Border Patrol Agents Killed Alex Pretti. Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?
Federal agencies have considerable authority outside their given jurisdiction, even when they don't have the training to match.
Over the weekend in Minneapolis, agents with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shot and killed bystander Alex Pretti. It was the second time a federal officer killed a protester in Minneapolis in the month of January, after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross shot Renee Good in her car just two weeks earlier.
Right away, officials said Pretti—who had a legally registered handgun in a holster—was trying to kill or injure the officers, who shot him in self-defense. This claim is contradicted by numerous videos of the interaction, which show Pretti holding a cell phone and never appearing to reach for his weapon. It also casts doubt on the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) pledge to investigate the shooting, especially after having prejudged the outcome.
One aspect of the shooting that shouldn't go unaddressed is what the CBP—which many Americans know as "border patrol"—was doing in Minneapolis, hundreds of miles from the nearest international border, at all. In fact, federal agents have considerable authority even outside their given jurisdiction. But this can have deadly consequences, especially when they're also operating outside what they're trained for.
U.S. law allows the CBP to conduct stops and searches "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States." Federal regulations define reasonable distance as "within 100 air miles" from any international border—be it the land borders with Mexico or Canada, or the eastern or western coastlines.
This includes many of the largest American cities, including New York, Chicago, Boston, and Washington, D.C., plus all of Florida and most of New England and California.
As a result, two out of every three Americans live within CBP's jurisdiction and are subject to being stopped and searched as if they were crossing the border from Canada or Mexico.
But Minneapolis falls outside the 100-mile zone; so, for that matter, do Charlotte and New Orleans, where the CBP was deployed in November. In fact, border officers have considerable authority even outside of the already-generous "border zone."
Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, both CBP and ICE "share a set of nationwide enforcement authorities," according to the American Immigration Council—like the ability to stop, interrogate, or arrest anyone suspected of being in the U.S. illegally or even of having committed a felony unrelated to their immigration status. "The Trump administration has taken this authority to the extreme, sending Border Patrol and ICE 'roving patrols' to terrorize communities."
The DHS justified its action in Minneapolis by saying it was necessary to target immigrants from Somalia. This came after news broke nationally in December about a yearslong scheme in which fraudsters, including numerous people of Somali descent, used Minnesota day care centers to bilk Medicare out of billions of dollars.
Soon after, President Donald Trump claimed Somalians "contribute nothing. I don't want them in our country." He also said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D–Minn.), herself a Somali refugee, and her "friends" were "garbage," and said the U.S. shouldn't "keep taking in garbage into our country."
"Almost 58% of the Somalis in Minnesota were born in the U.S.," the Associated Press reported. "And of the foreign-born Somalis there, 87% are naturalized U.S. citizens."
Still, agents surged into the state at Trump's request. "The largest DHS operation ever is happening right now in Minnesota," the department posted on X. Trump and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, it added, "have rallied DHS law enforcement personnel to keep Americans safe and ERADICATE fraud."
But even if the government had only the best intentions, to find and remove only the most egregious offenders, that wouldn't justify the Minneapolis operation by the department's own logic. If the reason is to "keep Americans safe and ERADICATE fraud," that wouldn't explain sending thousands of armed troops into a city because a few dozen of its nearly 80,000 Somali residents have been arrested for a nonviolent crime.
Besides, ICE and CBP aren't trained to swarm into a city like an occupying army. We're now seeing the tragic results of that lack of preparedness.
"It's clear that these people who we're seeing, these federal government officers in Minneapolis, are obviously overwhelmed and poorly trained and inexperienced," former DHS adviser Tom Nolan told NBC News. "So when you see them on the street engaging with people, that's a security concern right there, because they don't know what they're doing."
"What I clearly see is Border Patrol agents put in harm's way when they have minimal training to the circumstances they're being pushed into," added Jason Houser, a former DHS and ICE official under President Joe Biden.
"We're seeing routinely substandard law enforcement practices that would just never be accepted at the local level," Arizona State University criminology professor Ed Maguire told ABC News earlier this month, after Good's death at the hands of an ICE agent. "Then there seems to be just an absence of standard accountability practices."
"It's highly unlikely that your typical ICE agent has a great deal of experience with public order tactics or control," agreed criminal justice professor Ian Adams.
Indeed, while much of ICE's use of force policy is redacted, versions that have become available through lawsuits show that de-escalation is not prioritized, and agents are allowed to use deadly force "immediately."
There is a difference between enforcing immigration laws and besieging a major city for spite. ("This operation is driven by nothing more than the Trump Administration's desire to punish political opponents and score partisan points," claims a lawsuit filed against DHS officials by the state attorney general.) Rather than simply getting violent criminals off the street, the Trump administration is stationing federal agents, who are ill-equipped for the task, as an occupying force in a major city.
Under current federal rules, the CBP has the authority to operate in cities far from an American border. But as the death of Alex Pretti demonstrates, that doesn't mean it should.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Give it up. Open borders ain't happening. If you want to make deportations difficult, I would be OK with execution instead.
"Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?"
Because there are illegal aliens there.
It ain't that hard to figure out, Joe.
That and that MN and local government refuse to follow the law and act against the federal government regarding illegal aliens. In short, ICE is trying to do their fucking job and local/state government as well as crazy lefties are engaging in insurrection.
Joe might have noticed that Minnesota is a border state. But maybe he lacks a map.
His characterization of Pretti: "bystander Alex Pretti" is only correct at the very beginning of the encounter. When the woman was pushed by the ICE agents, Pretti interfered, committing a felony. So proper characterization would have been "buttinski" or "felon" or "interfering protester" Pretti.
The gun apparently discharged accidentally after it was taken from Pretti by an ICE officer:
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/minnesota-shooting-seemingly-caused?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-4153312f-9dc9-4320-ac8b-b4c0803cbf28
One shot set off the chain reaction that killed Pretti.
Why should these criminals roam free? Where are your tears for their victims?
https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-dozens-criminal-illegal-aliens-convicted-murder-child-rape-and-more
Hernan Cortes-Valencia, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico with a final order of removal dated Dec. 1, 2016, who’s been convicted of sexual assault against a child, sexual assault-carnal abuse and four DUIs.
Sriudorn Phaivan, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal from March 8, 2018. He’s been convicted of strongarm sodomy of a boy, strongarm sodomy of a girl, another aggravated sex offense, nine counts of larceny, unauthorized use of a vehicle, four counts of fraud, vehicle theft, two counts of drug possession, obstructing justice, possession of stolen property, receiving stolen property, burglary and check forgery. He also has pending charges for two counts of receiving stolen property, flight to avoid prosecution or confinement and burglary.
Ge Yang, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal from Oct. 16, 2012. He’s been convicted of strongarm rape, strongarm aggravated assault against a family member, aggravated assault with a weapon, an additional sex offense and domestic violence involving strangulation.
Vannaleut Keomany, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal dated Dec. 17, 2009. He’s been convicted of two counts of attempting to commit strongarm rape.
Tou Vang, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal dated Oct. 31, 2006. He’s been convicted of sexual assault and sodomy of a girl under the age of 13 and procuring a child for prostitution.
Chong Vue, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal dated March 11, 2004. He’s been convicted of strongarm rape of a 12-year-old girl, kidnapping a child with intent to sexually assault her, and vehicle theft.
Kou Lor, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal from Aug. 16, 1996. He’s been convicted of sexual assault, rape, rape with a weapon, statutory rape without force, two counts of burglary and shoplifting.
Pao Choua Xiong, a criminal illegal alien from Laos with a final order of removal dated Jan. 10, 2003. He’s been convicted of rape, fondling a child, two counts of domestic violence, burglary, larceny and disorderly conduct.
Abdirashid Adosh Elmi, a criminal illegal alien from Somalia who’s been convicted of homicide.
Abdirashid Mohamed Ahmed, a criminal illegal alien from Somalia with a final order of removal dated Feb. 18, 2022. He’s been convicted of two counts of negligent manslaughter with a vehicle, two counts of DUI, larceny and damage to property.
Aldrin Guerrero Munoz, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico with a final order of removal from Dec. 17, 2015. He’s been convicted of homicide and assault.
Gilberto Salguero Landaverde, a criminal illegal alien from El Salvador with a final order of removal dated June 25, 2025. He’s been convicted of three counts of homicide.
Aler Gomez Lucas, a criminal illegal alien from Guatemala with a final order of removal dated May 24, 2022. He’s been convicted of negligent homicide with a vehicle and DUI.
Mariama Sia Kanu, a criminal illegal alien from Sierra Leone with a final order of removal from July 5, 2022. She’s been convicted of two counts of homicide, four DUIs, three counts of larceny and burglary
Huh. Lots of Asians on the list. I was told we only deport brown people.
It's Trump's fault for opening the floodgates by declaring Peace & telling the Khmer Rouge to make nice with the Hmong and Thais. Before he retires, Bovino should recruit more to lower average ICE agent height to his own level.
Ctrl+f 'laos': 7 results
Grew up with people who used the n-word... not openly, but not as conservatively as more modern, urbane standards.
Most epithets were proxies for laziness or xenophobia/unfamiliarity. Probably the most eyebrow-raising unequivocally racist comment I've ever heard was later in my professional career from a Chinese (Han, I believe) National about Laotians.
I'm sure some of them are nice people.
All of those people should be deported. I don't think you'd find any sane person who disagrees with that. I certainly agree.
Maybe ICE should focus its efforts on deporting the violent immigrants, instead of spending their time going door-to-door to drag gardeners and maids out of their houses.
MN could, you know, work with them to do exactly that.
MN has refused to do so.
Walz and Frey seem to care about rapists more than citizens.
Why should a state government enforce federal law?
Mind you, we are talking about immigration law, not criminal law. To the best of my knowledge, the state of Minnesota, along with all states, still prosecute crimes of murder and rape.
You might want to revisit your assumption.
Why should a state government actively obstruct and interfere with the enforcement of federal law? Why shouldn't the federal government take action to put down such a rebellion?
But the state government is not actively obstructing or interfering with the enforcement of federal law.
We need a laughing face emoji.
MN Dept of Corrections is already cooperating and handing over prisoners to DHS. Then DHS prints propaganda saying they 'apprehended' criminals that Minnesota LEOs already handed over.
Take a look at the MN DOC video. You are parroting propaganda.
https://www.fox9.com/news/mn-department-corrections-video-disputing-dhs-ice-detainers-jan-22
And yet, people have been out there protesting ANY effort to collect these scumbags.
Oh, you said “sane”. Never mind.
Come now, that is not the real issue. Maybe you can find a handful of nutters who think that even criminal illegal immigrants should not be deported at all. But that is simply not true of the thousands of people who are protesting. Mainly, it is an objection to the unprofessional thuggish ICE tactics, and an objection to rounding up peaceful migrants who are actually contributing to the community. And yes some of it is just plain hatred of Trump. But it isn't about defending rapists and murderers.
Can we PLEASE move beyond these idiotic talking points and get to the real heart of the matter?
We haven’t seen these “thuggish tactics” play out in places like Dallas or New Orleans, both Democrat run cities.
I wonder why that could be? Just spit balling, but maybe it’s because we don’t have a bunch of crazy protestors trying to stop ICE from taking in people, regardless if they’re peaceful migrants or h hardened criminals. Maybe it’s because our politicians, as shitty as they might be, didn’t want us to be like LA or Minneapolis and so directed PD to run crowd control, containing the protestors so they remained peaceful.
Also, as far as I have seen, the protesting and obstructing of the vast majority of current ICE detainments are for people with existing final removal orders that, as most of Spiritus’ post show, have had them for YEARS.
I’ll respond to the heart of the matter down below.
Except, we have seen felony after felony committed to stop deportation of these "worst of the worst", most notably the judge that stopped the trial of a domestic abuser to sneak him out of the courtroom.
Additionally, we have seen article after article decrying the deportation of one person after another, casually omitting or burying that they were a convicted felon with a deportation order going back years.
So, no. I cannot agree with your assessment.
