Washington's State Capital Just Voted Against Increasing the Minimum Wage, Unemployment
Olympia residents apparently learned from Seattle’s experience that minimum wage hikes do not improve the welfare of the worst off in society.
Residents of Olympia, Washington, rejected Proposition 1 on Tuesday, with 4,857 votes against and 3,821 for. The proposition would have codified the Workers' Bill of Rights Initiative, which sought to increase the minimum wage and require employers to offer current employees extra hours before hiring additional ones.
Yes For Olympia Workers, a campaign that backed the measure, said that the Workers' Bill of Rights "is built on a foundation of key values that reflect the everyday challenges and aspirations of working people." Ostensibly to this end, Proposition 1 would have increased Olympia's minimum wage for large employers (those with more than 500 employees) from $16.66 per hour to $20 per hour on January 1, 2026. The minimum wage for medium employers—firms with more than 15 and up to 500 employees—would have increased to $18 on January 1, 2026, and by $1 every year until their minimum wage equals that of large employers.
Yes For Olympia Workers, whose top five donors are all unions, described the longer phase-in for medium employers as minimizing "the risk and costs to…small businesses." Olympians didn't buy it—and with good reason: Setting phase-in schedules based on headcount would have discouraged smaller businesses from hiring more workers. If the proposition had passed, a medium-sized firm with 500 employees could only justify hiring another employee if he were worth more than $2 million to the company—the combined yearly cost of his $20 per hour wage and the additional $2 per hour paid to the other 500 employees.
Washingtonians are not unfamiliar with such staggered minimum wage hikes. In June 2014, Seattle adopted a similar scheme, distinguishing between businesses with 500 or fewer employees and those with more than 500 workers. Although wage inequality was "reduced modestly" for workers making less than the city's median hourly wage ($26.42) who remained employed, the overall earning inequality "substantially widened" from 2014 to 2017, according to a University of Washington study published in 2021.
Regardless of whether they are phased in gradually or imposed immediately, increasing the minimum wage means existing and prospective workers who generate less value than the mandatory wage floor are fired or not hired in the first place. A case in point: California's April 2024 fast-food minimum wage hike from $16 to $20 per hour cost the state 18,000 jobs.
Yes For Olympia Workers said it's a "myth" that "raising the minimum wage will cause massive job losses." On Tuesday, Olympians rightly rejected the real myth—that a higher minimum wage benefits all workers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I’m surprised they got a chance to vote on it.
The minimum wage should be abolished. You should be compensated at what someone is willing to pay you. For some, that might be $0.50 per day.
Seen cases where the appropriate number is a negative.
Molly, White Mike, MAPedo shrike, and charlie just to name a few.
You misspelled Sullum, Boehm, ENB and Emma.
No no, let's agree to disagree. Let's leave the $22 minimum wage in place, but bring in illegal immigrants to do the job for $0.50 a day, that way the economy will stay afloat.
Olympia - The only reason to visit is the Chinook salmon run in late summer.
Someone must have found a large enough 2X4 to get their attention.
A lot of places voted against stuff that Seattle did. And Reason bitched and moaned about a lot of that backlash.
I repeat.
The living wage movement is not about boosting "the poor." A tiny percentage of the labor force works for minimum wage, and most of those are dependents starting off in the workforce or spouses and retirees looking to supplement household income. The number of "breadwinners" trying to live off of minimum wage is miniscule.
The real winners of minimum wage hikes are unions. Union contracts regularly, and generally, tie their union wages directly to the minimum wage. Statutorily raising the minimum wage automatically increases those union members' wages by fiat, circumventing the standard Union/Employer contract negotiations.
The living wage movement is not about helping America's lowest-paid laborers. It is about lining the pockets of unions.
This is commonplace news. The older I get, the more I understand that the government isn't interested in people living well. I myself am looking for any opportunity to earn money, even 1xbet registration by phone number kenya. If you make yourself dependent on your employer and the minimum wage, you will never rise above it.This is how the system works.