San Francisco Public Schoolteachers Make $79,468 for 184 Days of Work. Now They're Striking for Even More.
All of San Francisco's public schools were shut down Monday thanks to the United Educators strike.
The United Educators of San Francisco (UESF) went on strike on Monday, shutting down the San Francisco Unified School District's 120 schools and robbing 50,000 children of their regularly scheduled education.
The strike is the first one in 50 years, reports ABC10, and will continue "until we win the schools our students deserve and the contracts our members deserve," said UESF President Cassondra Curiel at a Monday press conference. Curiel's statement suggests that the district is taking advantage of union members, but the current contract is already quite generous.
Fully credentialed K–12 teachers (those with a bachelor's degree) who are in their very first year of service had a base salary of $73,689 as of January 1, 2025, according to school district data. These teachers receive an additional $1,897 from the Quality Teacher and Education Act (2008), billed as rewarding schools for improving student achievement, and $3,882 from the Fair Wages for Educators Act (2020), which instituted a parcel tax to increase teachers' salaries by 7 percent, amounting to a total effective salary of $79,468.
Earning nearly $80,000 as a starting yearly salary is a healthy sum by any reasonable standard: The average American made approximately $62,608 last year, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But, according to the official salary schedule, the unionized teacher works only 184 days a year. This means that they make nearly $432 per day. The median per capita income in San Francisco was $92,289 from 2020 to 2024, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Assuming the median San Franciscan works 260 days a year, that would mean they make $355 per day—nearly 20 percent less than a new UESF K–12 teacher.
In addition to their salary, United Educators members' fringe benefits included monthly contributions of up to $373.72 per month for family health insurance coverage under their preceding contract (July 2023–June 2025). Setting aside the fewer days worked by teachers as opposed to other civilian workers, this is substantially less than the average monthly employer contribution of $1,232.59 to family coverage, or $14,791.08 per year.
In light of this fact, the union succeeded in extracting the concession of "an annual allowance of $24,000 for teachers to choose their health care plan." Additionally, the district offered the union a 6 percent wage increase to be phased in over the course of three years.
Neither of these concessions satisfied the union, which has sought a 9 percent raise over two years, which would cost the school district an additional $92 million per year, reports ABC10, even though the district is already running a $102 million deficit. The UESF is also seeking fully paid family coverage on a Kaiser Permanente health plan and protections against AI replacement.
Only 53.2 percent and 46 percent of students at noncharter schools met or exceeded English and math proficiency levels, respectively, in the 2024–2025 school year in the San Francisco Unified School District. A decrease of 3.32 percentage points and 4.58 percentage points from the 2018–2019 school year (the earliest period for which data are available). Instead of protesting for even higher salaries and cushy health care plans, San Francisco teachers should focus on doing a better job educating children.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Isn't this just another distraction from Bad Bunny?
More likely from the governor's choo-choo.
With a name like that - he is almost certainly a furry on his days off.
So there it is. Bad Bunny Syndrome
You think their salaries are absurdly high? Wait 'til you see what they're teaching.
I'm not upset paying teachers $80K, SF is an expensive place to live and they have crazy tax rates that has a significant chunk of their salary going back to the state & local gov't, but my question is "How effective are the teachers?" If their student are high-performers compared to other school districts, then maybe higher pay is in order... but, if they aren't very effective, increasing their pay won't improve student test scores/grades - you'll just have better-compensated ineffective teachers, and that's not good for anyone but the ineffective teachers.
My compromise proposal? Simple, you want higher pay, give up tenure, let district get rid of bad teachers and pay remaining (and new) effective teachers better.
Think the union will go for it? Of course not... but the teachers should.
I generally agree with many of the Reason's views, but in this case I'm curious what Jack's knowledge is of SF Bay Area salaries in general.
First I agree...$80K starting salary in SF isn't that crazy. And I'm often one to criticize teachers for putting themselves over students...BUT...I also think it's a tad disingenuous to appear silent on teacher's work days (when the kids are not in school), the amount of time OUTSIDE the classroom they spend preparing material, grading homework, responding to emails from students/parents, arriving early in the mornings for work and leaving late.
Assuming you don't add extra days for those activities, but you add extra time each day, you'd easily get to 10 hour days for those 180+ days...which would get you to $45/hour for those days, with the following requirements--minimum Bachelor’s degree from a regionally accredited institution, possess or be in the process of obtaining a valid California teaching credential, and hold an English Learner or Bilingual Authorization. $45/hour in the SF Bay Area is by far NOT unreasonable for starting salaries with a Bachelor's Degree.
Right whiners never stop crying. They deserve double the pay having to deal with maga brats and their delusional parents
That salary would afford them a stylish cardboard box in the Tenderloin!
As long as they're willing to put up with a roommate.
Given Sarc’s extensive history as a worthless shono living in alleys and sleeping in refrigerator boxes, he should move to SF and become a realtor. He could steal a few dozen such boxes and ride the rails west. Flipping those refrigerator boxes at SF prices could net him a handsome amount of booze money.
If teachers made more, perhaps more conservatives would enter the profession, and quit whining about how Lefties own education.
If Lefties were competent there wouldn't be a 50% failure rate in both math and English. But you commies need your uneducated midwits pushing your slop.
Not enough conservatives want to fuck underage children.
hahaha, if right whiners loved kids they would adopt all the unwanted ones.
But then they would have to give up their food stamps and get real jobs
"Earning nearly $80,000 as a starting yearly salary is a healthy sum by any reasonable standard"
Not by the standards of San Franciso, thanks to its insane NIMBY policies that drove up the cost of housing to levels unknown in the US outside of Manhattan and Boston. At least in NYC one can live in the Bronx.
The salary would get you a really nice cardboard box in the Embercedo or the Candlestick park area.
San Francisco is populated by leftist morons, just like you.
If a fire department can be 100% volunteer - I see no reason to pay them anything.
Fighting fires can be fun for the adrenaline junkies. Have you actually met any of these digusting, miserable shits in public school now? Anyone willing to put up with them deserves some respect.
Lock them out.
So adjust to a 250 day schedule and on average they're making $107k for a profession that is averaging a 50% failure rate. Sorry but given their performance I'd suggest they are owed a 50% reduction in pay and benefits.
Teachers do not work nine to five. They do not get a lunch hour, some not even thirty minutes as they have to assist with discipline. They get a pothole laden excuse for a parking lot. Then when they get home - more work, grading, lesson planning, doing the grunt work that head office staff do not want to do. Then there are students and worse parents
I know plenty of teachers.
They do not work 9 to 5.
They also do not work 1/4 of the year.
Teachers work about 1600 hours per year. Full time employment works out to about 2000 hours per year. Teachers generally do pretty well unless they live in some expensive overtaxed, blighted shithole.
Like San Francisco.
This is a gross oversimplification. Yes, many teachers put in extra hours, but these are mainly the newbies. Many teachers, after getting experience, have figured out how to keep it down to 40 hours or so.
For every English teacher grading papers on Sunday there is a business Ed teacher clocking out at 3:30pm and racing students to their car. This is one of the frustrating things about the debate. Some teachers have easy schedules with very little prep and grading and some have it bad. But they get the same pay.
YES you are correct.
Teachers are not the biggest problem with education in the USA. The largest problem is the administrative overhead.
I don't believe that teachers are underpaid, if you factor in the number of hours. I suppose, you could increase their wages to match typical corporate job, but then expect the teachers to work the average number of hours of a corporate job.
This could be year round school? The other complaint is class size, which year round school would also help.
Personally, I would prefer adding market forces to the education system, where any school funding, either federal or state are attached to the student and not the school. If a student goes to a particular school then their tuition would go to that school.
Inferior would lose students and therefore lose market share. Quality schools would gain students and therefore gain market share. Schools would offer what the parents and guardians want related to curriculum, proximity, readiness, extra curricular activities, or any other item seen as desirable. Student would influence their parents or guardians, but as minors the decision would not be the student.
No, the biggest problem with education in the USA is that it is a near monopoly of the government, staffed by monopoly unions in bed with the elected officials who depend for their positions on being in bed with the government employee unions to get elected. The only way "bargaining" is EVER effective is if both parties have alternatives. So it's laughable to talk about contract negotiations between elected officials and exclusively union employees. The families who depend on tax-funded school systems for so-called "education" also have almost zero alternatives here. Quality of education is NOWHERE in the mix no matter how much both sides pretend and pay lip service to it.
We have a winner!!!!
The problem, in a nutshell, is tenure. When it's almost impossible to be fired, it's very hard to have great teachers.
FIFY
So [D]illinger is now refusing to even show-up to Gov 'Gun' rob the community bank now huh?
"I'll just stand out here in the street yelling, complaining and crying like a baby until someone else goes in with the Gov - Guns to ROB the community bank." /s
If you want better/different teachers, you first have to find a way to jettison the deadwood that brings down the average. The only way to get any significant new blood into the teaching profession is to do a blood-letting and get rid of the teachers that have given up and are just putting in time. It's not everyone, it's not even most teachers, but it is a not-insignificant percentage of currently employed teachers.
If we got rid of the democrats that would all go away.it would also help to get rid of Common Core.