Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Government Shutdown

Reopening?

Plus: CCP lies about CPI, promising Trumpbucks from tariffs, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 11.10.2025 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
The U.S. Capitol building | Indy2320 | Dreamstime.com
(Indy2320 | Dreamstime.com)

We may have a deal: A group of Democrats broke with their party late last night and voted with the Republicans to advance a bill that would reopen the government, a critical step toward ending a shutdown that has lasted for more than a month.

Materially, Democrats are getting few real policy concessions that will leave them in a better place politically than they started. And yesterday's 60–40 Senate vote is on a continuing resolution to fund the government through the end of January—which means we may well find ourselves in the same place come February, with two parties deadlocked and unable to fund the government further.

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"The compromise measure includes a spending package that would fund the government through January, as well as three separate spending bills to cover programs related to agriculture, military construction and legislative agencies for most of 2026," reports The New York Times. "The package also includes a provision that would reverse layoffs of federal workers made during the shutdown and ensure retroactive pay." In essence, this means that the Democrats have negotiated their way back to what they had when this started. Their primary demand at the heart of the original shutdown fight—extending health insurance subsidies that are set to expire at the end of the year—has not been won. But Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R–S.D.) did say that a separate vote could be held on extending the subsidies sometime in December, after the government reopens.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D–N.Y.) have both come out against the deal. "This health care crisis is so severe, so urgent, so devastating for families back home that I cannot in good faith support this," said Schumer from the Senate floor.

"I think it's a terrible mistake," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) told reporters. "The American people want us to stand and fight for health care, and that's what I believe we should do."

This is officially the deal, per source familiar. Led by King, Shaheen, Hassan

-CR through Jan 30
-A vote on ACA bill of Dem choosing in December
- Minibus
-Reversal of shutdown RIFs w/ back pay
-SNAP funded through FY26 https://t.co/n2LzGjR26l

— Stef Kight (@StefWKight) November 9, 2025


Scenes from New York: Inside a gathering of New York's political class in Puerto Rico, including tons of city council members strategizing about how to position themselves during the Zohran Mamdani years.


QUICK HITS

  • Who, specifically, has died from the U.S. strikes on alleged narcotrafficking boats? The Associated Press has a long investigation attempting to piece together whether those who have been killed were, in fact, involved in the drug trade.
  • President Donald Trump on Sunday floated the idea of a $2,000 dividend, paid out from the revenue generated by tariffs—possibly out of anger, given that the Supreme Court might strike his aggressive tariff agenda down. Then Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent turned around and said that, well, maybe "dividend" doesn't actually mean that: "The $2,000 divided could come in lots of forms. It could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing."
  • The New York Times reports that Trump is in the process of granting preemptive pardons to Rudy Giuliani and others, including John Eastman and Sidney Powell, who were involved in his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
  • "Times have changed since Millennials were little and neighborhoods had lots more stay-at-home moms available to pitch in," writes Olga Khazan in The Atlantic. "For nearly 70 percent of kids under 6 today, both parents work, compared with half in 1985. Your friends with kids might not be able to do school pickup in an emergency, because they, too, might be working. 'We just don't have as many people around….There are just fewer people physically available to call.'"
  • "China's official CPI figure—which offers limited item-level detail and is shaped by a complex methodology that isn't transparent—has hovered around zero since early 2023, occasionally posting modest gains," reports Bloomberg, which "analyzed prices for dozens of products in 36 major cities as well as both official and private data across China to get a sense of how much cheaper things have become on the ground….The analysis showed that prices are unmistakably dropping. Among 67 items tracked by Bloomberg News, prices on 51 dropped over the last two years. Economists say that official inflation measures may only partially capture the reality. Many key data series have quietly disappeared in recent years, and the National Bureau of Statistics has never offered the sort of granularity more common in the US, where inflation trackers go so far as to publish the cost of indoor plants and pet food. An outdated methodology for calculating rent changes in the CPI likely led to its overestimation in the past few years."
  • Pharmacy deserts, according to socialists: when getting your prescription refilled requires more than a 10-minute walk.

580,000 people in Massachusetts live in "pharmacy deserts," areas where residents live at least half a mile away from the nearest drugstore. It doesn't have to be this way — healthcare is a human right! pic.twitter.com/jkMh3xjFVa

— Joe Tache (@Tache4MA) November 6, 2025

  • "If there is enough pressure, and there is enough candy in the dish."

????According to The Atlantic, Maduro has opened the door to leaving power if he and his top military command are offered amnesty, the rewards for their capture are eliminated, and they are assured a "comfortable exile." pic.twitter.com/qRlMUM8OlO

— BowTiedMara (@BowTiedMara) November 7, 2025

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: California’s Fast-Food Minimum Wage Hike Is Killing Jobs

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Government ShutdownSenateCongressGovernment SpendingFederal governmentTrump AdministrationPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (388)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Crazy thread with videos of USAID working in secret with Signal to coordinate with foreign actors to help push a domestic color revolution.

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1987550101703909532.html

    1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

      This is Globalist Fascism. There is not a more concise label for this shit.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        “At what point does this become treason?”

        Quite a while ago. I’ve been advocating for the destruction of the democrats and mass treason charges for their upper echelons for years here. It’s long past time for that.

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Unless Daily Kos covers this, didn’t happen.

  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    ..areas where residents live at least half a mile away from the nearest drugstore.

    Take the bus. It’s free,

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Half mile? I live four miles from the nearest gas station and 15 miles from the nearest town. What a bunch of vaginas.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        That is unfair, vaginas serve a purpose.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          They’re more like fauxginas, the unhealed gash men who’ve cut off their balls and suffer from autogynephilia have.

          1. D-Pizzle   2 months ago

            Autogynephiles never get the snip. Never.

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Pffffft. I’ll bet you don’t even use mass transit to get to town, you culture war bigot.

        1. rbike   2 months ago

          We often walk the half mile to the CVS down the street. Sometimes we go in and buy things. I didn't realize this was notable.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Any inconvenience is an attack on freedom. The libirtine view.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        You mean like the inconvenience of a waiting period to buy a gun? Is that an attack on freedom?

        1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          I hAvE a CoNsTiTuTiOnAl RiGhT tO a DrUg StOrE!!!

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Look at how jeff compares gun control efforts to someone walking to get groceries/medicine for 10 minutes. Not waiting for groceries/medicine, but having to go somewhere to get them.

          Jeff equates government regulations to someone exerting responsibility. Jeff is a socialist.

          What a retarded fucking post.

          Bookmarked.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            You didn't answer the question. You were the one who mocked them by claiming "any inconvenience is an attack on freedom". So is the inconvenience of a waiting period to buy a gun "an attack on freedom" or not?

            Maybe the honest thing to do is to modify your absurdly rigid claim with one that is actually defensible. But of course you don't, you just go on the attack.

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              Well, some inconveniences are attacks on freedom and some aren't. Mocking the idea that any inconvenience is an attach on freedom does not preclude the notion that some inconveniences are.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                some inconveniences are attacks on freedom and some aren't.

                This is the honest and truthful position. But Jesse is neither honest nor truthful.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                  Project much, Jeffy?

                2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                  So it was dishonest to bring up in the first place. Which is why you did it.

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                    Jeffy is nothing if he’s not dishonest.

                3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  No Fatfuck. Jesse IS honest and truthful. YOU are a lying Marxist shitweasel. You come here and lie every day, all day. You’ve done so for years.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                    Going on decades now, actually.

                    It’s good work if you can get it (and you’re a psychopath liar).

                    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      So was he originally Cytotoxic? I’ve heard that theory a number of times over the years.

              2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                Jeff is comparing a government imposed inconvenience to a market one. They aren't even in the same region to compare.

                If he wants to agree to a 5 day waiting period and limit of 3 gallons a month for Ben and Jerry ice cream, he can make that argument.

                But he is comparing a government imposed restriction to one of simple markets.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  But he is comparing a government imposed restriction to one of simple markets.

                  Here, Jesse ignores all of the regulations governing pharmacies and pharmacists. He blames those people for being irresponsible when government is, in part, responsible for the problem. Funny how that works. Whenever THEY have a complaint, it's because they are whiny and irresponsible and they should just get over it. But when HE and HIS TEAM have a complaint, then it's a valid complaint and the rest of the world needs to bend over backwards to accommodate them.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                    You think without government regulations there would be pharmacies every quarter mile? Lol.

                    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      Jeffy’s Soviet Democrats would require that.

                    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      Remember when jeff argued even making someone register to vote was a poll tax? He is used to mommy giving him whatever he needs in his basement dwelling.

                    3. damikesc   2 months ago

                      He seems to think that the socialists have a valid point.

                      Oddly.

                    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      I suspect he’s too fat to make it out of the basement now. Like the steam shovel at the end of that children’s book that was converted into a boiler because he dug himself in during construction and couldn’t get out.

                  2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                    Does the government restrict where pharmacies are built?

                    1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

                      No

                  3. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

                    There are no government regulations on the location of pharmacies, you imbecile. There are many street corners with 2 right across from each other.
                    You are in a Knowledge Desert

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      There are no government regulations on the location of pharmacies

                      Wait, there are no zoning regulations or environmental regulations or parking regulations that pertain to all businesses, including pharmacies? Huh.

