This Black Friday, Thank Globalization for Affordable Gifts
Global markets make Black Friday deals and generous holiday gift-giving possible.
When the Christmas season comes around each year, we rack our brains for how best to show our care and consideration for our loved ones. Thankfully, capitalism and globalization have made it easier than ever to get gifts for the special people in our lives.
With Amazon, you can get the remote-controlled helicopter little Johnny's been begging for delivered to him the very next day, and at a far lower price than when you were in the RC market. If you have a lucky lady (or hombre; we appreciate flowers too!) in your life, and a penchant for missing important dates, no worries! You can have imported flowers picked up from the local grocery store and delivered to her doorstep via InstaCart, DoorDash, or Uber Eats. You can even purchase your liberty-loving friends and family a subscription to Reason magazine, which is printed on Finnish paper.
Unfortunately, President Donald Trump and his cronies have recast the gains from trade as losses. On the campaign trail last year, J.D. Vance said that "a million cheap, knockoff toasters aren't worth the price of a single American manufacturing job." Since assuming office, Trump has followed through on his campaign's protectionist rhetoric, increasing the average tariff rate from 2.5 percent to 12.5 percent, a rate not seen since 1940. Trump has admitted that his tariffs will make gifts more expensive: Not only will children "have two dolls instead of 30 dolls" this Christmas, but these dolls will "cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally," he told reporters in April.
With this protectionist nostalgia permeating in Washington, it's worth considering how much easier it is to be a holly-jolly Santa Claus nowadays than it was during the purported halcyon days of the 1960s.
In January 1964, manufacturing's share of total nonfarm employment was 27 percent. Since then, manufacturing's share of employment has declined, reaching 8 percent in 2024. This macroeconomic transformation has not led to deprivation for the average American family, but abundance. Median household income grew from an inflation-adjusted $66,750 to $83,730: A real increase in the average family's income of 25 percent! And with imports growing from 4.1 percent of gross domestic product in 1964 to 14 percent in 2024, we now have access to a wider variety of goods than at any time in human history.
This Black Friday, we would do well to remember the many ways in which capitalism and globalization have boosted our real wealth by making goods more affordable, and thus our ability to do meaningful things for the people we care about. Of course, Christmas isn't only about gifting material possessions (experiences are also a good option). But these items are a great way to show our love and affection for special people in our lives, and thanks to the fierce price competition promoted by global markets, we're able to give more affordable and better tokens of our affection.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
But according to the other story, nobody can buy dolls now!
Hello d-lame, let me help you reconcile facts in an evil, confusing world that somehow doesnt wanna work the way you want it to work 🙁
From this article:
"Since assuming office, Trump has followed through on his campaign's protectionist rhetoric, increasing the average tariff rate from 2.5 percent to 12.5 percent, a rate not seen since 1940. Trump has admitted that his tariffs will make gifts more expensive: Not only will children "have two dolls instead of 30 dolls" this Christmas, but these dolls will "cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally," he told reporters in April."
Now, you have to be very strong now, but... what you think is a clever rebuttal, in fact... isnt. im sorry :((((((
Lighten up, Francis.
The difference between 5.56 and Francis is that 5.56 welcomes a bunch of fags touching him.
Thanks to globalization, it's easier than ever for your family and friends to give you devices that governments and transnational organizations use to spy on you!
What better way to tell your friends and family "I love you!" than by compromising on price, interpersonal experience, *and* information security?!
"Thanks to globalization, it's easier than ever for your family and friends to give you devices that governments and transnational organizations use to spy on you!"
By design, of course.
And BTW, where can I get a device that's as hack-proof as the one Mr. Koch uses? And why isn't there a huge global market for Faraday Bags? Seems to me they should be selling like hot cakes.
Just wait until Trump's "Genesis Mission" kicks into high gear. The first step is "consolidating all federal datasets."
So, you're pretty openly admitting that you're OK with all the *known* and *illegal* data collection thus far but that it's somehow bad or worse if Trump accelerates or consolidates it (which typically implies a reduction) for programs under his purview.
You're part of the problem.
ALL Morally Superior Beings EVERYWHERE (including the Grinch and murderous xenomorphs with acid for blood; see https://reason.com/2025/11/28/alien-earth/?comments=true#comment-11296765, Trump Toadies, and Dear Orange Caligula Shitself) REJOICE in poverty and relative poverty, ESPECIALLY if shit sates their "Punishment Boners" by PUNISHING the non-AmeriKKKan ferriner workers and illegal sub-beings!!!
