Katie Miller Thinks Classical Liberalism Is Woke Leftism. She's Wrong.
How are the Millers going to defend Western civilization if they don't know the name of its defining philosophy?
Katie Miller is a conservative podcaster and former spokesperson for the Trump administration. She was briefly involved with the Department of Government Efficiency, but left government employment to work for Elon Musk full time. In August 2025, she quit that job too, and launched her own podcast, The Katie Miller Podcast. She is married to Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy.
One would hope that an individual who has spent so much time in close proximity to high-ranking conservative political figures—and who is married to the avatar of a very particular brand of conservatism, New Right populism/nativism—might be able to properly define classical liberalism, an extremely well-known philosophy that undergirds the entire American project.
Alas, Katie Miller recently issued a warning on X that betrayed a fundamental ignorance about classical liberalism: She is conflating it with leftism, and for good measure, wokeness.
The post in question was an attack on Chris Olah, a co-founder of Anthropic, an AI company. Miller expressed concern about Olah's stated commitment to "the principles of classical liberal democracy."
"If this is what they say publicly, this is how their AI model is programmed," she wrote. "Woke and deeply leftist ideology is what they want you to rely upon."
Co-Founder of Anthropic: "My deep loyalty is to the principles of classical liberal democracy."
If this is what they say publicly, this is how their AI model is programmed.
Woke and deeply leftist ideology is what they want you to rely upon. https://t.co/OkyxhOPiRU
— Katie Miller (@KatieMiller) January 26, 2026
She is clearly saying that "classical liberal democracy" and "woke and deeply leftist ideology" are one and the same. They are not.
Classical liberalism is the forerunner of modern libertarianism: It is a philosophy that emphasizes individual rights, including civil rights and property rights. Classically liberal thinkers such as John Locke helped establish the notion that government should be accountable to the people. Economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo used classical liberalism as a guiding principle when arguing in favor of free markets and free trade. In the realm of government, the political leaders associated with classical liberalism and laissez faire economic policies are people such as former President Calvin Coolidge, former U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and Argentinian President Javier Milei. Note that these figures are not exactly defined by their love of wokeness. To the extent that "wokeness" is even a coherent set of views, it emphasizes collective rights for various identity groups instead of the individual-rights framework of classical liberalism.
Leftists tend to agree with classical liberals and even most conservatives on some broad principles, like the notion that people should elect their leaders. But modern liberals, progressives, and leftists tend to disagree sharply with classical liberals and libertarians on economics: They want much more government regulation, taxation, and centralized government control of the economy. On these issues, leftism bears a closer resemblance to the version of conservatism advocated by Stephen Miller—who supports tariffs and extreme restrictions on immigrant labor—than it does to classical liberalism.
Katie Miller's former boss, Musk, seems to understand this much better than she does. In a reply on X on March 8, 2024, he wrote: "I believe in liberalism in the sense [of] supporting freedom of thought and action, but modern liberalism is the opposite of that." In other words, he was drawing a distinction between the classical liberalism of, say, America's Founding Fathers and the modern liberalism of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris.
Stephen Miller frequently talks in apocalyptic terms about threats to Western civilization. Given this, one might hope that the Miller household could easily provide the name of Western civilization's defining political philosophy. Hint: It's classical liberal democracy.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Stupid chicks.
She looks about 14 years old, of course she doesn't know anything.,,
*looks up her age*
Oh wow, uh, that's really sad.
It is absurd to connect classical liberalism with anything MAGA does, for MAGA rejects personal freedom, equality under the law, and free speech.
Equality under the law and the recognition of when/are people were not equal under the law is the foundation of wokeism.
Well, Robby, here we are.
Like decimate has come to mean totally destroy instead of the proper usage to kill one tenth, liberal, in any context, regardless of any qualifiers, is now the title for all those who prefer total government control of the lives of all citizens (and illegals, I suppose)
I guess, in the end, Humpty Dumpty was right.
I do believe there is a qualitive difference between the ideals of Anglo-American classical liberalism and the liberalism of the French Enlightenment and Revolution which emphasizes "equality" over "liberty". Unfortunately, the French version has more adherents in the West, including the American political Left. "Liberalism" is rather illiberal these days.
If that were true, they'd have put Egalité ahead of Liberté
Seriously Robby, why did you cut off the rest of his comment in your screenshot where he says, "a federal agent killing an ICU nurse for seemingly no reason and with no provocation"?
Her comment probably has more to do with the ignorance he expressed in his comment and the fact that his comment has nothing to do with classical liberalism except in a performative sense.
Part of the issue is that the left has seized the word "liberal" to mean their own brand of authoritarian socialism. I've commented on this time and again without gaining traction. As much as I hate giving up on the word liberal, we need to be careful to use something else (I've suggested "leftism") for that brand of foolishness and that we be consistent in using "libertarianism" and (unfortunately) get away from the phrase "classical liberalism" for personal responsibility and individual liberty.
Dunno. They changed the definition of liberal so I became a libertarian. Then they changed the definition of libertarian. I now identify as a malcontent.
I have joined The Professor's 'rational anarchist' philosophy.
This is standard post-liberal thought. The argument being along the lines that the equality and egalitarianism that are the basis of classical liberalism are the same demands wokeness has just without your preconceived notions on the limits of those things. There is a reason classical liberals have a hard time arguing against the woke until after it's too late and it's because they want the same thing in the same terms but the woke are following the Alynsky playbook of making classical liberals live up to their ideals well past the point of reason.
Classical liberalism relies on honest discourse. When a douchebag refers to an armed individual involved in active protest who violates the law in front of federal agents and then actively resists arrest as simply an "ICU nurse", they are not interested in honest discourse.
Honestly I am sympathetic to this woman's confusion. Reason editors conflate classical liberalism with wokeness every day.
Disclaimer: Reason is not responsible for your lack of basic reading comprehension.
And some Reason posters confuse capitalism with leftism
"apocalyptic terms about threats to Western civilization."
The greatest threats to western civilization have almost always been ... western civilization. Politicians' lust for power almost always trumps free enterprise, liberty and limited government. The notion that The People institute government to serve them is usually undermined by the people actually requiring government to SERVE them with other peoples' money.
Katie Miller Thinks Classical Liberalism Is Woke Leftism. She's Wrong.
I have no idea who Katie Miller is, but just on the context of her tweet, that isn't what she appears to be saying.
It appears that she's calling out someone who claims to be a classical liberal as being a woke in sheep's clothing. You know, like Nick Gillespie.
>How are the Millers going to defend Western civilization if they don't know the name of its defining philosophy?
Because Classical Liberalism today isn't the same as it was 50 years ago. The Left, as they do, killed it, skinned it, and our now wearing it as a skin suit.
Or do you think Britain is a classically liberal society? France? Germany? Canada? Australia? What do they do that has any resemblance to classical liberalism? Because they have an election periodically? How's that been working out? The Brits voted to leave the EU and the British establishment deliberately neutered that into an only-in-name Brexit.
They also had Tories run on limiting immigration and they did the exact opposite in office. Just like Republicans in the USA.
When Democrats go on and on about "saving democracy", it is always by passing incredibly fascist laws or just openly supporting and endorsing mass election fraud.
As you've already established that you're in favour of mass murder of political opponents, complaining about Democratic fascism is at least marginally hypocritical.
Katie Miller Thinks Classical Liberalism Is Woke Leftism.
Can you really blame her when Reason is the self-appointed champion of classical Liberalism?
This is why the silly people who split from the Libertarian Party to form the "LIberal Party" are doomed to fail - because no one will understand what they really mean.