                      Also, I specifically mentioned the regulations on how pharmaceuticals are dispensed, and the regulations on who can become a pharmacist. Why can't they be dispensed more widely by more people? Maybe if you could get your pharmaceuticals at a Dollar General there wouldn't be as many places lacking access to their medicines. What do you think?

                      Oh no no no, it's all about those people committing all that crime. Regulations have nothing to do with it!

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      The only person who talks about "those people" is you and your ilk, jeff.

                    3. Nobartium   2 months ago

                      If you refuse to prosecute those who do wrong, nobody will have nice things.

                      This is the fundamental conceit of civilization.

                      And that was settled over 5000 years ago.

                    4. damikesc   2 months ago

                      "Also, I specifically mentioned the regulations on how pharmaceuticals are dispensed, and the regulations on who can become a pharmacist. Why can't they be dispensed more widely by more people? Maybe if you could get your pharmaceuticals at a Dollar General there wouldn't be as many places lacking access to their medicines. What do you think?

                      Oh no no no, it's all about those people committing all that crime. Regulations have nothing to do with it!"

                      If they can absorb very high insurance rates so if they kill/maim somebody, they are on the hook for it, we can discuss it.

                    5. Azathoth!!   2 months ago

                      Maybe if you could get your pharmaceuticals at a Dollar General there wouldn't be as many places lacking access to their medicines.

                      Why would you need the Dollar General to have a pharmacy when there's a Duane Reade across from a Walgreens and there's a pharmacy in the supermarket two blocks away?

                      Oh, and that creepy drugstore with the 'Rexall' sign that's been there since your parents were kids. The one the old people use.

                      The only people who 'suffer' from pharmacy deserts live out in the country.

            2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

              Your question was a non sequitur. It’s a piece of shit false analogy that deserves little but ridicule.

              1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                That pretty well sums up all of jeffs analogies.

                We have adjective artie and analogy jeffy. What a pair. Lol.

            3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

              Who in the history of this comment board has complained about having to travel more than half a mile to an FFL store?

            4. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              Your brain is completely fucking broken Lying Jeffy. This doesn’t even make any sense.

            5. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              Fatfuck, you have no concept of the “honest thing”. You are a lying shitweasel and Marxist propagandist.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Jeff equates government regulations to someone exerting responsibility.

            Well, let's talk about the government regulations associated with pharmacies, shall we? What are the government regulations associated with becoming a pharmacist? What are the government regulations associated with dispensing pharmaceuticals? Do you think there might be a reason, related to government regulations, about why there aren't more pharmacies in certain areas?

            You are the one who insists that we include the cost of regulations when discussing trade and tariffs. Funny how in this case when it comes to regulations associated with pharmacies you are silent.

            That is because you really don't give a shit about regulations on their own right. You just want to use them as talking points to defend Trump and MAGA.

            1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

              The reason there aren't more in certain areas is that they closed due to crime being tolerated.
              End of story

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                I think Idaho Bob would be insulted to learn that the reason why he has to drive 15 miles to the nearest pharmacy is because he tolerates crime.

                Oh, right, but you are talking about those people. Carry on then.

                1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

                  You asshole. Clearly, Bob lives in a thinly populated rural area, where it would economically foolish to build a drugstore.

                  1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                    Jeffy knows that. He's just being sarcJeff. He's comparing government infringement with commercial inconvenience. Apples to brake rotors.

                    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                      This entire thread is a dishonest attempt by Lying Jeffy to achieve some sort of gotcha on Jesse,

                      After it became clear it was retarded, because he’s a psychopath he had to double and triple down on his stupidity.

                    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      And Pedo Jeffy has failed miserably, yet again. He only succeeds in being desperate and tedious. Being in Fatfuck’s company for even a few minutes must be excruciating.

                  2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                    Right. That’s a culture war violation, right thar, I reckon!

                    Do they even have buses in Idaho? Arrrrgh!

                2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                  You really are a major asshole, aren’t you?

                  I live in a suburban area where it’s one and a half to two miles to the nearest pharmacy. Any closer and they cannibalize sales from each other. It’s just the free market at work.

                  1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                    Look at how much space Fatfuck has wasted on this nonsense. This is what he does. He diverts real discussion and threadshits.

                3. Super Scary   2 months ago

                  Idaho Bob: It's because people are stealing from those places, so they close down.
                  Jeff: You're racist!

                  Bob didn't mention race at all, but great stuff Jeff, keep it up!

                  1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                    Jeff has shown a consistent internalized racism in these threads as he blames others for being racist. Quite amusing actually.

                    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      Yet no one is ever more homogeneously racist than far left democrat Marxists like Jeffy.

                    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      Its like when jeff was outraged when trump said shit hole countries then calls all other countries shit holes while demanding unfettered immigration from those countries.

                  2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    I didn't say anything about race. Frankly I don't think it really is about race at this point. I think it's about anyone that you don't give a shit about, which includes everyone outside of your tribe. It's their problem therefore you don't think you have to do anything about it, and/or you are free to blame the victims for their own problems.

                    When it's a government regulation that makes it more difficult for YOU to own a gun, then that is the fault of the government regulation.
                    But when it's a government regulation that makes it more difficult for THEM to go to the pharmacy, then who gives a shit, they need to grow up and take responsibility and stop sitting around on welfare all day and it's because of all the crime.

                    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                      Who’s “those people” referring to, Lying Jeffy?

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      I didn't say anything about race.

                      When will you change the last word of your handle to "sophist"?

                    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      It should be too much longer before Jeffy starts openly hating on Jews just like all his other extreme far left buddies here.

                    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                      Oh boy, here comes some selective nuance. Lol.

                      Hey jeff, what’s so great about trains?

              2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                If markets wont set up in regions of low profit and high crime, it is on the government to force them to. - chemjeff_retarded_mamdani_supporter

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  "I will complain about regulations only when it benefits me and my argument. That is because I don't really give a shit about regulations, I only care about winning political power and propagandizing for my team." -- JesseBot

                  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

                    Take the loss on this one.

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                      He won’t. He’ll keep digging his hole deeper until he reaches the mantle.

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      jeffsarc hates jesse so much, he rattled off a reply without thinking thru it. And now he is forced to double down all day on yet another of his dumbest comments ever.

                    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      =D

                    4. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                      Jeffy has a major case of Jesse Derangement Syndrome (JDS).

                    5. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                      He can’t. When I call Lying Jeffy a psychopath, I’m not being hyperbolic.

                    6. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      Bertram is correct. JeffSarc doesn’t let things go. He’s too stupid for that.

                  2. Chumby   2 months ago

                    Needs a Demjeff bigly bigoted bigly bot analogy special.

            2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              Just look at Lying Jeffy go!

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                He comes here to ruin real discussion.

            3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

              Do you think Mamdani favors less regulation of pharmacies, or more?

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                Heavy regulation, heavy subsidies. Think there's a word for that...

        3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Nice try at a false analogy, fucktard. Unlike the right to bear (not in a trunk) arms, there is no right to being close to a pharmacy.

        4. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          You cannot be this fucking stupid.

          *checks handle*

          Never mind.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      My closest pharmacy is 9 miles, same distance to closest grocery store (not counting Dollar General that's only 5 miles away). My zip code is only a few dollars above the level at which USDA says I live in a food desert.

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        The left LOVES the desert analogy.

        Filmmaker
        @KenBurns
        discusses why the Trump administration killed the Corporation for Public Broadcasting with
        @JohnAvlon
        : "It'll hurt mostly rural communities — maybe that's their intention. There'll be news deserts."

        I live in a food, drug, and news desert. JFC.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Correct response to such stupidity:

          Well, shucks n' tarnation, fix yer lookers on this, y'all.

          Us po' simple country folks out here in the Tennessee woods shure are a whole peck o' grateful we gots
          @kenburns
          to look out fer us.

          Why, without him, them city slickers up in Brooklyn, New York, Walpole, New Hampshire, and at Columbia Youneevers... Ukneeverse... Unyeevers... College, might not know we was all dependent on the wireless and stuff.

          They might think that Chattanooga was the first city in the You-knighted states to have fiber internet service to all residents, way back in 2010. They might even think we gots 25 Gbps fiber available to every home in Hamilton County.

          Nah, we ain't got that fancy stuff. 'round here, we likes to sit around in the evening by candlelight, passin' round a jug o' corn likker and watching PBS documentaries like "Unforgivable Blackness: The Rise and Fall of Jack Johnson", which is all 'bout Jim Crow and stuff, 'cause we shure like it when Yankees educamate us poor southern folks about our history.

          Sometimes we listen to NPR instead, jes' fore we brush our tooth and go to bed, real early so's we can be up with the dawn to feed the chikins.

          Now I jus' dun know what we gon do.

          Help us, @kenburns!

          https://x.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1987740099430232092

          1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

            Hmmmph. I’ll bet you’ve never ridden a train in yer life!

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              Whereas many of our leftist commenters have trains run on them, regularly.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          How do you survive without knowing about daily NYC life?

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            Quite merrily. Though I am interested in seeing the results of the Mamdani administration.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              John Carpenter already covered that back in 1981 with his documentary about the future of NYC.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                He was only off by three decades.

    4. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Not a joke: Legitimate mentally handicapped person works at the nearest local grocery store/pharmacy that's more than 1/2 mi. away. They also live more than 1/2 mi. from it.

      Under a mile, unless half the building are over 10 stories, is guaranteed to be beyond saturated.

