DHS Says Venezuela Is Safe for Migrants To 'Go Home' to After Maduro's Capture. These Venezuelans Disagree.
Venezuelan nationals interviewed by Reason say they don’t feel safe returning to the country while Maduro’s regime is still in power. “It’s like taking the hood off, but the engine is still running.”
In the day following the capture of Venezuelan Dictator Nicolás Maduro, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem proclaimed that "Venezuela today is more free than it was yesterday." As a result, Noem said she would not reinstate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans, which the DHS rescinded in 2025.
Under the TPS program, foreign nationals from specified countries experiencing a crisis are protected from deportation and given work authorization. DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News that Venezuelans who received TPS under the Biden administration "can now go home with hope for their country," and asserted that Venezuela will now have "peace, prosperity, and stability."
Yet for many Venezuelan nationals living in the United States, the prospect of going home is not as rosy as Noem and McLaughlin make it seem.
"Venezuelans are happy, but they're not celebrating," Ana María Diez tells Reason. Diez is the cofounder and president of Coalición por Venezuela, a Venezuelan civil rights network. She fled to Spain in 2022 after being targeted by the Maduro regime for her advocacy. While removing Maduro from power was a huge step for Venezuelans who had given up on the idea of justice, it's too early to say the country is on a path to prosperity, according to Diez.
After President Donald Trump announced his intention of working with Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela's former vice president and now acting dictator with a history of human rights abuses of her own, Diez expressed skepticism that much had changed in her home country. Diez compared the transition of power to a mere "rebrand" of a deeply oppressive regime. Although some political prisoners were freed on Thursday in a gesture of goodwill to the U.S., Diez says there is still a lot of fear amongst Venezuelans. "El Helicoide," Venezuela's largest torture center, formerly overseen by Rodríguez herself as head of the nation's national intelligence agency, and other torture centers are still operational. Meanwhile, laws remain in place that could make speaking out against the country's government a crime.
Shortly after Rodríguez took power this week, Venezuelan police were ordered to "immediately begin the national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support for the armed attack by the United States," according to Reuters. "Right now, people are being detained and accused of treason for simply shouting 'freedom,'" says Diez.
"Venezuela has a history of using violence and guns against the people," Josué Sánchez, a Venezuelan national currently living in Florida, tells Reason. "And right now the military is on high alert." Sánchez came to the U.S. in 2020, received TPS in 2021, and currently has an open asylum case. Although Sánchez is "happy" the U.S. removed Maduro from power, he says it's only the "first step in a long process to clean the country" of corruption. "It's like taking the hood off, but the engine is still running."
Sánchez emphasized the instability that Maduro's ouster has created in Venezuela. "They've closed the Colombian border," said Sánchez, "it's pretty much a war zone right now."
"If the situation gets better, people will return, but now is not the time," he added.
Jesús Noria, another Venezuelan national living in Florida with an open asylum case, echoes Sánchez's concerns. "The situation is tense in Venezuela right now. People won't post about it because the government is watching," he says. "Guerrillas are out…blocking the streets and asking for papers, so people are staying silent." On Tuesday, The New York Post reported that armed gangs in Caracas, Venezuela's capital, were hunting down supporters of Maduro's capture and demanding to search people's phones and cars. Thousands of Venezuelans have already fled the ongoing guerrilla offensive, reports The Guardian.
"There's a lot of tension, and people are asking what's going to happen next," Noria says.
Noria came to the U.S. under TPS in 2023 after being captured and tortured by the Venezuelan army and is currently waiting on the outcome of his pending asylum case. He says he doesn't feel safe returning to Venezuela during what he described as the "power struggle" likely taking place. "The Chavismo has a lot of concentrated power, and they're ready to defend it."
Sánchez and Noria, both former TPS holders, feel strongly that the DHS should reinstate TPS protections for Venezuelans. Noria, who was in favor of Trump's immigration crackdown when it focused on deporting criminals, doesn't think the country is made safer by targeting working immigrants. Giving TPS to Venezuelans who wish to continue working in the U.S. rather than return to an unstable country would enable them to "live their lives peacefully," he says.
Sánchez, who has debated whether staying in the U.S. is the right thing to do, tells Reason that "every day is a gamble without TPS, but the alternatives are worse." Ultimately, the country's ongoing economic crisis and fears that authorities will extort him have convinced Sánchez to stay in the United States. "Venezuelans want freedom and to return to a safe, uncorrupt government," according to Sánchez.
"Removing Maduro was only a first step. It's not enough to secure prosperity and peace," Sánchez says, arguing that TPS should be given to Venezuelans as his home country navigates the current political instability. "I deserve to have a life in the time being."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
The law says determination is by the executive, not by random people who want to stay.
The law says that Dear Caligula-JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer HAS SPOKEN, and determined that Venezuelans are SNOT Amerikkkans; therefor, they are illegal subhumans!!! QED!!!
Walz +6
DLAM has becum undone! Cuntaminated and DeLaminated!!! (Someone should set up a Go-Fund-Me web page to fund the RE-lamination of the DeLaminated DLAM!!!)
I see grey boxes. Sounds like it’s time put the SQRL through a wood chipper. Tentacles first.
We should be able to vote people off the island—when enough of us grey box someone, close their profile.
Amd boil them in acid, at least in SQRLSY’s case.
Little Autumn is a vapid little twat.
I wonder how that engine got started (i.e. Socialism) if it wasn't for the voting citizens of Venezuela.
