Killing Drug Lords Won't End Mexico's Cartels. Ending the Drug War Might.
The death of El Mencho shows why decades of prohibition enforcement have only strengthened cartels.
On a Sunday in February, Mexico's second-largest city ground to a standstill. Gunmen used burning cars as flaming barricades, shutting down traffic in and out of Guadalajara. Terrified zoo visitors sheltered overnight with the monkeys and kangaroos. Similar disturbances were recorded in 20 Mexican states.
The Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), one of Mexico's most powerful criminal organizations, unleashed mayhem after its leader, Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, alias "El Mencho," was killed in a gun battle with federal troops. He was the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) most wanted drug lord, with a $15 million bounty on his head.
"The nature of the unrest is not new in itself," says Sandra Pellegrini, senior analyst at Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), pointing to how cartels have mobilized against government forces in the past. "The scale, however, is rather unprecedented and clearly demonstrates the CJNG's ability to coordinate at a fast pace, and at a nationwide scale."
According to the Mexican federal government, at least 89 people were killed, including 25 soldiers, a prison guard, a prosecutor, an unidentified woman, and 46 suspected gang members (some of whom may have been forcibly recruited into CJNG's ranks).
"President [Donald] Trump had been dialing up the pressure on Mexico to deliver these spectacular outcomes," says David Mora, senior Mexico analyst at International Crisis Group. "It was already admitted by the government that this operation had a lot of U.S. intelligence, so this was a powerful message to the U.S.: We can use your intelligence, we can sit down at the table and cooperate and plan, but Mexican forces can do it. We don't need U.S. troops on the ground here."
The operation also came at a sensitive moment, as the Trump administration asserts itself in Latin America in the name of fighting the drug menace—killing at least 151 suspected traffickers on drug boats in Caribbean waters without due process and abducting the president of Venezuela. Perhaps fearing what the American government might do next, Mexican authorities decided to act first.
In other words, Mexico is fighting America's war on drugs. While most Mexicans would welcome an end to the criminals who have been terrorizing their country for decades, the reasons heavily armed bandits are running amok are inextricably linked to their northern neighbor.
"Without a doubt, the United States has decided what Mexico's drug policy has been for decades," says Zara Snapp, co-founder and director of Instituto RIA in Mexico City.
The Roots of Prohibition
Over a century ago, an alliance of religious crusaders, misguided progressives, and outright bigots pushed prohibitionist laws in the United States that banned alcohol, opioids, cocaine, and eventually cannabis. The alcohol ban didn't work. By the late 1920s, New York City had more than 10 times as many speakeasies as licensed bars today.
While Prohibition failed to instill nationwide sobriety, it proved a boon for smugglers and bootleggers. Tequileros—literally, "tequila people"—smuggled booze across the Texas border on horses, donkeys, and mules, covering bottles with layers of hay to stop them from clanking and giving them away.
Some of those early smugglers went on to build criminal empires. One of them, Juan Nepomuceno Guerra, later founded what became the Gulf Cartel and its bloodthirsty breakaway faction, Los Zetas. Since the beginning, smuggling bosses were protected by police and politicians, who accepted bribes in exchange for looking the other way.
But the U.S. was not alone. Mexico also had its own version of prohibition.
"Since the 1850s, marijuana was widely believed to be a drug that produced outbursts of madness and violence," explains Isaac Campos, professor at the University of Cincinnati and host of the History on Drugs podcast. Smoking reefer, he adds, was seen as a backward habit mainly associated with lowlifes.
Mexico outlawed pot in 1920 for "degenerat[ing] the race." Opium and heroin followed six years later.
But in 1938, Leopoldo Salazar Viniegra, a Mexican doctor and psychiatrist, published "The Myth of Marijuana," a report arguing that stories about cannabis driving you crazy were untrue. A bit of an oddball who reportedly injected cannabis extracts into chickens' brains and graded students on pistol marksmanship, Salazar nevertheless persuaded open-minded government officials. In 1940, Mexico briefly legalized drugs, allowing opioid addicts to score a fix at specially designated clinics.
