Schools Find Their Spines
Plus: Zohran Mamdani's photo ops, hearings on Caribbean boat strikes, how the pandemic changed the world, and more...

An indecent proposal: Seven of the nine universities approached by the White House have said no to its offer of throwing more federal money their way in exchange for signing onto a compact that stipulates their commitments to academic freedom.
The University of Arizona, Brown University, Dartmouth College, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Southern California, and the University of Virginia all said no. Vanderbilt University hasn't really telegraphed much (though the chancellor expressed hesitation), and only the University of Texas has indicated it might accept the terms.
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
The compact asks universities to no longer use race or sex in hiring or admissions (thus bringing them into compliance with existing federal law) and to shut down "institutional units that purposefully punish, belittle and even spark violence against conservative ideas," if they exist on campus. (Many universities have taken issue with this framing, suggesting it's singling out a specific set of viewpoints for protection.) In addition, "universities would not be allowed more than a 15 percent foreign student population," per The Hill, and "no more than 5 percent of foreign students could be from the same country." Also, "schools with an endowment of $2 billion could not charge undergraduate tuition to hard sciences majors" and tuition rates would be frozen for five years. Standardized tests would be required for admissions. Trans policies—like who is allowed to play on which sports teams—would be dictated from on high.
Some schools, like MIT, communicated to the Department of Education that they would not be signing onto the compact because it includes "principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution" and because one of their "core belief[s] [is] that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone." But MIT already makes plenty of commitments that are in line with what the Trump administration expects from universities: Enrollment of international students is already capped at 10 percent, and a document outlining the school's academic freedom commitments was adopted by the faculty toward the end of 2022, in response to the current wave of "wokeness" and suppression of free expression at elite colleges.
Colleges so far seem hesitant to embrace the Trump administration's proposal, fearing it would invite greater control over their decisions by the executive branch and prevent them from pursuing the policies they believe best serve their institutions. If that results in colleges—both private and public—accepting fewer federal funds, that's arguably a good thing for taxpayers, even if you disagree with the means by which it was achieved.
Zelensky's meeting: On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faced tough talk from President Donald Trump during a White House meeting in which Trump "tossed aside maps of the front line and urged Kyiv to concede its entire Donbas region to Russia to clinch a deal, according to people familiar with the exchange" who spoke with The Washington Post.
Trump's about-face is striking. "Last month, after meeting Zelensky in New York, Trump claimed Ukraine might be able to regain all its territory lost to Russia," notes CNN. "But now Trump is preparing for another high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, this time in Budapest. It was after a call with the Russian leader on the eve of the Zelensky meeting that Trump again insisted Kyiv must give up swaths of land for the conflict to end."
"A Ukrainian source separately called the White House meeting 'tense,' but said there was 'no shouting,' downplaying reports of a volatile encounter between the two leaders," added CNN. "Overall, the source called the meeting constructive, since Trump ultimately declared that a ceasefire be along the current frontline. Zelensky later endorsed the idea in remarks to reporters."
Scenes from New York: Zohran Mamdani's decision to pose with this man is actually insane.
I've been reliably informed that Democrats are opposed to any kind of political violence, so I look forward to them universally condemning Zohran Mamdani for campaigning with an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorist plot that killed 6 New Yorkers. pic.twitter.com/opk2er6BnB
— JD Vance (@JDVance) October 18, 2025
"Lefty NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani gleefully campaigned this week with a notorious, gay-hating Brooklyn imam who is an unindicted co-conspirator in 1993 World Trade Center bombing and who has been linked to other terrorist activity in the United States—including urging 'jihad' on the Big Apple," reports The New York Post. "The Democratic frontrunner to become the city's next mayor was seen laughing and grinning while standing arm-in-arm with Siraj Wahhaj at the imam's Bedford-Stuyvesant mosque in a photo the socialist posted to X a day after the first mayoral debate. Councilman Yusef Salaam (D-Manhattan), a member of the Central Park 5 who was elected in November 2023, was also in the photo."
More about Wahhaj here and here. A relevant chunk from The New York Times (covering the…extremely bizarre cult-like behavior of Wahhaj's son): "The elder Mr. Wahhaj has for decades been the imam of Masjid at-Taqwa, which several people connected to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center either attended or visited around the time of the attack. During the investigation of the bombing, the elder Mr. Wahhaj was named on a list of several dozen potential conspirators in the plot, though he was never charged in the case and the list was later criticized for being overly broad, some former terrorism prosecutors said."
Your mileage may vary, but I don't love Mamdani's decision to pose with this man (nor do plenty of other New Yorkers).
Oh look, the "America deserved 9/11" guy has opinions about the discourse… https://t.co/IMoVGwUmeV
— Rafael A. Mangual (@Rafa_Mangual) October 21, 2025
QUICK HITS
- Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee are calling for hearings into the Trump administration's decisions to strike down boats in the Caribbean, following news reports of fishermen being killed.
- "The US is balking at a European Union-led plan for Group of Seven nations to expand the use of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine, according to people familiar with the discussions," reports Bloomberg. "US officials informed their European counterparts that they won't, for now, be joining the initiative during conversations on the sidelines of the International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington last week, the people said, asking not to be named as the talks were private. The US cited risks to market stability as the reason for its reluctance, one of the people said. Another said the US simply was non-committal at this stage."
- "The fragile cease-fire in Gaza that came into force last week rests on some key assumptions: that Hamas militants give up their weapons and that an international troop presence keep the peace as Israel withdraws its military from the enclave," reports The New York Times. "But the countries that might make up that force are skittish about committing soldiers who could potentially come into direct conflict with Hamas while it is still an armed group, diplomats and other people familiar with the deliberations say."
- How the pandemic changed the world for the worse, a collection of observations by Patrick Collison: massive influxes of immigrants across the West; total shift in college student behavior, including students being far less likely to do reading assignments; British economic statistics on trade, population, employment no longer as reliable; nightlife depressed in the world's major cities; Western travel to China never recovered. What else?