All of ye sub-beings who do SNOT join the Morally Superior Beings in REJOICING in poverty?!?!? SHAME on you!!!
Reason.com has gone far-Left. Globalization is Collectivization which is the opposite of Individual Liberty and Libertarianism. Disgusting.
Letting ME chose what I buy, from whom, is collectivism, SNOT individualism; GOT shit!
Everyone everywhere FAITHFULLY OBEYING Dear Orange Caligula is FREEDOM!!! I GOT this shit, too!!!
All Hail Dear Orange Caligula!!!
"WAAAAHHHHH!!!!!! THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT THINGS OTHER THAN THEMSELVES!!!!!! WAAAAH!!!! SOCIALISM!!!! WWWAAAAAHHHH!!!!!"
No, you only care about yourself. If you cared about others, you wouldn’t be aggressively advocating for the support of Chinese slave labor.
No no, forcing you to pay for other people is compassion. Don’t even leftist bro?
Not very well, apparently.
Globalism is collectivism? What?
This comment is nonsense.
Why is a large part of globalism taking from western countries to subsidize other countries?
Why do crooks rob banks? Because that's where the money is.
International free trade is the opposite of collectivism.
Too bad we don’t have that.
LOL no
"International free trade" is like "social justice". If it were truly free, you wouldn't need to prepend it with "international", or "free". It would just be "trade". Trading with your neighbor would be as free as trading with someone across the ocean.
The reason you pre-pend the oxymoronic conditionals is either out of propaganda and/or true-belief of religious-style dogma, or as an explicit shorthand that connotes countries at both/either/all ends defending transoceanic trade routes and ports and that the trade is only free within the framework that either/both countries defend/uphold/dictate.
,Anne one day that might possibly exist.
Trade is free. The market is free
It can be nothing else.
The ersatz 'trade' we are forced to engage in while living in governments that try to control trade is directly affected by the market reacting to be unaffected by any 'central planning'.
When Black Friday comes
I'll stand down by the door
And catch the gray men when they
Dive from the fourteenth floor.
...When Black Friday falls
You know it's got to be
Don't let it fall on me.
Steely Dan
Wow. You didn't even try to hide it, Jack.
This article brought to you by George Soros.
Call the irrational ideology what it is: Globalism.
Trade and innovation on the other hand, are what humans do as naturally as breathing.
So... Trade and innovation withing the Magic Lines in the Sands = = inside the USA is GOOD...
Trade and innovation ACROSS the Magic Lines in the Sands = = BAD, 'cause "irrational ideology"?
BLEEEEVE in the Magic Lines in the Sands = = TRULY rational!
Look how stupid you are.
I said nothing about what you are ranting about. Trade and innovation are the absolute best ways to normalize international relations. I know the whole Dunning-Kruger thing is hard to surmount, and I know for some the bell curve may as well be Everest, but do try.
"Call the irrational ideology what it is: Globalism."
Is twat YOU said! Twat is so irrational about it?
If by "globalism" you mean the whole globe is to be run (into the ground!) by Top Men like Dear Orange Caligula, then yes, this globalism is irrational in that Top Men just do SNOT have ANYWHERE near the amount of data needed!
If by "globalism" you mean the whole globe full of individuals is to be free to make their OWN buying and selling decisions, across Magic Lines, then this is bad or irrational? Why?
CLEAR writing goes a LONG way, Chum!
Ugh, goodbye.
Yes, shit looks like Ye PervFectly said "goodbye" to clear writing a LONG time ago! Goodbye indeed!
Globalism is a catch word for One World Government, where, what's left of the human population are nothing more than slaves that will serve the elites.
Next step to the plight of the Uyghurs, brought to the world through social credit scores all for the sake of cheap and unnecessary shit.
We should be focused on exterminating Marxism. And you can’t have Marxism without Marxists.
So globalization is 100% safe and effective with no down-sides.
Where have I heard that before?
The Science IS Settled!
So RECOMMENDING SUICIDE FOR THE INFERIOR ONES is 100% safe and effective with no down-sides.
Where have I heard that before?
Think of tariffs as a mask, and shame other countries for not paying them?
Think of tariffs as a mask, and shame other countries for not paying them?
This is more retarded than "trunk bears".
