This College Dropout Thinks His AI Startup Can Do What Elon Musk Couldn't: Expose Fraud
Alex Shieh, creator of Bloat@Brown, co-founded the Antifraud Company to investigate and publicize corporate fraud in critical government programs.
Brown University eliminated 103 positions months after Alex Shieh, a sophomore at the time, used a combination of AI and public data to launch Bloat@Brown, a website that listed the names and titles of each of the school's nearly 4,000 administrators. Shieh has since left the school to launch the Antifraud Company, which intends to use AI to identify the billions of dollars of outright fraud that is perpetrated against American taxpayers every year.
Although the topic of waste, fraud, and abuse hasn't gotten as much attention since the flash in the pan that was the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it remains a huge drain of taxpayer dollars.
In 2024, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimated that the federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion a year to fraud (based on data from FY 2018 to FY 2022), which the GAO defines as "obtaining a thing of value through willful misrepresentation" including "making material false statements of fact based on actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance, or reckless disregard of falsity." Instances of this fraud include a physician billing health care benefit programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, for "unnecessary, expensive testing on addiction treatment facilities patients" to the tune of $127 million, and an owner misrepresenting his finance company to receive "small business loan lender status and fees" for $71.7 million.
The federal government has been able to recoup some of this money—the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency recovered between $6.6 billion and $19.7 billion annually from FY 2018 to FY 2022—but this is less than 10 percent of GAO's estimated yearly losses over this time period. Fortunately, the feds provide a strong incentive to uncover the rest of this monumental fraud: 30 percent of recovered funds.
The Antifraud Company believes this built-in bounty makes their Snitching-as-a-Service (SaaS) model viable for the long haul. The company's unique SaaS model consists of three parts: "Forensic accounting, natural language processing, [and] traditional pound-the-pavement interviewing," Sahaj Sharda, the company's co-founder and CEO, tells Reason. He says misconduct always leaves a trace. To discover it, the Antifraud Company uses machine learning to parse through traditional market data and large language models to parse patents, regulations, and contracts. In addition, the company "go[es] out and talk[s] to people who are affected by these practices," explains Sharda.
Shieh says that the company uses open source intelligence tactics similar to those used by digital investigation groups like Bellingcat. The Antifraud Company goes a step further by giving full-time investigative journalists access to the company's "AI tools and engineers…so that they can do more than they could have ever done manually," explains Shieh. Since its launch in June, the company has already uncovered $250 million in potential fraud.
The financial incentive to weed out fraud might be strong, but so is the cultural interest to reduce wasteful spending, regardless of political philosophy, a fact that is reflected in the company's leadership. Sharda, a recent Columbia Law School graduate and self-identified populist, reached out to Shieh to see how they might reduce fraud in government programs after listening to Shieh's testimony at a House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing in June. David Barclay, the company's third co-founder and CSO, served as the attorney-adviser to former Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan.
"Where Lina Khan, libertarians, and Democrats can all agree is that fraud, specifically, is bad and that doesn't…have any place in our government," says Shieh. He says that the Antifraud Company is "not against business or big business per se; it's against the subset of these businesses big and small that are defrauding the government….by falsifying [their] forms, by lying about what [they're] saying [they're] doing." Similarly, Sharda says "we're trying to protect the free market…by cleaning up bad actors from these government programs."
The Antifraud Company has already discovered substantial amounts of potential fraud, but only time will tell if it becomes the taxpayer protector that DOGE promised (and failed) to be. It's private and for-profit, so it's already off to a promising start.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
He will need approval from Congress.
And must follow norms and traditions. Plus go through bureaucratic channels, observing interagency protocols.
Trump got impeached for not following interagency protocols.
Numbers do not seem big enough to bother with. - Reason
Eh? They just bothered with it!
He’s mocking Reason’s response to doge. They decided on a narrative from the beginning and they’re sticking with it.
Psst. Someone above also joined in on it.
If you cant stop it all why bother.
