Federal Agents Used a Battering Ram to Enter a Minneapolis Home Without Valid Warrant, Video Shows
“Any American should be terrified by…such an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment,” said the arrestee’s attorney.
As tensions around Operation Metro Surge, the ongoing immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, continue to rise following the shooting and killing of Renee Nicole Good on January 7, the tactics used by federal agents to make arrests are undergoing increased scrutiny.
On Sunday, the Associated Press published a video showing a group of masked agents in protective gear, carrying weapons. The agents are seen approaching a Minneapolis home through a loud crowd of protestors and observers, before one officer takes a battering ram to the home's front door, striking it several times until it flies open. Officers stand back, pointing their rifles into the house, and likely order someone to exit the house. A woman appears in view, yells something inaudible at the agents through the doorway, and attempts to close the door. The officers then enter the home, before leaving with a man—later identified as Garrison Gibson—in handcuffs. "A distraught woman later emerged from the house with a document that federal agents presented to arrest the man," reports the A.P.
But there's a major problem: The document used to justify the violent entry and subsequent immigration arrest was not signed by a judge, but an immigration officer, according to the A.P. Although an administrative warrant issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and signed by an authorized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent can grant the authority to arrest or seize someone for suspected civil immigration violations, it does not authorize a search or grant the right to enter private places without consent.
Following Gibson's arrest, his attorney, Marc Prokosch, filed a habeas corpus petition demanding his immediate release from immigration detention because of the unconstitutional tactics used by officers, according to Fox 9, a local affiliate.
"Any American should be terrified by…such an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment," Prokosch told Fox 9. "That is from our Bill of Rights. To see a battering ram coming to the front door of your house with a 9-year-old inside is just terrifying," he continued.
Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers must obtain a judicial warrant or consent before entering a place where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as an individual's home. A valid judicial warrant must be supported by probable cause that a specific crime has taken place, place limits on what can be seized and searched, and be signed by a judge or magistrate. Requiring a judicial warrant for nonconsensual searches provides a crucial check against the executive branch and is vital to ensuring the constitutional right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." This cornerstone right to privacy is why people are generally advised not to consent to law enforcement entering a home or conducting a search without a valid judicial warrant.
Although it is unclear from the video what exactly led up to the immigration officers' decision to beat down the front door of a Minneapolis family home, it's clear their presence and entry were unwelcome. And while some exceptions exist to the judicial warrant requirement—such as plain view, exigent circumstances, or the hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect—legal experts told the A.P. that such circumstances don't typically apply to civil immigration arrests.
The DHS did not respond to Reason's request for comment on Sunday's arrest.
Tricia McLaughlin, DHS assistant secretary of public affairs, told the A.P. that Sunday's incident was "part of the administration's efforts to arrest 'the worst of the worst.'" Gibson, a Liberian national, has a deportation order from 2023 and a criminal history of "robbery, drug possession with intent to sell, possession of a deadly weapon, malicious destruction and theft," according to McLaughlin.
Even in light of this history, Gibson is guaranteed fundamental Fourth Amendment protections. Unfortunately, cases like this are not unfamiliar, as the Trump administration has shown a continuous disregard for both citizens' and noncitizens' constitutional rights in the name of immigration enforcement.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
In more important news, Gavin Newsom is getting #MeToo'd! U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!
I hope he gets his just deserts.
Link?
That seems an odd way for erstwhile Federal agents to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States.
Cue usual MAGA waddabout brigade explaining why it doesn't matter.
Cue lying piles of steaming TDS-addled shit lying (again)
You have no idea of what happened there, asswipe. Fuck off and take you lying face web site with you.
Cue non libertarian profanity laced tirade defending government's illegal activities.
I think the russian bots have flipped the script. Now they're trying to undermine the credibility of MAGA, while inflaming the deplorables.
What better way to trigger a split?
Your words do not seem calculated to elicit and reinforce your fellow citizens loyalty to, and love of, liberty.
Are you a troll?
Once the welfare state is abolished we can talk, until then you're forcing us to support illegals which is wildly anti-liberty. And to be clear: Liberty doesn't mean no borders.
