The Trump Administration Is Taking Credit for a Long-Running Murder Decline
2025 is on track to have the largest drop in the murder rate in recorded history.
When Donald Trump ran for president in 2024, he said he'd "restore law and order." The White House is now taking a victory lap on this campaign promise.
On Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt touted a January report from the Council on Criminal Justice, which found "that the murder rate across America's largest cities plummeted in 2025 to its lowest level since at least 1900," according to Leavitt, who added that this was "the largest single-year drop in murders in recorded history."
"This dramatic decline," she said, "is what happens when a president secures the border, fully mobilizes federal law enforcement to arrest violent criminals and aggressively deport the worst of the worst illegal aliens from our country."
The decline is noteworthy, but it is not especially surprising, given recent trends. "We're seeing the largest one-year drop in murder for the third straight year in 2025," crime data analyst Jeff Asher told Reason's Billy Binion earlier this week. "We're seeing the murder rate at the lowest level that we've ever recorded it."
While we won't know the exact drop in the 2025 murder rate until official data come out in August or September of this year, Asher expects the decline to be "somewhere in the 18 to 20 percent range." This would "supplant 2024, which supplanted 2023 as the largest one-year drop ever recorded."
The exact reason for this decline is unknown. Some have theorized that trauma care at emergency rooms has improved, which has led to fewer casualties from shootings. That's "a factor," says Asher, but it doesn't tell the whole story.
"We can show pretty convincingly with shooting data that murder has fallen the last years because shootings have fallen dramatically — not major improvements in trauma care," Asher recently wrote on his Substack. "We can also show that shootings have not become less lethal over the last 10 to 15 years suggesting that any gains from better trauma care — which have undoubtedly occurred — may have been offset by changes in firearm availability."
It's not just the murder rate that is falling; crime as a whole is on the decline. As Our World in Data recently pointed out, violent crime rates in the U.S. "have more than halved," since the early 1990s. In that time, property crimes have also fallen by about 60 percent.
These positive trends suggest that society is progressing and becoming safer. That may well be true, but the way we report and track crimes also matters. In cities like Washington, D.C., "crime is underreported," says Asher. This includes about "a third of property crimes and about half of violent crimes other than murder." There are myriad reasons for this, including how local and federal law enforcement agencies interact and share information, and personal preferences—sometimes people just don't want to report a crime that's happened to them.
Still, "there's no reason to suspect that the overarching trends that we're seeing are not accurate," he says.
While it's still too early to officially say, all signs indicate that 2025 will have the largest drop in murder rates in recorded history. The Trump administration will likely take credit for this feat, but this probably would have happened regardless of who was in the White House.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Can’t let Trump get credit for anything he does. Reason would rather have China conquer us than see Trump have a successful presidency.
(First, but not Fist)
>Some have theorized that trauma care at emergency rooms has improved,
Trauma care has been improving for the last 125 years - but sure, in the last couple of years its suddenly gotten so good . . .
Not couple of years. Couple of months.
>"We can also show that shootings have not become less lethal over the last 10 to 15 years suggesting that any gains from better trauma care — which have undoubtedly occurred — may have been offset by changes in firearm availability."
There has been no significant change in either the availability of trauma care or the availability of firearms in the last 15 years.
Other side of the coin, a base (or couple) that "We can also show that shootings have not become less lethal over the last 10 to 15 years" rather specifically skirts is that the ballistics of the 9mm have improved to the point that the arguments about penetration, stopping power, and wound channeling of the .40 S&W, .45 ACP, and several others have become moot.
Along those lines, it's been pointed out for over a decade that the overwhelming majority of (solved) homicides (and related violent crimes) included people who knew their attacker and that the problem was self-solving. Whereas 15-20 yrs. ago, someone would spray 30 bullets at someone they didn't like (and run whatever risk that any given Eli Dicken may be on the scene), now they tend to use more effective rounds face-to-face.
The entire point of the article is to prevent Trump from getting any credit for his results. 95% of Reason’s existence is now predicated on doing that, or attacking him for things he’s done.
What if they are not "his results?" That's the point.
What if no one, but no one, thought Trump was out there stopping bullets, understands that politicians back to at least Nixon have been claiming credit for falls in crime, and that Trump is no exception?
Then it would seem to be an obnoxious fixation on not just Trump but Trump in this term. Especially, if only to supplant it with "The exact reason for this decline is unknown." Specifically, "We have no idea what policies, if any, enacted by whom, or not, caused the decline; but we know it wasn't Trump (in this term)."
Well they cant admit they fell for the manipulated crime stats under democrats can they?
While we won't know the exact drop in the 2025 murder rate until official data come out in August or September of this year, Asher expects the decline to be "somewhere in the 18 to 20 percent range." This would "supplant 2024, which supplanted 2023 as the largest one-year drop ever recorded."
There's a reason we're getting these sudden big drops, and this might have something to do with it.
A mostly peaceful increase in gun deaths in 2020?
Now, I'm not one to get into knock down dragouts over statistical whackbat, you know, like global warming graphs that start in 1982 or some kind of crap like that... but... as you can see, something sure as shit happened in 2019, I'm not sure what... but something happened.
I report, you decide.
This is important.
There are advantages to having Trump visible in the White House where he can no longer go on killing sprees.
All the Blue City mayors are taking credit for the drop too. Maybe all those years of soaring homicides finally reduced the number of knuckleheads willing to kill each other over petty grievances?