I'm Dying of ALS. Knowing I Can Decide When To End My Life Brought Me Back From the Dead.
I didn’t really understand the power of Medical Aid in Dying until I received my terminal diagnosis.
One Friday morning in September 2023, my neurologist told me she suspected that I had ALS. I was completely healthy—or so I thought—and in the prime of my life. I had two adult children, a great career, and a wonderful marriage. I was 56, and both of my parents were still alive. My diagnosis was confirmed two months later. I felt as if I had just been told not only that I would die, but that I would be tortured to death, and that it would drag out over several years.
I was the chief clinical officer at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City, trained as an internist and geriatrician, and I've cared for many dying patients. Of all the people in the universe, you'd think I would be the person most ready to hear the news that I had a terminal condition. Instead, I discovered that the intellectual awareness of death and the emotional reality of facing it yourself are completely unrelated.
I thought about all the patients I had cared for with ALS or similar neuromuscular diseases—mentally intact but imprisoned in their own bodies, unable to move, swallow, speak, or breathe. I remembered the look of desperation in their eyes when they could no longer communicate.
About a year after my diagnosis, joy returned to my life thanks to the support of my family and friends, therapy, antidepressants, and a daily meditation practice. But the most important factor in my emotional recovery was gaining the knowledge that I can make the decision to end my own life when my suffering becomes unbearable.
When I got my diagnosis, I had a vision of my own death: I would be choking on my own saliva, gasping for air, unable to communicate my needs, my eyes filling with panic, as my family and friends looked on helplessly.
Now I know that my death will happen on my own terms. The source of my suffering was that everything was being taken away from me, and that there was nothing I could do about it. Now I know that I get to determine when my life will end, and that knowledge gives me great peace.
The Day My Life Split in Two
When patients receive a life-changing diagnosis, small details of that moment—where they were standing, the blaring fluorescent lights, the glare of a screen—haunt them. For me, it was a 10-word sentence, delivered by my neurologist that fateful Friday morning, that will repeat in my head for the rest of my life: "I'd like you to be evaluated at an ALS center."
A month earlier, I had been on a work trip in Nepal when my leg started spasming. I figured I must have aggravated something in my spine on the long journey from New York City to Kathmandu. A couple of weeks later, I was back in New York, and my leg symptoms were worse. I went to see my primary care doctor, who calmly, but urgently, referred me to the neurologist. She saw me on a Thursday, sent me to get a bunch of MRIs that evening, and then I saw her again the following day. It was at that appointment that she uttered my death sentence.
I walked 40 blocks back to my apartment, trying to make sense of what I had just heard. My wife was home, and when I told her the news, we held each other and wept uncontrollably. That's all I remember doing for the next month. This wonderful, beautiful life we had built together would be coming to a premature end. I would need to tell my kids, who were 23 and 21 at the time. And I would need to tell my parents, who, in their 80s, would now have to face every parent's nightmare: losing a child.
Also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, ALS is universally fatal. Most people die within three to five years of diagnosis after an inexorable march through total paralysis, the loss of the ability to speak, to eat, and ultimately to breathe. I've cared for all sorts of people with terminal illnesses, and I couldn't imagine a more horrific disease to die from than ALS.
Every waking moment, I veered between an overwhelming sense of dread and near-total panic. But I came to realize that I didn't fear death; I feared being imprisoned in a body that had died around me.

Reclaiming Control
One day in 2024, my thinking suddenly shifted. I realized that there are 13 jurisdictions in America where Medical Aid in Dying, or MAiD, is legal. I could establish residency in one of them if I needed to.
Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, the first in the nation, was signed into law in 1994 and took effect in 1997. Since then, similar laws have been passed in another 12 states and the District of Columbia. MAiD allows terminally ill adults, with less than six months to live, to request and receive a prescription for a lethal cocktail of medications. Once they ingest the medications, they typically fall fast asleep within minutes and die within an hour or two. People requesting this must be mentally competent and must be able to self-ingest the medications. In most states, there is a mandatory waiting period after the initial request, and two doctors must agree that the person requesting the medications meets all necessary criteria.
Opponents of MAiD worry that the current laws will turn into a slippery slope, ultimately including people who are not terminally ill but who are suffering because of a mental illness or a disability. Thankfully, we have a nearly 30-year history of these laws and a wealth of data and experience. These concerns are unfounded. MAiD laws have proven durable and consistent, and there has been no slippery slope.
