The Reading Method That Left Many Kids Behind
Balanced Literacy downplays structured phonics, where kids learn by memorizing letters' sounds. Is that why some are struggling to read?
"My child can't read!"
That's become a common complaint from parents.
Why? It might be because kids are distracted by social media and video games.
But I think it's also because reading instruction became lazy and political.
"Progressives" at teachers' colleges pushed a reading technique called "Balanced Literacy."
Instead of memorizing sounds and letters, teachers push what they call "cueing," guessing words based on their context, or pictures.
Balanced Literacy downplays "structured phonics," the older technique where kids memorize letters' sounds and learn to sound out words.
Balanced Literacy does sound more fun than boring phonics drills. Progressives said it would make kids want to read.
It mostly didn't. Yet it was largely accepted until about two years ago, when podcaster Emily Hanford released a series called Sold a Story. It resonated with parents who were upset that their children couldn't read.
"It didn't seem like they were really teaching them to read," one complained. "It seemed like they were teaching them to sound like they could read."
A teacher contacted the podcast to say: "I trained other people in balanced literacy using that cueing system. I'm mad. I'm saddened for the kids that I've taught."
Now, more than 40 states have passed "science of reading" laws that put more emphasis on structured phonics.
That upsets education professors like Andrew Johnson, who teaches teachers at Minnesota State University. "I hope they look back and call this the 'Hanford Era' in 10 years," Johnson says, "when they see this house of cards come tumbling down, when they see they've wasted billions of dollars on this boondoggle!"
Johnson says blaming teachers for bad reading scores ignores "social things like poverty." He spreads social justice messages, like: "How literacy is taught has everything to do with things like race, class, culture and identity," and argues that reading instruction should be left up to teachers.
Teachers like that idea.
Not teaching phonics is popular because its "drill and kill" technique is tedious.
The leftists at Time magazine even quoted a teacher calling phonics "colonizing…the man telling us what to do." Some opposed phonics simply because President George W. Bush pushed it.
But phonics just works better.
"We have all these scientists, researchers who are not political, and they've been in the labs, looking at brain scans, looking at rigorous studies, and we know that phonics is the way that kids learn to read," says reading app developer Niels Hoven.
A change in Mississippi schools provided more evidence. Mississippi once ranked last among states in reading.
Then Mississippi added more phonics to the curriculum and held back those who couldn't read.
Scores rose faster than in any other state. People call it the "Mississippi Miracle."
I confront Professor Johnson about that:
"Mississippi went up! Where's your state?…Fifth from the bottom!…Because of your bad teaching!"
"I wish the world were as black and white as that," he replies. "I wish there were an algorithm."
"There is an algorithm to teach reading!" replies Hoven.
He uses one in his app, Mentava Reading.
"First step…memorize the sounds the letters make….Second step…learn to blend those sounds together. That's the entire reading algorithm. It's not rocket science."
He boasts that with the help of apps like his, "Two-year-olds [are] now reading simple books. I think we really undersold what kids are capable of."
Today, thankfully, parents have better choices. Lots of apps teach reading, including free ones, like Khan Academy's.
And when it comes to kids learning to read, parents should remember that teachers can't do the whole job themselves; they need parents as partners. What parents do may matter as much or more than school.
You teach the joy of words just by talking to your kids, singing, making up stories, reading aloud.
You can teach them regardless of the progressive idiocy they may get in school.
COPYRIGHT 2026 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Phonics is important, but parents are critical. If kids don't see their parents reading, if parents aren't pushing their kids to read, it doesn't matter how schools approach reading education.
it doesn't matter how schools approach reading education
Yes it does.
Marva Collins was somehow able to teach very low income kids in Chicago, with terrible parental situations, successfully.
Kids can learn anything they want to ... but they have to want to. They have to have some reason to want to open a book and read, or even to open a messaging app and read messages. If all kids get in school is hatred of learning, hatred of knowing, hatred of doing well and passing tests and being competent, of course they aren't going to learn to read or do arithmetic.
Readin' writin' and 'rithmetic are the secrets to success, and wokism hates success. Success is racist, oppressive, and competitive. It leads to racist oppressive slavers who think they are good at something.
+1 My kids learned using something more like structured phonics and they learned to read younger than I did. Moreover, the complaint "It seemed like they were teaching them to sound like they could read." is the exact opposite of how I would describe the experience from both sides.
I was exceptionally good at running over letters and making the right noises, even regurgitating them in order, but rhetoric and shades of meaning took longer to grasp. My kids appear to be the opposite, they can't recall the words on the page in order, but if you try and use a line out of context, they remember the framing around any given line.
Ultimately, having picked up other skills elsewhere, the idea of strict phonics (which even pro-phonics teachers don't advocate) sounds and feels a lot like learning programming by flipping bits in assembly.
As a kid I was read to at bed time. I wasn't pushed, but I did enjoy the time with parents. In school (aside from a disasterous year with "ITA" [International Teaching Alphabet]") we were expected to read, and if we came to a word we didn't know, the refrain from teacher (and parent) was "sound it out". Call it phonics or phonetics, it's essentially the same thing.
Whole word recognition is fine if you're reading Chinese, but one of the glories of thought, along with the concept of zero, is the pairing of one sound with one symbol (or something like that if you are dealing with English as opposed to German, for example. French? Don't get me started....)
Parents are important but not "critical" to learning to read. If your claim were true, then no child of illiterate parents would ever learn to read. Working that logic back through time, no one could ever have learned to read in the first place.
Yes, parents pushing their kids is important. No, teachers cannot use the excuse of parents to abdicate their own responsibilties to teach effectively.
What a shock.
The left wing indoctrination camps disguised as schools, are not really trying to educate.
another success story for the teacher unions
Was anyone surprised to read:
That upsets education professors like Andrew Johnson, who teaches teachers at Minnesota State University.
Some still struggle with the end of DEI and WOKE. And yet it has proved again it is a failure and is harming our children.
Progressives said it would make kids want to read.
There’s your problem right there.
Who gives a shit what kids want? Make the little turds learn how to read. What are they, subhumans?
Not teaching phonics is popular because its "drill and kill" technique is tedious.
Sounds similar to the whining noise made about learning arithmetic "it's hard" or "it's just rote memorization".
p.s. This is why Johnny can neither read nor understand enough of numbers to get how badly out of balance the Federal (and many state's) budgets are.
I remember my phonics book back in the early 70's. Standard issue for everyone. Also was able to read along with the Catholic priest from the liturgical book every Sunday. It helped to follow along the readings from the Bible. I quickly took off on my own and I averaged reading over 1 book a day for the next 15 years. It helps when you live out in the country and only have 3 channels on TV that are controlled by your parents/ older brothers and sisters.
I can't imagine not doing it by phonics. I think Korea's success is due to much of this when the copied the US on this.
Also, some US cultures really do the crabs in a bucket practice ( black youth). I have worked with many and their friends are there worst enemies when it comes to success. They will glad drag themselves down instead of working to build themselves up. You would think some of this wise black women would not allow this .
Private school is the way.
An aside - Reading would be vastly easier (and phonics automatic) if we'd standardized on the Shavian alphabet instead of our hodgepodge of homonyms, homophones and homographs.