Judge Says ICE Violated Court Orders in 74 Cases—See Them All Here

The extraordinary document offers a glimpse of a national campaign by the federal government to deprive detained immigrants of due process rights.

An infuriated federal judge in Minnesota on Wednesday published a list of nearly 100 court orders that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had violated over the last month, and Reason has collected links to the cases. 

Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for Minnesota, released the list as an appendix to a court order castigating ICE for repeatedly violating court orders regarding immigrant detention.

Although the appendix listed 74 cases with 96 separate violations, Schiltz wrote that the "extent of ICE's noncompliance is almost certainly substantially understated. This list is confined to orders issued since January 1, 2026, and the list was hurriedly compiled by extraordinarily busy judges."

Nevertheless, the extraordinary document offers a glimpse of a national campaign by the federal government to deprive detained immigrants of due process rights that an overwhelming majority of federal judges say they're entitled to.

In one example from Schiltz's list, ICE arrested a Venezuelan man living in Eagan, Minnesota, and transferred him to Texas, despite a judge's order to keep him in-state. 

According to the judge's order granting the man's writ of habeas corpus:

He lives with his partner and his six-year-old daughter, and he is employed by a landscaping company. He is not subject to a final order of removal. After Petitioner attended an appointment regarding his pending asylum application on January 20, 2026, he was arrested and detained by ICE without a warrant and without apparent justification. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus that same day. The next day, January 21, 2026, the Court entered an Order enjoining Respondents from moving Petitioner outside of Minnesota until the Court ruled on the pending habeas petition. Nevertheless, the Court has reason to believe that Petitioner is presently detained in El Paso, Texas.

In another case from the appendix, ICE arrested a Moldovan refugee who had already gone through extensive background checks and vetting. In response to her petition for emergency relief, the government claimed that her detention was based on her "fail[ure] to acquire permanent resident status within one year." 

But as the judge noted in his order granting the woman's petition (citation omitted), "Such a basis for detention is illogical given that refugees are not eligible to apply for adjustment of status until they have 'been physically present in the United States for at least one year.'"

Schiltz's list, however, is just a PDF with case names and numbers. Let's bring it up to Web 1.0 standards.

Your friendly neighborhood Reason reporter found the dockets for 71 out of the 74 cases on CourtListener, a free online repository of federal court records. It appears most of the judges' orders and other docket entries are still only available on PACER, the federal government's clunky, pay-by-the-page database, but this is at least one more step toward making the information widely available.

25-CV-4722: Hakan K. v. Noem (Judges: JMB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

25-CV-4741: Luis L.P. v. Brott (Judges: NEB/DJF) (Order Violated: January 9, 2026)

25-CV-4776: Ahmed A. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DJF) (Order Violated: January 6, 2026)

26-CV-080: Francisco E.O. v. Olson (Judges: JRT/DJF) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-013: Suhaib M. v. Kristi Noem (Judges: JWB/DJF) (Order Violated: January 12, 2026)

26-CV-031: Alex V.Y.L. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DJF) (Order Violated: January 9, 2026)

26-CV-106: Marlon M.M. v. Easterwood (Judges: NEB/ECW) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-0107: Juan T.R. v. Noem (Judges: PJS/DLM) (Order Violated: January 14, 2026)

26-CV-130: Botir B. v. Bondi (Judges: LMP/DJF) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-138: Lide E.G.Q. v. Executive Office for Immigration Review (Judges: JWB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 9, 2026)

26-CV-00146: Jhony A. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-150: Christopher A.F.E. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/ECW) (Order Violated: January 14, 2026)

26-CV-156: Evelin M.A. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 23, 2026)

26-CV-160: Jose A. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/EMB) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-00161: Pascual G. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 12, 2026)

26-CV-164: Santiago A.C.P. v. Todd Lyons (Judges: JWB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026; January 19, 2026; January 20, 2026)

26-CV-166: Andrei C. v. Lyons (Judges: SRN/ECW) (Order Violated: January 12, 2026)

26-CV-167: Oscar O.T. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026; January 19, 2026; January 20, 2026)

26-CV-00168: Martin R. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 12, 2026; January 20, 2026; January 21, 2026)

26-CV-00208: Abdi W. v. Trump (Judges: KMM/SGE) (Order Violated: January 21, 2026)

26-CV-213: Adriana M.Y.M. v. David Easterwood (Judges: JWB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-216: Estefany J.S. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/SGE) (Order Violated: January 13, 2026)

26-CV-231: Martha S.S. v. Kristi Noem (Judges: JWB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 16, 2026; January 20, 2016)

26-CV-233: Joaquin Q. L. v. Bondi (Judges: LMP/DTS) (Order Violated: January 14, 2026; January 21, 2026)

26-CV-244: Jose L.C.C. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026; January 19, 2026)

26-CV-252: Juan R. v. Bondi (Judges: SRN/DTS) (Order Violated: January 16, 2026)

26-CV-261: Jesus A.P. v. Bondi (Judges: PJS/EMB) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-272: Abdiqadir A. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 16, 2026)

26-CV-276: Bashir Ali K. v. Noem (Judges: LMP/DTS) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-282: Roman N. v. Donald Trump (Judges: JWB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 3, 2026; January 17, 2026)

26-CV-00283: Sandra C. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 16, 2026; January 21, 2026)

26-CV-296: Yeylin C.R. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 20, 2026)

26-CV-301: Liban G. v. Noem (Judges: SRN/ECW) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026; January 16, 2026; January 20, 2026; January 22, 2026)

26-CV-0309: Joseph T.M. v. Bondi (Judges: PJS/EMB) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-312: Obildzhon E. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 17, 2026)

26-CV-313: Corina E. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 17, 2026)

26-CV-314: E.E. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 17, 2026)

26-CV-316: Manolo Z. L. v. Trump (Judges: LMP/DTS) (Order Violated: January 15, 2026)

26-CV-317: C. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 18, 2026)

26-CV-319: C. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 18, 2026)

26-CV-328: Felix J.C.A. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-00351: Ihor D. v. Noem (Judges: JMB/DTS) (Order Violated: January 20, 2026; January 22, 2026)

26-CV-369: Francisco M. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/EMB) (Order Violated: January 16, 2026; January 23, 2026)

26-CV-0380: Alberto C.M. v. Noem (Judges: DWF/SGE) (Order Violated: January 23, 2026)

26-CV-396: Josue David P. A. v. Bondi (Judges: LMP/JFD) (Order Violated: January 17, 2026)

26-CV-00404: Nadejda P. v. Lyons (Judges: KMM/DLM) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-410: Paula G. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 17, 2026; January 20, 2026)

26-CV-423: Ronnie C. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 18, 2026; January 21, 2026)

26-CV-0424: J.B.C.O. et al., v. Bondi (Judges: JRT/DJF) (Order Violated: January 19, 2026; January 25, 2026)

26-CV-437: Darvin M. v. Bondi (Judges: SRN/EMB) (Order Violated: January 19, 2026)

26-CV-439: Maria U.C.G. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-00440: Abdirahman S. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/DJF) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-00444: Enrique L. v. Bondi (Judges: JMB/SGE) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-0445: Fernando T. v. Noem (Judges: ECT/EMB) (Order Violated: January 20, 2026)

26-CV-447: Alexis D.A.M. v. Bondi (Judges: JRT/ECW) (Order Violated: January 20, 2026)

26-CV-449: Hector T.G. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 23, 2026)

26-CV-454: Luis S. v. Bondi (Judges: ECT/LIB) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-457: Sonia M.M.C. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/LIB) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-00480: Jose A. v. Noem (Judges: JMB/ECW) (Order Violated: January 26, 2026)

26-CV-485: Ivan R. v. Pamela Bondi (Judges: JWB/EMB) (Order Violated: January 21, 2026; January 24, 2026)

26-CV-489: Yosber I.M.C. v. Bondi (Judges: JRT/DLM) (Order Violated: January 21, 2026)

26-CV-493: Fabian L.C. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-00504: Maria P. v. Brott (Judges: JMB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 23, 2026)

26-CV-517: Brayan M.O. v. Bondi (Judges: NEB/JFD) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-00537: Isidro L. v. Lyons (Judges: JMB/DLM) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-546: Maria V.H., et al., v. Bondi (Judges: JMG/DLM) (Order Violated: January 24, 2026)

26-CV-00561: Elvis T. E., et al. v. Bondi (Judges: KMM/JFD) (Order Violated: January 22, 2026)

26-CV-0575: Guled O. v. Noem (Judges: ADM/DJF) (Order Violated: January 23, 2026)

26-CV-00580: Carlos A. G. v. Bondi (Judges: SRB-DJF) (Order Violated: January 23, 2026)

26-CV-597: Jose V. v. Easterwood (Judges: DSD/LIB) (Order Violated: January 25, 2026)

26-CV-00663: Marco Q. v. Noem (Judges: SRB-DLM) (Order Violated: January 26, 2026)

Comments

[Bubba Jones]

JUDGES DEFY DEMOCRACY 74 TIMES!

[MollyGodiva]

Violating federal law the the Constitution is now "democracy" in the very small mind of MAGA morons?

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

Which is a far greater amount of thinking matter than you possess, asswwipe. Fuck off and die, 混蛋

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

Tony, you are a massive retard. That you consider yourself more intelligent than anyone is laughable. Especially comparing yourself to a conservative.

You are a lower form of life. Never think otherwise.

You may fuck off now.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

And if the judges are the ones violating law? In quite a few of the cases checked the judges are adding conditions not found under the INA that simply dont exist china Tony.

The Republic instituted laws. Judges cant change these at a whim retard.

[freedomwriter]

You forgot "lefty activist" judges.

[mad.casual]

CONSERVATIVE! JUDGE CONSERVATIVELY! DEFIES DEMOCRACY 74 TIMES! WHERE ARE ALL THE CONSERVATIVES?!?!

[BigT]

The strongest order was highlighted, and it read:
the Court has reason to believe that Petitioner is presently detained in El Paso, Texas.

Really? Rumors and hearsay are now relied upon in a Judge's ruling?

Really?

[SQRLSY]

With a name like that, this Judge Patrick J. Schiltz should just "hold my beer" (and watch THIS!) for ICE and Ice-Storm-Trooper-Barbie and KGB and Gestapo and KKK and STASI thugs, for a few moments, while they put on some thuggish, murderous antics for the amusement of Dear Orange Caligula-Shitler and ALL of His Many-Many Minions who, above ALL things, LOVE to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH all of the illegal sub-humans, and ALL who think and stink that the illegal sub-humans can suffer or feel pain like us REAL humans!

[Garth Vader]

And??? Courts issue bad orders every day. Let's wait and see what the Supreme Court says about them.

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

"Activist Judge issues bogus rulings"
Got it.

[Rick James]

In one example from Schiltz's list, ICE arrested a Venezuelan man living in Eagan, Minnesota, and transferred him to Texas, despite a judge's order to keep him in-state.

So... ICE moved him from one social construct to another. Funny how not just borders, but internal borders suddenly have very discernable meaning and parameters for enforcement.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Basically the judge is demanding to have article 2 powers not found under the law.

We literally already dealt with this shit at scotus. Yet reason celebrates illegal judicial activism.

[windycityattorney]

Habeus petitions have to be filed in the jurisdiction where the detainee is located. If he filed while he was in MN then jurisdiction for the petition is MN. Hence, the Court's order not to remove him from the jurisdiction.

Just because this fed govt likes to shuffle people around the country intentionally for the purpose of them not being able to file habeas petitions where they live/have contacts/family is not a positive attributed to the feds. Quite the contrary. It is what is known in the legal profession as a "dick move." Gaming the system from players who are 'the system' is in essence cheating or if this were equity courts of old would denote 'unclean hands.'

I understand these high brow concepts such as 'fundamental fairness' confuse you. Maybe chapGPT can help you conceptualize it.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Hey not a lawyer. Was there a recent appeals case about due process in regards to INA? Nevermind. Real lawyers already know the answer.

[windycityattorney]

The practice of the fed govt shuffling people around to avoid habeas filings is well known and documented. Its not even really up for dispute that the feds are doing this and the (legal) motive behind it. What is new is that - apparently- even for those detainees who successfully and quickly file habeas petitions where they are first detained (which is usually where they live and work), the govt moves them 1200miles away anyway.

Hey, its not my credibility that is getting trashed by these tactics. The Chief Judge of the District Court isn't mad at me. Appendices filled with violations of court orders (in just the last 29days) are not being put on the public docket in my cases.

This is not 'normal.' Hence why OP wrote a story about it. And the Chief Judge went out of his way to draw attention to it. As the Chief said, ICE is not a law unto itself.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

You ignored the question.

Let me try a simpler one.

What process is due under th INA as even appeals and scotus have ruled?

You have no credibility by the way. Especially when citing a chief district Judge over scotus and appeals, higher courts. Which you would know if you were a lawyer.

Ironically you refuse to even answer if a judge can give illegal orders or not.

When you cant argue the law, appeal ro activist judges losing at appeals i guess.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

The Windycitybarista (unemployed) doesn’t know the first thing About the law and is probably too stupid and ignorant to even look up legal issues online and understand them.

[windycityattorney]

Your question is non sensical and impossible to answer dipshit. People being detained are not all in the same immigration legal footing. Some may have removal orders; others not...some could have expired visas, while others could have had previous temporary protected status that was later revoked...some could have work authorization while others do not. You can't lump an entire group of thousands of people, all of which have unique legal circumstances, and blather about 'what does XYZ say about it' - who fucking cares what xyz says? Regardless of what it says or what you think it says, litigants in federal court don't get to violate court orders. If the orders are invalid, the proper thing to do is to challenge it.

I suppose in the desire to distract from what this conservative judge did you have to throw as much trash into the fire as possible? Fuck off with this weak tea.

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

Fuck off and die, windycitybullshitter.

[Stupid Government Tricks]

I'll give you props for actually doing some digging like a real reporter.

But it's all one sided. I don't expect you to regurgitate whatever ICE/DHS says, but some kind of text more than "Order Violated: January 23, 2026" would be useful. What order? What is the immigrant's status?

Pick a few at random for more detail. Here, I'll give you five from a random number generator.

$ rand -M 71 -n 5
8 63 41 36 4

[BYODB]

I read a little of a few of them and it looks like several amount to 'ICE isn't legally able to arrest illegal immigrants because the State says so'. I don't think that's going to go well for them at the SC, nor do I think they really want to set the precedent that States can directly handle immigration issues because the Southern states would love to show them what that looks like for them. I imagine as soon as a Democrat is in office they'll immediately change their tune when Texas starts rounding up illegal immigrants themselves.

[Rick James]

If England is any guide, judges and magistrates who are fiercely committed to open borders can issue the most cuckoo-bananas orders regarding the removal of no-shit, no-argument, no-debate-required illegal immigrants because "reasons".

[Mickey Rat]

So we are just going for State nullification of federal law. State government has no duty to enforce federal law and can prevent the federal government from enforcing its laws. This was something that was settled around 200 years ago and not in favor of nullification.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

These judges should all be arrested and found guilty of treason.

[Social Justice is neither]

But this time Democrats are the ones demanding nullification...oh.

[Azathoth!!]

The due process for people here illegally is

1. Removal when apprehended if there is no mitigating official paperwork.

2. See 1

Despite reason writers fervent wishes there is no right to trespass.

[Super Scary]

It's only due process if the result is an illegal staying in the US permanently with a free cell phone, housing and monthly check in the mail. Anything less is a travesty of justice!

[Spiritus Mundi]

It was 100 yesterday.

[Chinny Chin Chin]

Nope.

From yesterday's reason article: "Schiltz attached an appendix to his order of 96 court orders that ICE had violated in 74 different cases in the district."

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

Oh, lefty shit can count to 4!

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Which ones of these 74 do you think are valid orders? Remember, many are similar to issues appeals and scotus have already overturned.

[MWAocdoc]

Thanks for this! Many of the comments on Reason are basically, "You can't show me a single case of abuse. That case you showed me is a rare exception, anyone can make a mistake. And anyway all those abuses you cited are just your spin - those aren't actually abuses!" I can't wait to see what they say here when 74 cases of abuse just during January documented as violations by actual Federal judges can no longer be denied.

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

"I can't wait to see what they say here when 74 cases of abuse just during January documented as violations by actual Federal judges can no longer be denied."

One more activist judge issuing bogus rulings and you suck it right up! Those boots won't get polished without you licking them!

