Michigan Mom Fights School District Rule That Says 7-Year-Old Can't Walk 3 Minutes Home From the Bus Stop
The superintendent blamed the “significant liability the district assumes whenever we are transporting students.”
Last year, Tali Smith's son Emmett walked himself home the four houses he lives from the school bus stop. He was six. The walk takes 3.5 minutes.
But this year, his suburban Michigan school will not let him do that—too risky.
The school district, Saline Area Schools, is newly enforcing a rule that says a parent or other adult must be waiting at the bus stop to escort anyone in kindergarten or first grade. Emmett is in first grade.
Though Smith not only believes Emmett can walk home himself on the nearly silent street, she has seen him do it for a year. But reality does not move a bureaucratic needle. "Other districts have less strict rules," including Ann Arbor, which is more urban and shares a border with her town, says Smith.
Unfortunately for Smith, Michigan has not yet passed a reasonable childhood independence law, unlike 11 other states. But a bill with bipartisan support is under consideration, sponsored by Sens. Jeff Irwin (D–Ann Arbor) and Ed McBroom (R–Marquette). Generally, these laws say "neglect" is when a child is put in obvious, serious danger—not anytime a parent takes their eyes off them.
"Parents should be able to decide when their children are ready to take on more independence," Irwin says. "I am sponsoring legislation to clarify that parents may allow children to do reasonable activities on their own."
McBroom adds, "Parents should never have to worry that the state is going to punish them or take away their children for letting them do regular childhood activities like going to the park, or walking home from school."
Smith sent letters pleading with the superintendent to change the bus stop policy, or at least let her sign a waiver releasing the school from any liability. In one letter she wrote:
I am writing to address a policy that, while likely well-intentioned, goes against current research in child development and negatively impacts our children's independence and mental health. The rule disallows my 7-year-old son Emmett, a very responsible and well behaved 1st grader, from walking home alone from the neighborhood bus stop once or twice a week while his older brother has after school activities.
We live in a very safe neighborhood with minimal traffic where Emmett has been allowed to walk, bike, and play alone, without incident, for years.
Smith even referenced one of my favorite stats: "A child is approximately 5 times more likely to be born with a conjoined twin than to be kidnapped by a stranger. Our fear of rare events is inhibiting our children from developing the resilience they need to thrive….Walking home for 3 minutes is not something to fear."
Superintendent Rachel Kowalski replied, in part:
From what I understand, our bus stop policy is longstanding and, while I understand it may feel restrictive in your situation, it is in place because of the significant liability the district assumes whenever we are transporting students. Our legal counsel advises us on best practices to have in place to support collective student safety. This policy is aligned with practices I have seen in every district I have been part of and is grounded in our responsibility to ensure consistency and safety for all students. By holding to this policy, we are anchoring it in the legal and safety responsibilities the district is required to uphold once students are on and off our buses.
Irwin says the school is misinterpreting Michigan's liability laws. "School administrators are severely limiting this family's choices based on a misunderstanding that the district might be liable if the child were harmed. In fact, Michigan provides broad immunity for schools even in cases of clear negligence. Letting a child walk a few yards at the request of their parents simply does not put the district at risk."
At my request, Smith photographed the walk home from the bus stop. Here it is:



At this point, says Smith, "I've lost the bus battle."
The day she threw in the towel she had her son wear a T-shirt that said, "You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right." It's a quote from another bus freedom activist: Rosa Parks.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
End all coerced taxpayer money going to the educational industrial complex and these issues resolve themselves.
End tort lawyers suing over everything under the sun expecting a big settlement. The district is protecting itself from sue happy lawyers. If that kid slipped on the grass some lawyer from a billboard would go after everyone from the city to the school bus driver and the school board.
It looks like a dangerous neighborhood.
By showing the street signs, Lenore just helped dox them. Won’t be surprised if Pluggo is already booking a trip there.
I see room for 17 white vans to hide - - - - - - -
My thoughts exactly....totally ghetto.
He's clearly at risk of encountering some white supremacy up in that hood.
His mom should claim disability and insist the kid walking is a reasonable accommodation; and/or claim the kid identifies as a third grade female.
Why does the school district have any say here?
The school nanny's authority should not extend beyond the bus stop to the school or school to the bus stop.
The rise of the "nanny State" run by moral scolds.
This has been standard for decades. Schools are responsible for the safety of the students on the bus and that includes not letting them out at somewhere other than their houses. Usually a safe distance for multiple kids being dropped off but not always. I'll bet the district is overcompensating on the advice of their lawyers to protect themselves from a potential lawsuit from parents.
They're not going to let him off the bus unless someone is there to meet him. They'll just finish the route and take him back to school and call the parents. A lot of hassle for everyone involved but that's how the district has the say.
