Trump's 'Golden Dome' Missile Defense Could Cost $3.6 Trillion: Report
The pie-in-the-sky space system promises to be a government spending bonanza—and might be a very bad idea.
President Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, nicknamed Star Wars, promised to create a missile defense system so effective it would eliminate the threat of nuclear war forever, at a cost of around $70 billion. As it turned out, the technology just wasn't feasible. And the Soviet Union figured out how to overwhelm the missile defense system at five percent of its cost. Reagan's successor, George H.W. Bush, scaled Star Wars down to a much more modest program called Global Protection Against Limited Strikes, emphasis on limited.
Now President Donald Trump is promising that, with today's technology, he can create an impenetrable missile shield for $175 billion. But the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated in May 2025 that the program could actually cost up to $542 billion over two decades. And according to independent analysis, the CBO may actually be underestimating the cost sixfold. Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, has calculated a $3.6 trillion price over two decades. Harrison and other experts spoke to The Washington Post for a bombshell report published on Wednesday.
The Golden Dome is designed as a "multi-layered" system. One layer would be ground-based missile batteries. Another would be a constellation of satellites orbiting the Earth, ready to shoot down incoming missiles from above. That latter part was also part of the Star Wars program. Proponents say that lower launch costs today—thanks, Elon Musk—make it more feasible today, according to The Washington Post. Harrison, however, estimates that it would take 950 satellites per enemy missile. The American Physical Society puts the number at 400 interceptors for a lower-end North Korean missile and 1,600 for a higher-end North Korean missile.
North Korea is estimated to have 50 nuclear weapons. And that's the lower end of the threats that the Golden Dome is supposed to counter. China has hundreds of nuclear weapons, and Russia has thousands. "You need so many more interceptors than missiles, it becomes operationally impractical," Harrison told the Post.
The Golden Dome program could also scale up ground-based missile defenses. The U.S. military maintains 44 interceptors at a base in Fort Greely, Alaska, designed to launch an "exoatmospheric kill vehicle" that would intercept an incoming ballistic missile in space. But even tests conducted "under scripted conditions and designed for success" show a 55 percent success rate for those interceptors, the American Physical Society reports. The Pentagon has been quite sensitive about that fact. After the recent movie A House of Dynamite depicted U.S. interceptors failing, the Missile Defense Agency wrote up a memo claiming that the system is 100 percent foolproof.
Israel's own ballistic missile defenses, Arrow and David's Sling, have shown a higher success rate. (The name "Golden Dome" is a homage to the Iron Dome, the Israeli system for intercepting smaller rockets and artillery, which is often used as a shorthand for all missile defenses.) The few exoatmospheric interceptors that Israel launched against the October 2024 attack from Iran had a 100 percent success rate, while lower-level missile defenses ranged between 65 percent and 80 percent success, according to a report by Sam Lair, a research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
But the circumstances were not exactly reassuring for U.S. missile defense. Israel was facing "favorable conditions" that the United States would not enjoy in a war with Russia or China, warns Lair. Iran did not use decoys or radar jammers, as Russia or China would be likely to deploy. And Israel had the ability to choose which missiles to intercept and which ones to let fall harmlessly in open areas. Indeed, an intelligence official told NBC News that the effectiveness of Israeli missile defense fell from 90 percent to 65 percent during the later Twelve Day War, which had a sustained back-and-forth combat and gave Iran a chance to adapt.
More fundamentally, Israel and America face very different missile defense problems. As The Washington Post points out, the Arrow, David's Sling, and Iron Dome are defending a territory the size of New Jersey against missiles with small conventional warheads. The Golden Dome would have to defend every city in the United States against missiles with multiple nuclear warheads. Even a 90 percent interception rate would not be enough.
There is also a question of whether trying to build a missile shield is a good idea to begin with. America's best defense against nuclear war so far has been mutually assured destruction, the principle that any country launching a nuclear attack would be committing suicide. During the Cold War, trying to build a missile defense system was actually considered an escalation, because it would undermine everyone else's ability to retaliate for a first strike.
When President Lyndon B. Johnson discovered that the Soviet Union was building a missile defense system around Moscow in 1972, he warned Soviet Premier Alexei Kosygin that the U.S. would have to massively increase its offensive capabilities. "We would thus have incurred on both sides colossal costs without substantially enhancing the security of our own peoples or contributing to the prospects for a stable peace in the world," Johnson wrote. Both sides eventually signed the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, severely limiting their ability to build missile defenses from 1972 to 2002.
Today, China and Russia are issuing the same warning in reverse. The Golden Dome "calls into question the effectiveness of efforts to maintain predictability in the nuclear and missile sphere" and "has high potential to provoke a regional and global arms race," the two governments warned in a joint May 2025 statement. And they emphasized a principle that they believed America had forgotten: "a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
You didn't complain when Democrats wasted money you hypocrite. That makes whatever Trump does ok.
Ds never came close to wasting this much money. And what you call "waste" the rest of us call valid.
Are you guys even aware you're arguing about a projection and not reality? One that us largely basis and assumptions created to generate the amount?
Stop funding Ukraine. Stop funding color revolutions in the east. Don’t borrow money to construct this technological terror. Close all foreign military bases. Cut the War Department budget simultaneously when ending all federal govt welfare programs.
Yes, and ALL of this and MORE, can be attained by SNOT reading JS!
Ignorance is STRENGTH, Cumrades!
Stop funding Argentina too.
Hey Matt. If your beat for Reason is going to be wasteful defense spending, check out this: We're quietly swapping out our old Minutemen IIIs for a new anti-missile system called Sentinel. It's going on in Montana and the Dakotas. I 'discovered' it in 2023 and wrote this: https://clips.substack.com/publish/post/69969375 I was just in Montana earlier this month and there looks like there are delays, which is why the cost is going up, etc. It looks like it'll cost 300 billion or so. But it's hardly got any publicity here in the east (pittsburgh area. If you want a free trip to Montana -- not in the winter -- you might want to look into this colossal waste.
Too local.
And besides, I'm still trying to calculate the cost of the Golden Shower defense the left has been exacting on Americans since the 1960s.
They have been pissing away taxpayer money on that.
Urine it to win it.
Reporting on it would be yellow journalism.
A Dependable missile defense system would leave MAD prostate.
BTW, how's Lucy doing?
LOL, sure you fucking "discovered" it. That program was announced long before 2023, you dipwad, and pretty much everyone over 35 has long been aware of ICBM silos in the Great Plains. In fact, a whole shitton of them were shut down as part of the SALT treaties and the end of the Cold War.
If you want to really look at high-end defense spending, check out the space program sometime. You know, the shit you use whenever you use your cell phone.
I'm sure there's something in it for someone powerful. And perhaps make-work jobs in important Congressional districts.
Could!!!111
It's like Trump was molested by a golden dildo as a child and got a trauma induced gold fetish. Dude is weird as fuck.
Oh, and as a Libertarian, I support big government spending when Trump does it.
If you're like a Reason writer, you only strategically and reluctantly support big government spending when Trump doesn't do it.
I'm a big government sort of Libertarian. The kind that supports the government seizing the means of production. And the president putting buddies in charge of media organizations and suing the media when it says something he doesn't like. And ramping up the war on drugs because we'll totally win it this time. And huge military spending. And increasing taxes on imports because taxes are good. Through the loving care of big government, we surely will prosper.
That's why I post here with my fellow Libertarian comrades.
Small-l libertarian and big-L Libertarian are not the same thing. Big-L Libertarian is a political party that sometimes represents small-l libertarians.
I'm the biggest L libertarian. I want to feel my huge Libertarian government gently caress my prostate.
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
Government loves me, This I know,
For the Government tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
GAWD does love me, yes indeed,
Keeps me safe, and gives me feed,
Shelters me from bad drugs and weed,
And gives me all that I might need!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
DEA, CIA, KGB,
Our protectors, they will be,
FBI, TSA, and FDA,
With us, astride us, in every way!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
Poor shrike. Keeps using "as a libertarian" in an attempt to hide his soros sucking.
Pettis child porn addiction could cost 4T.
SPACE FORCE Fuck yeah! Coming again to save the mother fucking day now!
If it saves just one life...
Won't be a problem now that we're keeping all that EBT money.
The problem isn't any person it's coercive government. The only solution is to prohibit government coercion.
Sorry in advance for discussing the article;
They really need to emphasize the 'missle' defense part that the 3.6 trill gets us. So we know something entirely different will still be needed for drone defense.
A Golden Drone Dome?
Like not selling land adjacent to military bases to the Chinese like under Biden?
This is easy peasy!
Consider that Trump declines emergency funding for natural disasters in Blue states that didn't vote for him but approves them for Red states. So, given that, he only needs to build his "golden dome" to protect his properties in states like Nevada (Purple) and then financial centers in Red states.
Consider also that Trump doesn't give a hoot about health coverage, food security, or anything else for the vast number of poor across the country, even the ones that vote for him. So his "golden dome" thing can be further shrunk to only cover the counties that support wealthy Americans in Red states. By the time you exclude coverage from people Trump doesn't care about, the actual cost of the system could very well be under $1T. I'm sure the CBO is assuming Trump means to cover the whole country, given their number, but that guy doesn't even understand that Puerto Rico, Samoa, and Guam are also included.
Or consider your whole fairy tale post is nonsense and say that so people do not waste a moment reading it.
It could be tree fitty or more but if you want to get rid of that God damn lockness monster you got to pay something.