      It's plainly dishonest social manipulation. Complaining about the distance to the nearest drug store specifically against the wishes of people who don't want to impoverish themselves living right above a drug store.

      If Nick Gillespie doesn't want rural Americans to feel left behind and move to the cities, why doesn't he expose these dishonest retards for what they are?

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Ironically, most rural A,Erica’s feel they’ve left the urbanites behind.

    5. Eeyore   2 months ago

      My nearest bus stop is over half a mile away. If we had drug stores every 1/4 mile there would be too many damn drug stores. Stupidest take ever. Why did Reason need to link to that? I already feel dumber.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        When I lived in metro-ATL, nearest bus stop was about 1.1 miles from my house. Of course, that bus didn't go anywhere near where I needed it to go if I wanted to, say, ride the bus to commute to work. I could literally walk the 4.9 miles from home to the office faster than I could walk 1.1 miles in the other direction to catch a bus, that about 45 minutes later would put me at the main transfer station, only to catch another bus that eventually did go actually very close to the office. Burning about 1/4 gallon per day (diesel car got 39MPG) and an 8-12 minute commute was far preferable.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Pfffft. No excuse.

          Culture war bigot.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Liz needs to get her family the hell out of NYC. And for a whole host of reasons that go far beyond Mamdummy.

    6. Chumby   2 months ago

      MAGA deplorables don’t ride buses so they should be 100% safe and effective.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Ain’t that the truth!

      2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Having Whites Only busses would increase ridership.

    7. CountmontyC   2 months ago

      Or order online and have the medicines delivered maybe? Really, regular prescription refills can be delivered via USPS. I have been able to refill prescriptions while sitting on my couch and receive them within 48 hours. If you don't wait until the last minute you are perfectly fine. Even then they can FedEx it if you need it sooner. Only the initial prescription actually needs a consult with the pharmacist. After that you only really need to go to your mailbox .

  3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    BBC director does something a US media CEO would never do, steps down after it was revealed the BBC altered J6 video footage to lie about trump.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Lies Reason was still repeating last week.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Facts change

  4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Long but worth reading. Short of it.

    The Dutch Line:

    We’re sending nearly $200 billion a year in subsidies to insurance companies and “nonprofit” hospitals, while they charge us a fortune on top of that and we still can’t afford basic medical care.

    Read the entire thing on the failure of ACA.

    https://x.com/DutchRojas/status/1987136491940651166

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      But the right people are getting rich along the way.

    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      But it was a big fucking deal! The genius Biden said so.

    3. Chumby   2 months ago

      Congress had to pass the bill to find out what was inside the bill.

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      100% the fault of democrats. Although I blame Ryan and McConnell for it getting rid of it when we had the chance. That shitweasel McCain too, along with Flake.

  5. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    whether those who have been killed were, in fact, involved in the drug trade.

    If you are on a boat filled with drugs, you might be a drug trafficker.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      Do they check the wreckage to make sure there were really drugs there? I don't really doubt much that they are drug boats (whether that justifies blowing them up is another matter), but government has been known to get things wrong.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        They recovered hundreds of kilos each one. Packages are designed to float. There were stories about each one.

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          OK. That's something, anyway.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Here is one of the stories.

            https://www.newsweek.com/first-us-dominican-joint-anti-drug-mission-navy-cocaine-2133480

            These ops are in coordination woth countries like the DR.

        2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Each one? Bullshit. Only one so far has confirmed cocaine (not fentanyl) onboard.

          1. Dillinger   2 months ago

            I went out searching & found zero cocaines

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Maybe I'm missing a joke here, but just in case...It's in Jesse's link.

              1. Dillinger   2 months ago

                admittedly I am my best audience.

              2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                Dillinger’s coke is in Jesse’s link?

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  Actually, my guess is Dillinger's coke is in his office desk top drawer, front and center.

                  1. Dillinger   2 months ago

                    lol the last time I did coke was the last time because I couldn't come down so I swore it off

                    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Moved to Texas to get away from more than one type of NJ snow, eh?

            2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              I found one and a half cocaines. Plus a quarter of a fentanyl.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      I'm sorry. But fish love cocaine. It is probably the best bait one can use.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        Actually, in that king of the hill episode he used meth

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          “Fish just for for that meth I tell you what”

        2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

          I remember that episode. And it was crack, not meth.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            You’re right. The meth episode was about Kahnie’s cousin from out of town manipulating Bobby into getting supplies and equipment so she could cook some.

            1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

              I didn't like King of the Hill that much, and only watched a few episodes, of which that was one.

              I also didn't like Bevis and Butthead.

              Mike Judge's movie Idiocracy was great, though, IMO.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Did you ever see the KotH episode where Arlen mandates low flow toilets? Season 4, Episode 22 if you haven’t. Great takedown of crooked crony government. My father couldn’t get into adult animated series much, but he loved that one. He also really liked Archer.

      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Sequel to the movie about the bear on coke could be a fun summer romp about a shark on coke.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Especially if it’s chasing people around the forest. I’d watch the hell out of that.

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Can't imagine there is a fisherman from a third world nation running 4 outboards to check long lines.

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        No, it's American bass fishermen who run four outboards.

    4. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      If you tell your wife you are going off to fish, and you're headed to North America at over 40mph, you might be a drug trafficker

      1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        If you have more than one relative named after a drug kingpin, you might be a drug trafficker.

        If your girlfriend can't wear any clothes at the packing plant, you might be a drug trafficker

        If your severance package comes with your limbs getting severed, you might be a drug trafficker

        1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

          If your abuela doesn't take the cig from her lips as she tells the DEA chinga tu madre, you might be a drug trafficker

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        The wives all admitted they were drug runners. They needed a burkin bag.

    5. diver64   2 months ago

      If your on an open water "fishing boat" that has no fishing gear, sports $75,000 in boat motors and is miles from shore you might not be a fisherman

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        But Quixy is certain they are!

    6. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      If you are on a boat filled with drugs, you might be a drug trafficker.

      I dunno. When I watch On Patrol Live, the drugs in the cars they pull over never belong to anyone in the car.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Yeah, they always blame it on the bear in the trunk.

  6. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Not just Medicaid and public hospital funds going to Healthcare of illegals, also directed grants.

    https://justthenews.com/government/congress/almost-200-million-federal-health-related-grants-benefited-illegal-immigrants

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      LOL more scapegoating of the illegals. "Money benefitting illegals" includes things like grants on how to expand access to health care to EVERYONE. Yes that includes illegal immigrants but it is completely dishonest to claim that the purpose of these grants was to directly benefit them.

      What's next, will Team MAGA release a new "study" which shows that funding for public roads "benefits illegals" too?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Again, Jeffy tries to conflate illegal aliens with legal immigration and other needs.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          You would think jeff would realize that after a full decade of retarded leftist propaganda here and only catching one retard drunk in Maine, his idiocy doesn't work. But he persists.

      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Look at Lying Jeffy support government subsidized healthcare just to own Jesse.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          He supports it anyway. But also he has a pathological hatred towards Jesse.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          He would support all forms of government socialism if i was here or not. His most consistent argument is more government spending.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Why do you come here just to lie, every day?

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          He can’t find anyone to pay him fifty cents for every cookie he eats.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            If he could make that business model work, his wealth would rival Musk.

        2. Chumby   2 months ago

          Other forums wouldn’t have him.

      4. damikesc   2 months ago

        "LOL more scapegoating of the illegals."

        Yes. Did ANYBODY vote to provide public monies to people who do not belong here?

        You are free to finance it if you so wish to...but you ALONE would do it. Do not demand MY money to make you feel better about yourself.

        ""Money benefitting illegals" includes things like grants on how to expand access to health care to EVERYONE. Yes that includes illegal immigrants"

        No, it does not. If they even mentioned it as a possibility, such monies would never be approved.

        Radical collectivist.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Next up: damikesc comes out opposed to public roads because "they benefit illegals".

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

            I thought true libertarians didn't want public roads at all?

          2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

            So you support socialized healthcare, and now you're trying to dunk on libertarians for not supporting more govt by using the leftist line about "public roads"?

            1. DesigNate   2 months ago

              He’s totally not a leftist. Just because he uses tired reddit talking points doesn’t prove anything!

          3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

            Public roads? Illegals?

            What are they, some kind of culture war bigots or something?

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          There is no doubt that free and open immigration is the right policy in a libertarian state, but in a welfare state it is a different story: the supply of immigrants will become infinite. - Milton Friedman

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            So,where within Peod Jeffy’s voluminous folds of blubber, he has a lil’ boner after reading that.

      5. Chumby   2 months ago

        So libertarian.

      6. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        What’s next, will team jeffy abandon the nonsense that illegals pay more in taxes than they take?

        Lol. Not likely,

  7. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Maduro has opened the door to leaving power if he and his top military command are offered amnesty, the rewards for their capture are eliminated, and they are assured a "comfortable exile.”

    Why, did they do something wrong?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      They can move in woth Sean Penn and the other fans of his.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        I don’t think it works that with leftists. Unless Maduro is still somehow useful. If not, he will be thrown away like rotting garbage. Just look at Cindy Sheehan.

    2. HorseConch   2 months ago

      Maybe he can talk to Hunter about securing a pardon.

    3. Chumby   2 months ago

      Didn’t even know the Fed could increase its number of board members.

  8. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Who, specifically, has died from the U.S. strikes on alleged narcotrafficking boats? The Associated Press has a long investigation attempting to piece together whether those who have been killed were, in fact, involved in the drug trade.