If every nation was a capitalist society then globalization be a net gain for humankind. But we are a looooooong way from that. Now globalization allows the free-er nations along with the gov-corp leaders of the second and third world to enrich themselves on the slave (or nearly enslaved) labor of the peasantry.
The good intention of course being that by buying shit from others puts money in their pockets and helps boost them from poverty.
But as you noted the regimes controlling the other countries do not allow their citizens individual liberty and freedom and the benefits of the people's labours end up with the upper echelon of slavers and autocratic rulers.
This Black Friday, Thank
GlobalizationChild Slavery For Affordable GiftsFuck off, I don't want cheap shit from China.
Almost everyone else does though. Revealed preferences.
If they were told the truth and not gaslit into stupidity by the media establishment and global marxists a large majority would wake up.
Then we would have the necessary grassroots support to eliminate the Marxists.
Globalization is dead. Those who lost from that change are not going back - and they despise the people who both a)won from that change and b)told the losers FYTW.
I doubt the pendulum will swing back in any way that makes life better for all. But have no fucking doubt - globalization is deader than any Norwegian blue parrot.
Median household income grew from an inflation-adjusted $66,750 to $83,730: A real increase in the average family's income of 25 percent!
That is an "inflation adjusted" increase of 25% over SIXTY years. That is a whopping 0.4% per year. So how accurate do you think your 'inflation-adjustment' really is? I can assure you that the people who measure that and release the measures have an agenda and a conflict of interest - and it ain't "be accurate above all else".
Further - that median household income in 1964 was a bit more likely to be a single source of cash income - AND more likely to include kids in that household. Which means, indirectly, that non-monetary value was added to that household back then via unpaid 'raising of kids by a parent/mother'. I'm not one for nostalgia but it is an obvious fact that 'raising of kids by a daycare/teacher" who are paid (a source of expense) is not equivalent to 'raising of kids by a mother/parent' who are unpaid (NOT a source of expense).
We'll ignore 'productivity' increases that might result in better conditions because those have proven to be complete bullshit. Productivity benefits do not accrue to the median or even the mean but only to the top 10% or so. Globalization has absolutely made that worse - as the 'median' now compete with the 'wretched masses of the Third World' - while American CEO's have extremely protected and tax-advantaged incomes (now delivered through stock options) compared to other country CEO's.
Sorry to hear you can’t keep up.
Lot of his attention is focused on exterminating the Jews.
Thanks to globalization the middle class has been nearly eliminated, but hey you can still buy some cheap imported stuff you don't need.
There's a scene in Lucas' THX where the drone goes into a store to by a random geometric shape and then throws it away as he leaves the store.
I don't remember that part. I do remember the robot cops bumping into the wall saying "excuse me maam."
That was a good movie.
Yep, Bush made China great again and catapulted hundreds of millions of foreigners into the middle class….he improved the lives of the most people of any leader in history.
>With Amazon, you can get the remote-controlled helicopter
Either AI wrote this or Nicastro is 60.
Little Johnny wants a drone, not an RC helo.
And either way it's going to be a cheap piece of shit that will break on a week - assuming it wasn't a flat out scam from China to start with.
There is a lot of that cheap crap out there. You can spend if you want, thousands on a Quad. DJI Phantom 3/ $1295.
DJI Inspire-1 /$2899.
"Warning: Don't be fly near other people!"
I love the reason slaved based consumerism stories. It shows the are all mindless retarded catpeople
Most of modern prosperity is the result of capitalism and international trade. So for course the Left wants to restrict capitalism and the Right wants to restrict international trade.
That's funny. Nothing says 'affordable gifts' like a $225,550 national DEBT /ea working citizen.
There's a common sleight of hand that the Government and corporate America pull. See they argue that these things can be produced better and at a lower cost elsewhere. But their definition of "better" is simply "at a lower cost." For example, the call centers in India are clearly a vastly inferior product to call centers located in America. Through no fault of the Indians doing that job. But the Government and banks pretend they're doing "the same job for less money."
But it's not the same job, and people are getting far less utility in exchange for the lower cost. So there's really no actual savings for consumers. And that goes for all sorts of things.
Butt... Butt Government Almighty FORBID that the cuntsumers MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES, right, right-wing wrong-nuts?
Thank the unemployment of your neighbors for your affordable commerical crap that will be thrown away in a few weeks. Who cares about them? Let them eat food pantry scraps.