Statistically 80% of immigrants support the [D]emocratic [Na]tional So[zi]alist party in the US being that very engine they're running away from. Just don't have much sympathy for someone who keeps hitting their own thumb with their own hammer and blaming it on everyone else but themselves.
I'm shocked. People believe Trump did something that he says he did beyond just breaking stuff and stealing stuff. Film at 11.
The DHS making that statement certain fits inline with the purpose-being controlling US 'invasion'.
No *excuse* to 'run-away' anymore. The US fixed your Bogyman problem.
Walz +5
Don’t you have some innocent Jews to harass?
Trump did something that he says he did beyond just... stealing stuff.
Oh wow! Stealing stuff is horrible.
What did Trump "steal"?
“It’s like taking the hood off, but the engine is still running.”
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. I've been thoroughly assured by Reason that crazy conspiracy theories about shadow governments and deep state regime are 100% bullshit.
*Now* you're going to tell me maybe some governments can still fully, functionally perpetrate an oppressive agenda while they're nominal leader is completely absent?
Why [fans self] this is all so... sudden... so... [turns head and presses back of wrist to temple] *scandalous*!
Closing time, dipshits. The "T" in "TPS" means you don't have to go home, but you can't stay here.
To wit:
She fled to Spain in 2022
Huh. You don't say?
it's too early to say the country is on a path to prosperity
Prosperity isn't the goalpost, sweetie. Learn gridiron rules or go back to playing futbol. Americans don't flop.
A stupid article. Written by a stupid little girl.
So it's too dangerous to send the criminals to CECOT and it's too dangerous to send the criminals home?
Is it safe?
While removing Maduro from power was a huge step for Venezuelans who had given up on the idea of justice, it's too early to say the country is on a path to prosperity, according to Diez.
"prosperity" is not the metric that we use to allow kajillions of migrants into the country in perpetuity while handing out daycare licenses and subsidies and voter registrations to anyone who checks the website box which reads I certify that..."
I read the whole article and while they pivot to violence perpetrated against Venezuelan's in exile, why keep pivoting back to 'prosperity'? If that were the case, there would literally be only one country in the world taking migrants, because every country 'less prosperous' would be null and void for anyone to live in. As soon as you find the next country more 'prosperous' then everyone would be entitled to run to that one, and so on...
"When our own country is as rich as America and gives us all the same freebies, then we'll go back"
"What? Rebuild our country to get to that point ourselves?"
"U R a racist"
Pretty much. And everything done must be at great cost to American taxpayers who must never receive any benefit for our efforts, or they are racist.
I missed the part where that's our problem.
Have you no heart!!!?!
I do, and my primary sympathies are with Americans.
Why aren't you allowing progressive suicidal empathy to squeeze the life out of your country, Vernon?
You're literally a racist!
I can't believe I'm shaking I'm so upset.
One of our modern's world greatest lie:
The government should fix the inherent unfairness of life.
AB;dr
AB;dr
I'll grant that those Venezuelans with legitimate asylum claims are right that the situation hasn't changed enough. I disagree that we can't tell Venezuelans that they're no longer welcome. Most of them are using the situation as an excuse to take advantage of America
It will take a little while for them to go back. So things will have chance to settle down.
"Venezuelan nationals interviewed by Reason say they don’t feel safe returning to the country while Maduro’s regime is still in power. “It’s like taking the hood off, but the engine is still running... Trump announced his intention of working with Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela's former vice president and now acting dictator with a history of human rights abuses of her own... Removing Maduro was only a first step. It's not enough to secure prosperity and peace”
Grabbing Maduro and taking him to the states for trial was bad, but not overthrowing the Venezuelan government is also bad.
I can never keep up with the new Reason's "libertarianism".
"Under the TPS program, foreign nationals from specified countries experiencing a crisis are protected from deportation and given work authorization..."
Working in America, plus, in many states, a monthly allowance, a rent-free residence, a free phone and internet, food stamps and free healthcare.
But I'm sure they'd all be rushing back home the second it's safe.
If we can get rid of the communists and slaughter the cartel people I might buy a place there in a few years.
Slaughtering the Mexican cartels should be a much more urgent priority.
It's funny as hell what the actual oil company execs who've met with Trump say about it:
1) The VZ debt would need to be restructured/bailed out. That is currently 160% of GDP (a higher govt debt burden than the US) and is in default and like all shit from the West re Third World debt since WW2 it would require the external imposition of debt slavery because Wall St vultures never write that down. It is why the Third World is entirely in China's camp now. China is a creditor and has options beyond imposing re-colonialism. The US is a debtor with a vulture attached.
2. It would require $100 billion in US government guarantees to the oil companies
3. It would require a DOGE reform of PDVSA.
4. It would require a multidecade US military commitment to provide 'security' to the oil fields.
5. Exxon and Conoco want the US govt to reimburse them for their initial 1976 and 2007 nationalizations. At least Trump told them that won't happen.
6. It requires $150/barrel oil - so 3x the current price.
Bessent said in a speech - we're gonna pivot more towards small independent producers (ie people who have never left Midland TX) and individual wildcatters. Those folks are really interested. Phones ringing off the hook.
Parade of clowns. Can't make this shit up. All we need now is some day trader living in their parents basement to figure out how buy the millions of barrels of oil now confiscated/stolen by the US nationalization of VZ oil.
Where did you get these talking points? I'd rather look at the original source.
What oil co execs told Trump
And yes they even mentioned the VZ debt though I filled in some of that. Because until the Wall St vultures get that debt paid off, there ain't no financing outside China/Russia.
It's laughable how different the statements in that article are from your rant. I guess you assumed I wouldn't read it.
So...where did you get your talking points?