    And what did they find liz? They were. But AP tried shifting to they werent the cartel leaders. No shit.

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      AP doesn't find things, they make things up.

    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      The cartel leaders weren’t actually driving the boats? Talk about leading from behind, losers!

    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      And what did they find liz?

      Of those identified: One was a fisherman struggling to eke out a living on $100 a month. Another was a career criminal. A third was a former military cadet. And a fourth was a down-on-his-luck bus driver.

      But because they accepted ~$500 to move commodities from a voluntary seller to a voluntary buyer they were killed for a crime that we don't execute people for even with trials and appeals.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        “But because they accepted ~$500 to move commodities”

        So they were, in fact, involved in the drug trade.

        You realize you can just make the argument you are against doing this without using the dishonest framing from the left, right?

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          So they were, in fact, involved in the drug trade. </i?

          Yes.

          You realize you can just make the argument you are against doing this without using the dishonest framing from the left, right?

          Yes. As I have been doing since this started. That's why I was honest above noting that these guys were involved in the drug trade.

          These people are not doing anything worthy of death and the US historically does not punish crimes without legal proceedings, especially execution.

          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            “But because they accepted ~$500 to move commodities”

            You see qb, this doesn’t fool anyone. Except yourself, apparently.

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              What fooling? It's from the link.

              Most of the nine men were crewing such craft for the first or second time, making at least $500 per trip, residents and relatives said. They were laborers, a fisherman, a motorcycle taxi driver. Two were low-level career criminals. One was a well-known local crime boss who contracted out his smuggling services to traffickers.

              1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                So you have fooled yourself. Sad.

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  Like any of it matters. There really is no polishing this turd. They’re international drug smuggling narcoterrorists. All of the excuses don’t matter, and I’m not sure why Quixy feels compelled to die in this hill.

                  1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                    Which leftist narrative hill doesn't he die on? In the famous words of qb, you get used to it.

                2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  So you have fooled yourself

                  Please explain what you mean.

                  1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                    I think he’s referring to your penchant for being willfully obtuse. Because Orangemanbad. Which has utterly destroyed whatever credibility you once had,

                    Do you feel good about yourself? Being a useful idiot for the likes of Sandy Cortez and Chuck Schumer?

                    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Nope. He's covering.

                    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      No, I’m right. Now, do you believe America has a right to it’s sovereignty?

          2. See.More   2 months ago

            These people are not doing anything worthy of death and the US historically does not punish crimes without legal proceedings, especially execution.

            The problem you're running into is your framing. Your argument isn't wrong. You're having the wrong argument.

            These "drug boat" sinkings are not, per the administration, about punishing crimes. Rather, by declaring the narcos "terrorists," Trump has trumped up justification to engage them with military action per the War on Terror.

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              I'm not beholden to Trump's dishonest framing though, am I? Because that's pretty much a settled matter. The article is clear on debunking Trump's framing that these guys are narcoterrorists. They're low level drug runners.

              So I reframed the argument to match reality and and to counter the framing of arguments from commenters here, that these guys are drug traffickers and (thus one infers) justifiable slayings.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                High level narcoterrorists are in management and don’t go out on drug runs anymore. You might as well excuse mafia contract killers becasie they aren’t John Gotti.

                It’s a bad argument. Quit trying to make narcoterrorists work.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  High level narcoterrorists are in management and don’t go out on drug runs anymore.

                  I know. The policy is designed to kill low level criminals without due process.

                  You might as well excuse mafia contract killers becasie they aren’t John Gotti.

                  We don't kill contract killers without trials.

                  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

                    Are you certain?

                    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      I'm certain it's not official policy.

                    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

                      Uh huh, go on….

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          But Mike gets all his framing from the left. Then cuts its dick off, puts it in a dress, and calls it libertarian.

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            OK then

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        In addition to being narcoterrorists, they’re international smugglers. Or do you not believe America has a right to it’s sovereignty?

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Is it warmer in the summer than it is in the city?

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Do you believe America has a right to its sovereignty? It’s a simple yer or no question. Why are you afraid to answer?

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              It's not relevant to our discussion.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Yes it is. Answer the question. I think you know by now I won’t relent. Or just admit you’re too scared to answer me.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  No. Not answering.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                    Yeah!

                  2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                    What do you have to hide? The likely event is that you don’t believe in American sovereignty, but are too gutless to stand by your beliefs.

                    Don’t you worry, I’ll keep along the question.

            2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Do you support the drug war?

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                I support eliminating international drug traffickers who try to enter our country just like I support all anti smuggling efforts.

                Now answer my fucking question. Do you believe America has a right to its sovereignty? Or are you afraid to answer?

                If you’re too scared of me to answer, just say so. You leftists are often too frightened of me to respond. Just ask Sarc why he’s been ducking me here for the last three years.

              2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Do you believe in American Sovereignty?

  9. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    The New York Times reports that Trump is in the process of granting preemptive pardons to Rudy Giuliani and others, including John Eastman and Sidney Powell, who were involved in his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

    Reminder. If you question suspicious votes you are trying to overturn elections. Thisnis terrible Liz. Government went out of its way to criminalize anyone seeking to validate ballots and returns. There were no crimes. There was a demand for an actual audit.

    1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

      It is important to remember this.

      The Dems for years had claimed that Trump colluded with the Russians®™ to steal the 2016 election.

      Crimes were committed to further this narrative. The Clinton campaign admitted to the FEC their violation of campaign finance laws. An FBI lawyer actually altered evidence to obtain a warrant.

      And there were 51 intelligence agents who signed that laptop letter, knowing it was a lie.

      So this raises the question.

      What would not they do to get FJB elected?

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        The real question is this:

        I won’t all of that, why do we allow the democrat party to exist at all?

  10. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    Who, specifically, has died from the U.S. strikes...

    Aspiring Maryland fathers.

  11. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...The Associated Press has a long investigation attempting to piece together whether those who have been killed were, in fact, involved in the drug trade..."

    Gee, why not some trusted source like NTY or WaPo?

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Maybe Rachel Maddow could investigate too.

  12. NealAppeal   2 months ago

    "This health care crisis that we created is so severe, so urgent, so devastating for families back home that I cannot in good faith support this," said Schumer from the Senate floor.

    FTFY

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Democrats still pretending they didnt cause the crisis.

    2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      It's rather rich that when the shoe is on the other foot, say with a tax cut about to expire, the left unequivocally says that it's the fault of the Rs who passed it for having it expire in 5 years, so the Ds don't have to extend it. And by not extending it, it's not the Ds raising taxes.

      Now the subsidies for Obamacare are about to expire, and the Ds say that it's Rs raising prices for insurance.

  13. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    The New York Times reports that Trump is in the process of granting preemptive pardons to Rudy Giuliani and others, including John Eastman and Sidney Powell, who were involved in his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

    Of those three names on the list, if any of them is guilty of sedition, it is John Eastman. He wrote a memo literally asking the Vice President to knowingly ignore the law and ignore the Constitution and hand over the presidency to his boss.

    But remember, sedition is only bad when the other team does it.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      He asked for a novel interpretation of the law. I thought you loved those when used to keep Trump out of power.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        The law to jeff is just a weapon to use against his enemies. Nothing more.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Pure projection. You are the one who quotes title and chapter when it comes to laws that you support but who proudly ignores the laws that you don't support (i.e. laws on asylum).

          1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

            You mean the law on asylum that says you must stop and claim in the first safe country?
            Who here ignores that?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              the law on asylum that says you must stop and claim in the first safe country

              You forgot the rest of it

              ... with which the US has a treaty declaring that country to be a safe country for purposes of asylum.

              Gee, I wonder how you could have made such an omission? It's a total mystery.

              BTW the only country that has a treaty with the US of this type is Canada.

              So yes, you and your team do ignore the law when it suits you.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Nope. Try gain you Fatfuck Shitweasel.

            2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              Don't know what the grey box said, but I can say there is no such law. The first-safe haven is a guideline, and countries may refuse refugees who did not apply for asylum in first-safe countries. But the US does not have that policy (even if some of us think it should!).

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                Jeffy was trying to call the efforts to look into the 2020 election sedition.

          2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            You’re not exactly one to speak about projection here, Jeff. Projection has been your modus operandi here for years.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      This is a hilariously retarded post. Do you even know what sedition is? Eastman gave legal advice. I get you want to lock up any lawyer who gives advice to your enemies, but youre really demonstrating what an evil piece of shit you are.

      Youre basically a modern day Stalin supporter. You support murder for trespassing, sedition for legal advice, 20 years for "bad" protestors (Catholics, school board moms, paraders, pro life protestors). Youre truly evil.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Eastman gave legal advice advocating for knowingly disregarding the law and the Constitution. When Biden ignored the Constitution to mandate vaccines or to try to cancel student loans you threw a fit. But when one of your guys does it, you just call it "legal advice".

        You are the one who is going along with, and openly propagandizing for, an authoritarian regime. If anyone is an open sympathizer for a certain 20th century ideology, once popular in Germany and Italy, it's you.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Again, another false analogy, comparing anyone who questions the “cleanest election ever” with fascists. Just how is this an authoritarian regime, Jeffy, when they’ve been actively trying to get rid of federal personnel and regulations?

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Jeff has been clear. Holding government officials who work for democrats accountable is illegal. Having clean elections or asking to is a crime.