“Although the topic of waste, fraud, and abuse hasn't gotten as much attention since the flash in the pan that was the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it remains a huge drain of taxpayer dollars.”
Quotes a Reason article from May.
“Contracts Update!
Over the past 4 days, agencies terminated 150 wasteful contracts with a ceiling value of $3.2B and savings of $240M, including a $67k USAGM “makeup artist” contract, a $107k Dept. of War services contract for a “group fitness instructor”, a $5.2M HHS contract for “professional support services in South Africa”, and a $276k USAGM broadcasting contract for the “Armenian radio program”.”
https://x.com/DOGE/status/1979604821217874211
This is a post from 6 days ago. Nicastro’s a fucking hack.
>Can Do What Elon Musk Couldn't: Expose Fraud
The fuck?
Elon's team exposed a ton of fraud - you whined about him doing it without congressional approval. You were literally crying that the deep state was being exposed.
Coming soon: The Reason Case for Deep State Bureaucratic Supremacy.
Nick sold out to Koch because he promised Nick he would give him the actual jacket Fonzi wore on Happy Days.
>Snitching-as-a-Service (SaaS)
What is sad here is you thought you had to explain the joke.
But anyone who got the joke didn't need it explained and the explanation does nothing for anyone who didn't.
Did he coin it?
This College Dropout Thinks His AI Startup Can Do What Elon Musk Couldn't: Expose Fraud
What're you talking about? A two and a half minute look at USAID books exposed billions in fraud! All the while you tards kept whining about Due Processes! You can't turn off the fraud spigot without due processeszz!
They uncovered projects they did not like. But all were legally authorized, no not fraud.
"Where Lina Khan, libertarians, and Democrats can all agree is that fraud, specifically, is bad and that doesn't…have any place in our government," says Shieh.
Man, this kid fell of the turnip truck like, yesterday.
No, Democrats, "libertarians" and Lina Khan can't even agree what fraud is.
Musk found fraud. Assholes like jack nicastro cried about it, said it couldn't be cut, and praised judges and democrats for blocking it.
Problem with all of this is that it is dangerous for a federal employee to whistle blow on fraud. They likely would be retaliated against or even fired. Not worth the risk.
Look at the retard who never heard of the waste fraud and abuse hot line and how much reporters if it get.
Tony needs his ignorance as a shield from inconvenient facts that could upend his tribal allegiance.
Here you go, Tony. If you're going to come here and lie for the Democratic party, you're going to need to up your game from Huffpo tier.
https://www.gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud
"This College Dropout Thinks His AI Startup Can Do What Elon Musk Couldn't"
Go fuck your hat, Nicastro.
1. Elon's job was to set up DOGE, not run it.
2. DOGE is just getting started, nevertheless it has already found astonishing levels of fraud, including during the time Elon was setting it up.
So many Reason writers have become garbage humans and dishonest hacks solely because orangemanbad. Nicastro definitely knows this, but he's paid to politruk and smear.
That's a good idea but hopefully he'll take the next step. Use AI to:
1)get rid of Congress when they choose to cover up and continue funding waste/abuse which is corruption once it is made transparent and not fixed. Certainly no one can rely on the media to serve as a watchdog for either that audit function or for elevating the issue to electoral consequences.
2)ramp up a learning/capability curve for citizens re that issue. The first response of Congress if they can't bury the issue themselves or have their media poodles bury it, will be to have a highly respected bipartisan commission bury it. AI can now finally enable regular citizens to BE that 'bipartisan commission' or to follow them around and force the issue.
3) not that any of the above is easy it can be done and points the way to the real reform. Both the above lay the groundwork for organizing a political party around those AI capabilities. DeRps are totally corrupted and will never internally change or pass power uncorrupted (read - outside the power of those who bought those parties) to the next generation. A political party will win elections handily if it can use AI to enable 'government by militia or jury service' (ie eliminate the bureaucrats, replace with citizens on short-term duty) and have government be based more on service and UBI and less on taxes and professional bureaucrats.
I wish him luck.
How about an AI that exposes how exactly everyone in Congress ends up so rich?