- More wild post-pandemic stats:
Education stagnation: Only 3 states have fully bounced back in both math and reading since the pandemic: Iowa, Mississippi, and Tennessee.
Just 6 of 23 states beat 2019 math levels, and only 4 of 20 exceeded 2019 ELA levels.
The recovery gap remains wide.
Grateful for this… pic.twitter.com/SmFS3J54df— John Bailey (@John_Bailey) October 20, 2025
- I can't stop loving Curtis Sliwa:
Have you ever purchased anything from a cannabis shop?
MAMDANI: *giggles* I have
CUOMO: No.
SLIWA: pic.twitter.com/lzzJhfxr7p
— ???????????????????????????? (@AnthonyHotBread) October 17, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No Dingalings
Muslim Trantifa gunman Eric Austin, aka “Sumayyah Dawud,” showed up at the “No Kings” protest in Phoenix.
Last year he was a person of interest in a murder investigation but has not been charged yet. Phoenix Police recommend charges but the prosecutor has not charged him.
- Bellum Acta
He showed up dressed as a Muslim woman while carrying an AR15 style rifle.
Still in the DNC big tent?
Isn’t that tent held up by a ladydick?
Gotta hand it to these guys...two days after their protest and we're holding steady with zero kings.
Imagine that in a constitutional republic.
If that queen gets married, would his husband be the king?
"The Bear Patrol is working like a charm."
Poor Damon, sullum, qb, sarc, jeff.. et al.
https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2025/10/20/9th-circuit-hands-trump-administration-a-big-win-in-the-oregon-national-guard-case-n2195280
How soon until Damon cools on the district judges?
Found it ironic this morning he posted that article after the 9th had ruled in favor of the Trump administration. He is incapable of learning facts.
Methinks he already wrote that and leaned into his TDS. My impression is they get paid by the article/have a quota for articles. Not unlike the fifty-centers, a bean got counted.
Either a complete retard or a hack. I’ll let dear reader decide.
What’s this “either/or” stuff? Why can’t he be both?
If the 9th ruled in favor of Trump for Portland, then it’s probably a slam dunk SOCTUS will rule in favor of Trump for Chicago.
The 9th ruling is 93 pages. Most of it tearing down the inferior judges. Pretty good read.
Wonder how Damon will spin this. Recall his sock going apoplectic about the shadow docket. He now has 93 pages to shove up his derriere.
Like all the other over-rulings of decisions he cheered, he’ll ignore this and move on to supporting the next lawfare attempt to transfer article 2 powers to the judiciary.
...no to its offer of throwing more federal money their way in exchange for signing onto a compact that stipulates their commitments to academic freedom.
I appreciate the dedication to their students' and staff's freedom to hate on the repugs.
There are other universities that have race based hiring and admission standards. They are all operated as for profit entities. So in the intrest pull the non profit status from them
Would you give MAGA a blank check to complain about criticizing MAGA?
Would you go play in traffic?
If you were on Telegram, I’d send you the video of the car chase where the carjacker guy got out of the stolen van on a highway and got plowed into by traffic going like 70. Darwin Award potential. Taxpayer saved money on the trial. Splat.
Wut?
How dumb are you?
Simp on the Barbie
In Melbourne, Australia of police deploying tear gas against violent Antifa counter protesters trying to attack participants of a anti-migration protest
- Bellum Acta
Words by one side is violence and violence by the fascists is speech.
Wait, which ones are the fascists?
Whoever we don't like.
The ones with jobs.
Witkoff statws how CIA has been intentionally misinforming Trump and State in regards to hamas and Israel to try to undermine the cease fire agreement.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/was-cia-misleading-witkoff-kushner-key-intel-about-hamas-during-critical-phase-peace
'Seven of the nine universities approached by the White House have said no to its offer of throwing more federal money their way in exchange for signing onto a compact that stipulates their commitments to academic freedom.'
Yup, rallying to oppose academic freedom (as judged from outside the academy) is spinal strength.
Academic freedom still means ideological purity in their hiring and tenure boards. This complaint is just defending their ideological walls they spent decades building.
Seriously: I figured out that when the left shouts "Protect democracy" they mean their ideological institutions and organized (and funded) elitist system. They don't mean any sort of broad participation in government by regular people, since that also poses a threat.
Trump should have offered the agreement or pulling ALL federal funding.
If they cannot assure equality in treatment, then what is the point?
Don't forget their commitment to racism, sexism and their fanatical devotion to Marxist dogma with it's hatred of the West. Very libertarian thing for Liz to be admiring there.
Child sacrifice, General; don't forget child sacrifice.
No one expects the college inquisition.
I read recently that the line was never in Mel Brook's History of the World Part I. I always thought it was, but apparently it's from Monty Python.
Indeed, it is. An example as it was a running skit:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vt0Y39eMvpI&pp=ygUgc3BhbmlzaCBpbnF1aXNpdGlvbiBtb250eSBweXRob24%3D
illin noise
ICE officials have arrested of a Montenegro national, identified as a criminal alien, who was serving as a sworn police officer in Illinois.
The ICE agency says the individual is now in federal custody pending removal proceedings.
A Montenegrin defied his ancestor's teachings on the folly of "job" and got struck down for his hubris
- Bellum Acta
Thankfully he wasn’t Brazilian or the bigly big bigot bot would continue his smug, racist narratives regarding that beautiful nation and culture.
Montenigga please.
Sir, he specifically requested two monteniggas. Well, to tell the family secret, my grandmother was Dutch.
Jesse Owens?
Where the white women at?
What did you expect? "Welcome, sonny?" "Make yourself at home?" "Marry my daughter?" You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land—the common clay of the new West. You know... morons.
THAT'S THEIR WORD!