            Everything jeff posts is in defense of the weaponozation of government by his team.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              JesseBot: "I and my team are entitled to do whatever we want because we are the real Americans and the real patriots. And if anyone disagrees or complains, then we will scream about how victimized we are and yell at them for being insufficiently patriotic."

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                Your analogy, as usual, was a piece of shit, and then you just go for the insult after being called out for it.

              2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Poor morbidly obese red diaper baby.

          2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            The morbidly obese pedophile does love his false analogies. He’s already used several just this morning. And let’s not forget his ‘bears in trunks’ humiliation.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              https://reason.com/podcast/2021/10/25/freedom-responsibility-and-coronavirus-policy/?comments=true#comment-9176512

              This link will be on my gravestone it brings me so much joy.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                Given Jeffy, I’m amazed that the Bears in Trunks comment is still his worst analogy ever. He’s come close since.

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  He’s gotten steadily more shrill and nasty. So he will eventually top himself.

                  1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                    His jacking off on a rape victim and saying sorry isn't a crime or deportable is up there.

                    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                      He is pretty despicable. In some ways he’s even more vile than Shrike. Which is really saying something.

                      And you just know those two are trading child rape videos.

                    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                      I'm inclined to agree that Jeffy is more vile than Shrike. Shrike at least comes out and says what he is, even if he's in deep denial about why his account was permabanned. Jeffy couches it in loads of bullshit made to sound smart and/or intelligent. He then uses plenty of whataboutism and poorly constructed analogies to make his argument look superior. When you actually dig into his arguments, you can see they're chock full of shit.

              2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                I especially love how it irritates him when it’s brought up. Not our fault he’s a persistent lying Marxist retard.

    3. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

      Of those three names on the list, if any of them is guilty of sedition, it is John Eastman. He wrote a memo literally asking the Vice President to knowingly ignore the law and ignore the Constitution and hand over the presidency to his boss.
      So what?

      It is not as bad as what Kevin Clinesmith did.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        That, of course, would be (D)ifferent.

    4. Chumby   2 months ago

      Lock up the lawyers who questioned whether the emperor was wearing the cleanest clothes ever.

  14. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

    This explains why Cato and Reason abandoned everything but the pretense of libertarianism.
    It's important that you visit the DataRepublican thread yourself, as every spaced line has a extremely important link below it. (Yes, even you, Lying Jeffy. You'll get to see the big picture behind your efforts).

    DataRepublican (small r)
    @DataRepublican·22h

    International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution

    This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call.

    Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn't new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year.

    But what's not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as "a global anti-authoritarian movement," connecting U.S. officials with "colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly."

    They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, "international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces," and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism.

    At what point does this become treason?

    As always, patience as I pull together this thread.

    Note at the end of the video, the "we" in reference to organizing the February 5th protests - that was organized by Soros-backed groups 50501 and Indivisible. This is the first solid link I've found connecting the No Kings movement, State Department, and Soros together.

    Ro Tucci herself goes onto talk about bringing in international actors to assist with the color revolution. Their role is going to be "mobilizing around corruption" ... what does that mean?

    They justify the international aspect by claiming that the authoritarians are already globally networked.

    @SenTomCotton , @LindseyGrahamSC , @joniernst , @DanSullivan_AK - you are in the International Republican Institute. Are you aware of this effort?

    Lest you think it is harmless, they outright admit their goal is to create new "socio-political economic governance systems." If that's not a coup, I don't know what is.

    In partnership with @iamlisalogan and @SKDoubleDub33 - here's a thread from last night outlining what these new governance systems look like - national servitude, mass censorship, bottom-up transformation of elections:

    I encourage you to watch this video to the end to understand just what a massive effort this is. This is the master plan being laid out -- reinventing US governance from the bottom up. The man speaking in this video, Stephen Heintz, is the architect and is the president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. He is also part of the New Pluralists, who @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan exposed as being directly linked to the color revolution involved ex-USAID employees.

    And this is the origin story thread - how this started with the billionaire network of Soros, Koch, Ford, Rockefeller, and more, and how Charlie Kirk became an existential threat to them:

    This is their core ecosystem. I did not build this map. Most dots represent a separate NGO. And this is only a partial list and does not include actors such as DemAID.

    Yes, why are we financing our own coup?

    The entire purpose of this is to eliminate populists from public discourse and make sure Trump never happens again. This excerpt is from Eric Liu's book, who along with Rockefeller President Stephen Heintz architected One Common Purpose.

    This is it.
    This is the grand master conspiracy you've been sensing, but couldn't find.
    It's a supranational network of "democracy" technocrats flush with countless billions and hundreds of thousands of full time employees.
    Their real target is you.

    I don't think I emphasized this enough - the first video mentions that USAID's Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI).

    USAID’s Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) is not a domestic civic-engagement bureau. They operate under Section 491 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to stabilize other nations in crisis - think Ukraine.
    @HarmeetKDhillon and @EagleEdMartin may want to see if this prohibits them from pperating under domestic civic engagement.

    Hard to appreciate the scale of this effort. Every blue dot is a NGO.

    John Steiner - vice-chair of the Mediators Foundation who along with Stephen Heintz organized the meeting from 2017 years ago with billionaires to set a new direction for America. See he works with Robert Fuller on the Dignity Movement.

    This is the same Robert Fuller who proposed the existence of an AmerRuss in 1986, joining Russia's "substance rights" with America's "process rights" ...

    Basically, Communism except we'll make it work this time.

    And there you have it full circle. Communism in the end.
    @JoshuaLisec

    Our clips were independently compiled from public, verifiable sources. We have no evidence anyone else shared this exact recording. I credit @SKDoubleDub33
    @iamlisalogan for helping point to them, and used ffmpeg to rip the m3u8 files.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

      The Democrat Party as we know it today would cease to exist if the following three measures were implemented:

      1. Nation-wide voter ID with in-person, same-day voting except for true absentee situations.

      2. End tax exempt status for ALL 501(c)(X)s (even religious, because if we leave that they will abuse it).

      3. Continue Trump's enforcement of existing immigration laws until we have rolled back all damage done over the last ten years.

      Seriously, literally all we need to do is these three things, and America will be transformed back into the Constitutional Republic it was always intended to be.

      It's just that easy.

      1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

        The important things in life are simple.
        The simple things in life are hard.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Re: 1...

        I personally have enjoyed my in-person early voting (~2 weeks before election day), where my ID is checked and everything is the same as election day except the lines.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          This is how it should be. I have zero issues with a 2 or even 3 weeks drop off period that has the same requirements as election day.

          1. Dillinger   2 months ago

            balance it. make Voting Day a national holiday.

            1. HorseConch   2 months ago

              Do that and allow early if it's secure, ID required, and in person.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Or just get rid of the democrat party and throw them in prison. Then we don’t hav ego worry so much.

            2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

              And federal employees get yet another paid holiday. And they'll all call in sick on Monday. Four day weekend! Whoo hoo!

              1. Dillinger   2 months ago

                SIEU et al. take Friday --> Tuesday off to enact properly the voting fraud policies

        2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          Why should voting be easy? The easier it gets the more stupid, feeble lazy people get to decide the taxes you will pay and authoritarian bullshit you will have to deal with. I voted absentee for years because I was never in town on Tuesday. But it wasn't easy. I had to request a ballot, fill out the additional paperwork and get it mailed in time to arrive by election day. The Democrats are pushing for lowering the voting age to 16 after already giving voting rights to illegal foreigners. We are way down the slippery slope. Fuck this bullshit. If some fuck head wants to raise my taxes so they can get a fat welfare check the least they can do is get up on election day and stand in line.

    2. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

      It's Globalist Fascism. There is no more concise way to label it.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Closer to globalist authoritarianism.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Pedo. Jeffy’s wet dream. Well, that and a Harlem of little illegal boys chained up for his perversions.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            ‘Harem’

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      (Yes, even you, Lying Jeffy.)

      No way in hell he reads all this. He’ll read just enough to find something he can throw fallacies at, or he won’t read it at all.

    4. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Related, and awfully insurectiony:

      Chicago Mayor Johnson asks the United Nations to intervene and stop ICE

      https://x.com/DefiantLs/status/1987938302922813614

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        First reply says look into his brainless eyes. I've done so and reached the conclusion that the people of Chicago have literally handed their government to a retard. I mean a full blown mentally defective idiot. He's not a charming stealthy evil character like Mamdani. He's barely able to function.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          They’ve fallen far. Like them; hate them; Rich Daley and Rahm at least had functional brains. This fucker is just a tool of the CTU.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          They had a drive by shooting on ICE in Chicago. Luckily the judge will declare it a peaceful protest so no need for nat guard.

        3. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

          Yes but Beetlejuice-Beetlejuice-Beetlejuice wasn't the sharpest tack either. I'd say that this is more of a lateral move than a downward one.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        That’s treason. Arrest him.

  15. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

    Well if Schumer Jeffries and Warren want something I am by default against it.