IF the child walking from the bus stop to his home exposes the school to liability, the way to reduce said liability is to have a bus stop closer to the child's home.
Every kid in town walked to school when I was there. The only ones who rode the bus were out of the village.
Nobody was kidnapped, shot, stabbed, raped or robbed or assaulted.
Detroit was 400 miles away.
It takes the kid 3.5 minutes to walk that short distance?
They have shorter legs when they're seven.
Make it a point to notice when you are out driving, kindergarten kids, and first graders, hit the ground running when they get off a school bus. They may be alert and well-drilled on traffic hazards, but they are destined to remain clueless for years about driver sight lines.
The principal hazard to a youngster getting off a school bus is not likely found along the way home. It is the bus itself, and the way the bus hides kids getting off from the cars of drivers impatient to get moving again, after being delayed by school bus lights.
A nightmare scenario happens when a kid's home is behind the bus stop, and on the other side of the street. The kid gets off the bus with a crowd of others, who cross in front while the driver watches carefully. The one kid whose home is behind the bus runs down the right side of the bus toward the back, then turns to cross the street behind the bus—out of the visual coverage provided for bus drivers by mirrors or cameras—even the best designed systems can be obscured by shadow, sun glare, darkness, or a plume of bus exhaust in cold weather. Plus which, school bus windows, except for the windshield, typically fog completely in cold humid weather, just like would happen to your car if it were chock full of passengers—but in this case it's likely 40-plus passengers.
Thus, school bus drivers become accustomed to driving all winter with no better outside visibility than afforded in the cab of a tractor trailer rig. Which means no visibility at all close-in and directly behind.
As at other times, in those conditions, the kid knows the bus holds the traffic until it doesn't, so he/she bolts to cross the street as soon as possible. Likely just as the driver, seeing all the other kids safe, checks the right side mirror, seeing no one, and releases oncoming traffic by closing the bus door and turning off the bus lights. At that moment the kid pops from behind the bus into view of an accelerating driver who has only a split second to hit the brakes to save the kid's life.
That happens all the time. Sooner or later every experienced school bus driver sees it. And the bus driver and the district will be held strictly liable every time if the worst happens, which thankfully it usually doesn't. It is the bus driver's invariable responsibility to know where every kid who gets off goes, and to not release stopped traffic until all kids are safe and out of the street. Car drivers are very impatient about delays that responsibility creates.
So never mind that sometimes car drivers jump the bus lights, or don't even slow for them, and will certainly lie about that if trouble happens. Never mind that there may not be a sidewalk or shoulder on the road—AS IN THE CASE SHOWN BY THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
This is Michigan. In winter, that behind-the-bus scenario may play out in fading evening light, with the kid trapped on the road by continuous snow berms along both sides, put there by snow plows. Icy road conditions make braking ineffective. A car skidding between a snow berm on its right, and a school bus on its left will likely continue straight ahead and hit the kid a second or two after the car driver first sees the kid.
Note that a parent there to meet the kid getting off the bus makes all that horror go away. The kid heads for the parent, every time. The parent supervises the street crossing.
In fairness, that is not a hazard anyone can expect even a responsible parent to anticipate in detail. It would not be reasonable to call irresponsible the parent advocating in this case. But it absolutely is reasonable to protect that parent and her child from tragic possibilities neither she nor her child can be expected to understand.
I have written at length because this is a case where it might do some good.
When you say that happens 'all the time,' do you have numbers? How often has it happened in the last year, for instance? I ask because, while your scenario sounds both possible and frightening, it is not something I've actually seen or heard of happening in reality. I'll add I'm old enough to have walked home from school myself, and again, not something I've heard of.
agarrett — Fair questions. By, "all the time," I meant statistically commonplace, not everyday experience for everyone.
I had a journalist's interest in school bus safety, partly because I happen to have an old friend who made his career as a private school bus operator. He contracted to school districts which did not choose to manage their own bus operations.
That acquaintance enabled insight into my initial interest—the overall safety improvements delivered or not by using school buses instead of private means to deliver kids to and from schools. That focus was my initial open-ended question. Turned out, millions of passenger miles per year without so much as a fender bender was achievable, and probably within normal expectations.
But I also learned about the particular hazard mentioned above while talking with my friend, and hanging out at times with his bus drivers. I was allowed to accompany some on their routes.
I learned all the drivers got trained—and specifically cautioned—about that scenario. Every effort was demanded to insist kids cross in front of the bus, never behind.
When I learned that, I asked some of the drivers about their own experiences, to find out how well it worked. Everyone I asked said passengers followed the rule steadily, but not perfectly. Exceptions had happened in their experience multiple times, but always harmlessly, or as close calls, never with a resulting catastrophe. One account suggested certain mayhem avoided by inches, because a car driver showed astonishingly quick reaction time. A young girl looking in the wrong direction down the road was almost struck and run down, but may never have noticed it happened.