Comey apparently tried to hire a lawyer who is one of the people who recieved classified materials from comey to claim attorney client privilege and keep him off the stand.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/10/doj-believes-comeys-attorney-has-a-conflict-of-interest/
There's no deep state.
You might be right. The formerly deep state seems to be right at the surface these days.
True dat. The Deep State is rearing its ugly head like a massive turd needing to be pushed out.
Colleges so far seem hesitant to embrace the Trump administration's proposal, fearing it would invite greater control over their decisions by the executive branch...
Looks like Trump is going to have to find a way to go Title IX on their asses.
They just want the taxpayer money, no strings.
Raging Case of TDS
North Carolina. 38-year-old accountant Benjamin Michael Campbell arrested after allegedly opening fire on a MAGA supporter (62-year-old Mark Thomas) over a Trump sign, according to the Daily Mail.
"He was driving along, saw the sign, slammed on his brakes, you know, had a political trigger moment, and he just had to tear the sign down," Thomas said.
Campbell was later arrested and charged with Class C felony assault. He is facing 17 years in prison.
- Live Leak
Political trigger moment indeed. Video available on Telegram. The accused is a midget and might not even need to get on his knees to mouth hug his frothcoming prison cellmate.
Sounds like more of that "my violence is speech" thing.
Frothcoming... outstanding.
I love how "opening fire" becomes "tear the sign down."
From the video, I believe the accused is shown to have done both.
I will maintain that libertarians need to get on Telegram. Some good channels there often with raw footage.
'Many universities have taken issue with this framing, suggesting it's singling out a specific set of viewpoints for protection.'
I wonder if this is because universities, in practice and in "scholarship", singled out this specific set of viewpoints for persecution.
'Many universities have taken issue with this framing, suggesting it's singling out a specific set of viewpoints for protection.'
It's an odd complaint considering their own professed beliefs that the equal protection clause, civil rights, and other legal/policy protections only apply to certain groups based on historical underrepresentation.
For example schools claim anti-discrimination polices apply only to certain protected groups and exclude straight white males. So when these same schools claim they cannot have policies targeted at specific groups we know they are lying. The only difference is that this policy targets a group they hate.
Colleges continue to be sued for dem endorsed segregation.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/education-org-files-racial-discrimination-complaint-over-black-only
When "Wokes" And "Racists" Actually Agree On Everything
https://youtu.be/Ev373c7wSRg
That was a genius sketch and how I found out about Ryan Long (and Polishchuk) in 2020.
It was after a call with the Russian leader on the eve of the Zelensky meeting that Trump again insisted Kyiv must give up swaths of land for the conflict to end.
WHO LET PUTIN BE THE LAST ONE TO TALK TO TRUMP BEFORE THIS MEETING?
RuSsIaN cOlLuSiOn!
If you understand that the weird capitalization means mockery of the written point, why did you jump on me when I accused you of being a "PuTiN pUpPet"? This was about a month ago. I thought it was obvious by using that alternating capitalization that I wasn't actually calling you a Putin puppet, but instead mocking those who called you one.
Who wants TACOs?
It’s sad you idiots think this is in anyway clever.
Those people aren't laughing at your cleverness. They are laughing at your stupidity.
It is Taco Tard Tuesday, and Bubba delivers.
In a terrible move, trump administration agrees to settle with AFT to make loan forgiveness in loan relief programs untaxable.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-administration-agrees-speed-up-student-loan-forgiveness-under-new-court-deal
Not as terrible as what joe tried, but still a bad move for taxpayers.
This post does not exist - sarc
He always was for loan forgiveness. Well until he found out he didnt qualify. Was against it for a few weeks then. But went back after his enemies were against it.
Zohran Mamdani's decision to pose with this man is actually insane.
He could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot a kulak and not lose any voters.
*infidel
Nice.
Don't give him ideas.
Posted this yesterday:
Wahhaj has made no secret of his contempt for American democracy, openly saying that “Islam is better than democracy” and predicting that “in time, democracy will crumble.” He has repeatedly called for replacing the U.S. government with an Islamic caliphate ruled by sharia law. His speeches are filled with violent rhetoric, including a 1991 sermon in which he told followers, “Those who struggle for Allah, it doesn’t matter what kind of weapons [you use], I’m telling you it doesn’t matter! You don’t need nuclear weapons or even guns! If you have faith in Allah and a knife! If Allah wants you to win, you will win!"
Wahhaj added, “Because Allah is the only one who fights. And when his hand is over your hand, whoever is at war against my friends, I declare war on them…. The Americans are not your friends … The Canadians are not your friends … The Europeans are not your friends.“
No Kings included a lot of threats and calls for murder.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/10/20/make-assassinations-great-again-leftist-demonstrators-call-for-murder-of-trump/
Robespierre approves.
They should keep in mind what happened to Robespierre in the end.
Shhhh. Don't spoil the surprise.
When people show you who they really are, believe them:
- A man dressed as Charlie’s assassin.
- A woman reenacting the moment Charlie was shot in the neck.
- A protester saying, “I’m glad Hitler is dead” when asked about Charlie.
- The crowd singing “Bella Ciao,” the same phrase engraved on the bullets used by Charlie’s assassin.
- Signs mocking Trump and Erika’s injuries: “Which heals faster: Trump’s ear or Erika’s heart?”
- A billboard honoring Charlie destroyed and covered with “Smash Fascism.”
This wasn’t free speech. This was a display of pure hatred and a call to murder.
No. That IS free speech.
Display of hatred?, Sure.
Call to murder? I don't see it.
There is insensitive celebration of murder, but surely no drone-bombing-boats-supporting, Hang-Mike-Pence chanting MAGAs will let mean tweets or mean cardboard signs get under their thin orange skin, right?
The "This machine kills fascist" guitar is a Woodie Guthrie reference, not a death threat by the way.
Edit:
I just saw the guy shouting to shoot ICE agents, so yeah, that's a call to murder, but still within the bounds of free speech in my opinion.