    How do you suppose they will react when the intergalactic aliens arrive on December 19th? I say they’ll be open borders all the way.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      The aliens from war of the world's would have won if only they wore a mask

  16. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Perhaps SCOTUS needs to do more than tell (D)imwit appellate justices to STFU:

    "Government shutdown drags on as Supreme Court blocks SNAP order for Trump: Recap"
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/government-shutdown-drags-on-as-supreme-court-blocks-snap-order-for-trump-recap/ar-AA1PZJ8N?ocid=BingNewsSerp

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      It wasn't "The Supreme Court"...it was Justice Brown Jackson.

      https://www.newsweek.com/ketanji-brown-jackson-snap-benefit-ruling-sparks-division-11017742

      The stay, granted late Friday night by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in her role as circuit justice for the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, halts the use of a separate Department of Agriculture (USDA) nutrition account to fund benefits while the appeals court considers the administration’s request to repeal the lower court's order.

  17. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    I know bears in trunks are dangerous, but there is a far worse threat out there

    https://notthebee.com/article/watch-this-black-bear-wander-off-with-a-tennessee-mans-chainsaw

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Still less dangerous than unmasked beats during covid.

      1. HorseConch   2 months ago

        Why bring Toobin into this? He returned after his unmasked beating.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      I smell a Cocaine Bear sequel.

      ‘Cocaine Bear with a Chainsaw’

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        But will it jump out of a trunk?

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Yes! Several trunks! The protagonists will be trapped in a full parking complex. Never knowing which cars have bear filled trunks. Lots of jump scares.

          It could even be called ‘The Jeffening’.

    3. Chumby   2 months ago

      The saw owner must have been choked up about it.

  18. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

    "The package also includes a provision that would reverse layoffs of federal workers made during the shutdown and ensure retroactive pay."

    Gee, remember when all of that was going to be permanent and this shutdown was going to shrink the government? Instead we just gave government parasites a month of paid vacation. Tell me again what purpose congressional Republicans serve.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Doesn't stop them from being fired next year. That's the inferior judges stopping it.

    2. Eeyore   2 months ago

      Anyone who didn't work obviously isn't essential and should just be cut.

      I could see paying the people who did show up without pay double time.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    A group of Democrats broke with their party late last night and voted with the Republicans...

    Senators, with their six year terms, won't even have to put through struggle sessions for their constituents over this.

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      Broke with their party my ass.
      The democrats selected those senators so they could pretend the party did not cave in.
      I nave not followed this in detail, but i suspect there will be just enough "defections" to permit passage, while most dems can maintain their socialist bona fides.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        Agree. Deals were cut inside the caucus.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        It was exactly 8 dem votes.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        "Oh shit, if even KJB is going to thwart our lawsuits and rogue judges..."

      4. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

        Yup 2 not seeking reelection and a couple "independents" yeah right, who caucus with dems, so dems.

        And Fetterman. The only reasonable voice on the left side.

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          Are you saying it takes a stroke to cure TDS?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            Can we test it on Sarc?

          2. DesigNate   2 months ago

            Based on Fetterman’s performance since his hospital stay? Yes, that seems to be the only cure.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    In essence, this means that the Democrats have negotiated their way back to what they had when this started.

    TRUMP JUST CAN'T STOP WINNING.

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Until he shows up to the Lions V Redskins game rooting for the Redskins! Ha!

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        I don't mind Trump losing there. Hopefully the Eagles prevail tonight.

  21. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

    DemJeff getting abused early and often this AM, you wonder why he keeps at it

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      How else does he get paid by Media Matters?

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        I think they lay him in 55 gallon drums of Ben & Jerry’s. My guess is that he is fresh out, with nothing to gorge on. So he’s having sugar withdrawals, coupled with a. Edd to get his comment/response count passed the next threshold to receive another 55 gallon drum.

        I wonder it if it would fuck up his arrangement if everyone here ghosted him for a month?

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      He’s into the humiliation.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Only time people talk to him.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          He’s probably much worse in person. 400 lbs, of shambling Marxist asshole.

      2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        DemJeff exists at the center of both a Knowledge Desert and an Honesty Desert

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Qb is doing his best to take some of the heat off jeff.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          And any space he occupies (12XL footprint) becomes a dessert desert within moments of his arrival.

    3. Chumby   2 months ago

      In the comments, he plays the role of the heavy.

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        Fat chance!

      2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        He's on a roll.

  22. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

    Just for the Miseks in our midst by a real libertarian, not a Reason liberal-tartian.

    https://x.com/ludwignvermises/status/1987655006871236776?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    1/3

    Brett is correct the ideas must be challenged.

    But the idea that’s the problem isn’t bigotry, it’s Jewish supremacy.

    Trying to convince someone to not be bigoted without addressing the core contention is not a satisfactory responses to the claim that Jews are responsible for all the bad things in your life.

    If someone thinks that Jews are responsible for the destruction of society through Marxism, pornography, mass immigration all the Middle East wars and the general degradation of or culture then they aren’t gonna care about whether anti semitism is good or bad.

    You can love Jews, have many Jewish friends or be a Jew and it would still be a problem.

    Increasingly people are willing to engage, but very few of them are taking on the core arguments outside of “bigotry bad”. In fact they are often reinforcing them indirectly.

    Leaning into the idea that Israel controls US foreign policy looks like a way for Tucker to avoid getting outflanked by Fuentes, but it just brought Tuckers audience one step closer to accepting Nicks premise of Jewish control.

    A premise that would have otherwise been very hard for many conservatives and libertarians to ever accept without first adopting the mental model of Israeli control from trusted sources. I know because I’ve watched half my friends fall to this mind virus.

    You can’t beat Nick playing a half assed version of his own game.

    Saying Israel controls US foreign policy is even more farfetched than the narrative of Jewish control which can at least be hypothetically connected to larger institutions outside of the nation state of Israel.

    Empire is not motivated by allies it is motivated by hegemony and all the special interests that come along with it.

    Our empire originated in progressive era interventionism. We never stopped expanding global hegemony after the Cold War.

    Unless you go all the way you get outflanked. So it’s better to be honest about our own responsibility towards the Middle East. Rather than leverage a powerful rhetorical lines around Israel first to carry out a vendetta against Israel or try to win media wars on the new right at the expense of us all.

    None of this is helping us beat Lindsey Graham, it entrenches his establishment position and pushes him into being further endeared by MAGA, while we fracture the right and advance Nick without his core addition to the conversation being challenged.

    Israel does not control US foreign policy.

    The people who predicted war with Iran on this basis were wrong.

    As general Wesley Clark stated after the fall of the Soviet Union we immediately targeted the 7 former Soviet client state in the Middle East that were high value targets, outside our hegemony and easy pickings post Cold War.

    These are countries outside our banking system, our regulatory system, our tax standardization, our currency monopoly and with key resources in a global choke point. Europe still doesn’t have an external pipeline outside of from Russia.

    Nothing stopped us from ME regime changes until Russia came back in to prop up Assad for a bit in the same pattern of the Cold War.

    The original excuse for the Middle East wars was that it was to protect America from people who hated us for our freedom.

    That wasn’t believable and people said naw it was for oil. So they then leaned on the ‘well we need to help our allies’ line.

    But then people got so mad about that they might as well just admit it was for oil and more broadly hegemony in the former Soviet controlled countries. But the neocons can’t admit that which leaves room for narratives of Jewish control.

    Netenyahu got into power as our stooge while the rest of the Israeli gov was against the Iraq war and he kept playing the part even after we stopped when Trump beat the neocons.

    But it doesnt matter because we control what we do and Trump (who was against the Iraq war when it was happening) ended the Iran war with a no casually nuclear stike that took out the neocons war excuse.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Part 2:

      https://x.com/ludwignvermises/status/1987655011598532622?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

      2/3

      He handed Gaza off the the regional arab elites getting them on board for development and dooming Hamas. There will be no major middle east wars and Israel doesn't control the US government.

      Israel doesn't matter, America does and splitting the right over Palestine who are better off with the current arrangment makes no sense outside of a counterproductive attachment to the issue. It’s over, the Middle East is not dragging us into a race war.

      Time to focus on actually giving people an opportunity for a meaningful adventure in America, before the lost generations run ouf time to start living their lives.

      Argumentation is useful but fixing our own problems is key. And if you think the only problem with the bureaucracy is that “Jews run it” then you are never gonna figure out the correct solutions.

      The west has its own civilizational trajectory take some pride and responsibility for your own heritage.

      The theory of Jewish supremacy is even crazier than white supremacy and more like the 1619 project as it credits jews for the trajectory of American history.

      The thing the left never understood was the problem with white supremacy wasn’t the whiteness. It was the socialism. We are responsible for both the light and the shadow of our own civilization.

      If you are abandoning American values of freedom you aren’t helping the cost of living crises, the empire problem or the debt regardless of whether you’re white or not.

      The west has gone through numerous revivals and iterations of this process. It didn’t start in the 60’s because of a few Jewish immigrants.

      The progressive era and metaphorical death of god were over 100 years ago. This set the inevitable course of our domestic and foreign imperialism.

      The consequences of civilizational collapse are entirely predictable.

      Sodom and Gomorrah is one of the oldest stories in the world, we did not descend into degeneracy because Jews tricked us with the TV’s we invented.

      The left has trained the whole of society to think like victims. When you plug that mental model in on the right this is the result.

      It’s beyond embarrassing that progressive ideology got the descendants of the Vikings, William Wallace and the American revolution to forget our own history and reduce our self image to being a “slave to the Jew.”

      Progressive voting patterns in New England correlate with the labour voting regions of England from which those Puritan settlers came.

      Puritan emphasis on collective action, public education, lack of tolerance for breaking with orthodoxy, predeterminism, egalitarianism and justice remain cornerstones of modern progressive ideology.

