Trump's Somali Insults Are a Disgrace
A welfare fraud scandal in Minnesota is the Trump administration's latest excuse for demonizing immigrants and refugees.
After Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said he was proud that his city had the largest Somali community in the United States, President Donald Trump unleashed a vicious rant during a press conference ostensibly about the auto industry: "I wouldn't be proud to have the largest Somalian―look at their nation. Look how bad their nation is. It's not even a nation. It's just people walking around killing each other…They have destroyed Minnesota."
Trump also penned a social-media post claiming Somali gangs have taken over Minnesota and "are roving the streets looking for 'prey' as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses." The Hennepin County District Attorney's Office, which is the top law-enforcement agency overseeing the Minneapolis area, released a video debunking those claims. Nearly 90 percent of Somalis there are legal residents, with 58 percent of them having been born in the United States.
"They contribute nothing…I don't want them in our country," Trump added, as he has pushed forward a plan to reduce the nation's refugee-acceptance program by 90 percent. Somalis actually have revived some downtrodden Minneapolis neighborhoods as they mostly pursue the American dream, but why pick nits? The bulk of the new refugees will be white South Africans, but I'm sure race has absolutely nothing to do with his latest immigration-related tirades and decisions.
It's seems hardly a coincidence that Trump also has directed ire at Haitian immigrants in Ohio whom he falsely accused of eating pets. His decision to eliminate free-entry days at national parks on the Juneteenth holiday commemorating the end of slavery and Martin Luther King Jr. Day also don't seem like coincidences. In reality, the only roving gangs that Twin-Cities residents need to worry about are the masked ICE patrols Trump has sent to the region, but that's apparently the point.
Trump is maligning "garbage," as he referred to a Somali member of Congress and her "friends," to justify efforts to quash immigration from non-white countries. Can the GOP stop pretending otherwise?
Conservative media are focusing on Minnesota's social programs, with City Journal's Christopher Rufo explaining that "fraud has allegedly been perpetrated by members of Minnesota's sizeable Somali community" with "millions of dollars in stolen funds have been sent back to Somalia, where they ultimately landed in the hands of the terror group Al-Shabaab." Minnesota's Democratic politicians and media have been loath to "connect the dots" because of their "progressive pieties," Rufo added.
That may be true and any fraud is appalling, but perhaps one reason for the lack of dot-connecting is Minnesota officials' fear that the administration and its supporters would react as they have, by blaming the entire Somali community for the criminal acts of a few and using the scandal to justify heavy-handed immigration policies.
There are two schools of conservative immigration thought. The first, to which I subscribe, acknowledges immigrants often flee countries ravaged by crime, tyranny and disorder. That's why many people come to the United States. Our nation's settlers fled persecution. My father escaped Nazi Germany, which was literally putting people in ovens (although many Republicans lately have struggled with their views on such horrors). Under this long-standing view, Americans should welcome immigrants, but promote E Pluribus Unum.
The other conservative view, which is clearly embraced by national conservatives and populists, is that America is fundamentally a white, Christian nation and that immigration, to whatever limited degree we allow it, should align with those demographics. Some conservatives still tout the, "we're only against illegal immigration" canard, but that's not what's going on here. Trump's policies—along with much of the anti-immigration rhetoric on the right these days—are about limiting immigration in general. Minnesota's Somalis and Springfield's Haitians are, after all, primarily legal.
No one disputes that law-enforcement should clamp down on government fraud. The root problem is the government freebies themselves, which often are overly generous and lacking in oversight. But it's not like fraud scandals are confined to immigrant and minority communities. One can find similar scandals involving any ethnic group (including native-born Americans).
The president always doubles down. Following the brouhaha over his comments, Trump said to supporters: "Why is it we only take people from sh**hole countries, right, why can't we have some people from Norway, Sweden, just a few…We always take people from Somalia, places that are a disaster, dirty, filthy, disgusting, ridden with crime." It's clear what he's saying.
By contrast, in his last presidential speech, Ronald Reagan said, "We lead the world because, unique among nations, we draw our people—our strength—from every country and every corner of the world. And by doing so we continuously renew and enrich our nation." Reagan was right. Trump is wrong. Americans shouldn't be ashamed that our nation is a beacon to the tired, poor, huddled masses, but we have reason to be ashamed of him.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Many people don't share trump's view on immigration or greenhut's. Trump's anti-immigrant schtick was idiotic back before his first term. However, after the open borders progressives in the last administration let in 10 million + immigrants from predominantly low trust countries (yes they do exist) people are tired of the empty virtue signaling and naïveté.
Is it naivete or obfuscating stupidity to hide corrupt practices?
"That may be true and any fraud is appalling, but perhaps one reason for the lack of dot-connecting is Minnesota officials' fear that the administration and its supporters would react as they have, by blaming the entire Somali community for the criminal acts of a few and using the scandal to justify heavy-handed immigration policies."
So the Minnesota authorities would rather turn a blind eye to massive criminal activity defrauding Minnesota and US taxpayers than the possibility that Trump might say mean things about Somalis? What misplaced priorities. It is the same rational that British authorities covered up the Muslim rape gangs for so many years which allowed many young women's rights to be abused. Also, it is quite more likely that Minnesota Democrats are beholden to the Somali immigrant community as a constituency and was tolerating the criminal activity on that basis. Furthermore, the nature of the fraud required widespread knowledge of and participation in by the Somali immigrant community.