So, the violence you like is speech. Is the speech you don't like violence?
First please address what violence I like. Seems like a false premise for a stupid question.
- A billboard honoring Charlie destroyed and covered with “Smash Fascism.”
You called destruction of property "Free Speech".
When someone burns down the Democratic Headquarters and paints "Fuck Communism" on the rubble, you will applaud the free speech?
You called destruction of property "Free Speech".
That's news to me since it directly contradicts my principles.
So when did I call the destruction of property free speech? What are you referring to?
Your post, not mine
- A man dressed as Charlie’s assassin.
- A woman reenacting the moment Charlie was shot in the neck.
- A protester saying, “I’m glad Hitler is dead” when asked about Charlie.
- The crowd singing “Bella Ciao,” the same phrase engraved on the bullets used by Charlie’s assassin.
- Signs mocking Trump and Erika’s injuries: “Which heals faster: Trump’s ear or Erika’s heart?”
- A billboard honoring Charlie destroyed and covered with “Smash Fascism.”
No. That IS free speech. In bold, by YOU. See above
- A billboard honoring Charlie destroyed and covered with “Smash Fascism.”
OK. I see. That is not free speech, but vandalism.
Since that had nothing to do with the No Kings protests (happened earlier last week), I ignored it for the discussion of "No Kings included a lot of threats and calls for murder."
Just remember Mike's stance on covid censorship.
Refresh our memory.
It is just a wittle ouchie.
Yeah, it's all quite disgusting and in very poor taste. But of course it's free speech unless it rises to the level of actual incitement or threats. Conservatives need to resist the urge to mirror the left with their "hate speech isn't free speech" idiocy.
I would really like it if such things were not socially acceptable among much of the country, but it's definitely protected free speech in the vast majority of cases, excepting the vandalism.
At the No Kings protests, some attendees had made guillotines and brought them with them.
After all the shock displayed by the left and the media at the miniature gallows that was erected at Jan 6, I'm so surprised the guillotines brought by the left wasn't featured more or even condemned by MSM. Shocked, I tell ya.
I do agree, though, that those chants don't rise beyond the standard set by Brandenburg v. Ohio. It is pretty despicable speech that deserves to be called out by anyone who doesn't want political violence, though.
Yeah, ideally it would be called out by the side it ostensibly favors. I don't understand why it's condoned by fellow protesters or those on the same side as it is almost always counter-productive.
Like if I'm on the fence that a given Trump policy should be curtailed, but see someone against that policy celebrate the death of CK, I'm going to put some distance between myself and that person and their policy desires.
Like if I'm on the fence that a given Trump policy should be curtailed, but see someone against that policy celebrate the death of CK, I'm going to put some distance between myself and that person and their policy desires.
Reminds me of the South Park episode "Chef Goes Nanners" from 2000.
No. That IS free speech.
The thing to note here is the comment this responds to does not advocate censorship, it merely recognizes the protests included threats and calls for murder (which even QB recognizes is true).
So why is QB trying to frame this as a "free speech" issue? Is it because that's the only way he can turn this into a criticism of the right?
From the link in the OP:
This wasn’t free speech. This was a display of pure hatred and a call to murder.
A search of the Federalist article for "free speech" returns 0 hits. What did you do, search through links of links of links to find something to attack the right about?
Yeah, I followed all the links in the article.
And since history shows you LOVE talking about me, here's more about me:
I usually check out linked articles pretty thoroughly, including following embedded links and sources (or ignore a comment completely.) I'm a depth, not breadth type of person.
I usually check out linked articles pretty thoroughly
It's more accurate to say you go to whatever depth is necessary to find a way to blame the right. We call this the Jeffsarc Model.
You poor baby. I'm sorry. it must be hard to try to comprehend your MAGA authoritarian apologist takeover of a libertarian site is incomplete and you still have to see a few libertarian views that cause pain by countering your confirmation bias.
You'll be OK. Try some warm milk and a pacifier.
it must be hard to try to comprehend your MAGA authoritarian apologist
Not very perceptive are you?
you still have to see a few libertarian views
If you're pretending to be libertarian you're not doing a very good job.
Try some warm milk and a pacifier.
I love how you all return to childishness when you need to change the thread focus. It's a tell.
Was wondering who would catch this as Ive chosen not to engage Mike.
I, nor did the federalist, made no assertion on legalities as you point out. As I often do I was presenting reality against the narrative Mike and democrats love to push.
Mike doesn't care though. Dishonest shit he is.
Yes, we know you're afraid to confront me.
When do the preemptive strikes begin?
But have they made any sarcastic remarks regarding wood chippers?
Saw multiple instances of No Kings man-in-the-street segments on video wherein none of the people questioned could produce a single thing they were actually protesting about, not one concrete thing...just "Trump is bad".
Family Guy AI spin on No Kings
https://twitter.com/i/status/1979482893681349119
That was pretty funny.
I saw that too. But I caution against thinking that represented most protesters there. It's the same as when you see one of those "man on the street" interview channels where random people are asked easy questions, which they can't answer correctly. If you look at the comments, you'll see a bunch of people from outside the US laughing about how stupid Americans are. And while those respondents truly are stupid, it's just as foolish to assume the respondents shown in the video are representative of the whole population. Most of those channels interview/quiz hundreds of people, but only show the ones who were comically dumb.
Then again, it wouldn't surprise me if most of the protesters at No Kings struggled to articulate actual reasons why they hate Trump other than feelings.
I'll just counter a bit with: Yes, but these are people who willingly and intentionally made the effort to show up at these rallies and not just random people off the street. If you're going to make an effort, give up your Saturday to travel to a rally to protest something, is it unreasonable to think that you could perhaps be able to articulate one tiny reason why?
In this case, the real answer for many seems to have been "It's what they paid me to do".
Sure, each and every one that attended should be able to answer easy questions with specifics as to why they think Trump is a tyrant or a king.
