Jeffrey Epstein's Secret Role in Washington's Middle East Diplomacy
Epstein was supposedly advising Arab countries on how to deal with America, had an audience scheduled with a Qatari prince, and close to Trump’s future ambassador to Turkey.
President Donald Trump announced in 2017 that his first official overseas trip would be to the Middle East. An unnamed political figure, possibly from Kuwait, wanted to know how to deal with the new, unpredictable American leader. So the person turned to his acquaintance, Jeffrey Epstein.
"[A]ny tips on how we should communicate with him?" the figure wrote in an email. Epstein asked what "concrete" things the person's emir (prince) would like the U.S. to offer. "[A] good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think..and if peace agreement was signed in kuwait that would be [seven thumbs up emojis]," the figure wrote back.
Kuwait had hosted unsuccessful peace talks in mid-2016 to resolve the Yemeni civil war, which was the worst humanitarian crisis in the Middle East at the time.
Epstein sent the person a link to a Jerusalem Post article about cosmetics heir Ronald Lauder's attempts to act as a freelance diplomat. "[H]e just left my house when you arrived. [H]e is the key for you. I understand Dubai," Epstein continued.
Lauder did not immediately respond to requests for comment sent through his company, Estée Lauder, or his nonprofit organization, the World Jewish Congress.


Emails published as part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Epstein's estate this week shed new light on the late sex trafficker's international political dealings. Long after his 2008* guilty plea for procuring a minor for prostitution, he was active and welcome in powerful circles. Epstein bragged to a former Norwegian president about passing on information about Trump to a Russian ambassador, and offered former Trump adviser Steve Bannon help meeting with politicians in Europe.
But the most intriguing revelations have been about Epstein's dealings in the Middle East. Some of Epstein's relationships to the region are already known. He kept a photo of himself with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in his apartment, and did business with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, while helping Barak set up backchannel contacts with Russia to negotiate over the future of Syria.
The House Oversight Committee's disclosures add two other countries to the mix. Along with the mysterious figure asking about favors for Kuwait—the name is completely redacted—the emails show that Epstein was in contact with an influential man in Qatar referred to only as "Jabor Y."
In November 2016, shortly before the U.S. election, Epstein apologized to Jabor for canceling an audience that Jabor had arranged with Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, the former prime minister of Qatar.** "[T]oo much work around the election," Epstein wrote, adding that "the states will be in turmoil for awhile no matter who wins" and promising to "explain when i see you."

It's unclear whether he ever rescheduled the meeting. The exact identity of the Qatari man is also unclear. However, a group of influential names that Epstein sent to himself with the title "list for bannon steve" includes "HBJ," a nickname commonly used for Al Thani, the former prime minister.
The Qatari foreign ministry and Qatari embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The disclosures also touch on Epstein's longstanding relationship with Thomas Barrack, a real estate investor close to Trump. During the 2016 election, Barrack was a major fundraiser for the Trump campaign. He now serves as U.S. ambassador to Turkey and Trump's special envoy to Syria.
In March 2016, Epstein and Barrack made small talk via email. Barrack asked Epstein to "catch up," while Epstein complained about the constant questions from the media about his relationships with Trump and former President Bill Clinton. "[S]end photos of you and child," Epstein added. "[M]ake me smile."
Barrack did not respond to a request for comment sent to him through the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, where he works.

A few months later, Epstein wrote to businessman Peter Thiel, "dont know how well you know tom barrack he is great." Epstein would go on to introduce Thiel and Barrack separately to Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin, according to schedules obtained by The Wall Street Journal. Thiel told the Journal that Epstein was "a crazed networker and low on substance," adding, "I didn't think enough about what Epstein's agenda might have been."

In January 2017, according to the House Oversight Committee emails, Epstein told Emirati businessman Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem that "it might be worth it" to accept an invitation from Barrack to attend Trump's inauguration. "Do you think it will be possible to shake hand with trump," bin Sulayem wrote back. Epstein told bin Sulayem to call him on the phone.

Emails from the Handala leaks show Epstein introduced Barak to bin Sulayem in 2013, describing bin Sulayem as "the right hand of maktoum," the ruling family of Dubai. In 2015, bin Sulayem reached out to Epstein to arrange another meeting with Barak, for reasons unexplained. Epstein also kept a photo of himself with bin Sulayem in his apartment, according to images released by The New York Times.
Bin Sulayem's company did not respond to a request for comment.
Epstein, a financial manager by trade, was interested in mixing business with politics. He frequently wrote to Barak about his excitement for military and intelligence affairs. The past two decades of chaos in the Middle East offered Epstein plenty of opportunities to get involved.
But the disclosures also underscore questions about the Epstein case. What value did so many influential political elites from around the world see in advice from a convicted sex offender? And what exactly was Epstein's political endgame?
In a 2014 email, Epstein joked to a friend about the danger that her talk about "girls" will "renew an old habit." Then he listed all the meetings he had lined up during the U.N. General Assembly in New York. They included power brokers from America, Europe, the Middle East, and beyond.

*CORRECTION: This piece previously misstated the year of the Epstein plea deal.
**CORRECTION: This article initially misstated the identity of the Qatari official referred to as "Shk. Hamad."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Rumor & Innuendo magazine.
Not even new rumors. This was being discussed over a year ago.
Part of me would rather have an Emma/Autumn article reviewing some romantic fantasy novel.
"The sexy vampire man flew billionaridly towards me."
While choking me but supporting my career.
Lol !
Supermarket checkout stand romance novels are in a class by themselves.
The conspiracy theory that I have largely stuck with is Epstein was an intelligence asset. It makes the most sense.
More Pettifogerry. Epstein was not a financial manager. If you believe that please produce a single piece of evidence that he had any clients that generated his 100 plus million fortune. The best evidence is that he was an international arms deal facilitator going back to moving weapons through Israel in the Iran Contra deal. He knew a lot of powerful people worldwide and obviously in the middle east. Nothing here is particularly surprising or even particularly interesting at this point. And none of this involves Trump in any way except that they may have known some of the same people.
Haven’t seen much. There’s that email to Wexner . There’s his work at Bear Stearns. But nothing that amounts to his reported estate.
Adnan Khashoggi (part of the whole Iran-Contra thing) and Les Nessman (or whatever his name is) and Leon Black (Apollo) all hired Epstein for whatever he did. The latter two alone gave him just under $400 million. The first is the connection to foreign billionaires, organized crime and arms dealers and tax evasion and bounty hunting, Israeli intelligence, Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine's father - and Mossad) and the Mega Group. Lots of untraceable money there.
And none of this involves Trump in any way except that they may have known some of the same people.
Trump knew both Epstein and Ghislaine for a long time. Trump knew Ghislaine via her father from the late 80's, early 90's. He prob knew Epstein (though not as well) through Ronald Lauder (classmates at Wharton), Ace Greenberg (Trump's broker and Epstein's boss at Bear Stearns), Roy Cohn (Trump's mentor/lawyer and Lauder's lawyer), all the Wall St - and later Mega Group - people both of them knew from the late 70's through the mid/late 80's, Palm Beach when Trump bought Mar A Lago.
Personally though - I don't see Trump as a pedo part of that. But I have no doubt he knew what was happening. That is why Epstein talks about Trump being 'the dog that doesn't bark' in 2011. Trump could've ratted on Epstein in 2004 or 2007 or 2011. He didn't. THAT's the dog that didn't bark. Instead he told Ghislaine not to steal his (underage) employees. To protect Mar a Lago from legal liability.
Donnie and Epstein were two peas in a pod. I'm just waiting for all the cultists' Epstein rehabilitation, like we're already seeing them do with Ghislaine.
Hold your breath.
You misspelled ‘Bill Clinton’.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/13/us-news/bill-and-hillary-clinton-delay-depositions-in-house-oversight-panels-jeffrey-epstein-probe/#
Why not both?
Because your great president Trump wasn’t. He even went to the FBI. But that isn’t what the DNC ordered you to think.
So much doc-u-men-ta-tion.... so little sense....
know what else about Epstein? nobody cares about Epstein.
You do, or you wouldn't have clicked the article, clicked SHOW COMMENTS, and submitted the comment.
no that's now how it works.
Why do they all chat like they're teenage girls?
7 years of the MSM's deep aspirational yearning and commitment to a "gotcha" moment with Trump re: Epstein, and this is all NBC News can come up with:
"In one of the emails, Epstein said Trump 'knew about the girls,' but didn’t directly accuse him of any wrongdoing. In another, Epstein referred to Trump, who was in his first term as president at the time, writing, 'I am the one able to take him down,' but the exchange did not provide context and occurred about six months before Epstein's arrest on federal sex trafficking charges. In yet another email, Epstein said Trump had been to his home 'many times' but 'never got a massage.'"
Yet another case of the Dems getting their hands caught in multiple cookie jars, and instead of acknowledging their own guilt, all they can do is project these misdeeds onto Trump a la "RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!"
Epstein was funded entirely by the MOSSAD and a Les Wexner. A total fraud.
The goal was to set up a massive blackmail operation using the same tried and true methods as they ever have....sex, especially with young girls.
And before anyone smears Trump just consider how many other had been ensnared including prominent democrats as well. It has also been exposed that prominent TV personalities and even some sport figures were also involved. The Democrats might wish to remain silent on releasing the records.
And Virginia Guiffere did not kill herself.
"The Democrats might wish to remain silent on releasing the records."
Maybe the older generation. New releases may give younger Democrats the ammo they need to unseat the elders. Same thing works for non-pedophile Republicans. Taylor Greene is keen on releasing files likely to damage her party's leadership.
My reading is that Trump was pretty close with Maxwell and less close with Epstein. I believe at one point he chews Maxwell out for getting involved in all of Epstein's nonsense. But I don't know. Trump could theoretically be WAY guilty if all the info came out.
But you'd have to think if Trump was dead to rights in the files, the Biden Administration would have leaked it. I think the problem is more likely to be that Epstein was an intelligence asset for both us and Israel, and because of that got away with tons of bad things. And now no one involved wants it to come out.