Trump Threatens NATO Members With Tariffs Paid Almost Entirely by Americans
Threatening European allies to further tax American citizens is unlikely to persuade them to surrender Greenland to the United States.
President Donald Trump is threatening NATO member countries with higher tariffs if they refuse to back an American acquisition of Greenland. But Trump's efforts are unlikely to be persuasive for one simple reason: Americans have borne the greatest burden of Trump's tariffs, not foreign exporters.
The Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a nonpartisan German think tank, released a report on Monday finding that American importers and consumers bore 96 percent of the tariff burden under the first 11 months of the Trump administration. Trump praised his protectionist policies for raising $8 trillion in revenue and foreign investment in August and inflated that number to $18 trillion in December. In reality, tariffs raised $288.5 billion in gross tariff and excise tax revenue in 2025. Applying the Kiel Institute's finding to this figure, Americans paid a whopping $277 billion in import taxes, while foreign exporters paid only $11.5 billion.
By threatening nations with which the U.S. has already reached trade agreements, Trump undermines American credibility and sows economic confusion. "Trump's tariff announcement confirms what trade policy experts have long warned," says Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute. "Because Trump's trade deals are unilateral and non-binding, they can be easily changed on a whim and are unlikely to constrain his daily tariff impulses." This unpredictability has wreaked havoc on American small businesses that import inputs and goods from abroad while failing to change the terms of trade: Instead of "slashing margins to maintain volume" in the U.S. market, foreign firms "redirect their sales to Europe, Asia, or other destinations," explain the Kiel Institute researchers.
Trump first floated the idea of purchasing Greenland in 2019 and revisited the subject shortly after winning the 2024 election. Four days after the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, Trump's White House upped the ante by suggesting that the military could be used to seize Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark.
In response, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the U.K., the Netherlands, and Finland dispatched military units to Greenland last week. On Saturday, Trump threatened them with "a 10% Tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America" as of February 1, which will "be increased to 25%" on June 1 "until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland."
Trump stated that the U.S. needs Greenland to maximize the efficacy of the Golden Dome, a layered defense shield that is expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars. (The 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement already allows the U.S. to establish and operate defense areas for the protection of NATO members.)
Whatever Trump's motivation for the acquisition, threatening to do to ourselves what enemies seek to do to us in times of war—preventing Americans from buying what we need to improve our situations—is unlikely to persuade NATO members.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
And yet the CPI continues to decline. But thanks for putting your faith in a German think tank. Trust the experts. Again. Denmark and the rest of NATO are vassal states of the US. We guarantee their survival. The Germans sent their elite military forces into Greenland and they left 2 days later on commercial flights. Anybody who thinks Europe is going to save the colony of Greenland from the machinations of Trump is delusional. The tariffs aren't relevant.
And yet, we will end up paying them... to teach those filthy Europeans that Americans don't know where tariffs come from.
Based on what? Incorrect narratives?
I thought we wanted more foreigners to spread our tax burden around?
I guess there's something distinct about the people of Greenland that Reason is willing to abandon its "BORDURZ IZ KONSTRUKTZ!" ideology in order to reject them as a whole based on their race/color/religion/national origin.
Probably a lack of blueberry farms/farmers. Maybe a lack of ethnically-Greenland-centered food trucks.
The main problem is the German soldiers - all twelve of them - realized they left their broom handles at home. Otherwise their military exercise to prove their defense of Greenland went very well.
Well Trump didn't invade on their watch so Mission Accomplished!
I sleep better knowing they are on that wall.
I really hope after all this bullshit, Congress refuses to pay for it.
As long as we are forced to pay double for French wine - I'm OK with it.
I switched to freedom fries the last time the Frenchies fucked with us.
Hey jack... we have real world data that shows your assertion to be a lie. Americans are seeing 10-15% of the costs at most per data from just last year. Atl Fed report from trumps first term shows only a 6% vost pass through.
The 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement already allows the US to establish and pay for the defense of Greenland for the benefit of NATO
We are required to also say "pretty please can we defend you" with every request. Who the fuck negotiated this?
Somebody has to raise taxes. Hes not cutting spending thats for sure.
Release the files!
So many distractions.
Pedo protectors gotta pedo protect
A tariff is not a tax.
Deal with it without whining.
Twat planet do You PervFectly Hell-hail from, stranger?
(REAL libertarians LOVE that them thar unprovoked trade wars, more taxes, more tariffs, and always MORE AND MORE Government Almighty!)
Slut us now bow and pray and Worshit Government Almighty!
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
Government loves me, This I know,
For the Government tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
GAWD does love me, yes indeed,
Keeps me safe, and gives me feed,
Shelters me from bad drugs and weed,
And gives me all that I might need!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
DEA, CIA, KGB,
Our protectors, they will be,
FBI, TSA, and FDA,
With us, astride us, in every way!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
Golden Dome? Call it Golden Showers for defense contractors. Seems fit that Trump is a proponent.
Or maybe there is a world outside of just Reason and TTAARRIIFFSS.. /s
And it is about time the 'foreign-goods ONLY' are tax-exempt ends.
Maybe the taxpayer can stop subsidizing the shipping on them too?
I really don't understand the economic argument here. A tariff makes a foreign good more expensive only RELATIVE to a domestic one. Both the foreign seller and the domestic seller can each respond to the price pressure that a tariff creates. The foreign seller may decide to lower their cost to stay competitive. The domestic seller may also decide to lower their cost to gain market share previously lost to the foreign. It isn't automatically true that the purchaser "pays for all tariffs". That's only true if the buyer decides to pay the higher price for the foreign good even if there was a less expensive domestic version.
To further complicate things, it may be that the foreign good costs less because it is of lower quality. A consumer who discovers that a domestic good that costs more but is a better value, would be better off. The lower initial cost has actually hidden the value proposition from them. You will pay more at a Costco than a Walmart, for example, but one is of far better quality, and thus, a better value.
These interactions are just not as simple as "the taxpayer pays for all tariffs".