Mamdani's 'Rental Ripoff' Hearings Won't Fix New York Housing
Demonizing landlords might make for good social media, but it does nothing to reduce the regulations that make New York housing so expensive.
"No heat, no hot water. The boiler wasn't working. I have water in my walls," renter Tori Brown informed officials at the first Rental Ripoff Hearing last month in Brooklyn. Another tenant told NTD that he had been dealing with "leaky roof issues, pest issues, mold issues" for almost a year because any repairs costing $10,000 or more require court approval.
The event was advertised with signs that read "New Yorkers vs. Bad Landlords." In a promotional video for the hearings, which give renters a chance to air their grievances directly to government officials, Mayor Zohran Mamdani called out landlords for "taking advantage of the housing market to gouge tenants with outrageous fees."
"We need a city-wide crackdown on rental rip-offs," the Democratic mayor said. "We need to take on the indignities from those landlords who demand more than their fair share."
New York's housing problems are substantial—rents there are among the highest in the country—but these hearings aren't likely to fix them. Inside the gymnasium, there were bulletin boards with interactive questions, one of which asked participants to "place a sticker by your top 5 priorities for change." The three most-marked proposals included expanding the city's power to appoint new building management or transfer ownership, aggressively collecting fines from landlords who fail to make repairs, and strengthening tenants' ability to lawfully withhold rent.
Property owners in New York City feel the blame has been unduly pinned on them. One landlord who attended the hearings told New York's CBS affiliate that property owners deserve representation too. "Just the way they're having their voice heard, we need to have our voice heard, as landlords," he said. Lehodey asked Ahmed Tigani, commissioner of the New York City Department of Buildings, whether the city would be holding a similar hearing for landlords. Tigani said no.
"The hearings are a forum for blaming residential property owners for the ill effects of regulations," says Howard Husock, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. "In particular the New York rent stabilization law, which sharply limits how much owners can recover for improvements to their properties." Rent controls limit how much landlords can recoup for capital improvements, reducing incentives to invest. "The result, not surprisingly, is that some properties fall into disrepair."
Unfortunately for New Yorkers, meaningful improvements to the city's regulations are unlikely to come anytime soon. In early January, Mamdani appointed Cea Weaver as the director of the tenant protection office. The activist has advocated a rental market entirely financed by the government; in 2019, she tweeted that "private property including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as 'wealth building' public policy."
There are three more Rental Ripoff Hearings left, after which Mamdani will draw on them to "publish a report proposing policy interventions," according to a city press release. With Weaver as the lead architect of these hearings, these "policy interventions" will likely include more invasions of property rights.
Until Mamdani and his advisers understand that burdensome regulations are themselves a source of New York's housing problems, the city will keep getting political spectacles instead of meaningful reforms.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
"Lucy Gay is a writer based in Washington, D.C."
Reason finally ran out of "editors".
..because any repairs costing $10,000 or more require court approval.
Is there anything judges don’t control?
Public hearings are an important part of the right of the people to petition government.
Government has no business running housing.
And hearing from one side only frequently tends to lead to excellent policy choices...
Anyone who can't see that this is dekulakization, is a moron. Mandami is a Stalinist.
Rent control will solve the landlord's lack of capital improvements and repairs.
Quite bluntly, the city should be grateful the landlords don't just shut down shop and leave. Close the buildings completely and dare the bank to repossess. No bank wants THAT.
It's simply supply and demand. The city has a finite housing supply. Even if you lift all zoning regulations, there is only so much space for new houses or apartments. So an increasing city population leads to increasing cost of housing. It's not rocket science.
But the part that does seem confusing to the editors of Reason is that city population increases are generally driven by IMMIGRATION, the same immigration that they constantly tell us is always a good thing.
Let me see if I have this straight: the tenant is living in a rat-infested, moldy, leaky, unheated apartment because he HAS NO CHOICE? And his only option is to complain about it to the Mayor?