      They won the civil war. They created the Ivy League system from which people were selected to run the machinery of government, finance, media and industry.

      Woodrow Wilson, the first progressive president was a university professor and the president of Princeton.

      He instilled the income tax, the Federal Reserve and got the US involved in WW1.

      Around the same time, our modern regulatory bureaucracy was emerging out of the expanded federal powers granted by the interstate commerce commission formed in 1887.

      This managerial bureaucracy is often staffed by North Eastern Jews but they work to generate trillions of dollars, primarily for the progressive Anglo Saxon coastal elites who set it up.

      Everything progressive NY Jews said in the 60’s was said in the French Revolution. These are not external ideas, they are classic inversions of western values.

      The conservative Jews who didn’t adopt the progressive culture of the north east when they moved there were the Jews least likely to participate in this leftism.

      All of our failings were predicted by the founders.

      If the younger generations want a future you need to take some responsibility for your history and fix it.

      No one is stopping you. Success is not predicated on dealing with the “Jewish question.”

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Part 3:

        https://x.com/ludwignvermises/status/1987655014274543621?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

        3/3

        The system is not run by Jews, special interest are more than willing to scapegoat Jews if it divides and sends their opposition off target.

        The entire democrat party ignored their supposed AIPAC handlers as soon as it was in their interest. Most progressive Jews don’t even care about Israel so why should you.

        You can’t be on “both sides” of a totalizing conflict over global communism. The globalist seek to standardize international tax and regulatory regimes to insulate their respective oligarchies.

        We either break the dam and have a “race towards the bottom” as the socialist say, or we enter into global communist tyranny.

        Except instead of a race to the bottom it will be a race to the top towards prosperity, peace and the future.

        Oligarchical special interests and their socialist enablers want to protect the bureaucracy not the Jews.

        To operate on their level people need to realize socialism is the problem and it doesn’t work, with or without Jews.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          Nazi shitbag JohnZ has a sad.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Indeed.

        2. Roberta   2 months ago

          ...

          You can’t be on “both sides” of a totalizing conflict over global communism.

          You can if you're the British.

          For years I laughed at the NCLC's characterization of the British crown this way. 15 years ago I finally realized how right they were about this. They're still nuts about other matters, though. If you're wondering, I got early exposure to them at Columbia U. in the early 1970s, where LaRouche was a BMOC, then known as Lyn Marcus. Such a bewilderingly crazy bunch. And then it became vexing when people conflated the Labor Committees with the libertarian movement and especially the LP. (I phoned in to Barry Farber's show to ask LaRouche if he was as vexed by this confusion as we were. He said yes.) I don't think we escaped that confusion until about the middle 1990s.

          A friend of mine thinks the NCLC became so weird via the influence of Helga Zepp when she married LaRouche. I don't know; just look at his former associate, Fred Newman, who implemented an organizing gimmick LaRouche must've kicked himself for not thinking of first: social therapy.

        3. Dillinger   2 months ago

          >>... but it just brought Tuckers audience one step closer to accepting Nicks premise of Jewish control.

          lamppost both. rotten vegetable barrage until they agree to self-banishment.

    2. Roberta   2 months ago

      Sure, American imperialism grew out of progressivism, but that doesn't tell you the direction it's being steered in or who's steering. Did it ever occur to you that the same Zionist Revisionists have been at work on both Israeli and American policy? It's not like "the Jews" can be so easily fingered by such a description. More Jews have been victims than perpetrators.

      Overall, though, it's the British Foreign Office that's maneuvered and so fucked up both the US State Dept. and Israel. And fucked up numerous other parts of the world.

  23. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Two words in UC Berkeley grant application have led to defunding of 50-year-old program"
    "Equity" and "Inclusion"...
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/two-words-uc-berkeley-grant-120012973.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAKEmN4HuypD8J8jfS2mKFIJ3uFYUDlaJfaU1Hx5LiklrNV3YMjbGXrRMCNrTNV8eAlrleX0UgCoelDXXMfLowqR_no1Gj3pHA7jm6vKHddINBRxZUZbHnMM3qwp63doU2Dfzf4b4PgyytZDDkP5obSxi1UB8PjqTsMoQPoCzrJ5v

    Would have been easier if they just admitted to being scumbag racists.

  24. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Ripples,,man.

    https://archive.ph/L7sL8

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      God damn ripples. Amazing how Boehm, sarc, and stg all stopped using (who am I kidding, they never did) actually data to push their models generated beliefs.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        “The walls are closing in because of tariffs!”

  25. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

    A group of Democrats broke with their party late last night and voted with the Republicans...

    I thought the first rule of playing hardball was that you had to be willing to play hardball? This is why I have a hard time taking Dems seriously.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      the second rule of bread and circuses is don't join the circus.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        At times, it can be like walking a tightrope.

    2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      “This is why I have a hard time taking dems seriously.”

      Lol. Really? This is why, Libby? The whole “dudes can be chicks and everything is racist, and climate doom is imminent” stuff wasn’t enough for you, eh?

      Lol. What an idiot.

  26. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Sounds insurrectiony to me.

    Leftist planning a “Remove the Regime Rally” in DC between Nov 20 and 22 (I've seen different dates)...

    "We are gathering on 11/22 in Washington, D.C. to remove this regime. We hope you can find a way to join us. There is strength in numbers."

    https://rally.co/remove-the-regime-washington-dc

    Liberals are organizing a large-scale protest in Washington D.C. from November 20–22, called the “Remove the Regime Rally.” Activists plan to occupy congressional offices and demand President Trump’s impeachment. Authorities are preparing for potential unrest as the rally gains nationwide attention.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      How have they not hit protest fatigue? Oh yeah, jobs for many of them.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        These are their jobs as professional protesters. They’ll never be fatigued from it.

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          They are only fatigued when conducting covert operations.

    2. Dillinger   2 months ago

      >>Activists plan to occupy congressional offices

      how many agents from Flowers By Irene will help this time? will Dee Cee Metro shoot any servicemembers in the face?

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        So, they plan on doing 1/6 -- except with an ACTUAL desire to overthrow the government.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          how I read it.

          edit: T should remind them that morning to "march peacefully"

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          That seems to be the gist.

    3. Super Scary   2 months ago

      "Activists plan to occupy congressional offices "

      Maybe some more Capitol Police officers will get medals of honor.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        If one of them gets shot in the face, I wonder if certain people will be here arguing that they got what they deserved for trespassing?

    4. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Activists plan to occupy congressional offices ..

      Boots on the desk!

    5. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      Is the standard still that you can shoot people for trespassing? Or does that only go one way?

  27. Minadin   2 months ago

    - Minibus

    They should all qualify for the short bus.

  28. BioBehavioral_View   2 months ago

    Sliding Towards The Cliff

    The thieves are back in action in the District of Corruption. Hurrah!

    Rep. Jeffries (D) well my be right when he predicts that the Democrats will regain control of the House of Representatives. These United States have devolved from a vibrant democratic republic into a suicidal republican democracy. Accordingly, an increasing percentage of the population becomes financially dependent on government as the federal government slides towards the cliff of bankruptcy.

    “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” -President John Adams (1735-1826)

    More than forty-million people on "food-stamps"? Whence comes their "right" to shift wealth from the productive to the non-productive. Need? There's always need, and it's never ending always expanding.

    Even so, should the government provide a minimal, financial safety-net? Yes, minimal! Yes, provided those on the federal dole lose their entitlement (not right) to vote?

    “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can exist only until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury.” - Alexander Tyler (1747-1813)

    In the novel, Retribution Fever, the current, corrupt system administered by the Washingtonian Establishment has collapsed. The military has declared temporary marshal law. It deploys a comprehensive, revised, scientifically-based system reflecting the vision of the Founding Fathers. Solutions not complaints.

    "We, the members of the TMG (Temporary Military Government), have targeted a goal with regard to welfarism. It is to have secured in place a social safety-net that allows for reasonable and appropriate humane charity without progressively increasing governmental largesse for the unproductive."

    Meanwhile as is currently the case, the federal government under President Trump (the "king of debt"), will continue to slide toward insolvency. Only then will the system have the opportunity for real reform. Will it seize the opportunity as described in Retribution Fever? If not, the Chinese will rule the world. Guaranteed!

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Cool story bro.

    2. GroundTruth   2 months ago

      Groundtruth's welfare plan:

      Food: 1500 calories/day as bread, pasta or rice.... whichever is cheaper. Water as needed.

      Clothing: The shirt on your back.

      Shelter: Barracks, 16 to a hut.

      Voting rights: None, but restored once you produce more than the state (at any level) is providing to you.

  29. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    >Your friends with kids might not be able to do school pickup in an emergency, because they, too, might be working. '

    These idiots always looking for excuses.

    NOBODY DID PICKUPS. On an emergency or otherwise. You walked or took the city bus back to an empty home. You made a sandwich and you did some of your homework.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Latch key gen xer for the win!

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Yeah, the whole idea that kids are picked up and dropped off at school every day by their parents is entirely foreign to me. When did this happen?

      1. Minadin   2 months ago

        We used to walk or ride bikes - it was about 2-1/2 miles.

        One year, when I was in 7th or 8th grade, the school decided that we suddenly needed to have a parent or guardian present when we left for the day (not upon arrival, though) or we had to go into the (extra cost) after-school program until one arrived. That policy lasted less than a week.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Hopefully you passed at least 5 pharmacies on that walk!