So you believe in rule of opinions, not of laws. Sorry laws are needed to ‘abolish the welfare state’. In the meantime the Constitution is still the law of the land.
It shouldn’t be that hard to get the right kind of warrant. Then they can bash in the door.
So you claim to know what happened? You're full of shit.
No, and I'm not a TDS-addled steaming pile of lying shit like you, either.
Whaddabout the fact that 77mph is 66.91117 knots, hmm?
"To see a battering ram coming to the front door of your house with a 9-year-old inside is just terrifying," he continued.
----------------
[Not defending the violation just tired of the sob story BS] If mommy and daddy really want to protect the 9 year old, daddy can just step outside and accept his arrest under the administrative warrant.
Not sure it's a violation. If someone inside is wanted and won't come out, I'm pretty sure they can knock a door open.
Yup, if they have reliable info that that the subject is in the residence. Can't search and seize evidence, though.
Not with an administrative warrant.
Cite?
From that shitstain?!
Start with Payton v New York, 445 US 572 (1980) and work your way towards 2020.
Daddy could've voluntarily deported, cashed the check, and applied for re-entry.
Daddy could've taken his family, voluntarily deported, cashed the check, and lived somewhere else.
Daddy could've not come to the country and taken up residence with other people.
YEs we should be battering doors for a civil matter. My god, he sounds like a monster. How do you sleep at night with this man in the country?
I sleep great either way.
Will you please come and cry for every deportation going forward too?
How do you sleep at night knowing you defend pedos, murderers, rapist and terrorists, democrat and global fascists and stupidity?
>>To see a battering ram coming to the front door of your house with a 9-year-old inside is just terrifying
is the 9 year-old like encased in plexiglass or just bouncing around inside the battering ram?
That's your complaint? Not about the illegal entry?
"...Not about the illegal entry?..."
Prove it, fuckwit.
The onus is on the government to prove it wasn't. Where's the warrant?
Leftists don’t have a sense of humor.
I’m sorry your funny bone was removed.
removed along with common sense...
LOL That would be terrifying.
Seeing a battering ram come through the front door of your house without a 9-yr.-old inside is like watching paint dry. Slightly more boring than watching a Honda CR-V come through the front door of your house.
What direction are the wheels pointing at the time?
Remember when the FBI was going door to door with battering rams looking for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and everybody was so proud to be "Boston Strong"?
Apparently, Minneapolis is just cowardly.
The "We Don't Dial 911" decoration next to the front door is interesting. Should that be interpreted as Pro-gun or Anti-police or both or something else entirely?
That door was coming right at them !!
Look at that wicked metal doorknob, a lethal weapon every bit as dangerous as a Honda rear view mirror in domestic terrorist hands !
Is this you or your boss?
https://x.com/adamscochran/status/2011481208266637716
Your words do not seem calculated to elicit and reinforce your fellow citizens loyalty to, and love of, liberty.
Are you a troll?
Your word seem calculated to prove you're a TDS-addled steaming pile of lying shit.
You ARE a troll, and a particularly bad one.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
See above, asswipe.
"Although it is unclear from the video what exactly led up to the immigration officers' decision to beat down the front door of a Minneapolis family home", Autumn is going to go ahead and bloviate about it anyway.
Well, ICE officers either need a warrant or suspicion of probable cause to take someone into custody. It sounds like she believes that they didn't have a valid warrant, but admits she doesn't know about the probable cause portion. And wrote a ragebait article about the situation anyway.
It’s pretty clear the directive came down that Reason will be a part of this op.
Gibson, a Liberian national, has a deportation order from 2023 and a criminal history of "robbery, drug possession with intent to sell, possession of a deadly weapon, malicious destruction and theft," according to McLaughlin.
Fun fact: A deportation order comes from a judge.
Bonus fun fact: Even citizen ex-convicts don't enjoy the same full-throated 4A protections that law-abiding citizens do.
Extra special bonus fun fact: Reason doesn't actually give a shit if ICE is arresting and deporting the worst of the worst. They want due process above and beyond what even regular citizens in their home state enjoy just like Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman.
Sounds like you're saying it would have been trivial to get a judicial warrant.