MAiD isn't used because people lack access to hospice and palliative care. It turns out that nearly 90 percent of people choosing to end their lives on their own terms are already in hospice when they do so. MAiD, hospice, and palliative care are not mutually exclusive.
I have an excellent palliative care physician. When I qualify for hospice care, I will gratefully receive it. But I know that, even with the very best of these services, there is no therapeutic path to free me from becoming completely locked in.
Knowing that I can avail myself of MAiD when I decide that enough is enough has freed me of immeasurable degrees of fear and dread. It has allowed me to get back to living and to make the most of the time I have left.

Embracing Life in a Dying Body
I had lived and worked in New York City and the surrounding suburbs for my entire career, but I dreamed of having a house in the country because I love growing vegetables and caring for animals. A year before my diagnosis, my wife and I bought a piece of land in Columbia County, a rural area in New York State. When I found out that I had ALS, the house wasn't complete, so we were still able to make all the necessary modifications to make it accessible as my condition progresses.
We moved in a year ago, and are raising chickens and goats. Once MAiD becomes legal in New York in 2026, I will have the privilege of creating the exact conditions I want for my own death. I want to be out in the field with our animals, watching tree swallows and bluebirds fly in and out of their boxes. I want my wife and my daughters by my side.
In December 2025, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D–N.Y.) announced an agreement with the state's legislative leaders on a MAiD law. The State Assembly and Senate just need to pass the new version of the bill and send it to Hochul's desk, and it will take effect six months after it is signed.
If the law didn't pass, I was prepared to move to another state and establish residency. But most of the people in the 37 states without MAiD laws don't have the resources or ability to move elsewhere to die, which is why I've decided to become an advocate for MAiD in states where it isn't yet legal.
MAiD gave me the freedom to determine my own fate, and today I'm living more vibrantly than I could have imagined on that horrible Friday morning in my neurologist's office. I meditate. I exercise carefully. I spend time with my wife and daughters, extended family, and friends. I laugh. I advocate. I build fences. I rest in the sun. I savor good meals. I watch every bird that lands on this property as if it's the first one I've ever seen.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
It's real liberating - until they tell you it's mandatory.
It's real liberating until they start telling you that you are a drain on reaources and it's super selfish for you to be putting others through having to deal with you.
See: Canada.
Suicide's always been an option - professionalising it leads to horror.
You said it better than I did. Thanks.
Tell me neither of you assholes has ever had to be caregiver for a loved one suffering a horrific disease without telling me. Mercy can be a gift. You assholes probably enjoy watching people suffer.
Fuck you, asshole. Nothing they said implied anything of the kind. Stupid strawman bullshit.
You said it better than I did. Thanks.
Well, you both speak retard so that makes sense.
God you guys are really bad at this.
Tell me neither of you assholes has ever had to be caregiver for a loved one suffering a horrific disease without telling me. Mercy can be a gift. You assholes probably enjoy watching people suffer.
What does any of this have to do with state-sponsored assisted suicide?
Tell me you are scared shitless of doing anything without government permission. Oh wait, you just did.
"Tell me neither of you assholes has ever had to be caregiver for a loved one suffering a horrific disease without telling me. Mercy can be a gift. You assholes probably enjoy watching people suffer."
You are free to kill your loved one. Opening that door to the government is the worst idea possible.
Save your sob story for some who care.
Nearly everyone expresses the desire to die at home, in their own time, and not end up unconscious in a hospital undergoing extraordinary measures serving only to extend the dying process. But if you are unable to communicate your wishes (as often happens), that decision will likely be made by your loudest close relative.
Many are fine with that, OK, your decision, and it’s no more right or wrong than mine. As for me, before I lose rationality, before I lose the ability to choose, before I lose what makes me, me…I will go gently into that good night (I'm not the raging type). That, hopefully, will be with the support of understanding and ethical doctors. But, by my own hand if necessary.
Context: retiring a few years ago, we moved from Colorado to be a day's drive from our Idaho extended families. We chose Washington because of its generally less intrusive state government, which unlike Idaho's, has rational, pragmatic laws on private personal behavior…including end-of-life care.
My attorney-reviewed Advance Directive (including its Do Not Resuscitate conditions) is in my medical records and discussed with my doctor. My children each have a copy and are fully aware of my position. Pragmatically hard-headed eldest Purple Son—not Ms. Purple—has my health decision power of attorney because, frankly, it's one of the very few things about which I can't quite trust her word. She doesn't argue the point.