Where are your tears Lancaster?
https://rumble.com/v74vtf2-dhs-drops-video-revealing-the-types-of-people-the-idiotic-ice-protesters-ar.html?mref=1wxk5&mrefc=8
Why are you simping for the state? Why are you gobbling up their propaganda and repeating it uncritically? How does that boot leather taste?
Why did you do those very things during Covid?
Umm, I didn't? I didn't recommend wearing masks because the government said so, I recommended wearing masks because, in the right situations, it could make a difference in reducing the spread of disease, based on the information available.
Do you brush your teeth at night? Do you do so *because* the government recommends it, or do you do so because it's a good idea for oral hygiene?
You do realize Minnesota is a border state, right?
Like most topics, reason is ignorant on geography as well.
No, he does not.
Blame Canada! They stopped Somalis from entering Canada for the Mogadishu-Manitoba hockey match. And now the US is stuck with Somalis who don't even play football.
More terrorists enter from Canada than Mexico.
In 2023, 85% of all land border encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist occurred on our northern border.
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/migration-us-has-more-one-border
The Border Patrol has the worst reputation for corruption of any relevant agency. They've let millions cross the southern border without legal papers, taken that much again in bribes from traffickers. Number of BP agents in jail for corruption? Barely a handful.
Well, Presidents gave no shits about it until Trump. So, it was not corruption. It was executive policy.
You think Mexican coyotes have stopped bribing border patrol agents because Trump is president? You think Americans have stopped buying drugs from the cartels or stopped selling them weapons because Trump? You give an awful lot of credit to an old reality game show host.
They can show video of the border at any time and see it is empty.
Could not do that under any other President.
The Border Patrol can lie and cheat under any president, including Trump. Who's going to call them on it with stooges like you cheering on their most atrocious behavior?
At this point, I think Reason is like the manager who found our 40% of all sick days were taken on a Monday or Friday, and vowed to end that abuse of the system.
Just close those days and run T-T every week. Problem solved until the employees take off new days.
Border Patrol Agents Killed Alex Pretti. Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?
Because, when Reason was trying to appear to defend the rights of citizens to be secure in their cars away from the border and, to a lesser degree, pushing back against the welfare state, it was later revealed along several lines (bake the cake, safe injection sites, "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there", "mostly peaceful", etc.) that they were, in fact, calling for the law to be disobeyed and/or ignored, not just whimsically, but specifically against natives and citizens in favor of preferred political groups.
That, when Reason writers were calling each other civil libertarians, what they really meant was private SS with better manners.
they were, in fact, calling for the law to be disobeyed and/or ignored, not just whimsically, but specifically against natives and citizens in favor of preferred political groups.
This is bonkers. When has Reason said that the law should only be disobeyed by certain favored groups?
When has Reason said that the law should only be disobeyed by certain favored groups?
Border Patrol Agents Killed Alex Pretti. Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?
Seems like a reasonable question. Maybe the Border Patrol should go back to.. patrolling the border. Minneapolis isn't on the border.
Doesn't seem terribly responsive to my question though.
chemjeff radical individualist 1 minute ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Seems like a reasonable question. Maybe the Border Patrol should go back to.. patrolling the border. Minneapolis isn't on the border.
Would you like a map
*I read that as Minnesota, not Minneapolis. Even after bolding it.
Doesn't seem terribly responsive to my question though.
"At All" is an absolute. Lancaster is advocating for zero immigration enforcement. This would be advocating for the law to be disobeyed by certain favored groups(illegals).
Border patrol also has jurisdiction at point of entry, meaning international airports.
https://legalclarity.org/border-police-authority-jurisdiction-and-your-rights/
"At All" is an absolute. Lancaster is advocating for zero immigration enforcement.
I think you are reading too much into his comment.
He acknowledges that CBP is legally allowed to operate within 100 miles of an international border, but Minneapolis is not within 100 miles. And clearly the agents who killed Alex Pretti were not at the airport.
Also, CBP is not the only agency tasked with enforcing immigration law. So questioning why CBP is in Minneapolis is not equivalent to declaring opposition to all immigration enforcement entirely.
Maybe Joe Lancaster, in his heart of hearts, really wants zero immigration enforcement, but this article does not make that case.