No. I'm saying a deportation order is a judicial warrant, they already have it and Autumn even states it. The administrative warrant only charges ICE (or the ATF or the EPA or USDA...) with enforcement, rather than local LEOs.
I'm sorry your second-grade level of reading comprehension fails you but you really should do better, Autumn and others "They put the wrong warrant on top!" idiocy will continue to fail you and any cause you support. To be clear, I primarily blame Autumn and her associated activists, but those of us who can read the law and understand the situation at above a 6th grade level can't do all the heavy lifting for all of you.
“ No. I'm saying a deportation order is a judicial warrant”
I’m not a lawyer, but I’m reasonably certain a deportation order doesn’t authorize forced entry into a home.
I believe you are using the word “warrant” in an absurdly broad manner.
Do you believe that a deportation order authorizes forced entry into a home? If so, why?
He is also wrong about ex convicts having reduced 4th amendment protections. Parolees actively on parole have reduced 4th amendment rights due to the fact they are still under court supervision/parole. In this case, we don't know if the man is on parole or not.
An administrative warrant signed by an ICE officer doesn't get them into a house. At least under any case law I am aware of - absent consent or some other exigent circumstance that isn't disclosed with the information we have.
We know ICE is going to door to door doing warrantless sweeps because they said they are and there are videos of them doing just that. Assuming they came across this house during that operation, it is reasonable to conclude they don't have an actual arrest warrant/search warrant because if they did, DHS would have said so. Usually the fed govt would just lie about that sort of thing so the fact they didn't is kinda telling here.
Mad casual might be suffering from mad cow.
"such circumstances don't typically apply to civil immigration arrests."
IOW: Illegal immigrants are too *special* for typical-application of the law.
IOW the Constitution is so special it is only reserved for the right sort of people.
Your hypocrisy concerning the power of the government seems limitless.
As-if "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of *citizens* of the United States" didn't give that away.
Just as the use of the word "people" not "citizens" in 4A gives it away.
And they are all subject to warrants, fuckwit.
Just as the use of the words "We the People of the United States" in the very first line didn't explain who "the people" are.
TJJ you're cooking them so fast they can't tell they're golden brown.
When is the last time a battering ram was used for a civil matter? We'll wait.
#1 Until you know that the illegal immigrant was arrested on an over-stay you can't even pretend it was just a civil matter.
https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/is-illegal-entry-into-us-criminal-or-civil-matter-0feaeb
#2 https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/1b522wf/cops_broke_the_door_of_my_house_used_a_battering/
Next BS excuse.
It literally was a civil matter. Show me the criminal warrant.
TJ, your own source says "unauthorized presence and overstaying are principally civil immigration violations that can trigger removal (deportation) and administrative penalties"
Reddit doesn't quite cut the mustard as a reliable source.
Forced entry for civil matters happen all the time, to the point that they specifically go unnoted. If you ever have to break into your own home or vehicle or the home or vehicle of a loved one, police can and do provide legal cover for your actions. Anybody whose had anything to do with residential evictions, storage units, or private security knows this.
Domestic disturbance doesn't specifically note a crime, it does note a civil action and can note probable cause. You're fucking retarded if you think police shouldn't be able to kick in the door if they get a call from a woman about a domestic disturbance and, when they show up, just accept whatever answer her husband gives when he pokes his head out of the door. Even if the situation ends up with her not filing any charges, they can and do have the right to get her take and evaluate any claims of "I ran into a door frame." or "I fell down the stairs." for themselves and take action.
Same Retarded Shit, Different Retarded Day - If it's ok for police to shove someone out of the way of an unlocked door they are blocking, what fucking difference does it make, libertarian or otherwise, to use a battering ram on a locked door with no one behind it? Any misunderstanding Autumn may have about arrest warrants vs. search warrants vs. administrative warrants is, to a degree, understandable, but this "We don't use forced entry for civil matters." is utterly, inhuman-basement-dweller/crazy-cat-lady level retarded.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a69137908/ice-recruiting-human-resources/
ICE Is Hiring Literally Anybody, and It’s Terrifying
"So they’re accepting people who flunk an open-book take-home exam on the Fourth Amendment? Lovely."
---------------------------------------
Scrape the barrel, get the dregs.
"Scrape the barrel, get the dregs."
We've done so, and you're what we got.
I don't listen to grey boxes.
I read the bullshit put out by slimy piles of shit like you.
Sevo, come up with an argument. Ad hominem attacks undercut everything you say.
How about a SCOTUS justice who admits she doesn't know what a woman is, who is now deciding what is a woman.
The beauty of freedom is that you can be whoever the fuck you want to be. Want to be a woman? Get a sex change and go to town. Want to be a billionaire? Put in the work.
“over the past three months were later sent home because they couldn’t pass the written exam”
So they literally weren’t hired.
haha this is the joe scarboro account
Nah, Mika does all the thinking for the two of them.
"were later sent home because they couldn’t pass the written exam"
So according the article you yourself posted, they aren't hiring "anybody." People are flunking out and going home. Do you even read what you are posting or are you just hoping the rest of us don't?
turd sock? Or just equally dishonest AND stupid?
You will notice that usage of quotes and a spacer indicate that quip you reference is from the author of the piece, not from me.
Esquire? You are not a serious person. You are whom the sombrero wearing democrat mouth piece Jeffries describes and projects as being Maga. And you continue to be wrong...
They still haven't gotten to you yet so they must have lower to go. Also, they were washed out before interacting with the public, just as normal people would want. Should they be more selective under normal circumstances, sure, but Biden's open border policy and the Antifa riots and assaults on officers have ensured this is not normal circumstances.
ICE Agents shouldn't cross imaginary social constructs and illegally enter unused but conventionally-designated spaces?
What's next? You're going to expect them to announce themselves before entry, present documentation of who they are and what the nature of their visit is, and deny them entry or throw them out if they refuse?
We *told* you your immigration stance was retardedly anti-libertarian and you didn't listen.
"What's next? You're going to expect them to announce themselves before entry, present documentation of who they are and what the nature of their visit is, and deny them entry or throw them out if they refuse?"
Yes. Exactly that.
LOL
“ What's next? You're going to expect them to announce themselves before entry, present documentation of who they are and what the nature of their visit is, and deny them entry or throw them out if they refuse?”
That’s an excellent encapsulation of the Fourth Amendment. It’s disturbing that you think it’s a bad thing.
They have to be escorted by a sitting member of congress and pull out the ICE Margherita machine and the little umbrellas.
“...Any American should be terrified by…such an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment,” said the arrestee’s attorney...."
1) Always an unimpeachable source!
2) Is he American?
Recent ruling on the entering of the home:
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/court-finds-police-properly-entered-mans-home-despite-absence-of-a-warrant/
The = a. Didn't mean to imply the case had anything to do with this specific one.
In this case it should be justifiable self-defense to shoot the ICE agents. They are committing a violent criminal act against you.
"You get to shoot cops if YOU think they're violating their civil rights"?
How many people was Trump eligible to shoot? He was found guilty on just 4 votes.
Given that cops can murder people at will, the people need some way to defend themselves.
from where do you low IQ brainwashed far left Democrat cultists get your programming?
LMFAO okay. Maddow/ or is it Madcow?/ Molly says that murderous thugs, rapists, illegal criminals are justified in committing more violent crimes to stop from being arrested and deported including shooting ICE agents as self defense.
You are fucking awesome!
The creatures in miniapolis, and all sanctuary cities are actively violating federal law.
That is not true at all. Sanctuary cities are completely legal. Federal government has no authority to force states or cities to help enforce federal law.
South Carolina 1861. Hands off our slave property.
They can not obstruct either.
The problem is, they tend to want their cake and eat it too on these issues. They will turn their position around a soon as it is an inconvenience to their issue of the moment.
LMFAO please try to bring your intelligence to the level of a broken clock.
At least the broken clock is correct once or twice a day.
If you had told me 10 years ago that the Open Borders Uber Alles Libertarians and Dem shills that post here would willingly die on the hill that we can’t even apprehend criminal illegal aliens with years old deportation orders, I would have said “There’s no way they would be that insanely myopic.”
But here we are.
Reason is pro-crime so long as it's committed by a minority or left-aligned person. It's a common through line in their reporting. They dig in harder the more evil and degenerate the actions and motivations are
Ten years ago was 2016. 20 yrs. ago I would agree with your assessment. Ten years ago, we were explicitly telling them that not defending national borders and enforcing immigration policy, especially with an expansive social safety net and vast regulatory state is, de facto and/or de rigueur, if not de juris, indistinguishable from taking and/or analogous to refusing to defend individual property rights.
We were subsequently called bigoted racists for daring to believe that mass vagrancy wouldn't make our failing social programs solvent.
Yeah, my timeline was too short.
Reason has aways upheld due process rights. That's one of their things. And while the ICE says the guy is a criminal and so on, there is very little trust. Their "worst of the worst" propaganda is very deceptive. Many innocents are being swept up and many migrants whose only illegality is crossing the border is part of their worst of thew worst lists. Couple this with the fact that congress has not changed the immigration laws and then yes, we should be critical of these masked thugs. They want to start mass deporations they need the opulation on their side. At a mininmum it means getting congress on their side. It also means not using ICE as a cover for Trump going after blue states. Until Trump stops using ICE as his own party squad Reason and sensible people will keep critiquing this fascist administration.
"...Until Trump stops using ICE as his own party squad Reason and sensible people will keep critiquing this fascist administration..."
TDS-addled steaming piles of lying lefty shits have active fantasy lives, don't they?
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
You and Reason have tried to create out of thin air and new set of magical due process rights specifically meant for anyone that does not agree with Trump, 80% of the people, or the law.
"Many innocents are being swept up and many migrants whose only illegality is crossing the border is part of their worst of thew worst lists."
Many innocent whats? Innocent illegal immigrants that have deportation orders in place?
Only illegality? Meaning they broke the law. You failed to include they had their due process in the immigration courts and were denied asylum and were given deportation orders which provides ICE authority to arrest and deport them.
Be sure not to wear a mask when you are throwing frozen water bottles at ICE agents. In fact record yourself doing this and post the video on social media. Quick, hurry, I want to see where ICE is operating at this moment.
They got their due process when they were given final deportation orders fucking YEARS ago.
Go fuck yourself.
The common thread that is never focused on and usually if even mentioned is that a large number of these illegal immigrants already have outstanding deportation orders.
That these illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders flee to cities like Minneapolis because the city of Minneapolis and the State of Minnesota not only don't cooperate with the Feds, but actively and loudly refuse to cooperate with the Feds.
This is not anything new, but spans over a decade and probably even longer. It is interesting that these massive ICE operations seem to always be in cities that don't cooperate and actively take steps to thwart the Feds deporting illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders.
Illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders should be deported. Cities should cooperate with the Feds regarding removing illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders.
If you disagree with how deportation orders are ruled, that should be done through politics in Washington DC and through a protest/riot.
There is civil disobedience, but those who engage in it, have to accept the ramifications of their civil disobedience. I don't see this in the protests/riots in Minneapolis. To me these protests/riots in Minneapolis seem to be more like the participants are play acting and have a cavalier attitude and absolutely clueless of the gravity of the danger they are placing themselves in.
Illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders should be deported. Cities should cooperate with the Feds regarding removing illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders.
It should be noted that the opposite is not Reason's sales pitch of a resistance-to-tyranny anarchy or even a proto-Marxist anarchy. It represents a kleptocracy or failed state. Where, just like in China, just like in feudal Europe, a regional governor enriches themselves via turning a blind eye to or even exploiting and grafting off of corruption. This was implicitly, if not explicitly, a justification of Lincoln's actions.
Even if you don't agree with or like libertarianism, you're more socialist democratic or even outright socialist and believe workers should control the means of production, workers can't control the means of production if employers (within or around Minneapolis) can simply hire two illegal immigrants for half the price and give them voting share. It's specifically and inherently a destructive, destabilizing ideology and, more critically, per Friedman and others, it's an exceptionally expensive one, even moreso than a "well-functioning" socialist regime because more resources are expended regulating and exploiting the regulation of the means of production rather than actually producing.
But then, at least a part of the people involved specifically know this.
“ Illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders should be deported.”
Yes.
“ Cities should cooperate with the Feds regarding removing illegal immigrants with outstanding deportation orders.”
No. Checks and balances are important, and the State/Federal tension increases freedom for Americans by requiring the Feds to actively prove they are exercising their power in a valid way, not just defaulting to “the Federal government can do what it wants”.
Back in my day, conservatives supported federalism and advocated for states rights. That worm turned incredibly fast.
“ absolutely clueless of the gravity of the danger they are placing themselves in.”
Most people assume that law enforcement isn’t full of trigger-happy sociopaths who ignore use of force rules and standard operating procedures. ICE is rapidly changing that assumption.
So yes, these days there is a heightened danger because ICE isn’t behaving like valid and well-trained law enforcement officers. That’s on ICE, not protesters. Blame the victim is an ugly game.
Despite how you think it should be, it is not.
The law is set and is specific for a reason. You do not have the level of intelligence to comprehend the law based on your posts, but you think you are smart enough to rewrite it?
The states don’t get to put a check on how federal immigration law is executed and not because “the Federal government can do what it wants”. There is no tension on immigration as it is 100% in the purview of Congress and whatever power they gave/give the Executive to execute their laws. (This ship sailed like 15 years ago and federalism lost.)
Also, You could probably take it back to the civil war, I’m just too lazy to expound on that thread right now.
"according to the A.P." She's using the Associated Press as a reference on Immigration Law. Is she really that stupid? Like the A.P. is an expert on Immigration Law and will give an unbiased answer. I used to like Reason. Now I stop by to see what shit they are spewing today. I'm rarely disappointed. I stop here for laughs.
"...Is she really that stupid?..."
Really no need to ask.
"Any American should be terrified by…such an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment,"
Do illegals who have no right to be where they are, wherever that might be within the country, have the right to hide from immigration enforcement?
Yes, the Fourth Amendment applies to everyone in America. Everyone.
Sorry but if you have orders for removal and the law enforcement officers who have the authority to remove you show up to do so, hiding behind a wall, under a bed, in a cave or a gay brothel does not provide you protection from the lawful orders to deport you.
"Right to Refuse Entry: Residents generally have the right to refuse entry to immigration agents who do not have a judicial warrant signed by a judge."
Note the word residents which implies being legally allowed to reside which any illegal with deportation orders is not...
Committing the civil offense of not having the correct bureaucratic paperwork does not void the Constitution for you, nor is it an automatic death sentence.
Libertarianism was supposed to be about such things.
"And while some exceptions exist to the judicial warrant requirement—such as plain view, exigent circumstances, or the hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect—legal experts told the A.P. that such circumstances don't typically apply to civil immigration arrests."
Can an actual person be noted as the legal expert when citing "expert" opinions in these articles?
Writer may as well have said "I stayed in a Holiday Inn last night".
While I disagree with your dismissiveness, especially given the vast reams of Fourth Amendment precedents, “Writer may as well have said "I stayed in a Holiday Inn last night".” made me laugh out loud.
> can grant the authority to arrest or seize someone for suspected civil immigration violations, it does not authorize a search or grant the right to enter private places without consent.
It does when the entry is in order to effect an arrest of someone you know is in there. A cop with an arrest order doesn't get nullified because you won't open the door.
Federal Agents Used a Battering Ram to Enter a Minneapolis Home Without Valid Warrant, Video Shows
Lie from the get go.
No, the video shows police using a battering ram to enter a home. It then cuts to a scene of law enforcement officers standing on a lawn. It then cuts to a man being led, presumably, to a squad car or other means of detention or removal. It *then* cuts again to a woman outside crying, indicating that the administrative warrant is what they gave her. At no point does it show Federal Agents using a battering ram to enter a home without a valid warrant. Not even remotely. The parts where it would were either not captured or edited out.
It isn't the first time I've posted this:
"I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you."
What's really scary, is the 9-0 decision in the SCOTUS, giving police authority to forcibly enter into a home without a warrant on a welfare check. In that case the welfare check turned into the police shooting the resident of the home.