          1. Eeyore   2 months ago

            That would be a desert. You mean at least 10 pharmacies. With only 5 it would be impossible to find one.

          2. Chumby   2 months ago

            Jeff took a upgraded suspension Lil Rascal mobility scooter and passed a Dunkin and a Burger King. Both managers said the seven years he was in high school, they had their largest bonuses.

          3. Minadin   2 months ago

            No pharmacies, one park and a bunch of residential streets. But that was the back way.

            If we went down the main road, it was a longer trip, but we would have passed 3 pharmacies and 6 car dealerships, plus a few fast food joints, and other random shops. None of these pharmacies were within a mile of my house, though.

    3. Dillinger   2 months ago

      every K-12 school in Dallas causes traffic every day because singularly every mom picks up their child in large SUVs.

      1. Minadin   2 months ago

        Where I live, there's a crosswalk-only traffic light on the main feeder road to the interstate, and every other morning there's either 1 elementary-aged kid crossing on bike, or a middle-aged woman walking her dog. Smack in the middle of rush hour.

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        That sounds like a culture war violation to me.

        Well, not to me. That’s a chemjeff luxury belief.

    4. Chumby   2 months ago

      Making a sammich is sexist.

  30. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    I thought we were all supposed be be forced to move to a 15,
    minute city? 15 minutes is close to a mile. More if you bike.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      Cyclist bitches get rammed into ditches.

  31. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Another story to make JesseBot sad:

    Government agent caught lying

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/08/border-patrol-gregory-bovino-chicago

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      You got called out for this one yesterday, retard. The judge is an Obama appointee with an agenda and axe to grind. And you use one of the furthest left sources to push your own narrative, the Guardian.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

        No, no, no. Just because the Graunaid is a rage-bait Communist paper, doesn't mean that this isn't totally real.

        Yesterday Jeffy had a freakout that Jesse used the New York Post as a source, and yet here he is pushing lies from the Pravda with bad teeth.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      Fuck off and die, lying lefty asswipe.

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Ha, I was hoping you’d bring this back up Lying Jeffy!

      When did Jesse, or anyone else for that matter, say government agents never lie?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Well jeffsarc said they never lie about elections. Or never lie when prosecuting trump.

        Oddly jeffsarc is defending comey for lying to congress. Likely will defend jack Smith and Brennan too.

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Jesse lives rent free in your head, Fatfuck.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        If you mock and ridicule only 2 of his posts a week it drives him crazy. Lesson one on how to give jeff a type of Derangement Syndrome. He gets so lonely when you ignore him 98% of the time.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          You should give a point by point breakdown of how you infuriate him so much. I want to see how much pressure it takes for that blob’s heart to give out.

    5. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      CPD responded and then said there is no evidence someone was shot. That doesn't dispel or disprove that ICE agents were SHOT AT. I don't know if they were shot at, but the weaselly wording shows the article writer to be dishonest or pushing an agenda.

      Saying the video supplied by a protester doesn't show another protester attacking the ICE agent is similarly misleading. If the protester recording with a cell phone started the video AFTER another protester assaulted the ICE agent, the article's claim would be correct that the video doesn't show that, but that's because the recording started after the alleged assault. That doesn't prove the protester DID assault the ICE agent, but framing it this way is also weaselly to imply, without stating, that the protester didn't assault the agent.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Are you telling me Lying Jeffy cited something that was dishonest?!!!

        Inconceivable!

  32. Minadin   2 months ago

    "healthcare is a human right!"

    Socialism is slavery.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      yes healthcare is a human right. each human has the right to care for his health.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Socialism IS slavery.

      Health care is not a right!

      Nor is housing, food, or any number of other things socialist nanny/welfare states try to say are fundamental human rights.

      To me, it is a self-evident truth that your rights do not trump mine. If the only way you can afford food, shelter, clothing or health care is to force your fellow citizens to pay for them, then you have essentially decided that it is worth enslaving others to meet your needs.

      Here's how we can see that health-care is not a right. Imagine that tomorrow every doctor, nurse, P.A., EMT, etc.--every health-care provider--decided to quit their jobs and refused to practice medicine. How then will you exercise your health-care "rights"? Many people will say that doctors will have to be forced to provide care. And those people have just espoused a form of slavery--forced labor is a form of slavery.

      Forcing others to pay for your health-care is only somewhat removed from that far-fetched scenario. Each dollar removed from someone to pay for your health care is a dollar they worked to earn. A portion of their allotted time on this Earth was confiscated from them for your benefit.

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        Yeah, if it requires others being forced to do something for you, it's not a right.

      2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

        I follow @RockChartrand on X. He routinely dismantles commies' and leftists' claims like this (healthcare is a right). He comes from an Ayn Rand/Objectivist perspective. I don't agree with him on everything, such as war and immigration, but it's worth checking out.

      3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Your starting from the assumption that your possession of your property is legitimate. Leftists reject that.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Well, that's just the money part. What about the "they all quit" part?

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            Send a few to a gulag and the rest will cooperate.

            1. Minadin   2 months ago

              Gulags need doctors, too.

  33. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>A group of Democrats ... voted with the Republicans to advance a bill that would reopen the government

    Ruling Class folds. bummer, as usual I was unaffected and enjoying another shutdown

    1. Marshal   2 months ago

      The shutdown was worthless as we all knew it would be. I find it interesting to note that while Dems think getting government employees paid is important they also believe the monthly work product of somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3 of government employees is completely worthless. This shows they know government employment is a program offering jobs in exchange for political support.

      1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

        Nailed it. Government employment is a "program offering jobs in exchange for political support"... The swamp.

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          Particularly to college-"educated" Black women.

      2. Dillinger   2 months ago

        apparently now so is a residence in Virginia

  34. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >> Maduro has opened the door to leaving power

    peace through superior firepower

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Maybe we will catch him leaving in a speedboat.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        "Trump Blows Up Speedboat Driven By Man Who Was A Father, Former Public Servant, Trade Unionist, and Bus Driver."

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          lol ... Trump's Illegal War on Venezuela Death Toll Adds One

        2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

          “Important international figurehead “.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            "Austere scholar"

    2. Minadin   2 months ago

      Expropriate! Maduro.

  35. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Who, specifically, has died from the U.S. strikes on alleged narcotrafficking boats?

    I suppose dave smith knows, but who specifically is in hamas?
    who specifically is in antifa?
    who specifically is in trantifa?

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      How does the sun set?
      Why are boobs good?
      How does a posi-track rear end in a Chrysler work?

  36. Marshal   2 months ago

    The NYT finally ran an article outlining how expensive Mamdani's plans are, I'm sure it's just happenstance they published it after the election.

  37. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    The oh, so tolerant left:

    "Who Is Severing Ties With Friends and Family Over Politics?"
    [...]
    "Nearly 1 in 5 Americans would cut ties with family or friends over politics—especially young, liberal, childless adults..."
    https://research.skeptic.com/who-is-severing-ties-with-friends-and-family-over-politics/

    Fuck off and die, shitbags.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      >>young, liberal, childless adults..."

      dear young, liberal, childless adults: nobody wants you around anyway please don't come over for turkey or ever

      1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

        What prog isn't childless? They reproduce by laying their eggs in the child's head in K-12 and Universities.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          the lib couple in my circle produced one relatively normal girl (Marilyn Munster lol) & one boy who thinks he's a girl

    2. Super Scary   2 months ago

      They cut off their friends and families because of politics, stick to their bubble and then are shocked when someone like Trump wins. They continually cry "Who are these people voting for Trump!? Everyone I know would never vote for him!"

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        For the most part, they don't vote anyway.

  38. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Trump ... floated ... a $2,000 dividend ... from the revenue generated by tariffs—possibly out of anger, given that the Supreme Court might strike his aggressive tariff agenda down.

    it's like the 87th time he's said something about paying us out from the tariffs so no, Eric ... not out of anger

  39. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    "I think it's a terrible mistake," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) told reporters. "The American people want us to stand and fight for health care, and that's what I believe we should do."

    Well maybe [WE] need to stop pretending Government 'Guns' are going to make us healthy.

    Conflicting beliefs are never a winning situation.
    Government has nothing unique other than a monopoly of 'Gun' force.

  40. GroundTruth   2 months ago

    So now the major question of whether the ACA covid-era emergency subsidies should be continued will be dealt with by itself, with full debate. What's the problem? If an idea is so great, it should be able to stand by itself rather than be tied to some other actual Constitutionally authorized and mandated spending.

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      I would have preferred R’s say “no, it’s expiring. You douchebags even picked the date. Make peace with it. Elections have consequences. Discussion over. Losers.”

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Trump Administration's Deportation Reels Keep Getting Copyright Strikes for Using Music Without Permission

Autumn Billings | From the February/March 2026 issue

Comic: It's Mercy Otis Warren vs. The Blockheads

Peter Bagge | From the February/March 2026 issue

DHS Says Venezuela Is Safe for Migrants To 'Go Home' to After Maduro's Capture. These Venezuelans Disagree.

Autumn Billings | 1.9.2026 5:53 PM

Video of the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Does Not Resolve the Issue of Whether It Was Legally Justified

Jacob Sullum | 1.9.2026 4:00 PM

No Other Choice Is a Dark Satire of Capitalism and Masculinity

Peter Suderman | 1.9.2026 10:20 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks