ICE Turns Lawyers Away at Minneapolis Detention Facility
As arrests surge under “Operation Metro Surge,” attorneys say the Trump administration is again denying detainees meaningful access to counsel.
On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claimed that over 3,000 immigration arrests have taken place in the last six weeks amid the agency's ongoing crackdown in Minneapolis. This influx of arrests has brought to light new concerns that the Trump administration continues to violate immigrants' and Americans' rights to due process.
Earlier this week, ABC News reported that federal authorities were denying legal representatives the ability to see clients held at the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis. One anonymous immigration attorney told ABC News that they were denied visitation with a client who'd been held at the facility for multiple days. "I stood outside the visitation room for about four hours…And they just kept repeating, we don't do attorney visitation," the attorney told ABC News. The attorney also claimed that this was the first time in a decade of representing immigrants that they've had any issue visiting clients at the Whipple Federal Building.
Similarly, ABC News interviewed an anonymous criminal defense attorney who said they were turned away from seeing their client, a United States citizen and an Iraq War veteran, who was being held at the facility after an immigration enforcement operation took place near their client's home. "I've been practicing law in Minnesota for almost 20 years," the criminal defense attorney told ABC News, "and I have never been denied access to a client."
A third anonymous attorney told ABC News that one Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent at the facility said allowing lawyers to see their clients would result in "chaos."
These, and other instances reported by ABC News, stand out as potential violations of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to due process. Immigrants also have a statutory right to counsel, which protects an immigrant's "privilege of being represented" in removal proceedings and appeal proceedings. And according to the ICE National Detention Standards, legal representatives are supposed to be permitted "visitation seven days a week, including holidays…for a minimum of eight hours per day on regular business days, and a minimum of four hours per day on weekends and holidays."
Unlike criminal defendants, immigrant detainees are not guaranteed legal representation. However, they may procure legal representation to protect their rights while navigating a convoluted immigration system, and immigrants who obtain counsel are much more likely to win their cases.
When Reason asked the DHS about how the agency was ensuring meaningful access to counsel for both immigrant and criminal detainees, or if ICE detention standards had changed, a spokesperson replied that "all detainees at the Whipple building have opportunities to communicate with their family members and lawyers." A DHS spokesperson likewise denied any constitutional violations at the Whipple Federal Building in a statement to ABC News, and added that detainees "have access to phones they can use to contact…lawyers" and are provided a "list of free or low-cost attorneys."
Yet access to phones isn't always enough to ensure attorney-client confidentiality when government authorities record and likely listen to phone calls, the anonymous immigration attorney told ABC News. And other situations, like family members dropping off a detainee's medications, require more than a mere phone call.
Since President Donald Trump took office for his second term, the DHS and immigration authorities have been frequently accused of denying detainees' due process rights. In November, a federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration for inhumane conditions at the overcrowded Broadview ICE facility, and required, in part, that federal authorities provide Chicago-area detainees with three full meals a day and any prescribed medications needed, as well as allow communication with attorneys. But even with that restraining order in place, plaintiff's attorneys argued that ICE was still violating the terms of the order in December, according to CBS News.
Although immigration authorities have since left Chicago and are now focused on Minneapolis, the Trump administration's habit of violating rights seems to have followed in its push for speed over the rule of law.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Were they real lawyers who had been hired by the defendants / detainees? This time at least?
https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/duckworth-staffer-immigrant-ice
This was my first question, too.
I would like to think that no matter where you fall on the spectrum of immigration legality that we could all at least agree that the right to an attorney should apply. However, I'm fully expecting that this behavior by the Trump administration will be roundly defended by the "libertarian" commenters at Reason.
How much access to an attorney is a right though?
The article admits these people have access - just not in-person access at the whim of the attorney.
The article also mentions that at least one MN attorney has never been turned away from this facility previously.
""I stood outside the visitation room for about four hours…And they just kept repeating, we don't do attorney visitation," the attorney told ABC News."
If true that's pretty problematic.
If you have an order of deportation, there is nothing for a lawyer to do.
A right to an attorney to what exactly? They've had their due process and legally ordered out, which they've refused to do. Now Leftists like you demand infinity due process for them to remain.
It's leftist to say that maybe people need to be able to consult an attorney to be able to navigate our legal system? Seems like the tactics from actual leftist regimes.
"Similarly, ABC News interviewed an anonymous criminal defense attorney who said they were turned away from seeing their client, a United States citizen and an Iraq War veteran"
Was this citizen veteran also given due process and legally ordered out? Or are you just going to deny this might have happened?
Wow, a criminal defense attorney made a claim? That never happens.
So you support outright lies and demand perfection on the other side, typical. Sorry but you open borders retards guaranteed that sort of thing would happen because your entire fucking strategy is to overwhelm and defraud the system to such a degree that you guarantee issues to cherry pick for sympathy.
Leo, at any time you are free to read the INA and see what process is due for illegal immigrants. You choose not to do so in order to argue from ignorance, as is your standard.
You are also free to rely on anonymous sources as the basis of your facts despite how often they lie, as is your standard.
This claim is specifically about a US citizen. Do try to keep up.
"You are also free to rely on anonymous sources"
Thanks, I appreciate your approval.
Cmon Leo. We know you really mean taxpayer funded activist with a law degree.
>Yet access to phones isn't always enough to ensure attorney-client confidentiality when government authorities record and likely listen to phone calls
OMFG. Neither is sitting in a room in the detainment facility. It's never enough with you people, there's always one more stupid hurdle you demand everyone jump over.
My brother hasn't seen his public defender - neither she nor the prosecutor show up in person to the fucking *hearings* but these illegals are supposed to be entitled to in-person interviews at the convenience of random ambulance chases who probably are there just to find clients.
As arrests surge under “Operation Metro Surge...
Couldn't be bothered to break out that thesaurus?
If they already have been issued a deportation order, there are no "proceedings" happening at which an attorney could represent them.
There are appellate proceedings. Peter Harisiades got to appeal his deportation order (though he ultimately lost)
No. There are a limited smoujt of days to file a potential appeal and the clock doesn't start only when you've been busted. OMFG you libtards are all so ignorant of everything other than your "feelz".
You may be interested to know there is literally a recent appeals case about this.
It favored immigration courts.
Stopped reading while trying to count the anonymous attorneys.
Gee, I can't imagine why someone might be a little concerned with saying something negative about DHS or the Trump administration...
How do you feel about anonymous ICE agents?
CNN, MSNOW, CBS, NBC, ABC, The Atlantic, Politico, The Hill, WaPo.....an countless others stream negative comments about Trump and DHS 24/7. What has happened to them to give somebody pause? Have they been run over by cars? Doxxed? Had their wives and children threatened with murder?
A good number of the media companies you listed have been sued by Trump.
"Had their wives and children threatened with murder?"
Probably would happen if they were identified. That seems to be the state of politics on all sides.
Oh, so you oppose libel suits now?
Got it.
Fuck off commie. Name the Leftists attacked or shot by conservatives, name the ones doxxed for their legal activities by conservatives. Also, name the media companies sued by Trump for true things they said and not known lies.
I have no problem with negative comments about DHS. I have a problem with journalism that is entirely based on anonymous claims. If Autumn wants to publish the claims of anonymous ICE officers I have a problem with that too. So far that hasn't happened.
I was simply positing why the claimants in the article might wish to remain anonymous.
Because the tons and tons of people continuously condemning ICE have been disappeared? When did this happen?
Lol. What a childish response.