That really is an infuriating rationalization for Minnesota law enforcement to ignore crimes against the American people.
Minnesota dems admitting they didnt go after Somalis as they are a large voting block for Democrats.
Greenbutt is a disengenuous imbecile. Most of this fraud happened under Biden. Mean Tweets were never part of any calculus.
Even CBS News is admitting this is an issue. Calling the now 18B in suspected fraud propagated by "fraud tourists."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minnesota-fraud-tourists-indictments/
Yet the open borders acolytes continue to push bullshit articles like this. Reasons claims of accountability and supporting audits is always undone in their pursuit of blind obedience to the religion of open borders.
There are two schools of conservative immigration thought.
You wrote a love letter to San Francisco. You openly, bragging, pretended to be your own contractor and went around counting the Mexicans standing outside Home Depot as a gauge of immigration. You primarily publish for a specific local-to-California audience.
Go fuck yourself with this "As an impartial connoisseur of conservative thought..." bullshit, Greenhut.
"By contrast, in his last presidential speech, Ronald Reagan said, "We lead the world because, unique among nations, we draw our people—our strength—from every country and every corner of the world. And by doing so we continuously renew and enrich our nation.""
It is estimated some 42% of Somalis in America are officially on public assistance. I am not sure how much they are enriching the USA.
Reagan:
"No free and prosperous nation can by itself accommodate all those who seek a better life or flee persecution. We must share this responsibility with other countries.
...
At the same time, we must ensure adequate legal authority to establish control over immigration: to enable us, when sudden influxes of foreigners occur, to decide to whom we grant the status of refugee or asylee; to improve our border control; to expedite (consistent with fair procedures and our Constitution) return of those coming here illegally; to strengthen enforcement of our fair labor standards and laws; and to penalize those who would knowingly encourage violation of our laws.
....
At the same time, in so doing, we must not encourage illegal immigration.
...
We shall seek new ways to integrate refugees into our society without nurturing their dependence on welfare.
...
But the simple truth is that we've lost control of our own borders, and no nation can do that and survive.
...
In 1992, the federal Government actually issued more work authorizations to immigrants and temporary foreign workers than the net number of new jobs created by our economy. Something is fundamentally wrong when we have millions of American citizens and legal residents begging for jobs, and yet we are admitting thousands and thousands of immigrants a year with virtually no consideration to our employment needs or their employment skills.
We have not lost control of our borders. Our governing class has deliberately given up control of our borders for their own reasons. There is a difference.
Was just adding to the quotes of Reagan Reason refuses to recognize as they cherry pick quotes for their open borders religion.
I could easily add a few dozen more.
That is fine. I just find this was not unintentional, it was deliberate.
Oh I agree it is intentional. Has been a decades long globalist design. They started the lies regarding Reagan right after amnesty as he calls out in the 92 speech.
Part of the long march and borg like adoption of open borders Marxists. Finding every useful idiot they can. Reason and CATO not being exceptions.
"But it's not like fraud scandals are confined to immigrant and minority communities. One can find similar scandals involving any ethnic group (including native-born Americans)."
One of the issues is that Somali culture perhaps does not consider this type of fraud to be wrongdoing. Trying to deflect attention elsewhere is lame. There seems to be fairly widespread issues among Somalis in the USA, that does not respect the wider culture and people. Something needs to change here, else there will be further crime.
He also ignores how widespread it was. Parents were all on the take while giving their children to be used.
It looks like ICE will be antagonists in a game of hide the Somali.
Nice one.
So much stupidity in one article, almost every sentence contains a lie!
For example juneteenth is is bs holiday. It celebrates the day the slaves in Texas heard about the emancipation proclamation. Don't worry slavery was still legal in delewar.
And yes Somalis are shit animals with a shit culture. They bring nothing to the table and can never integrate in western culture.
Letting in a large number of people without our values, from a place where corruption and graft are a way of life is not a sound policy.
Import 3rd world shithole population, import 3rd world shithole problems.
A few immigrants from anywhere can be incorporated into society, blended into the melting pot. Importing wholesale population groups that self-isolate into "communities", ethnically focused enclaves where they cling wholeheartedly to the ethos of their 3rd world shithole is NOT a recipe for success.
Let's not forget that a Somali clan feud basically decided the Minneapolis mayor race.
*That may be true and any fraud is appalling, but...*
The second you follow core libertarian principles with a "but", you reveal that you are neither libertarian nor principled. This hard-left rant is better suited to MSNBCNowBC than an ostensibly libertarian publication. And it's why I come here less and less.
Greenhut's takes are what pass for 'moderately conservative' in California. Which isn't libertarian either.
"are roving the streets looking for 'prey' as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses."
Nearly 90 percent of Somalis there are legal residents, with 58 percent of them having been born in the United States.
The later does not obviate the former.
All cultures and all people are equal. That is why every nation is equally free, safe, and prosperous.
If I wanted woke bullshit I would read the atlantic or huffington post.
#libertarians4magicsoil
I thought citing Mary Moriarty (that unnamed Hennepin County AG) was a lovely touch. Does Steve know her history? Too radical for the PUBLIC DEFENDERS office? Known to hand down blatantly racist verdicts?
No wonder this pseudo-male likes her.
Hint for Steve: She would NEVER have a finding of anything negative for any group outside of white males. Check her history.
"My father escaped Nazi Germany, which was literally putting people in ovens"
Fortunately, the sins of the son do not mean the father deserved a miserable fate.