The L.A. Sheriff's Office Is Mad at Starbucks—Over a Pig Doodle
Starbucks says the employee was fired but that the drawing was not intended as a slight against the officer.
Over the weekend, a sheriff's deputy reported receiving rude treatment at a chain restaurant. Not only did he complain to management, but his own boss called and threatened the restaurant's corporate management on the deputy's behalf.
In a statement posted to social media over the weekend, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) said it was "deeply concerned" about an incident that took place at a "local coffee shop in the city of Norwalk." (The department has since confirmed it was a Starbucks.)
On January 9, the statement said, a LASD deputy "was deliberately served a cup bearing a hand-drawn image of a pig, which is commonly used to demean law enforcement. This action was extremely offensive, inappropriate, and unacceptable. The deputy quickly reported the incident to the store manager, who advised that the matter would be investigated."
"It felt discouraging and disrespectful, especially after a long day of serving the community," the deputy wrote on Instagram. "All I wanted was caffeine, but instead I left feeling uneasy."
Assuming the deputy was correct, it's certainly unprofessional to draw disparaging doodles on a customer's cup. But the matter didn't stop there.
"Upon learning about this incident from the employee," the statement continued, LASD Sheriff Robert Luna "immediately escalated the matter and contacted an individual in the coffee company's corporate security division to formally raise concerns and to ensure accountability. In addition, the Sheriff spoke directly with the deputy to check on his well-being, convey his full support, and make it clear that disrespectful actions will not be tolerated against our personnel."
This detail is galling. If a server is rude, you have the right to complain to their boss; you're also free to eat at a different restaurant, or to just forget about it and move on. What you can't do is call the police because a member of the wait staff was mean to you.
And yet an officer was so offended that he not only told the manager, but his boss—the top law enforcement official in the largest sheriff's department in the country—felt compelled to get involved in something that is in no way within the police's purview.
Because no matter how uneasy or disrespected the deputy felt, the First Amendment protects our right to insult or disparage the police. Numerous court cases have made clear that this includes giving the finger and calling them discourteous names—yes, including pig.
Telling Starbucks corporate security that disrespectful sketches "would not be tolerated" is an egregious misuse of Luna's authority.
Besides, it's not even clear whether the barista intended to disparage the deputy.
Jaci Anderson, Starbucks' head of global communications, confirmed to the New York Post that the employee in question was fired but added the drawing was not derogatory, nor was it drawn with the officer in mind; rather, the employee had doodled John Pork, an internet meme, on cups meant for coworkers and didn't intend to serve them to customers.
Readers are free to decide whether they find this explanation plausible. (The pig in the drawing certainly seems genial.) But it would hardly be the first time a police officer exaggerated or invented a perceived slight at the hands of a service worker.
In June 2020, three New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers checked into Bellevue Hospital, feeling ill after getting milkshakes from Shake Shack that appeared to contain traces of bleach. Within hours, the NYPD detectives' union put out a statement claiming "three of our fellow officers were intentionally poisoned." By the morning, the NYPD had determined there was "no criminality by Shake Shack's employees," and the bleach was unintentional residue from a recently cleaned machine.
The prior year, an officer in Herington, Kansas, reported receiving a cup from McDonald's with "fucking pig" written on the side; as it turned out, the officer had written it himself.
True, police work is dangerous—though certainly not the most dangerous profession. But there's no excuse for law enforcement to drum up stories of harassment and abuse when the facts aren't on their side.
After all, do we want people this thin-skinned to be the ones tasked with using deadly force to protect us?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
FAFO
At least they didn't serve him a Goddamn litre of cola with a hole in it.
What if the sketch is supposed to be a police K-9 unit and the barista just sucks as an artist?
Fortunately, there are endless philosophy majors out there to take his place.
This guy has a bright future as a political pundit. Reason is always looking for interns.
Then he learned a valuable lesson, didn’t he?
Reason is mad the doodle got attention.
Neither is illegal. But doubt Starbucks wants to piss off customers. So why does reason care this came to light?
I would totally expect this article of it had been an ICE officer.
>>"It felt discouraging and disrespectful, especially after a long day of serving the community," the deputy wrote on Instagram.
never introduce Deputy Insta to NWA
John Pork! LOL! The kids are alright.
Asshole baristas are as American as apple pie - let freedom ring!
L.A. Sheriff's Office Is Mad at Starbucks
Hey ChapGHB, how many shares of SBUX does CalPERS hold?
1.5 to 3.3 million depending on the quarter
the employee in question was fired...the employee had doodled John Pork, an internet meme, on cups meant for coworkers and didn't intend to serve them to customers.
Then why was "the employee in question" fired?
Because it was a bullshit story the idiot came up with when they fired him?
There’s so much bullshit in the article you need a shovel to get through it.
At least you can’t accuse Reason of avoiding stories that are “too local”
Good question. Someone is full of shit here. Not sure who.
I wonder why the article didnt scream muh private companies.
Surprise twist: copyright infringement.
""the drawing was not derogatory, nor was it drawn with the officer in mind; rather, the employee had doodled John Pork, an internet meme, on cups meant for coworkers and didn't intend to serve them to customers.""
Could very well be.
In the current climate you can't blame the office for misunderstanding.
Seems like a hell of a coincidence. You'd also think whoever served it would notice and understand the optics. Not remotely shocked Lancaster takes their claims as gospel.
""You'd also think whoever served it would notice and understand the optics.""
I understand why you would say that. A logical, reasonable, aware person would. But is who we are talking about?
You'd also think whoever served it would notice and understand the optics.
Politics aside, you've never been to a Starbucks have you?
About half the time, they make McDonalds employees who can't tell the difference between a cheeseburger and a Big Mac look like geniuses.
Sounds like both sides were assholes and Starbucks did the right thing. Not surprised Lancaster is more interested in running interference for the lefty than he is in calling out asshole behavior.
Admittedly I skimmed this, but did he bother to mention that this happens to cops a lot? Starbucks hires a bunch of liberal arts majors and has been especially prominent with its employees being political dickheads.
Have you been to an Apple Store lately? I had the displeasure of doing so several weeks back. It’s like they have a booth at the antifa job fair. I had to dress one of them down when he became impertinent with me when I criticized foreign customer service call centers.
running interference for the lefty
We know the political leanings of the people involved?
Can make a highly probabilistic guess.
Too bad, so sad.
Because no matter how uneasy or disrespected the deputy felt, the First Amendment protects our right to insult or disparage the police.
*thinks back to 2019- late 2024.*
*facepalm*
Said barista should’ve claimed that they/them/faer were pulling double duty as a “legal observer”.
Do I have to think of everything for these people?
A picture is worth a thousand words.
Words are violence.
This was a major assault.
Brava
Somebody drew a picture of a pig on cop customers cup instead of writing his name. I'm sure that it was totally just a random coincidence.
Nothing that the budding artist did was illegal, but it was definitely a deliberate insult to the customer. The cop had the right to complain and Starbucks had a right to fire the barista for doing it.
Seems like this one is solved.
Yeah. I really don't understand why Lancaster thought this was worth an article.
Clicks are clicks - - - - -
Help me understand who's rights were violated? The barista exercised their free speech. Cops have a right to complain (free speech). Corporate fired the barista as a likely code of conduct violation. Didn't find it worth defending. Sheriffs will keep buying Starbucks coffee. Someone learned the lesson of who their master is if they want a job.
I thought those cups came with pre-printed "art" of some kind?
If you can't handle being called a pig, maybe law enforcement isn't the job for you.
If you cant follow company policies, maybe employment isn't for you.
So, I shouldn't expect caricatures of Mohammed on the cups at my local Starbucks this upcoming Ramadan?
Im going to ask specifically for it.
That too.
Maybe, but employees should be fired when they deliberately insult your customers.
Of course if the employer thinks that's what's best for business that's what they should do.
So should this Starbucks be forced to bake the cake? Or is there a double standard here for a leftist ACAB Starbucks barista versus a Christian baker (Masterpiece Cakeshop)? I mean, the gay guys should’ve just gone elsewhere, yet the cake shop was forced to bake the cake.
If you’re suggesting the cops should just go elsewhere due to something that’s a direct insult, then the gay guys should’ve just gone elsewhere when politely told the baker didn’t do that type of cake (i.e. not on the menu).
That tears it. I'm signing up for X, requesting my cup get a picture of Mohammed drawn on it, and then rage-baiting either way they make their decision.
Don't blame me, I'm just a 'legal observer'.
The gay guys should have just gone elsewhere.
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ThE 1A YOU IMBECILE
Do they arrest the barrista? No? STFU
This
Can anybody explain WHY this story is even being covered?
Seems as local a story as one could possibly be. Nothing remotely interesting.