Review: The Anarchist Writings of Robert Anton Wilson
"I'm the kind of anarchist whose chief objection to the state is that it kills so many people," Wilson said in a 1976 interview
The works of Robert Anton Wilson, especially the Illuminatus! trilogy, were an alternative path to libertarianism in the late 20th century. His influence has been less appreciated than that of his fellow novelist Ayn Rand, whose apodictic certainty based in ancient Greek philosophy he hilariously lampooned via the made-up novel discussed within Illuminatus!, Telemachus Sneezed. Wilson was, to put it bluntly, hipper than your average libertarian: more into drugs, sex, the occult, and cutting-edge 20th century literary figures such as James Joyce and Ezra Pound, but still oriented toward his stated goal of "reduc[ing the State] to an object of contempt among all educated people."
While his novels and nonfiction led many young seekers to the arcane lore of libertarianism, he wanted no permanent political labels. In A Non-Euclidean Perspective, a new volume of previously uncollected political articles and interviews, he expresses beliefs contrary to standard Austrian economic stances. Following 19th century individualist anarchists of the Benjamin Tucker school, Wilson was opposed to absentee landownership and doubted the legitimacy of interest, which he thought would fade in a world of total currency freedom.
"I'm the kind of anarchist whose chief objection to the state is that it kills so many people," Wilson said in a 1976 interview. Too many who use the term libertarian today paradoxically embrace an extreme immigration enforcement state based on misguided applications of axiomatic thinking about property. Wilson's influence, with his radiantly sane skepticism and his desire to minimize violence and cruelty, is sorely needed.
Beyond politics, Wilson's sense of life that won so many fans—including Reason's Jesse Walker, who wrote the collection's introduction—comes across in epigrams such as: "It is a great privilege to be conscious in this universe. Those who understand, shine like stars."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
'Wilson said in a 1976 interview. Too many who use the term libertarian today paradoxically embrace an extreme immigration enforcement state based on misguided applications of axiomatic thinking about property.'
Open borders uber alles!
Never change, Reason.
Now Reason is responsible for what RAW said 50 years ago?
Anarchists aren't very useful for current practical politics, but I'm still very sympathetic to an-caps. RAW had a big influence on my libertarian and minarchist views. Though I've become a bit more practical/pragmatic about politics in recent years, I think it's still worth having that kind of axiomatic libertarian and anarchist thought around. Not everything has to be practically applicable to contemporary politics.
The RAW quote I use most often these days is, "Convictions make convicts."
My favorite RAH quote right now is "Secrecy begets tyranny."
Wilson earned a degree in electrical engineering as Heinlein did in mechanical engineering. Neither used anarchist in the arnychist sense of the past two centuries: bomb-throwing communist assassin. Those two and KMW may someday reshape the vernacular, but for purposes of keeping the LP on the ballot to use spoiler votes to make the looters repeal bad laws, pretending to not understand the vernacular is a non-starter. BTW, the Roundtable discussions make ALL competing media look pretty silly. You do good work there.
I once read a description of his work as "allegedly funny". I think that's pretty accurate.
I've read the Illuminatis! books. Nothing "alleged", they were legit hilarious.
Telemachus Sneezed struck me as a sort of bastardized cross between Atlas Shrugged and The Turner Diaries.