Took me a while to do all that, not because it's hard to do, but because it's just plain hard to think about. But when I finally had it all done, I felt nothing but a peaceful relief.
Everyone, if that's your desire, please, take the time right now to look up Aid in Dying requirements in your State, and start the process to give you the best odds of making sure your wishes are followed. Your children will thank you.
Nearly everyone expresses the desire to die at home,
This is true. The state, for instance very much expresses a desire for you to die at home, preferably before you soak up too many resources.
Unless of course you're Somalia, then they're doing everything possible for you to soak up resources so they can get their "fair share".
+1
Once they ingest the medications, they typically fall fast asleep within minutes and die within an hour or two.
Now do the death penalty.
Hush your mouf! That is a torturous, inhumane, painful way to go. Haven't you read the news reports where the child-molesting serial killer gurgled and his eyes twitched! That's proof that he was in pain!
Why, here's Reason's own Emma Camp!
You know what Stephen Hawking found liberating? A trip to Epstein Island.
Sorry for your ALS, but to be blunt and cold about it, sorry even more that you think you need government permission and assistance to kill yourself. This has nothing to do with religion, since it would be the same sin either way.
Don't want the bloody mess of shooting yourself or crashing your car? Blame government for making easier, less messy ways criminal.
Worried that getting the right chemicals and drugs illegally would put others in the government's crosshairs? Don't congratulate government for creating yet another medical monopoly; blame government for making it illegal in the first place.
Congratulating government for piling new regulations on top of old ones is the coward's way of putting on blinders.
ETA: And as Incunabulum says above, making suicide a government "feature" is just more government nannyism. Government health care already gives them all the excuse they need to control what you eat, drink, and otherwise imbibe. A government monopoly on legal suicide is just another excuse for them to cut costs by telling the aged and infirm to let the government kill them, because they won't provide any health care if you get too aged or infirm.
Dogs don't kill themselves yet we see it as compassionate to end their suffering with mercy.
Dogs aren't morally equivalent to humans, and never will be.
And we routinely kill dogs that are not suffering from terminal illnesses, but just because they are a burden on society.
This is true and more so with cats. But with humans we simple leave them alone on the streets and then bitch about them. In fact some Fox news host suggest killing homeless people. Strange that people want to refuse terminal patient the right to die but want to kill homeless people who presence bothers them. But hey that the MAGA way.
Fuck you and fuck MAGA, there are other positions. I am with SGT here, in a libertarian society none of this would be necessary. And I have no moral qualms with suicide, I just don't trust the government.
The problem with suicide is that when the time comes you may not be able to end your life. Also self administered suicide is not guaranteed to be successful. Now you could ask a family member or friend to help you but that involves them in the suicide. Not a good place to be legally speaking. I know of a ALS patient who committed suicide. He got the diagnosis, went home and hung himself. His death coming the way it did devastated his family. Imagine if like Jeremy Boal he had taken time to make a plan, talk and prepare his family, set benchmark for the time he wished to die. Right to die will not be in every state or every country. If you don't trust the government go to a state that does not allow right to die.
Now do 'dementia' where the patient doesn't know why the doctors are in there, what the needles are they're putting into his arm and decides (in his demented state) that he has no interest in dying today and doesn't care Dr. Mengele is waving an 'end of life plan' form he signed when he was 22 years old-- where in the comments he wrote, "If I could I'd choose firing squad because that form of death would be so fucking metal!" with a little devil-horn hand symbol drawn in the margin.
While dementia is terminal it does not fall in the same category as ALS or cancers. I am wondering if two doctors would sign off on assisted suicide for that diagnosis? Certainly not in the case of advanced dementia where the person is unaware of what is their condition.
Canada will kill you for a lot less than dementia. They will kill you for depression.
Pandora's Box was a cautionary tale.
Well Canada does not offer MAiD to dementia patients. As for mental illness that is not available until early 2027. I will wait to see what conditions are set for MAiD for mental illnesses before making a judgement.
Moderation4ever: "We have to pass the law before we can see what is in it."
Then it will be too late to do anything about it.
I am wondering if two doctors would sign off on assisted suicide for that diagnosis?
Yes.
F*cking ghoul
Correct, and like euthanasia for animals, the choice will end up not being yours, but your handler's.
No, you dumb motherfucker. The choice should be your family's if you are too far gone to make decisions. You're the only one with a handler. Idiots like you say dumb shit like this until the day you are faced with the reality of a horrible, frequently inevitable situation.