On that basis, if the drivers I talked to are typical, that safety crisis probably happens thousands of times a year nationwide. I think that must imply some deaths and injuries as a result, but have no numbers.
The drivers I talked to were all long-serving, and probably had more-than-average experience. One mentioned how many years he had to drive before he gained experience enough to feel fully safety proficient, and then reflected how that feeling might turn into dangerous complacency.
I learned that safety in school bus driving is not much analogous to driving a car safely. The former prioritizes alertness to passenger behavior issues as highly as vehicle operational safety. It takes more training to learn bus operation, but once learned day-to-day bus operation seems not too challenging. Maybe any attentive driver with a few years auto driving experience could learn to do it.
But managing kids interacting in groups adds complexities, and continues to deliver surprises, which private auto drivers do not expect to encounter. The kid-management issues turn out a bigger challenge than the vehicle operation issues. I think we discussed in that context a growing tendency toward high driver turnover in school bus fleets. All that was pre-Covid experience, by the way.
It doesn't help when impatient entitled drivers ignore the bus stop sign and drive on through.
They should get double the fine.
Those are the sorts who ignore stop signs and red lights, speed and drive recklessly.
It surprises me very little that you went on "ride alongs" with school bus drivers, Stephen.
You wrote at length to describe something that isn't an issue?
How does the kid being *behind* the bus cause an issue for the bus *moving forward*?
Also, if the kid is *running off* - they are, according to your scenario guidelines, already out in the other lanes of traffic before the bus driver turns off the stop sign. And that would still presuppose that other drivers slam on the gas as soon as the lights turn off.
All lot of effort to defend stupid state over-reach.
Incunabulum — The other drivers too often do slam on the gas the moment the bus lights turn off. They can see the door closing, even before the lights turn off.
Your other remarks suggest someone challenged to let information with a demonstrable provenance affect groundless priors you are trying to cherish. Maybe try to do better. I gave you enough information to critique everything you mentioned. You had to disregard what I wrote to reach your conclusions.
Anonymous sockpuppet talking about "information with demonstrable provenance..." Reason really oughtta go back to checking IDs.
So here we have a clue in those photos that "the district's concern" is that taxpayers may suddenly realize they've been monopoly-robbed since before the kid was even born and STILL AIN'T GOT NO SIDEWALKS! The mindset that swims into focus is that payroll looter bureaucrats are "the district", kids the kidnappable truancy pawns and parents' income the ransom slop in the trough. There's a photograph for ya!
I not only live in that school district, I was surprised to see that I live one block away from that street. Those people are our neighbors. In fact, a six-year old in the same class in the same school happens to live next door to us. I can attest that it is indeed just about as quiet and safe a neighborhood as one could find anywhere. (FWIW, our local 6-year-old is probably better able to handle himself in traffic than most adults, since he has been driving his own mid-sized ATV and dirt bike on the street since he was two, and has been teaching his 2-year-old sister how to do the same.) More generally, excessive litigiousness and obsessive concern with liability go hand in hand, and both are an affront to common sense and a drag on society. ... I do wonder if an interim workaround could be found if one neighborhood parent per day volunteers to meet the bus; whether having one 'responsible adult' present would meet the district's concerns. Once the bus moves on, all the kids would run home, which is exactly what they do now.
Oh, the joys of living in a society run by moral busy bodies and the nanny state.
C.S Lewis said it best: "Of all the tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busy bodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep. His cupidity may at some point be satiated but those who torment us for our own good will torment us with out end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
Maybe demand that the city install sidewalks so the kids aren't walking in the road.
Not a city, an unincorporated township. In Michigan townships, most roads, and I think sidewalks, are the responsibility of the country road commission, not the township -- except state highways. However, these particular streets are, I believe, originally subdivision streets, which means that any improvements would require a petition by the affected homeowners, and probably a special assessment on the homeowners as well. Just paving a neglected street normally costs about $4,000 per house. Adding sidewalks (leaving aside issues of who owns the verge) would probably cost a lot more.
Most suburban and rural-ish neighborhoods (housing developments) do not have sidewalks. I have lived in many such neighborhoods for 50+ years and I don't ever remember having a sidewalk. That's more of a city thing.
The superintendent blamed the “significant liability the district assumes whenever we are transporting students.”
This is the most important part of your article, yet you spent so little time on it.
TORT REFORM, LENORE. How's about you advocate THAT for a change? You address that issue, and then free range kids will naturally slot into place after it.
The single biggest problem in this country is entitlement payments to dirtbags. The second biggest problem in this country is that all those entitlement-receiving garbage humans have realized that the New American Dream isn't hard work and earned reward; it's that victimization is the new currency and the tort judgment is a potential jackpot.
This is why they go out of their way to find puddles to slip in, cracks to trip over, and declare traumatic brain injuries after fender benders. We taught Americans to be exploitative scumbags and abuse the justice system in hopes of windfall reward.
The State has adapted to that. This is the result. They don't care that the likelihood of harm on a 3min walk home is minimal. They care about the piece of human garbage that's going to SUE THEM if their kid trips and falls during that three minutes.
"WHY DIDN'T YOU PROTECT HIM FROM FALLING!?" they'll shriek.
This is their preventative measure against hearing that shrieking.
Lenore, I respect your idea of free range parenting and independent children. I really do. I despise the fact that you never attack the disease, and only ever bitch about the symptoms.
It's what makes it impossible to take you seriously.
There's a term for victim tort: "winning the ghetto lottery" as did the family of George Floyd.
Observe how Altruist Totalitarians have a lot to say whenever brainwashable kids are mentioned. It always reminds me of those photos of smiling Hitler with the kiddies....
Get the government out of schools.
Problem solved.
That part, yes. But what about Mrs. Grundy who lives next door to the park and calls the cops every time she sees someone under the age of 20 by himself? Or whenever she sees a middle aged man walking alone.... 'cause you know, he might be a pervert?
People need to start minding their own business. In this case, the superintendent of schools business ends once the kid is dropped off at the bus stop.
You see this in just about every story about "human trafficking;" I know otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people who are just convinced that kids and [pretty, young] women are routinely being shanghaied to supply a sex slavery industry. When asked to provide a specific, it's easily dismantled to a reply of "Oh" or vague assurances that everyone just knows it is happening everywhere, even in the tiniest of communities. And then there are the ones who have been to "conferences" where they trot out the same "victim" for the umpteenth time and it's "there, see?" And even so "no young girl wants to grow up to be a prostitute, RIGHT?"
People generally like lurid stuff [Unsolved Mysteries, for example], and even more they like to think they can "do something" anytime they "see something." In their minds victims abound, and it appeals to them.
The civil justice system is by far the greatest threat to liberty in our country. Businesses and institutions trying to cover their asses from attack by liability attorneys and insurance companies impair our freedom of action far more than criminal law enforcement.
Just watching a few hours of local television will dispel any doubts about sleazy tort lawyers.
"If you've been hurt or injured on the job or in a car accident, you may be entitled to compensation. Just call the law offices of Dewey Cheatam and Howe."
Time to move.
Between busybody "child advocate", woke indoctrination and trans brainwashing in schools, and just generally all the ills that come with being around too many people, if I had kids I'd feel an obligation to bring them up in a rural enough environment that they had a better chance of developing a bit of independence and self-reliance.
The two sides of the liberal nanny coin:
Heads--I will provide for your needs.
Tails--Since I provide for you, I can control you.
This is exactly my worry with governmental takeover of health care: we're responsible for your health, so you will eat, exercise, and generally live as we tell you to. And when we tell you it's time for you to die, you will do so.
I hope you are not trying to make a case that no government adult ought to have power to control a kindergarten kid.
How do they stop him? Do they force him to stay on the bus if "a parent or other adult" doesn't claim him? If that's the case, I'd suggest the child be instructed to threaten the bus driver with a charge of kidnapping. If not, just get off, wait for the bus to pull off, and walk home like normal.
The parent(s) could even obtain a limited power of attorney, granting the child their authority to walk himself home.
JParker — Pretty much all you suggest is nonsense. And, yes, it is routine for school bus drivers to deliver young children back to school if drivers judge that dangerous conditions threaten a child. The schools then call the parents to come get the kids.
Not even legal maniacs ever suggest that amounts to kidnapping. Note also that school bus drivers at least in some jurisdictions enjoy considerable legal authority and discretion when they are tasked to protect children. Cops approve of that and defer to it, mostly, and support the drivers. A lot of cops have kids on the buses.
Lothrop: "if drivers judge..."
Dude. He's in first grade. Do you think he's going to threaten an adult bus driver with a kidnapping charge? What is wrong with you?
My parents would never have believed Lenore's current Reason articles could be anything but fiction back when I was seven. "Our" looter kleptocracy "could never be like that" I can see them thinking. Then along came Nixon to fund entrenched looter klepto parties with tax money...
The school administration isn't concerned about this child's safety; it's clearly stated 3 times in their response that it is about liability, and they are therefore gong to treat every case the same, as advised by their counsel.
Pass a law relieving them of this, and kids can do whatever they want once they're off school property; pretty much like it was when I was a kid in the 1960s, with me and Julio down by the school yard.
They aren't going far enough. Children shouldn't be out unaccompanied until they are thirty-seven.