Trump Wants Immigrants—Sometimes
The president is alarming the MAGA faithful by saying he wants more high-skilled immigration. But that doesn’t mean he’s rethinking the rest of his nativism.
Since President Donald Trump began his second term in office, he's taken a hardline stance on immigration. The surge in federal enforcement is responsible for 527,000 deportations and egregious civil liberties violations. Despite his restrictionist policies, Trump is surprisingly sanguine about high-skilled immigration.
During a Tuesday interview, Fox News host Laura Ingraham told Trump that "a lot of MAGA folks are not thrilled about this idea of hundreds of thousands of foreign students in the United States," alluding to the president's plan to let 600,000 Chinese students study at American universities. Trump retorted that cutting "half of the students from all over the world that are coming into our country [would] destroy our entire university and college system. I don't want to do that."
Later in the segment, Ingraham asked Trump if reducing H-1B visas would be a priority for his administration and argued that, "to raise wages for American workers, you can't flood the country with tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of foreign workers." Trump agreed with Ingraham's assertion that immigrants depress the wages of low-skilled native workers, but said "you also…have to bring in talent."
The claim that foreign-born workers lower native born wages has been contradicted time and again. Economist David Card found that the influx of 125,000 Cuban refugees to Miami from April 1980 to October 1980 "had virtually no effect on the wages or unemployment rates of less-skilled workers." While the Card study is 35 years old, its conclusion is supported by recent research that finds "US-born workers in areas losing immigrants did not gain in income score relative to workers in less exposed areas."
To the outrage of online nativists, Trump at least appreciates that there are not enough skilled Americans to completely satisfy employer demand: "You can't take people off an unemployment line and say, 'I'm going to put you in a factory where we're going to make missiles.'" Trump cited the detainment of 500 South Korean workers at the construction site of a Hyundai factory in Georgia this September as a wrongheaded instance of immigration enforcement. Trump's admission is more than a little ironic, considering his own immigration policies and officials were responsible for the bust.
Ingraham told Trump "we have plenty of talented people," and there are undoubtedly millions of high-skilled Americans. However, if Ingraham's nebulous "plenty" is understood to mean "sufficient to satisfy labor market demand," then her assertion is refuted by the 113,460 approved H-1B petitions for FY 2025. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem celebrated as much on Fox News Tuesday evening, saying "we've sped up our process and added integrity to the visa programs, to green cards [and] more people are becoming naturalized under this admin than ever before."
While Trump's endorsement of high-skilled immigration does not make up for months of inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants, it does represent a win for MAGA dynamists in their ongoing feud with MAGA nativists. One can only hope that the president realizes the folly in deporting hundreds of thousands of hardworking people while 7.2 million job vacancies exist.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
This is not new information.
Right? Surprise, but Jack Nicastro is being a dishonest hack again by deliberately conflating illegal and illegal immigration.
It's the Reason writers favorite trick.
Never mind that Trump's wife and JD's in-laws are immigrants. Never mind that they never once inveighed against legal immigration.
None of that matter's because if Nicastro didn't deliberately lie about this, he and the rest of the slave labor Koch klavern wouldn't have an argument.
Recall jeffsarc making those attempts to create a singular category in an effort to support the illegal alien rapefugees remaining.
Deport all illegal alien rapefugees.
How about all the legals that are having their visas or green cards stripped?
Currently illegal alien rapefugees? Buh-bye.
It's not happening, at least not to anyone who didn't lie on their application... But hey! If you guys couldn't lie about this you'd have no argument.
That is a lie. Some US Citizens have even been deported.
For lying on their applications? Violating the terms of their agreements?
FFS, Egregious civil liberties violations? Seriously?
Do Reason writers think anyone should be charged for assault when the assault is on law enforcement officers, conservatives, MAGA, SCOTUS, CEO's, or anyone who has not bent the knee and publicly proclaimed support for the democrats?
There are many positions which require specific experience and knowledge and which the amount of Americans with this are limited or non existent.
Attempting to bring a comparison between legal immigration systems which are necessary for the country versus Trump deporting the millions of illegal immigrants that entered through Biden democrat open borders is stupid.
"There are many positions which require specific experience and knowledge and which the amount of Americans with this are limited or non existent."
Name three.
Nurses.
Merchant marines.
Mexican ass sex food trucks.
Baseball players that pitch and play a position in the field.
Why only gay ball players?
Because they play for the other team.
As a switch hitter that goes both ways?
He plays to the base.
- Narcotraficantes
- Preteen sex slaves
- Food trucks because Americans have never had Mexican food before. Completely unknown. They look at a burrito like it was the 2001 monolith.
Seriously though, Neutral not Neutered's point about the conflation of illegal and legal immigration motives stand.
With legal immigration America is trying to get the best and the brightest worldwide to come to America and bring their expertise to contribute.
With illegal immigration corporations are attempting to import labour that requires no benefits or minimum wage and is subsidized by the American taxpayer, and the Democratic party is trying to replace the American voter.
"With legal immigration America is trying to get the best and the brightest worldwide"
No it isn't. The quotas from India, China, Mexico, and the Philippines are way too low. And MAGA refuses to allow them to be increased.
Way too low for what?
There IS a difference between legal immigration and criminal border crossings. To support one and oppose the other is not illogical.
As long as they don't engage in wrongthink, like saying anything good about Palestine or anything bad about Charlie Kirk.
As long as foreign national guests don’t support terror organizations, threaten students at a local high school, rape, murder, traffick, assault children, share photos shrike likes, drive drunk, or rob then they should be ok.
If they violate the conditions for entering and remaining in the country, then those same conditions allow for deportation. If they want to violate those conditions then unilaterally declare themselves a sovereign citizen, it won’t work out too well for them. Buh-bye.
"anything bad about Charlie Kirk."
Tell us. Are you happy you guys put a bullet in his neck. Does it make your peepee hard, thinking about how he bled out in front of his little children?
saying anything good about Palestine
They are such wonderful, non-racist, non-sexist, pro-LGBTQ+++ egalitarians.
Making it an all or nothing proposition is why your side is losing this argument, Nicastro.
But he is right and the refusal to admit that is damaging the US.
You mean a smart strategy to fill needs instead of blind importation into a welfare state?
TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit:
'Trump prefers to be selective about those we welcome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
yes bring in the smarties. brain drain everyone else. seems an easy win.
Not according to MAGA.