"That [policy] basically provided a safe supply of substances to people who were using very regularly, so they could consume safely," Snapp explains, adding that Salazar believed legalization could weaken the growing class of narcotraficantes.
The experiment lasted merely five months. Under pressure from America's Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN), the Mexican government repealed the policy and adopted even harsher drug laws.
This didn't stop the rise of the narcos; if anything, it encouraged them.
How the Drug War Built the Cartels
The counterculture explosion in the 1960s created an insatiable demand among pot-smoking young Americans practicing free love and New Age spirituality. Mexican farmers started sowing strains such as Acapulco gold to meet the booming market.
"What changes after the 1960s is the size of the market in the United States, and thus the amount of money on the line, and the increased pressure by the authorities on those markets, which incentivized criminal organizations to grow larger, more powerful, and more ruthless," explained Campos.
The hippie era provoked a fierce conservative backlash. Richard Nixon was elected on a law-and-order platform and vowed to crack down on dope, calling drugs "America's public enemy number one." In 1973, the FBN was rebranded as the DEA, which soon expanded its operations into Mexico.
One of the agents sent south was Enrique "Kiki" Camarena. Posted to Mexico in 1980, he began investigating the Guadalajara Cartel, the country's top drug ring at the time. Camarena led the Mexican army to Rancho Búfalo, a massive 1,300-acre weed plantation in the Chihuahua desert. The raid destroyed roughly 10,000 tons of marijuana—a financial blow to the cartel.
Someone had to pay. Camarena was snatched off the street and tortured to death over three days while a doctor pumped him full of drugs to keep him alive. His mangled corpse was later discovered in a plastic bag outside Guadalajara.
That's one version of the story. A more controversial theory holds that members of the Guadalajara Cartel were linked to the CIA, which allegedly allowed them to import drugs into the U.S. in exchange for using their airplanes to ferry weapons to the anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua. Conspiracy theorists believe Camarena was killed because he stumbled across the CIA operation.
Whatever the truth, the killing triggered a massive crackdown. Over the next four years, the Guadalajara Cartel leadership was rounded up. The narcotrafficking empire was split between its former lieutenants: Juárez was the domain of Amado Carrillo Fuentes, nicknamed the "Lord of the Skies" for his fleet of aircraft; Tijuana belonged to the Arellano-Félix brothers, who imported San Diego gangbangers as muscle; and Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán received Sinaloa. It wasn't long before they began turning on each other, setting the stage for the cartel wars that continue today.
Meanwhile, another U.S. intervention inadvertently strengthened the cartels. In the 1980s, the Reagan administration deployed a massive federal task force, backed by naval warships, to secure the Florida coastline, where speedboats laden with cocaine landed from the Caribbean. But American demand remained unchanged, so Colombian suppliers simply diverted their product through Mexico instead.
Instead of being paid in cash, Mexican traffickers increasingly received cocaine itself as payment, allowing them to become distributors in their own right. The shift transformed them from middlemen into some of the most powerful drug traffickers in the world, setting the stage for the violence that would soon engulf Mexico.
The War Escalates
For most of the 20th century, Mexico was governed by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which maintained pacts with organized crime. But when the PRI gradually began losing power in the 1990s, the cartels could no longer rely on political protection and began building private armies.
In 2004, gunfire erupted in border towns between armed gangs from the Gulf and Sinaloa cartels. Among these was Los Zetas, a crew of elite Mexican commandos trained at Fort Bragg before offering their services to the Gulf Cartel. The Zetas applied military counterinsurgency tactics to gang warfare and were responsible for some of the darkest episodes of recent memory, including the massacre of an entire town in 2011.
The situation deteriorated further after 2006, when Mexican President Felipe Calderón took the term war on drugs literally and deployed the military against the cartels. As crime bosses were captured or killed, their henchmen struggled for power. Among them was El Mencho, once a lieutenant of the Sinaloa Cartel. After his boss's untimely passing in 2010, Mencho broke away from Sinaloa, forming the CJNG.
By trying to weaken the narcos, the drug war intensified competition between them instead, fuelling an epidemic of violence across Mexico. From 2007 to 2024, the country has recorded over 460,000 homicides; perhaps as many as two-thirds linked to organized crime. Another 130,000 people have disappeared, their loved ones unsure whether they're dead or alive. Search parties continue to uncover mass graves as families search burial sites for the remains of the missing.
Some of the worst bloodshed has erupted in border regions and port cities. In 2010, the DEA estimated that 70 percent of cocaine entering the United States passed through the El Paso-Juárez crossing. That year, over 3,000 people were murdered in Juárez as the city became a battleground between the Juárez and Sinaloa cartels. Among them were 15 innocent teenagers gunned down at a birthday party, after hitmen mistook them for rivals. Since then, there have been countless such massacres, but the bloodshed has become so routine that many barely register beyond local headlines.
Why the Drug War Keeps Failing
Over the course of Mexico's decades-long drug war, kingpin after kingpin has gone down. And yet, the overall picture remains the same. Drug deaths in America have finally started falling in the last two years. But why didn't they start falling 10 years ago, after the capture of El Chapo, who once boasted that he supplied "more heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine and marijuana than anybody else in the world"?
If anything, the opposite happened. Chapo's sons, the Chapitos, ramped up fentanyl production, while fatal overdoses soared to dizzying heights.
Paradoxically, tough enforcement sustains the cartels' business model. The risk premium created by prohibition is exactly why a kilo of cocaine costs merely $2,000 in Colombia but 10 times that sum when it reaches the U.S.
In the 1990s, Donald Trump seemed to understand this: "You have to legalize drugs to win that war," he told an interviewer. "You have to take the profit away from these drug czars."
There are examples of other alternatives. Cannabis legalization across much of the U.S. has already collapsed the cartel's marijuana exports, forcing many groups to pivot toward opioids instead.
Other countries have experimented with policies closer to the ideas proposed by Salazar nearly a century ago. In the 1980s and early '90s, hundreds of addicts gathered in Zurich's Platzspitz park, nicknamed "Needle Park," where overdoses were a nightly occurrence and dealers clashed over clientele. But after Switzerland regulated heroin in 1994, those scenes vanished. Prescribing controlled doses of heroin to addicts reduced disease, petty crime, and deadly poisonings.
Yet the current political momentum points in the opposite direction.
In his second term in the White House, Trump slapped Mexico with tariffs, threatened to deploy U.S. troops to combat cartels, and declared fentanyl a "weapon of mass destruction." The pressure is having an impact in Mexico. Eager to stay on the good side of her unpredictable northern counterpart, President Claudia Sheinbaum has intensified operations against the cartels.
"At ACLED, we have recorded that clashes between Mexican security forces and non-state armed groups increased by 26% in 2025 compared to the previous year," says Pellegrini. "We can correlate the intensification of security operations since the beginning of the second Trump administration with the heightened deployment of security officers at the border, the destruction of criminal assets, and arrests and the extradition of cartel leaders."
Unsurprisingly, the operation that killed El Mencho was guided by U.S. intelligence, including surveillance from a Predator drone hovering over his safehouse. To be sure, Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes was a bad man. But it remains to be seen if his death will only kick off yet another round of cartel warfare.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
It does not have to end them.
Like the war on the Mafia, it will degrade them and change the nature of their relationship with the US.
Except, as the article points out, it doesn't even degrade them. Instead, it actively strengthens them.
Note that the "war" on the Mafia didn't end because we wiped out the Mafia - their decline started when we repealed Prohibition and took away the economic incentive for the Mafia in the first place.
The article asserts that it strengthens them.
A certain amount of oppression can drive up the money to be made - a lot more oppression can turn the numbers around and the chance of death becomes too high.
What would help is for the populace to not be disarmed as they are.
Allowing the Mexican population to rearm themselves would help. Ending the "war on drugs" would help a whole lot more.
Note that even in the US where we don't have the same restrictions on guns, we still have problems with drug-funded crime gangs.
Not to that extent.
And the reason is we are a lot richer with more opportunities. This also means our institutions are less corrupt.
Simply ending the WoD in a place without the above won't magically make the cartela go away.
Legalizing addictive narcotics is not going to happen. The libertarian fantasy of heroin and fentanyl hanging on a hook at Walgreen's next to the aspirin is ludicrous. We need reality-based responses to the crime cartel problem.
If I have to pay one penny to support an addict, either through therapy or having to pay for Narcan to keep them alive --- then, no, we should not ever end it. But, like welfare, the costs for their addiction are borne by taxpayers.
Not my job to financially support losers. Somebody wants to kill themselves. Do not do it on my dime.
Not quite. A lot of what weakened the mob was RICO statues and the ability to target mobsters based on their adjacency to criminal activity.
Also, modern techniques for investigating crimes. Concealing the identity of a corpse by cutting off the head and hands doesn't work when we have DNA analysis. Doing business with envelopes full of $100 bills is not practical in an age of electronic commerce and banking. Etc. Part of the decline of the Mafia was that their ways of doing things don't work well anymore, and their competitors in the crime business were better able to adapt to new ways of operating.
The mafia still exists to this day. Even have foreign mafia here. They just have other schemes. They never ended.
The were reduced when America went after them like El Salvador did with their cartels.
Ending prohibition just switched their activity. Did nothing to end them.
El Salvador figured out the cartel problem. It made reason angry.
Illegal or legal drugs, we need to keep killing cartel leaders.
If drugs were legal there would not be cartels. Also murder is wrong.
And just who is going to sell and distribute heroin, fenty, meth, and cocaine?
No legal business in the US would accept that level of liability. Not in 2026.
Even if the drugs were legal and liability was legally limited, there would be cartels. Likely named Pfizer and Moderna.
Liability aside. Government sees taxes from drugs as a cash cow. Your purchase will cost more from the government than the cartel. So the cartels stay in business.
I've watched this in real time with the legalization of weed in NY. Most people I know still buy from the dealer they have known and avoid the legal spots because of cost and the extra taxes.
""If drugs were legal there would not be cartels.""
Black market weed is still major business in NY and weed is legal.
As long as weed is illegal a the federal lever it matters little what the states do.
Given that states that have pot illegal do not tend to really care if you have it, then it is irrelevant.
In addition to what Molly said, the ridiculously high taxes on nominally-legal weed will also continue to support a black market. Note that cigarettes are entirely legal at both the state and federal level but there is still a black market in NY for untaxed cigarettes.
Killing enemy combatants engaged in war is not murder.
This is retardedly false.
Do you ever stop and wonder why the cartels don't sell lettuce, Bic razors, aspirin, and Toyotas? If you had two brain cells you'd realize they can't compete in a free and fair market. If you legalize drugs, CVS and Walgreen's would undercut cartels. Their biggest revenue stream would dry up and they'd need to resort to other criminal activity like extortion, which puts them at much greater risk and can't really be done cross border.
we need to keep killing cartel leaders.
Not just leaders. We need to kill all of them.
Well, yeah, killing ONE doesn't make much of a dent.
No, it doesn't. That's why, now that we've finally gone on offense, we need to continue killing them relentlessly. As many as possible.
How preciously naive that you really think losing drug profits (assuming an end to the War on [Some] Drugs that removes the black market incentive) will actually end Mexico's Cartels. Their incentives aren't drug money. Their incentives are power. Currently, illicit drug money is a primary fuel for that power. Do you seriously, naively believe they won't find other ways to fund their operations if the black market profit incentives of the drug trade is actually removed?
There were no drug cartels before The Controlled Substances Act of 1970. How does that square with your assertion? Before alcohol was prohibited, there was no nationally organized "Mafia". The entire rap music industry was funded by crack sales. That is, possibly, the worst consequence of the War on Drugs.
While drug prohibition may be the causal catalyst of the Cartel genesis, like any organization they evolve.
As the article outlines, as certain drug markets become less profitable (e.g. marijuana) they pivot. Currently, to other drugs because the War on [Some] Drugs keeps the profit up. However, they have demonstrated a willingness and ability to pivot to different revenue streams.
As long as they can exert power and influence, the Cartels will find a way to fund their ventures. This is not to say that ending the War on [Some] Drugs is fruitless nor am I advocating for continuing it. However, it is naive to believe that ending the drug war will end Cartels.
Alcohol Prohibition only lasted almost 14 years. The American Cartel analogues did not have as much time to build, expand, and penetrate into civil infrastructure.
Lies
Was there organized theft, kidnapping, murders, threats, human trafficking?
Cartels have even taken over avocado farms.
The pro drug arguments are always so terrible.
That's why the Mafia in the US reached its peak of wealth and power half a century after Prohibition ended. They continued to adapt. Even today, they're still in business, even though they're not what they used to be.
They turned to gambling, drugs, and other illegal activities that in a libertarian country, would be legal. These days gambling is legal enough that the cartels would be cut out. Add in drugs and the cartels would be looking pretty hard for a source of revenue.
Your fantasy world is not relevant to public policy decisions in the real world.
More people have died from drugs and violence because drugs are illegal than would have if they never had been criminalized.
Bullshit.
Sorry but Oregon and British Columbia have proved this assumption totally false.
The extent of violence AMONG drug addicts gets little attention.
I wonder... how much of this violence would be mitigated if the population wasn't effectively disarmed?
Mexico has one legal gun store on a military base in Mexico City. Citizens may only own handguns limited in caliber up to .380, rifles limited to .22, and shotguns 12 gauge or smaller. And, legally, their guns must be registered.
There are more facets to the Cartels than simply profit from the illicit drug trade. Citizens are woefully under-armed. Mexico has a deeper culture of corruption and corruptibility. Etcetera.
Good article, much better than the usual Reason editors mail in. And I absolutely agree with the conclusion that the WOD is the problem. But at this point in history the nation to our south no longer has a functioning government. It has multiple alternative governments at war with each other. The US government has an obligation to minimize the effect on our own domestic tranquility. Legalization as libertarians imagine it will not happen. We live in a world where vaping is outlawed for crissakes. It seems like the best we can do at this point is to secure our own borders.
""We live in a world where vaping is outlawed for crissakes.""
We did that for the children.
the best we can do at this point is to secure our own borders.
Not good enough. We need a real war against the cartels/Mexican government. We can't seriously mitigate these problems by staying on defense.
You wrote as if the only income for the Cartels is from drugs...
Of course with the democrats no longer being a cartel cash cow with open borders, the purse strings and power are tightening for the cartels and evil when becoming desperate lashes out violently.
Income for the cartels through fraudulent NGO's, illegal immigrants, the border now far more difficult to run drugs and weapons and people in the sex slave industry has been reduced. They will become more desperate.
Somehow manipulating the cartels to fight each other and reducing their capabilities at this point is probably a good idea.
Otherwise government involvement especially through military action could bring the cartels together which will be far more difficult to remove them.
It will be difficult, but it's necessary. It's not possible to have a free and prosperous country next door to a failed state run by organized crime.
it's not the role of the federal govt to do but i will shed zero tears for any cartel leaders hunted down and killed like dogs.
They are demons.
Defending our country against hostile foreign powers is not just the role of the federal government, it is their primary duty.
The drug cartel don't deal exclusively in drugs anymore, they've diversified to selling weapons, human trafficking, collecting bribes and..... timeshare scams. Apparently.
Are we going to legalize fentanyl and cocaine to end the drug wars? It's not going to happen. And high hopes of legalization vaporizing the black market turned to be wishful thinking - the cartel actually grew their own stuff in CA. No amount of deregulation would beat black market prices.
Reason would legalize all drugs but leave the borders wide open. So under their rule, the drug cartel will flourish. How could it NOT? Please, tell me how unchecked access to the biggest market would somehow diminish the drug cartels or the drug wars.
This isn't 2012 anymore, we need to stop the tired allusion to the alcohol prohibition. Someone in prison can brew their own alcohol in their cell. It'd be harder to cultivate pot. If pot becomes so ubiquitous as to make black market products unappealing, then the cartel will try to muscle in on the legal supply. And they do that because..... yeah.
The "drug wars" are merely a symptom. The problem is Mexico, the corrupt and to some degree, the border. LOTS of people in Korea do drugs, but there's no mass scale drug wars or shooting.
I'm guessing "Mencho" is Spanish for "mensch".