When has Reason said that the law should only be disobeyed by certain favored groups?
Johnson/Weld '16
Jorgensen/Cohen '20
Oliver/ter Maat '24
If you didn't know Reason regards lines in the sand as "imaginary social constructs" right up until Kyle Rittenhouse travels 20 mi., entirely legally, across state lines to get to where is Dad lives, and then switches their stance 1/3rd of the way back when a 10 yr. old girl needs an abortion after being raped by her illegal immigrant father... you might be surprised to learn that Chase Oliver is gay.
Wait what?! Chase Oliver is gay? Next you'll be telling me Robby Soave is a conservative.
TBF, Jeff only recognizes other countries “imaginary social constructs”.
Not true. Borders are real, but I do not impute the same meaning into borders that the immigration restriction crowd tends to impute onto them. I view borders as the extent of a sovereign's jurisdiction, and that's it. I don't view borders as prison walls that require permission to enter and leave through the gates.
My ideal viewpoint on borders is that if you should step across a border without permission from the state, then it shouldn't be a crime; instead, it only means that you are agreeing to be bound by the laws of the sovereign on the other side.
What do you think?
I think your view of borders is idealistic (much the same way ancaps think there should be no borders at all and that everyone will just respect private property rights). And just to be clear, I don’t begrudge you or them for such lofty ideals, I just don’t think they are realistic.
Borders are absolutely the extent of a sovereign’s jurisdiction, I agree with you there. The problem I see with your line of thinking is that, whether we like it or not, every country on earth does view their borders as walls and does consider it a crime to step across it without permission. Which makes sense pragmatically and logically just from the point of view of how do you determine who is and isn’t a citizen of said country, with all the rights and privileges that entails, if anyone can come or go without permission. For one country not to do so, in the modern era and with robust welfare, is tantamount to suicide. And that’s not even getting into the havoc it causes for things like apportionment of congressional seats.
I think there are solutions to some of the issues, like guest worker visas with caveats about welfare, residency, etc. Could we allow for more legal migration? I honestly don’t know, as we averaged like 2.5 to 3 million per year under Biden and it was such a cluster fuck they tried to just ignore the issue.
Now, I know what you’re thinking: but Nate, we have no such restrictions between the states, why is that okay? To which I would point out that 100% free movement works inside the US because we have one over arching federal government (which is why I often point out that true unfettered movement necessarily requires a one world government, or total anarchy). And even then, we are seeing major issues in places like Tennessee and Texas as people flee places like California and New York (infrastructure and city services being the most glaring). Adding millions more to an already strained system is less than ideal.
Unfortunately, unrestricted migration is a relic of a bygone era, at least until we figure out how to get off this flying rock and colonize other planets (assuming there isn’t intelligent life there that has strict non-Terran immigration rules).
(which is why I often point out that true unfettered movement necessarily requires a one world government, or total anarchy)
Without seeing context behind the gray box: disagree. This is a sophist take.
Unfettered movement with varying degrees of anarchy is the natural state of existence. Even the most totalitarian state wasn't and isn't as totalitarian as mother nature... yet.
Sorry for the text wall, but wanted to really expand on my thoughts and honestly answer your question.
it shouldn't be a crime; instead, it only means that you are agreeing to be bound by the laws of the sovereign on the other side.
And when the sovereign on the other side says you are not allowed in... what then? Right, it's a crime and they have the right/duty to deport you or worse.
So, help me to understand your argument here. Because the Libertarian Party position holds that there should be free movement of goods and people across borders, you infer from this position that this represents a viewpoint that only certain groups should be entitled to violate immigration law?
Freedom of association is a universal natural right, and stating that governments should respect that right in no way implies that only certain people should have that right respected.
Or did I misunderstand your argument?
"What I clearly see is Border Patrol agents put in harm's way when they have minimal training to the circumstances they're being pushed into," added Jason Houser, a former DHS and ICE official under President Joe Biden."
What "harms way?" Aren't we being told the protestors are just peaceful observers? What "harms way" are they putting agents in? Or is this an acknowledgment by a former Biden official that the agents are, in fact, being thrust into dangerous situations where they may be harmed by those opposed to their operations?