Me: Correct, and like euthanasia for animals, the choice will end up not being yours, but your handler's.
You: The choice should be your family's if you are too far gone to make decisions.
Like your pet, your family will be your handler. And you're calling me a dumb motherfucker?
This isn't hard. When you are old and your mental faculties are intact, you create a living will saying "when I am in x, x, x, state, it is my desire to go home where I was before I was born" and then you name power of attorney to carry out your wishes. You absolve the people who love you of guilt and have dignity in death. It's the best we can hope for. Your stupid hypothetical situations of death squads is theatre.
I appreciate that stating something as benign as “you shouldn’t need government permission to decide when to end your life” and laying out how the government has made it harder/illegal to do so, has brought out such retardation in some people.
I'm still trying to figure out how we can do this humanely.
Right to die is expanding and I think that is for the good. If people are so worried about being involuntarily killed they can move to a state that does not allow the practice, in the same way Jeremy Boal was prepared to move to a place where the option was available to him.
This issue is the one that is the most core to my idea of liberty. Where power - and restraint from power - are what really define liberty in a meaningful sense. It almost always gets me back to Hayek's Use of Knowledge.
It is rather a problem of how to secure the best use of resources known to any of the members of society, for ends whose relative importance only those individuals know.
Does everyone individually have the right to decide the terms on which they themselves will die? If right is the wrong word, find an alternative - but only an alternative that empowers the individual who is facing that particular circumstance. Not all the individuals around them who have all sorts of opinions about everything BUT the circumstances that dying individual faces. Those entities that have opened MAID as a discussion are the only ones that allow an individual to decide those terms themselves.
Life is an inalienable right of a human being. You cannot give another person a permission to kill you. Undermining the inalienability of the right to life weakens it in ways you do not see, and weakens respect for human rights as a whole.
Do we really even need permission?
Death is the inevitable end. If you can't understand that and deal with that and understand that everyone is going to have to deal with that, then you are simply imposing an ignorant tyranny on someone else. No one facing death wants to hear your fucking lecture about life while they are SUFFERING. And yet you people do those lectures with a smile while you torture others.
You self-righteous religious assholes imposing that tyranny on others is what weakens respect for others. It is what demonstrates that you have no respect for anyone else's life. And that is precisely the attitude that is normalized when your ilk criminalizes everything - including discussion - about all topics of death.
"Death is the inevitable end."
And is what your cult worships.
"I just interviewed a Canadian man named Roger Foley for my Humanize podcast. The episode will be posted in a week. He is in a hospital with a progressively disabling condition for which doctors, he says, have repeatedly pushed euthanasia on him for several years — as they concomitantly deny him the kind of care that would make his life easier to bear."
"Euthanasia is awful “medicine” and even worse public policy. It exposes the most vulnerable among us to abandonment and death. It pretends to be kind. It claims to be compassionate. But in the end, it justifies the most callous cruelty."
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-callous-cruelty-of-canadian-euthanasia-illustrated/
Wonder what Aella thinks?
Bang Bus for ALS patients?
>Opponents of MAiD worry that the current laws will turn into a slippery slope, ultimately including people who are not terminally ill but who are suffering because of a mental illness or a disability. Thankfully, we have a nearly 30-year history of these laws and a wealth of data and experience. These concerns are unfounded. MAiD laws have proven durable and consistent, and there has been no slippery slope.
Yes there has, in Canada.
Disability was slippery-sloped by the Truchon v. Canada decision in 2019 which ruled that the restriction to dying people is unconstitutional, resulting in Bill C-7 which extended it to disability. C-7 put mental illness on hold for a while, but not permanently, and as of March 17 2027 medical aid in dying will apply to mental illness as well.
I can't believe you missed this in your 30 year history.
I CAN believe that you have deliberately misinterpreted that judicial decision because you seem to prefer to torture the dying. Shame on you.
"...Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) is a legal health service in Canada and has become a significant cause of death, rising to become the fifth leading cause of death in Canada by 2022/2023, with over 15,000 deaths in 2023 alone, reflecting a major expansion since its legalization in 2016. MAID eligibility, initially for terminal illnesses, expanded controversially to include non-terminal conditions, leading to its rapid growth and debate over its role in healthcare."
So is the author telling an untruth because he does not want to examine this too closely, or because he is actively propagandizing a lie?
I'm going with the active propaganda because he won't be around to see the consequences of his advocacy and be held accountable with a long and painful death...wait a second.