Still, in almost any large group of people, there will be some dumbasses. My point was that those videos from the protest showcasing people who believed strongly enough to protest but couldn't answer basic questions were probably edited to select for the worst or dumbest answers and might not be representative of most of the protesters. But, yes, the ones I saw who couldn't even give specifics, even specifics I would have disagreed with, were pathetic or possibly paid protesters. I just don't think the paid ones account for many of the people there.
Guillotine Trump, waste ICE agents, "Hurray Charlie Kirk got killed", nice bunch of folks up in Wisconsin
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2025/10/20/wisconsin-dems-delete-post-wishing-death-on-trump-n2665187
LOL, meanwhile these same people get assblasted when Trump does a literal shitpost and shows an AI video of him bombing them with crap.
As a Libertarian, I think the president should be able to dictate terms to private institutions. And if they stand up to the president, they're terrorists.
They can do as they please, once freed from the burden of receiving tax dollars.
Of course you are correct, but he already knows that. He's not even trying to make a libertarian argument. Pathetic.
They should stop being sent money coerced from taxpayers.
As a Leftist, you believe leftist indoctrination should be paid for by the tax paying public, and the denial of civil rights to icky parts of our populace, with no strings or oversight
I'm pretty sure that Abbott can keep tabs on the University of TEXAS without Trump's help.
Abbott doesn’t keep track of fed dollars dipshit
Anyone else notice that the obvious leftists here always use the "as a libertarian" introduction? Always defending bad acts of the left such as DEI and free taxpayer funding of their views?
I cringe when someone asks "Can I be honest with you?" or says "To be perfectly honest..." because I KNOW the next words coming out of their mouth will almost certainly be a lie.
Kill yourself.
"As a fucking slimy pile of lying lefty shit..."
Fixed, asswipe.
I call bullshit. There is no fucking way Kung Fu Shrike is a libertarian.
No. But he once got pounded in the ass by an openly gay, closet progressive LP candidate.
Did he chase that?
The Obama Administration is at the door, and they're delivering a "Dear colleague" letter...
You’re not a libertarian.
Lefty NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani gleefully campaigned this week with a notorious, gay-hating Brooklyn imam who is an unindicted co-conspirator in 1993 World Trade Center bombing...
Having Madmani preside over the 25th anniversary of 9/11 is peak 2020's.
I feel bad admitting this, but I am going to be amused by gay folks learning how asinine their support of Islamists is.
You are better than I am. I am waiting for an Islamist to throw one of these Queers for Palestine off a roof.
Then watch the MSM try to blame it on MAGA.
Then watch Jeff tell us "Diversity is our strength!"
Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee are calling for hearings into the Trump administration's decisions to strike down boats in the Caribbean...
The walls will be closing in, Iran-Contra style!
Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee are calling for hearings into the Trump administration's decisions to strike down boats in the Caribbean, following news reports of fishermen being killed.
Reports based on guess for facts? This is repeating hamas propaganda all over. Journalists saying their job is hard so they report supposition.
"It was after a call with the Russian leader on the eve of the Zelensky meeting that Trump again insisted Kyiv must give up swaths of land for the conflict to end."
Does anyone with even a quarter of a brain think that this war can end (mostly) peacefully without Ukraine ceding some land?
And as a libertarian might ask, what do the locals in those territories want?
Democracy it the most important thing, except for when people vote in a way that favors Russia.
How the pandemic changed the world for the worse, a collection of observations by Patrick Collison: massive influxes of immigrants across the West; total shift in college student behavior, including students being far less likely to do reading assignments; British economic statistics on trade, population, employment no longer as reliable; nightlife depressed in the world's major cities; Western travel to China never recovered. What else?
Yes. The globalists/Marxists used covid as an excuse to try to push their desires strongly. The comments here pointed this out from day one. Youre almost there Liz.
Notably missing are the 20 million votes that appeared in the middle of the night in 2020 and disappeared in 2024. So I guess we made some progress there.
Those votes later died from covid.
Isn’t that, “with Covid”?
'Some schools, like MIT, communicated to the Department of Education that they would not be signing onto the compact because it includes "principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution" and because one of their "core belief[s] [is] that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone."'
Sure, MIT. Can you prove that over the past 50 years none of your hiring, promotion, program management, admissions, community engagement, political signaling, and, yes, research funding, put DEI ahead of scientific merit?
Agreed. I highlighted the exact same section. What a complete farce.
I think what their spokeshole meant to say was they wouldn't be signing onto the compact because it includes "principles with which we disagree, like freedom of expression at our dependent institution."
As Liz noted the administration is simply asking for compliance with federal law in hiring and admissions. That shouldn't be controversial. The end of viewpoint discrimination seems to be a bridge too far for the academy and probably not enforceable. Meanwhile they will continue to use illegal racist and sexist criteria until they get sued into bankruptcy. With any luck.
Any new on trump getting the in to drop a proposed carbon tax? You read that correctly in 2024 the un voted itself the ability to levy taxes, then tried to pass a carbon tax that was stopped by trumo
https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/10/taking-action-to-defend-america-from-the-uns-first-global-carbon-tax-the-international-maritime-organizations-imo-net-zero-framework-nzf
'Scenes from New York: Zohran Mamdani's decision to pose with this man is actually insane.'
Unless you are an Islamo-marxist who thinks sharia socialism is right around the corner.
That’s exactly what’s around the corner in NYC.
But he's going to freeze your rent and isn't that the only thing that really matters?
No. Skin color is the only thing that matters.
Well, that and not having chicks in charge. Which I think disqualifies zoran. Did you see that pathetic bench press? Yikes. Soy boys may as well be chicks.
But the countries that might make up that force are skittish about committing soldiers who could potentially come into direct conflict with Hamas...
"Many of our troops have been tweeting and insta-ing 'river to the sea' support for over a year so it could get pretty awkward."
How the pandemic changed the world for the worse, a collection of observations by Patrick Collison...
How pandemic mitigation policies changed the world, you mean.
Yup. Government response to the pandemic.
Who would have thought a Wuhan wet market could have stopped the world from spinning…
People keep acting as if the government had no choice.
You mean our "abundance of caution" as a cover for immense power-grabbing government?
I blame our pajama class and NYC corporate media facilitators and I will never forgive them.
A bigly big bigot bot would bring up the “bears in trunks” dilemma.
And any asinine analogy asserted outta his anal aperture amidst asinine asymmetrical assumptions.
https://www.popsci.com/environment/bear-attacks-japan/
Bears have attacked over 100 people in Japan since March
The dangerous encounters are on the rise.
But did these bears jump out of unlocked trunks? Asking for a fatfuck here.
That's exactly what I asked myself when I read about it in the first place!
Pfffft. Rice burners can’t hold in a bear.
The ageless battle of man versus pangolin is a treacherous tale and if not for our wise bureaucrats our wiley enemy might well have prevailed.
I am a two time (TWO TIME) survivor of covid. Visit my merch shop for branded gear.
'Your mileage may vary, but I don't love Mamdani's decision to pose with this man (nor do plenty of other New Yorkers).'
Well, Liz, then leave now and avoid the jihad (or at least providing these assholes a soft endorsement by hanging around). Actual democracy is not just who you vote for, but where you choose to live and who you choose to trade and associate with. Did you know that?
If that results in colleges—both private and public—accepting fewer federal funds,
Much like how corporate America will not reject fed money, neither will these universities.
I feel no sympathy for them.
"The US is balking at a European Union-led plan for Group of Seven nations to expand the use of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine"
Hmm, using assets confiscated from Evil People to support war on said Evil People? I wonder if the EU would ever do this to their own rich people.
"But the countries that might make up that force are skittish about committing soldiers who could potentially come into direct conflict with Hamas while it is still an armed group, diplomats and other people familiar with the deliberations say."
I think some countries are confused about the role of "soldier".
"universities would not be allowed more than a 15 percent foreign student population..."no more than 5 percent of foreign students could be from the same country...endowment of $2 billion could not charge undergraduate tuition to hard sciences majors...tuition rates would be frozen for five years.
The most mind-blowingly moronic 'policy' I have yet seen from these clowns.
Tuition rates frozen for five years is a good policy idea. In particular because the ONLY way to achieve that is to eliminate all federal student loans for 5+ years. That would achieve other things too. But that's not part of the plan is it.
The half-witted notion that endowments must pay for 'hard sciences' study is basically the right-wing central planning notion that substitutes for 'get rid of federal student loans'. And it would backfire spectacularly and very predictably. No surprise there either.
As for limiting foreign students to 15%, the schools with the highest % of foreign grad students are: Illinois Tech, Carnegie Mellon, MIT, Stevens Tech, Rice, CalTech, and GA Tech. IOW - say goodbye to some of the bigger STEM talent pipelines.
Which is ok because clearly the intent of that 15% total and 5% 'from one country' limit is to quite deliberately cut off Chinese and Indian talent. Those are the two countries that have a population greater than 5% of the global total so the intent there is deliberate focused restriction. So what industry is gonna be obliterated by this? What two countries will benefit the most?
Those multi-billion dollar endowments are not taxed. They also aren’t being used as anything other than virtue signal footballs for the markets.
They are supposed to be used to further the educational mission of the university. Instead, tuition increases at 5x inflation, knowing that the govt will fund it thru loans that won’t be repaid, so the admin staff can grow exponentially from the pool of unemployable critical studies majors they churn out.
If they can’t fund the education of American engineers and scientists, why do they get this royal kid glove treatment from the taxpayer?
Why should we subsidize the Chinese?
They can do as they please once they stop taking tax dollars.
IOW - say goodbye to some of the bigger STEM talent pipelines.
Horseshit. Many of these foreign students aren’t worth it. They commonly need to be brought up to speed, and they often suck as teaching assistants because they can’t communicate with the undergrads.
They also have rampant cheating. Experienced it first hand. Foreign TA would give test answers to his fellow country men undergrads.
Rice was a STEM talent pipeline long before they had a president who was married to a Chinese national and had the bright idea to jack up tuition and milk the foreigners for shiny new buildings.
I work with a lot of foreign STEM. The H1b system is used to fill up labs with lab grunts at depressed wages.
This isn't really about the H1b system is it.
Are you saying that the foreign grad students in STEM are not even capable of being grad students in STEM? That they are basically DEI students (with more dollars than sense) - the worst of the worst where STEM schools are lowering proper STEM standards to accept them?
If you want to make that case then fine - do that. Find evidence that foreign STEM students are basically the STEM equivalent of basketball/football scholarship students/players.
The H1b system is more about employees who already have work experience. The STEM/student pipeline goes through F1 visas and then L1 visas or only ultimately H1b visas.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Just stop.
There’s only one side here that’s gotten violent.
https://x.com/basedmikelee/status/1980350916604919967?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Fuck your whataboutism.
I liked the fat chick making fun of Charlie Kirk getting shot.
Could this be a chemjeff sighting?
Believe it or not, she’s a teacher in the Chicago Public Schools system.
Hopefully soon to be former teacher.
We wish. This is CPS and the CTU we’re talking about here. The fucking CTU hierarchy says the same shit.
More wild post-pandemic stats:
A much more intelligent post-pandemic stat:
China now exports more 'energy value' than the US does. In the US case that is mainly fossil fuel inputs and airplanes/defense (the only fuel use that still requires oil and that the US still produces/exports). In China's case, that means solar/wind/renewables/battery tech - and everything that enables/incentivizes electrification. And the difference will only skyrocket from here.
Not that Americans will bother understanding what this means - but its huge for everything (not just economic) that the US has depended on for over 100 years.
"...China now exports more 'energy value' than the US does. In the US case that is mainly fossil fuel inputs and airplanes/defense (the only fuel use that still requires oil and that the US still produces/exports). In China's case, that means solar/wind/renewables/battery tech - and everything that enables/incentivizes electrification. And the difference will only skyrocket from here..."
JFucked is behind the curve again. It is becoming quite clear that watermelon energy is on the skids; un-reliable, expensive, requiring huge amounts of real estate and short lived.
solar/wind/renewables/battery tech
People still believe in this bullshit?
Well, this is J(ew)free we’re talking about here.
Except that renewables do not remotely work. At all. China is taking advantage of how asinine our "elites" are in the West.
Yeah, “See, China is getting rich exporting all this green energy to the West (while continuing to build coal power plants for their own use)!” isn’t the win here thinks it is.
"Zohran Mamdani's decision to pose with this man is actually insane."
Readers' digest version:
Zohran Mamdani is actually insane.
He's not insane, he's remarkably adept at tapping in to what the core of the Democratic party thinks. And he's and adept debater... although when your competition is Andrew Cuomo, you've been handed a layup.
"...The compact asks universities to no longer use race or sex in hiring or admissions (thus bringing them into compliance with existing federal law)..."
Imagine requiring obeying existing law as a requirement for funding! NO KINGS!
"(Many universities have taken issue with this framing, suggesting it's singling out a specific set of viewpoints for protection.)"
Mostly because only one viewpoint has been under unrelenting attack?
An indecent proposal: Seven of the nine universities approached by the White House have said no to its offer of throwing more federal money their way in exchange for signing onto a compact that stipulates their commitments to academic freedom.
*rubs eyes*
So what now? The schools have stood up against academic freedom? Is this like the libertarian "don't ban the ban" thing?
The compact asks universities to no longer use race or sex in hiring or admissions (thus bringing them into compliance with existing federal law) and to shut down "institutional units that purposefully punish, belittle and even spark violence against conservative ideas," if they exist on campus.
Wait, why is the Trump administration paying colleges to not break the law?
Too early for this fucking shit.
I can never tell if MAGA is naive or disingenuous. I don't suppose it matters. They don't call them "useful idiots" for nothing.
The agreement grants Trump the power to unilaterally decide if the university is living up to his personal vision of conservative freedom.
And his 'personal vision of conservative freedom' is don't be racist? And the Universities' position is, "that's our right"?
Poor leftist retard.
Yes, you are a useful idiot. Recognizing the problem is the first step to your recovery.
"I can never tell if MAGA is naive or disingenuous"
Which is strange because I've always considered you somewhat of an expert in being disingenuous, Shrike.
Wiegel is Buttplug’s buttplug.
Why, PRECISELY, should MAGA give a shit?
What would conceivably be WORSE for us than the present status quo?
"Oh no, we might...continue having our voices silenced by angry lefties who will never be punished".
Oh dear, how will we survive?
Useful idiots was a term created for MAGA? Interesting. And by interesting I mean retarded.
Scenes from New York: Zohran Mamdani's decision to pose with this man is actually insane.
Yet completely in line with what we expect from the left. I'm still shocked that anyone is shocked. You voted for it, New York. Suck it.
Suck it, and stay.
If I can mandate a new law for NYC, it would require anyone who votes for Mamdani to stay there for the next 10 years.
Well, if he's elected, he might have to do that. The Berlin Wall was to keep people in, not out, after all.
And Escape From New York takes one step closer to reality.
gay-hating Brooklyn imam
That's cute how you think pointing that out will make Mamdani's supporters gasp in unison.
Liz... the thing is never the thing, the thing is always the revolution.
Sometimes I think Liz is almost there. Then I don’t.
Your mileage may vary, but I don't love Mamdani's decision to pose with this man (nor do plenty of other New Yorkers).
Would that 'plenty of other New Yorkers' be sufficient to say, hold up an electric car market?
Former President Joe Biden's 2025 speaking tour was canceled, with nearly all of his scheduled appearances called off amid growing concerns about his health.
Fit, rested and ready...
Steve Miller Band canceled the tour because zero ticket sales too.
Think he once wrote a lyric about shrike:
He’s a joker, he’s a smoker, he’s a little boy poker.
Wasn’t that joe Walsh?
Maybe not. Boomer hippies all sound the same.
No. His Maserati could do 185, but now he lost his license and can't drive.
Some schools, like MIT, communicated to the Department of Education that they would not be signing onto the compact because it includes "principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution"
Compare this to these schools reaction to the Title IX Dear Colleague Letter creating kangaroos courts devoid of due process for men accused of sexual harassment on campus. No institution refused to accept that program even though it was issued illegitimately and violates the civil rights of half their students.
"if that results in colleges—both private and public—accepting fewer federal funds"
Silver linings!
Exactly. What’s the downside to this?
Less racism.
>>Many universities have taken issue with this framing, suggesting it's singling out a specific set of viewpoints for protection.
I was hoping your next sentence would be why this is ludicrous.
>>If that results in colleges—both private and public—accepting fewer federal funds, that's arguably a good thing for taxpayers, even if you disagree with the means by which it was achieved.
sign this or stop receiving money you shouldn't receive is disagreeable means?
>>I don't love Mamdani's decision to pose with this man (nor do plenty of other New Yorkers).
lol your city is weeks from falling to Hamas but keep clutching the pearls.
Like London, Paris, Birmingham...
yes. The Smiths' Panic takes on entire new meaning now
Who is the DJ in this scenario?
I assume the PM is playing the music that says nothing to them about their lives right now
>>Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee are calling for hearings
from the golf course?
And here I thought it was from a nursing home.
I didn't think about who the membership was. Mazie & Warren & Duckworth are probably pretty fun after a couple drinks I wonder if any of them golf
edit: dammit these are senators ...
I doubt Duckworthless golfs.