The rioters claim to be "legal observers", not "peaceful observers.
Since they clearly aren't peaceful.
Of course, "legal observer", like so many left wing propaganda terms, means nothing.
Immigration cops are well trained for the task required which is removing illegals. They are not trained as riot police. But as usual Reason has the problem upside down. Why are they forced to encounter rioters and obstruction? Could it be because of Walz and Frey and Ellison and sanctuary laws and Ice Watch and propagandists at outfits like Reason? The chaos that ICE and CBP encounter is manufactured and funded by Koch heroes like Soros and their mouthpieces at Reason are as responsible for the deaths of Pretti and Good as are the cops that pulled the trigger.
These type of comments always crack me up.
The people who think that the protests are "manufactured" by Walz or Frey are so out of touch, they can only be the product of living in a hermetically sealed right-wing media bubble.
If you step even two millimeters into a left-of-center space and see what they are saying about Walz, you'll see that it's not kind words.
Look at the comments to this article:
https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesota/comments/1qltq1u/gov_walz_statement_on_the_state_leading/
This is an article about a statement Walz put out demanding that the state investigate the Alex Pretti murder. The comments are about 2/3rds mocking and contemptuous of Walz because he isn't doing enough. A few snippets:
Take action, Tim. Your words are meaningless. ACT!
I’m sure very serious statements will make a difference any day now.
Im sorry, but his words and press conferences have been politcal posturing at best.
Grow some fucking balls, dude.
THAT is what "THE LEFT" thinks of Tim Walz. He's not organizing anything. He is following the mob.
Yes, it's true, Walz is not actively supporting ICE. He dithers and makes foolish comments claiming to be in favor of the citizens of Minnesota, while he allows fraud and illegals to squat all over the citizens.
Well Mr. Houser, maybe your boss shouldn’t have done such a shitty job on border enforcement.
"What 'harms way?'"
Perhaps the harm of being prosecuted for murder? Which at least their upper-level their superiors seems to be setting them up for?
"It's clear that these people who we're seeing, these federal government officers in Minneapolis, are obviously overwhelmed and poorly trained and inexperienced,"
Careful here, Joe.
You are clearly defining the case to send in regular troops, since the courts have ruled Trump can't use National Guard units until after the regular Army fails.
Answer: Because there are illegals in Minneapolis and the mayor is refusing to hand them over when they have them in their jails.
But the point is that many of those being detained have NOT been held in jails because they have not committed crimes. Objecting to government actions is a time-honored practice in America, and how we started. They don't need sanctions or funding from others. If DHS keeps shooting, citizens will shoot back.
Bring it.
Except they did commit crimes. And were released. Often multiple times they committed crimes and were released.
So ICE is coming it to find and remove them.
U.S. law allows the CBP to conduct stops and searches "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States."
From Lancaster's link, which destroys so many narratives about 'unlawful, warrantless ICE searches and arrests'
(a) Powers without warrant
Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—
(1) to interrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien as to his right to be or to remain in the United States;
(2) to arrest any alien who in his presence or view is entering or attempting to enter the United States in violation of any law or regulation made in pursuance of law regulating the admission, exclusion, or expulsion of aliens, or to arrest any alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest, but the alien arrested shall be taken without unnecessary delay for examination before an officer of the Service having authority to examine aliens as to their right to enter or remain in the United States;
Joe hoisted on his own petard.
(1) to interrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien as to his right to be or to remain in the United States;
This power is still subject to the Fourth Amendment.
It's also incredibly broad and should be reined in IMO.
But Minneapolis falls outside the 100-mile zone; so, for that matter, do Charlotte and New Orleans, where the CBP was deployed in November.
A regulation, 8 C.F.R. § 287.1(a)(2), defines this “reasonable distance” as 100 air miles from any land or coastal border, including the shores of the Great Lakes, international airports, and U.S. territories.
Lancaster likes to pick the parts that reinforce his opinion and excludes thise that don't.
Just for the record:
New Orleans to Port Fourchon is 59 air miles.
Port Fourchon is on the Gulf of America.
Charlotte (NC assumed) is an international airport.
Do you mean Golf of Mexico? Where's the Golf of America?
The 19th hole?
This does not mean "100 air miles from any airport". That would be absurd and would cover most of the nation.
If you go to the actual regulation
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1
this is the actual definition of "reasonable distance":
And no, "external boundary" does not include "the boundary of an airport".
So New Orleans definitely falls within the 100-mile limit as it is about 82 air miles from the Gulf. Charlotte however is over 170 miles from the Atlantic Ocean so it does not fall within the 100-mile limit.
>Border Patrol Agents Killed Alex Pretti. Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?
Federal agencies have considerable authority outside their given jurisdiction, even when they don't have the training to match.
Lancaster - Border Patrol doesn't exist anymore. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement was created post-9/11 by merging Border Patrol with Customs Enforcement.
In addition, Border Patrol had - like ICE has - immigration law enforcement duties. So ICE is in Minneapolis to enforce immigration laws.
Enforcing immigration laws against fraudsters and violent criminals. We know they're violent criminals because everyone you hold up as a 'innocent unaccompanied military age male just looking to give his family a better life' he ends up as murder, rapist, pedophile, and usually a member of a foreign gang.
>U.S. law allows the CBP to conduct stops and searches "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States." Federal regulations define reasonable distance as "within 100 air miles" from any international border—be it the land borders with Mexico or Canada, or the eastern or western coastlines.
That is *not* what US law says. US law says ICE can conduct *warrantless* stops for immigration (and customs enforcement) purposes w/in 100 miles of the border.
In addition, ICE isn't doing warrantless stops in Minneapolis. They're executing removal orders. Which they can do anywhere.
>There is a difference between enforcing immigration laws and besieging a major city for spite.
Yes there is. Now ask cities that the Democrats besieged for spite - like El Paso or Chicago - how they liked it.
Yeeeeaahh, they didn't do that. Democrats were elected in those places and implemented policies you (and in many cases me) don't like. Nothing was spiteful; the people got what they voted for. Very few people who voted for Trump voted to see murders in the streets by masked state terrorists.
The number of fake libertarians in these comments is stunning.
Border Patrol should... I don't know? Patrol the border? They shouldn't operate 50 miles away from the border let alone 250.
It's wild to read so-called libertarians breathlessly defend Big Government coming into your house without a warrant or summarily executing a law-abiding citizen in the street for daring to carry a weapon.
The number of steaming piles of TDS-addled shit are impressive also, steaming pile of TDS-addled shit.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion...
Reason adlib: Unless the invasion gets to the 100-mile mark
...and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
I can't believe how pathetic Reason has gotten lately.
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution grants that Federal Laws supercede State and Local Laws. This is incontrovertible in matters where the Federal Government has exclusive jurisdiction. Immigration and Naturalization (Article I, Section 8, Clause 4) is one of many such exclusive jurisdictions.
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution grants that Federal Laws supercede State and Local Laws. This is incontrovertible in matters where the Federal Government has exclusive jurisdiction. Immigration and Naturalization (Article I, Section 8, Clause 4) is one of many such exclusive jurisdictions. With these two most relevant points in mind, the real questions are: #1 Why was Alex Pretti interfering with Federal Officers in performing their constitutional duties? #2 Why did Alex Pretti commit a felony assault on more than one Federal Officers while performing their constitutional duties PRIOR to being fatally shot in the mele he initiated? #3 When did Libertarians start ignoring the Constitution, Natural Law, and NAP to come to the rescue of a deranged who committed an armed felony assault on Federal Officers while performing their constitutional duties? This magazine has twisted the word "Reason" to mean something very different than the thought process of the rational, clear thinking, and lucid.
ICE could greatly reduce the intensity of the conflict by announcing that they are going after "a male, about 30 yrs old, who was wanted for child molestation in Connecticut in 2023" or something similar. And then when they catch the guy, perp walk him very publicly so that people can see that ICE is successful and specific.
They can't use the person's name or they could be warned, but advertising the specific purpose of any particular deployment would go a long way to shutting the mouths of the protesters.
No, it wouldn't. They are against border security and immigration enforcement. They want no deportations, of anyone.
"Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?"
The obvious answer is because Minneapolis is a sanctuary city that openly resists and obstructs federal immigration control.
The democrats provoked a response and now they got it. As a result ICE is in Minneapolis.
This didn't need to happen, all the way back when Obama was in office, the issue with sanctuary cities should have been dealt with.
Nations have borders for a reason.
Immigration should only be legal.
Every single person in the country illegally is legally subject to being deported.
Most countries in the world have less lenient law and are more black and white on illegal immigration.
Our legal immigration process is like everything else the government does, is extremely inefficient and expensive.
The congress and senate are cowards who are afraid of addressing the root issues surrounding immigration or are purposely using the issue to utilize as a political weapon.
Amnesty is difficult to swallow, because of the failed promises that were either intentional lies or intentionally forgotten.
Legal immigrants should not be eligible for any safety net or entitlements until they become citizens.
Legal immigrants should have to resend any other citizenship before being allowed to become a citizen.
Illegal immigrants should not be allowed to become citizens.
Illegal immigrants should have to leave the country to apply to enter the country legally.
There is a difference between enforcing immigration laws and besieging a major city for spite.
I think Joe has unintentionally hit on a good idea. Pull ICE and Border Patrol officers out of these cities. Literally besiege the sanctuary cities instead. Stop the flow of goods from going in, and in a couple of days the residents will be dragging out illegal immigrants to trade them for sandwiches. No violence needed.
"Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?"
It gives the sort of MAGA knuckledraggers we see in the Reason comments section a big hard on, that's why.
No, it gives the steaming piles of TDS-addled shit something to whine about, steaming pile of TDS-addled shit.
Joe Lancaster suffers from a severe case of TDS, which is obvious from his first sentence wherein he falsely claimed Pretti was a "bystander".
To refer to someone who carries a hidden loaded gun (and multiple magazines of bullets) while intentionally confronting and interfering with federal agents who were doing their job is NOT a "bystander", but rather an armed and dangerous potential domestic terrorist.
Why does Reason, like other Trump hating media propagandists, immediately defend and protect people who have gone to extraordinary efforts to prevent federal agents from doing their job, which is a federal crime?
Seems to me that Tim Walz, Jacob Frey, Keith Ellison, Amy Klobachar and other Trump hating Democrats (along with their left wing Trump hating media pundits) should be charged for conspiring to create an insurrection against the federal government.
Unlike the bogus allegations by Democrats against Trump in 2021, what is going on in Minnesota appears to be a well coordinated attempted insurrection against the United States of America.
Why is reason.com working so hard to defend illegal aliens? They are all trespassers. At the very least they should be evicted from our country. Many, like the ones ICE is targeting, are violent and have committed horrendous crimes while here. We should be cheering ICE on, not trying to stop them from protecting us.
They don't think Libertarian-ism should have a National Defense.
Which is probably why so many called it anarchy years ago.
Which I never really thought was justified until now.
Summary of the brainless commentariat here: illegals are criminals just for being here even if they are hard-working, Christian family people doing jobs that Americans don't want to do for wages that Americans are unwilling to work for, prima facie evidence that illegals are taking away high-paying union jobs picking fruit. ICE is only targeting violent criminal aliens and has never rounded up brown people with names like Rodriguez in the parking lot at Home Depot and all of the Americans who happened to be arrested during the mass roundups and detained for a week without checking their IDs were understandable mistakes necessitated by the noble work of purging America of brown people.
Summary of your criminal-brainless & racist assertion...
Break-ins are only illegal for non-brown people or people without a job ... because look! look!; I got a whole list of BS 'pity-me' *excuses* that says breaking-ins aren't really a crime if you Identify-as 'brown' and have a job. /s
Or maybe any-color can apply for an invite at the door and prove they can abide by the law eh? Instead of creating a list of BS *excuses* to constantly commit crimes.
"Why Is Border Patrol in Minneapolis at All?"
Because slobberin' Joe didn't stop them at the border, you fuckwit.