no one else on Earth outside the Middle East should be paying for US alliances in the Middle East.

      He may be phrasing this alternative in his usual petulant child-bully self - but in fact getting the fuck out of the Middle East is a HUGE positive for the US.

      No doubt the morons of the MAGA commentariat cannot remotely process Trump own contradictory thoughts except through their useful idiot cult-worshipper lens.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        'No doubt the TDS-addled streaming piles of lying shit cannot remotely process Trump's thoughts except through their imbecilic cult-worshipper lens.'

        Fixed, asswipe.

  26. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Megyn Kelly and Mark Levin have escalated their war of words; the words now include "micropenis."'

    On which one?

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      It's 1" Hiroshimas and vibrating IEDs you keep in your purse on both sides.

  27. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    Other countries would be stupid to get involved in the war.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      As if you have the ability to recognize levels of intelligence, you retarded pile of shit.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Molly just wants her Chinese masters to get their cheap clandestine Iranian oil back.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        But for china not to pay for the security of it.

        1. mtrueman   2 months ago

          You've been paying for it for more than 40 years. Are you satisfied you're getting your money's worth?

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      You know, you’re something of a retard yourself.

  28. Rick James   2 months ago

    the Institute for Humane Studies

    This is a thing?

  29. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    You may think that swinging dicks shouldn’t appear in a judicial opinion. You’re not wrong. But as much as you might understandably be shocked and displeased to merely encounter that phrase in this opinion, I hope we can all agree that it is far more jarring for the unsuspecting and exposed women at Olympus Spa — someo as young as thirteen — to be visually assaulted by the real thing.

    https://thefederalist.com/2026/03/16/media-29-federal-judges-freak-out-over-rude-words-in-dissent-attacking-trans-child-abuse/

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      "vulgar barroom talk"

      "If you're going to talk about hitting minors with a swinging dick, go to a bar. That's what they're for. Keep it out of our spas."

      JFROFLMAOC.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Its a pretty funny dissent.

        Media of course is outraged that their narratives were broken so easily.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Why do you hate the ladydick?

    3. Marshal   2 months ago

      It's pretty funny left wingers think they need to be protected from the words "swinging dick" but others should be fine with actual swinging dicks since they're no big deal.

  30. mad.casual   2 months ago

    In several groundbreakingly historic firsts, Commander Yvonne Gray officially court-martialed.

    After the Monty Python-esque "The ship ran aground, caught fire, and *then* sank.", do you even really have to say it?

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      This is why you never let chicks drive.

  31. mtrueman   2 months ago

    "Iranian forces have closed the strait to most ship travel, which has fallen by about 90 percent in recent days."

    According to the Iran foreign minister, the Strait is open, provided the ships aren't related to Israel or the United States, countries that launched an unprovoked attack on Iran in February. Ships from India, China, Pakistan and Turkey have passed through. NATO members France and Italy are negotiating passage with Iran.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Yes, we know the media lies all the time.

      1. mtrueman   2 months ago

        Yes, and now you know that the Strait is open to countries that are not involved in the aggression. I think this would be something to celebrate in a magazine that promotes free trade and non aggression.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          "Yes, and now you know that the Strait is open to countries that are not involved in the aggression."

          Which is yet one more lie. It's the Jews, right asswipe?

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          And you celebrate the IRGC.

  32. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >he is a prominent leader of the noninterventionist faction of MAGA,

    No, he is not Soave. You and the Leftists want so bad for him to be a 'thought leader'.

  33. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

    Too bad Paul Ehrlich died of cancer and not starvation like he should have. Hopefully all his dreams will come true in hell.

  34. Roberta   2 months ago

    we don't even know for sure whether this CIA inquiry is real. But we should be very worried at the idea

    You seriously recommending people be worried at ideas?

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Tucker should be investigated. He may be a traitor.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

California Can't Define 'Hate Speech' But May Mandate Workplace Training Anyway

J.D. Tuccille | 5.1.2026 7:00 AM

Review: Latest Bridgerton Season Explores Personal Autonomy

Reem Ibrahim | From the June 2026 issue

Review: Minecraft Is Still Getting Better Over 15 Years After Its Original Release

Jack Nicastro | From the June 2026 issue

Brickbat: Who's Gonna Drive You Home?

Charles Oliver | 5.1.2026 4:00 AM

Canada's New 'Sovereign Wealth Fund' Is Actually a Debt-Fueled Spending Scheme

Reem Ibrahim | 4.30.2026 4:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks