The Olympics Will Never Achieve World Peace If It Keeps Clamping Down on Free Speech
Plus: Olympic hockey almost didn’t happen, how to pad the medal count, and a reader survey on fixing the Olympics
Hello and welcome to another edition of Free Agent! Do whatever it takes to get across the finish line today, even if you've got to do it backward.
We've got a jam-packed newsletter today full of Olympics content for you. From free speech issues to construction issues and some thoughts on the medal count, there's plenty to enjoy. At the end, you'll find a reader survey where you can sound off on your ideas for changing the Olympics.
Don't miss sports coverage from Jason Russell and Reason.
Locker Room Links
- The head of the Major League Baseball Players Association is resigning, adding more drama to the labor negotiations and potential lockout after this season.
- News you can use: Sports Illustrated's Mitch Goldich has been posting a very useful schedule of Olympic events every day.
- Eileen Gu grew up in California and studies at Stanford. Beverly Zhu was born in America to immigrants. Both compete for China, not the U.S.—probably because the Chinese government paid them a combined $6.6 million, according to The Wall Street Journal.
- The two cities with the most Olympic viewers are Ft. Myers, Florida, and curling hotbed Minneapolis. (Could those two cities be any more different?)
- The International Olympic Committee (IOC) was heavily criticized for selling a T-shirt commemorating the 1936 Berlin Olympics (you know, the one with Hitler), which has now sold out. They're selling shirts for a wide variety, but not all, of past Olympiads.
- Surprising, but true: Until Saturday, no one representing a South American country had ever won any kind of medal at the Winter Olympics.
- Remember my coverage of the Trump administration's takeover of a few Washington, D.C., golf courses? A new lawsuit is hoping to stop that.
- Elsewhere in Reason: "How Much Is Kristi Noem's Alleged Adultery Airplane Costing You?"
- The evidence is clear:
Chloe Kim:
2018: Gold Medal
2022: Gold Medal
2025: Starts dating a Cleveland Brown
2026: Silver Medal— Danny Neckel (@DNeckel19) February 13, 2026
Peace Through Speech
Some of the most famous moments in Olympic history, the ones that make the games so special, have been acts of expression: a legendary line in the final moments of an upset, an unstoppable release of emotion, or a silent act of free speech.
Naturally, the IOC wants to tamp down on those expressions.
Last week, Ukrainian Vladylsav Heraskevych was banned from competing in skeleton (similar to luge and bobsledding) because he was going to wear a helmet with images of Ukrainian athletes killed in Russia's war against Ukraine.
The IOC's statement on the ban included some gibberish: "Mourning is not expressed and perceived in the same way everywhere in the world….the IOC has put in place multifaith centres in the Olympic Villages and a place of mourning….There is also the possibility to wear a black armband during competition under certain circumstances." It added a valid point, that athletes can still express their views "in the media mixed zones, on social media, during press conferences and in interviews." The IOC's Guidelines on Athlete Expression had input from thousands of athletes, and their strict rules for jersey imagery are well known.
Even with all that, banning Heraskevych is still a bunch of hogwash.
The whole point of the Olympics, so they say, is bigger than sports: It's world peace. "The goal of the Olympic Movement is to contribute to building a peaceful and better world…through sport," the IOC says on its website. Likewise, part of its mission is "to place sport at the service of humanity and thereby to promote peace."
Trying to achieve all that by clamping down on free speech is awfully authoritarian. In a dispute, more speech (and listening) leads to more understanding. That may not always lead to agreement, but it's still progress. Especially in the Olympic context, athletes need to learn to respect the abilities and sportsmanship of their competitors, even when they disagree with their politics.
This is not to say that athletes should or shouldn't make political statements at the Olympics. The IOC, of course, is a private organization and can set its own rules. But allowing for more free expression will only help the Olympics further its lofty aims.
Not in My Ice Rink
The return of NHL players to the Olympics has been a joy to watch. It almost didn't happen—not just because the NHL finally relented after keeping its players away from the 2018 and 2022 games. Even a month or two ago, there were major concerns about whether the hockey arena would be built in time, and whether its ice would be safe.
Yes, even with seven years of notice, the hockey arena almost wasn't finished in time. In 2022, a "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) lawsuit delayed the start of construction by a year.
In this case, the NIMBYs were nuns (a notably powerful interest group in Italy).
"Construction of the Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena was supposed to begin in 2022, but a lawsuit filed by an order of Roman-Catholic nuns delayed the project by roughly a year," Jeff Eisenberg wrote for Yahoo Sports. "The nuns unsuccessfully argued that construction would encroach on their property and violate noise ordinances."
Of course, these weren't the only issues. The rink is three feet shorter than an NHL rink (which is surprising, if you've noticed the large gap between the boards and the seats). The project is also way over budget—as a libertarian, I wish I could blame this on the government, but it was actually a private German company that was in charge of construction.
Thankfully, none of these problems seems to have affected the actual hockey games. Let's hope the preparations for 2030 go more smoothly.
If you think the Milan Cortina 2026 hockey arenas have had issues… this is the plan for French Alps 2030.
Two rinks, width wise on the soccer pitch at at Stade De Nice with 17,000 seats each.
Going to be quite the test. pic.twitter.com/OIgMttJFH0
— Ben Steiner (@BenSteiner00) February 4, 2026
Padding the Medal Count
Readers who made it to the end of last week's newsletter noticed my amazement that biathlon, a niche sport that requires skill in both cross-country skiing and rifle shooting, gets to award 11 gold medals in various events at these Olympics, almost a tenth of the total. Freestyle skiing is awarding 15 gold medals. So if your country is good at one of these sports (France has four biathlon gold medals so far, plus three silver and two bronze), it's easy to rack up medals and work your way up the medal table.
But if your country is good at ice hockey, there are only two medals up for grabs there.
The same dynamic is at play in the Summer Olympics. With 36 sports awarding 351 gold medals, each sport gives out an average of 9.75 gold medals. There are 41 gold medals in swimming, but just four in basketball, three in golf, and two each in cricket, handball, surfing, and squash (as random examples).
There's no ideal solution here. We shouldn't expect every sport to have the same number of events. Swimming need not cut its lengthy event list down just because other sports can't get to 41 events. But it would be fun and interesting to see other sports expand with other versions of their sports.
We have five-on-five hockey, let's add three-on-three too (there's already a professional league for this, and its first world cup is coming this summer). Add a shootout competition as well, and between the men's and women's sides you now have six hockey events instead of two. Basketball was allowed to do this with the addition of 3x3 basketball. Next they should add some kind of shooting accuracy competition too—and maybe a dunk competition.
Time To Go for Gold
In the spirit of that last section, let's fix the Olympics together. We've got a very quick two-question survey for readers this week. The first question is open-ended: What ideas do you have for improving the Olympics? Ideas for the summer or winter games are fine. Then I'm curious if you look at the medal table and care more about each country's gold medals or total medals.
Let me know what you think. Maybe you have ideas for more sports or more formats. Maybe they should skip the hosting rigmarole and just have the games in the same permanent facilities every four years. Or maybe you've got a great idea for who should light the Olympic torch in Los Angeles in 2028. And if you can figure out how to fix the judging in figure skating once and for all, please do the world a favor and let us know what to do.
Whatever is on your mind, sound off in the survey and we'll discuss next week, after the games have wrapped up. Feel free to come back and answer again if you have a great idea later on.
Replay of the Week
The last lap of the Daytona 500 always delivers. It's one of the few times that if cars start crashing everywhere, the people in charge just say "Keep racing!" This year, there were two big crashes in the span of 2.5 miles, with the last one happening just as the final pass for the win occurred. (Congratulations, Michael Jordan!)
That's all for this week. Enjoy watching the real event of the week, the four-man bobsled competition on Saturday and Sunday (or feel free to watch Cool Runnings on Hulu).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
"The goal of the Olympic Movement is to contribute to building a peaceful and better world…through sport," the IOC says on its website. Likewise, part of its mission is "to place sport at the service of humanity and thereby to promote peace."
This is almost as believable as Wyld Stallyns achieving world peace thru bad rock music.
How can boasting about how many gold medals “your country” won bring about world peace?
No, but boasting about your nuke arsenal may.
remember when I asked her to the prom? shut up!
So, slightly more believable than Bob Marley achieving world peace through bad reggae?
I thought that the purpose of the Olympics was to give belligerent nations a nonviolent method of competing for global status.
Not for "resolution" of conflict.
Not sure how the most corrupt private organization known is doing jack shit for peace, but you do you.
The Olympics were never about peace (the 1972 Munich games alone showed that definitively). Anybody who thinks they do is too naive to take seriously.
Actually, the olympics were designed to foster 'world peace'.
The events allowed countries (cities?) to show that their warriors could run (therefore maneuver units) faster, throw spears farther, heave rock better, and in general have a better military so that other countries would not attack them.
Our men are stronger than your women!
Men punching women in the face is offically an olympic sport. Thanks Dems!
Hey, at least the Olympics didn't ban Colbert from having James Talarico on air!
Poor sarc.
The Olympics is about corporate profit, corruption, and kickbacks, not world peace.
Corporate profit? No other profit is evil, only corporate profit?
The project is also way over budget—as a libertarian, I wish I could blame this on the government, but it was actually a private German company that was in charge of construction.
That's because you've partaken of the kool-aid that suggests merely 'privatizing' something makes it 'more efficient'. There are a lot of variables involved when you have a market in which hundreds of hockey rinks are being built vs a bidding process in which one company is chosen by a corrupt, massive bureaucratic quasi-political organization through a bidding process managed by a bunch of Euro-trash wokesters.
"The Olympics will never achieve World Peace [full stop]" There, I fixed it for you!
Will Bad Bunny be performing at the Olympics half time show? Does anything else really matter?
Gold medal snubbing leader story:
https://www.britannica.com/story/was-jesse-owens-snubbed-by-adolf-hitler-at-the-berlin-olympics
It was FDR who snubbed Owens (and other Black Olympians) not Hitler. Apparently it was thought that a public display of support would alienate support from Southern Democrats, (the White ones, presumably.)
"A month after the Olympic Games, Owens told a crowd, “Hitler didn’t snub me—it was [Roosevelt] who snubbed me. The president didn’t even send me a telegram.”
Remember when you told us about getting a medal for donating blood?
Remember when jfree told the truth for once and you responded by changing the subject?
Owens was a Republican who was campaigning for Alf Landon against FDR. (And the Landon/Knox ticket indeed was much more supportive of Civil Rights than the Roosevelt/Garner ticket. Both Landon and Knox had supported Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive campaign in 1912.)
Avery Brundage, the anti-Semite who was running the US Olympic Committee, who was the real US villain. He had two Jewish athletes, Sam Stoller and Marty Glickman, kicked off the relay team because he thought that they might offend Hitler if they won (and that was likely). He replaced them with Jesse Owens and Ralph Metcalfe. Metcalfe would later serve in the US House of Representatives as a Democrat. One report I saw was that Owens objected a team meeting and he was dismissed with a racial slur. The relay team won and Hitler was still embarrassed.
Glickman would have a long successful career as a sports broadcaster. He was one of the first journalists to discover Wilt Chamberlain:
https://youtu.be/q9GPibuasw4?si=NmPctv1BRT27jS30
Decades later, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, along with Australian Peter Norman, protested Brundage being head of the International Olympic Committee, and a bunch of other things, on the medal podium. Days before the Olympics began, Mexican security forces had opened fire on peaceful protesters in the famous Tlateloco Massacre. Think Kent State multiplied by 100.
Smith and Carlos suffered a lot. Norman was driven into an early grave. The Interior Minister who ordered the security forces in, Luis Echeverria Alvarez, would be installed as President of Mexico two years later, and followed a policy of silencing political opponents. After leaving office, he ran for UN Secretary General and lost to a Nazi, Kurt Waldheim. I visited Tlateloco two days before Echeverria died at the age of 100. No Mexican mentioned his death to me.
FWIW I had a pleasant chat with John Carlos at Penn Relays a few years back. Very pleasant chap. We mostly talked about sprinting in general, but he was interested in how the protest was received in Britain. (My recollection - I was 11 at the time - was that it was generally but by no means universally favourable, and few people were naive enough to think the Olympics were not themselves political.)
There's no ideal solution here. We shouldn't expect every sport to have the same number of events.
There's no problem in search of a solution here. Are you trying to find a nonsense equivalence? eg Norway sent 80 athletes and has won 30 medals - while the US sent 233 athletes and has won 20 medals.
Every athlete who gets a medal in either a team sport or an individual sport gets a medal. They don't have to share a medal every leap year or something. The ONLY potential issue I can see is in events that have both a team and an individual component - eg 4x400 relay. In that case it does seem odd that the nation creating that relay team can only select three for individual competition.
The "solution" is to count a team gold as more than 1 medal. If a hockey team has 20 members, that counts as 20 medals.
So we accuse the nuns of a NIMBY lawsuit when all the description said was they were asserting their property rights over something that was encroaching on their backyard.
We do not know what they exact issues were.
It is kind of funny for a post that thinks it is a bad thing to memorialize the '36 Olympics, but being paid well to a be a shill for the Chinese Communist Party is no big deal.
Peace Through Speech
...
Even with all that, banning Heraskevych is still a bunch of hogwash.
Something like 99.9% of the world doesn't critically believe in free speech. Of the other 0.1%, probably somewhere between a half and two thirds of them are somewhere between "The war in Ukraine is a money-laundering boondoggle.", "The Olympics are on *again*?", and "You had one job." And, given your retarded interpretation of "peace" as "co-opting other people's platform after they already afforded me a platform to make a vacuous and deliberately *contentious* social sympathy-plea", I'm pretty convinced the 99.95-99.966% are right.
> Last week, Ukrainian Vladylsav Heraskevych was banned from competing in skeleton (similar to luge and bobsledding) because he was going to wear a helmet with images of Ukrainian athletes killed in Russia's war against Ukraine.
I see no problem with this. The competition is not an appropriate forum for this discussion. If he wants to talk about it on social media or in press conferences after his event, go for it. Putting it on his gear crosses a line.
> In a dispute, more speech (and listening) leads to more understanding. That may not always lead to agreement, but it's still progress. Especially in the Olympic context, athletes need to learn to respect the abilities and sportsmanship of their competitors, even when they disagree with their politics.
Heraskevych doing this doesn't achieve that. Other athletes learn to respect his abilities and sportsmanship through competing against him, not through having discussions about a war elsewhere in the world.
As far as survey responses are concerned:
1. Moving subjective and aesthetic sports - diving, gymnastics, fucking synchronised swimming, etc to their own Olympics. (Technically, boxing scoring is still objective...)
2. By golds. Reason: medal tables can either rank by colour of medal - total golds, then by total silvers, etc - or by some points system, e.g., gold = 4 pts, silver = 2 pts, bronze = 1 pt. I think it was Merlene Ottey who said that 1 gold medal was worth about a thousand silvers. She never won a gold medal...