This thoughtful article from almost exactly six years ago has stayed with me…
How cruel. How utterly arrogant. Losing the ability to communicate your wishes, to even say "No," is not a complete turnaround. Losing self-awareness is not becoming content. And that, dear friends, is the crux of the matter.
My father died at 61 of a heart attack, my mother at 67 after a brief illness. They died too soon, and I miss them still. But I now understand how incredibly lucky they, and I, were.
My father-in-law died at 86, my mother-in-law at 95, both with progressively severe dementia over the last 10-15 years of their lives. He died just as her own dementia was becoming apparent, meaning she spent her final lucid decade as caregiver to a husband who didn’t recognize her.
Though growing up with very little, it was never my goal to get rich (and I’m not), but I’m content to have ended up with a more satisfying life than my younger self would have ever thought possible. At 71, alongside my only wife (of 50 years next month), I’ve watched three children grow to adulthood. They’re all better people than I—more empathetic, more compassionate, more ambitious, and more conscientious—and I could wish for no greater legacy.
I play with my grandchildren and tell them stories. I write a little and read a lot, bake bread, sing with others and get lost in music. Although having to stop my life-long running habit a couple years ago, I'm grateful to remain physically able to walk to my local course and play almost daily disc golf, either comfortably solo or with the added joy of children, grandchildren, and friends.
I want to live another 30 years, watch my grandchildren grow up, improve my disc golf short game, bake better bread, travel some, sing more, write more, read a lot more, and help society progress through its recovery from the Trump Interregnum.
But if forced to choose one fate—that of either of my father, or of my mother-in-law—another 20 good years would not offset the miseries and horrors of the final 10. If presented with only those choices, I’d willingly die today (or ten years ago, at my father's age), grateful for the life I’ve able to live.
As mentioned earlier (so won't repeat it all here), I've arranged my Advance Directive (including its dementia provisions) to give me the best odds of controlling the conditions of my end of life.
People such as the James Wrights of the world believe themselves more moral, more ethical than you and I. They, today, believe they’re more competent to determine my fate than I am, today. But in their arrogant authoritarianism, they make me only more certain of the wisdom of my choice.
“Gladly I lived and gladly die, and I lay me down with a will.”
I love how everyone tells personal anecdotes of terminally ill relatives... I really appreciate the stories bro, but uhh, I really don't know what bubble you live in... like there will be some 'rules' around who the state kills (only upon "request"). The state still decides when you die, they merely expand the definition infinitely until it starts to look like something very different.
I think we can all at least agree that there are some, you know, minor ethical concerns.
As recently as 2025 Euthanasia was listed as the fifth most common cause of death in Canada. So a leading cause but not the top leading cause of death. It is also important to remember that the people getting MAiD are already are facing a terminal illness. It not like a perfectly healthy person gets MAiD.
It not like a perfectly healthy person gets MAiD.
Sure, as long as we define "perfectly healthy" as someone without any personal trauma, depression, sad memories etc.
But hey, it's progressive Europe. It would be inhumane and unethical to kill the Islamic terrorists, but we'll happily kill the victims!
You keep throwing Canada up, but it's an erroneous comparison. Canada has a national health care system where care is essentially rationed. There is a far greater incentive to keep people out of the system. In the U.S., we have the opposite, where health care systems WANT to keep people in their beds for as long as possible (providing they can pay or milk insurance companies, of course). And while some may be lucid and able enough to end their own life when they want, not everyone has that luxury, and that's why laws like MAiD are needed. As the author points out, here in the U.S., that slippery slope has not materialized after years of implementation.
On a more basic level, the right to end your life - whenever you want, and enlisting whatever help you feel you need to do it - should never be prohibited by government or interfered with by well-meaning religious nannies.
The difference between having means and not is displayed in setting up your own story book ending.
12 states and the District of Columbia. MAiD allows terminally ill adults, with less than six months to live,
How quaint. "Six months to live" and "terminally ill".
How conservative and unprogressive.
el oh el.
I am going to bet that if a doctor erroneously says they have that little time left, there will be no repurcussions for doing so.
But what if you identify as terminally ill?
Instead of forcing the 38 other states to allow assisted suicide, why not create a charity to fund moving expenses?
Why should I have to pick up stakes, move to another state, and go through all the rigamarole of establishing the needed residency per that jurisdiction's laws, especially when I'm undoubtedly sick and feeling poorly, when all the other 38 states need to do is allow us freedom over our own bodies?
I encourage all Marxists to participate in maid as soon as possible