[Murray Rothtard]

it's a lot more than one judge. and most of them were appointed by conservatives.

but they were the old school conservatives, who wanted to conserve things like constitutional rights and due process.

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

My mistake, Retard. Several activist judges. Wonder how many have already had rulings overturned, Retard?

"but they were the old school conservatives, who wanted to conserve things like constitutional rights and due process."
Where, Retard, does the Constitution allow those who are here illegally with deportation papers served keep staying here?
I'll wait, Retard.

[Murray Rothtard]

Many of the circumstances that make it legal are written out explicitly in the article above, and in the rulings from the judges.

Since you either don't care to read, or are incapable of comprehension, I don't see the point in typing it all out again for you. You can just scroll up and click.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Then why do these judges keep losing in appeals dumdum?

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

"Many of the circumstances that make it legal are written out explicitly in the article above, and in the rulings from the judges."

So your retarded claim of Constitutional authority is so much bullshit, Retard?
Fuck off and die, Retard.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

A) ignores the cases already through appeals that have been struck down
B) ignores the blue slip process in a leftist argument on who nominated a judge
C) remains retarded
D) ignores the administration win rate against similar orders

Yeap. Retard from Chicago confirmed.

[MWAocdoc]

As I suspected, even you can no longer deny that there is a legitimate dispute going on here and that you are no longer able to simply knee-jerk your dismissal of people who are alarmed by Federal developments, but actually have to cite reasons for your disagreement. Progress. Baby steps, but any concession from you knee-jerkers is welcome.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

What was that dumdum? You didnt scream holocaust in this post.

There is not a dispute. There are activist judges ignoring superior courts. Reprimanded by even scotus multiple times.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

Walz +4

And also a really stupid take on what Jesse said.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

Oh bullshit. This judge is just another Boasberg. So we can no longer deny we have a problem with rogue judges.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Hey, the antisemitic retard who compares executing the INA to the holocaust weighs in.

Then literally assumes the question on if these orders are valid as valid without inspection. He basically assumes his retarded beliefs are valid just because they agree.

Which orders do you think are valid? Difficulty. Read the INA and recent scotus and appeals court rulings.

[MWAocdoc]

Just because a Judge's opinion agrees with mine doesn't mean that I or the Judge are wrong. Citing an unconstitutional law and previous unconstitutional rulings by the Supreme Court does nothing to render actions taken under uncsonstitutional laws and unconstitutional rulings constitutional. I assert that the Federal government has been operating unconstitutionally for a long time. Your knee-jerk support of the current administration or the previous administrations who acted unconstitutionally does nothing to change my opinion.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Please. Keep screaming out comparisons to the holocaust and the constitution and other concepts you dont understand.

Youre too fucking retarded to understand arguments being made.

It is not constitutional for judges to ignore the law and add their own conditions to it.

It is not constitutional for inferior Courts to ignore appeals and scotus.

It is not constitutional for judges to assume article i or article ii powers.

The more you type the more it is apparent you have zero comprehension to reality or facts.

[freedomwriter]

They all have BDS and ODS

[Dillinger]

>>the list was hurriedly compiled by extraordinarily busy judges.

the League of Extraordinarily Busy Judges lol

[SRG2]

"Judges? We don't need any stinkin' judges".

More evidemce that the "law and order" advocates are more concerned with order than with law.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

Marxist democrats! We don’t need no Marxist democrats! No, really. We don’t need your kind.

Get out.

[SRG2]

Fuck off, I'm neither a Marxist nor a Democrat - and my actual posts prove it.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

No they dont.

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

"Fuck off, I'm neither a Marxist nor a Democrat..."

Could be, but you're a TDS-addled steaming pile of lying shit, fuckwit.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

So you’re Green Party? That’s a distinction without a difference.

[SRG2]

Nope. Registered independent with capitalist/libertarian heuristics. I've had plenty of pro-capitalist posts here,

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

In the same way that the ChiComs are ‘capitalist’. All while backing. Far left Marxist democrat totalitarians. So we’re not buying it.

Just the same way way we don’t believe that JeffSarc are libertarians.

[SRG2]

In the same way that the ChiComs are ‘capitalist’. All while backing. Far left Marxist democrat totalitarians. So we’re not buying it.

i.e, because I don't kowtow to Dear Leader, though I have often posted in favour of capitalism and against socialism and communism, I must be a far left Marxist democrat totalitarian. You really are a stupid cunt.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

“You really are a stupid cunt”

That only works when I do it. But a stupid cunt like you couldn’t possibly understand that. Which also helps explains your Marxism.

You may now fuck off, Shrike.

[freedomwriter]

They are more concerned with killing anyone who disagrees with them. It is a wonder they haven't all moved to Chia or Russia or Iran. They would LOVE how they do things in those countries.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

Yes, you should all move to China, Russia, or Iran. Of course, the way things are going, the Iranian people would probably just kill you, along with those mullahs you and your party love and cherish so much.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Can a judge issue an illegal order shrike? Hint. Look at appeals court win rate by the administration.

[freedomwriter]

Now or about the 2020 election?

They certainly cannot follow precedent.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

You’re not going to be able to push that tired canard much longer. The proof of your fraud is coming out.

[freedomwriter]

Let me clear this up for everyone. This is a leftist activist judge on a witch hunt whom Trump has never heard of and Trump's SCOTUS will overturn it all. Hell, theyd rubber stamp student loan forgiveness if Trump did it.

[Spiritus Mundi]

These are all in Minnesota. Kind of odd these infractions are only occuring in the place with all the attention.

[Murray Rothtard]

They violated all the Chicago orders too. Reason is just keeping it tight here. If they listed all the orders they have violated nationwide, it would crash the internet.

[JesseAz (RIP CK)]

Which orders have been upheld at appeals buddy?

[Gaear Grimsrud]

I posted links a day or two ago revealing that judges in the MN district court are rubber stamping habeas petitions without even informing the government. I'll repost if I get around to it.

[XM]

Oh, color me shocked!

[Uomo Del Ghiaccio]

Judges say lots of things that are controversial and then later have their rulings reversed. We will need to wait and see how this ages.

In stead of harping and throwing gasoline on a fire, why not write articles on the solutions to a very real illegal immigration problem?

[mad.casual]

In stead of harping and throwing gasoline on a fire, why not write articles on the solutions to a very real illegal immigration problem?

This is my take on ICE-Block-Tea-People-without-Papers Watch. If half of the videos were them stalking and doxing ICE agents, blowing whistles, and capturing video of ICE agents and the other half were them stalking and doxing (immigrant) fraudsters, blowing whistles, and capturing video of empty Somali daycare centers it would be a real "Huh? [scratches head]" with regard to whether they're acting against democracy/the Republic/The People or not.

Instead, they're rather obviously, intentionally or not, covering for the funding of Civil War in Somalia *and* precipitating it here. But, I suppose, globalists gotta global.

[TJJ2000]

74? It was almost 100 just yesterday.
Now I've got to re-calculate.
A whopping 0.015% of cases or ~ 1 in 7,000.
So 'Fed-Up' with imperfection! /s

[freedomwriter]

Let me clear this up for everyone. This is a leftist activist judge on a witch hunt whom Trump has never heard of and Trump's SCOTUS will overturn it all. Hell, theyd rubber stamp student loan forgiveness if Trump did it.

[SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad]

Walz +8

You really are a bitchy retard.

[mad.casual]

Where were all of these judges when the election was stolen?
Where were all of these judges during the "summer of love"?
Where were all of these judges for COVID?
Why not Snowden, Clapper, and NSA spying?
Why not Ross Ulbricht?
Why is there no 100 count list of laws Fauci broke and orders Fauci refused? Fauci was responsible for the deaths of millions for perpetuating work his own/friendly administration ordered him not to do and made illegal. He then colluded to compel media outlets to cover it up.

Judge Malt Liquor has been on the bench since the Bush Administration, why *now* is he suddenly so active?

[scotterbee]

Were court orders violated in any of those cases? Honest question as I do not know.

[Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment]

If you are to claim so, let's see the cites.

[Jeff Mason]

As we saw with Abrego-Garcia case, progressive judges like to make up rights where none exist. Let’s put it in simple terms. If someone breaks into your house or is trespassing on your property, you don’t need a warrant before making them leave. Illegals are just trespassers at the national level.