>>Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faced tough talk from President Donald Trump
"Hey at least he didn't dump poop on me from a plane." ~~Volod
Can’t say the same for the Dave Matthew’s Band.
who pushed what empty the septic tank button?
Any Trump defender who says the Department of Education must go is a liar. Why? Because then Trump would have no power to dictate what schools that receive federal money can and cannot do (not like he wouldn't anyway, but he'd loose leverage). They celebrate that power because they want to see it used to harm people they hate.
Nice try at a strawman, bro. You do realize that Trump wants to massively shrink, if not eliminate the Department of Education, right, retard? Kind of makes your argument idiotic.
His EO to dismantle the DoEd is to be as minimally compliant as allowed by law. This angers sarc and he has to ask congress arguments. Also trump is simply enforcing congressional laws that bar racism. Sarc always demands anything trump does, he has to ask congress. Yet ironically is upset that trump is enforcing what congress asked in regards to barring racism.
Almost like sarcs arguments are not principled.
Almost everything sarc is mad at Trump for doing is simply faithfully executing the laws.
You have achieved full sarc(retard).
Tell us about your hero Jimmy Carter again.
Also, why do you keep defending democrat racism?
Because he's a racist and antisemite. Not of his own volition but because he wanted to piss off the people he was arguing with on the internet.
Probably the stupidest reason for becoming racist ever.
Any Trump defender who says the Department of Education must go is a liar. Why? Because then Trump would have no power to dictate what schools that receive federal money can and cannot do
Ahhh.... I expect Sarcposting to be stupid and trolly, but not this stupid. How he manages to pack so many fallacies in three short sentences is beyond me.
1. Ad Hominem
“Any Trump defender who says the Department of Education must go is a liar.”
2. Straw Man
Sarckles invents a false motive (“they celebrate that power because they want to see it used to harm people they hate”) and attacks that instead of the actual argument.
3. Begging the Question / Circular Reasoning
“They celebrate that power because they want to see it used to harm people they hate.”
4. False Cause / Non Sequitur
“Because then Trump would have no power to dictate what schools… can and cannot do.”
5. Hasty Generalization
“Any Trump defender who says…”
It’s a mix of personal attack and circular moral reasoning, rather than any logically supported argument. Basically another Sarcasmic temper tantrum disguised as stupid trolling.
Sarc is a walking, talking, typing, living, breathing, drinking example of logical fallacies.
Sarcular reasoning.
Another one!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/illegal-immigrant-allegedly-causes-fatal-semi-truck-crash-on-highway-killing-driver-officials/ar-AA1OQfbM
Illegal immigrant allegedly causes fatal semi-truck crash on highway, killing driver: officials
The Portage Police Department said Broko Stankovic was driving on U.S. Highway 20 in Indiana on Wednesday when traffic came to a stop due to a Ram Sprinter turning near Douglas Drive, but the suspect didn't appear to slow down in his semi-truck, according to FOX 32.
Officials said Stankovic attempted to make a hard evasive left turn when he entered opposite traffic and hit a Subaru Crosstrek.
The semi-truck jackknifed as a result and hit the Ram Sprinter, which was pushed into a road sign. Police said the 54-year-old driver of the Subaru died at the scene.
Officials said Stankovic possessed a suspended Illinois CDL, which was a family member's, but didn't have a valid CDL himself. His company wasn't registered with the Department of Transportation, they added.
Stankovic's immigration status caused ICE to put a detainer on him as he was being taken to the Porter County Jail. He was charged with felony reckless homicide and felony criminal recklessness resulting in death.
On US-20, he’s probably trying to avoid the Chesterton weigh stations on I-94 where ICE has been set up for weeks.
He needs infinite attempts at due process.
It's not due process until the other side gets it's way.
It is all about protecting their precious illegalkind!
"The compact asks universities to no longer use race or sex in hiring or admissions (thus bringing them into compliance with existing federal law) and to shut down "institutional units that purposefully punish, belittle and even spark violence against conservative ideas," if they exist on campus. (Many universities have taken issue with this framing, suggesting it's singling out a specific set of viewpoints for protection.)"
Hmm, they don't want to single out specific viewpoints for protection, but I wonder how many of those universities still have signs everywhere telling us whose lives matter?
Colleges so far seem hesitant to embrace the Trump administration's proposal, fearing it would invite greater control over their decisions by the executive branch and prevent them from pursuing the policies they believe best serve their institutions.
This is sort of saying the silent part out loud. What academia is looking for isn't so much academic freedom, per se, as academic autonomy. That is to say, academia has little or no interest in preserving freedom within the confines of academia. What they want is for academia to be free from external restraints imposed by...."outside troublemakers". Even if those troublemakers are, in fact, the people paying the bills. In a lot of ways it's an echo of the medieval clashes of church and civil law, which shouldn't be too surprising given the history of the university.
Of course, I think academia might be surprised at the lack of public pushback if Trump were to ask, "Will no one rid me of these meddlesome professors?"
"in exchange for signing onto a compact that stipulates their commitments to academic freedom
Why the hell would a modern university commit to academic freedom? That flies in the face of the whole indoctrination process so carefully cultivated over the last 75 years.
The Portland government, including the police, are ANTIFA. Time for the insurrection act:
"She's literally running behind you guys"
@nicksortor
captured the moment a riot suspect outside the Portland ICE facility ran to
@PortlandPolice
for cover. PPB have been recorded recently assisting riot suspects, i.e., after they're pepper-sprayed.
https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1980657798687158746
Operation Linebacker III.
Prosecute them for violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339A and 2339B; giving material aid to terrorists.
And another one...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/illegal-migrant-walked-free-from-multiple-duis-before-north-carolina-killing/ar-AA1OQoHR
Illegal Migrant Walked Free From Multiple DUIs Before North Carolina Killing
An illegal migrant charged with fatally running over a North Carolina man carried a history of drunk driving arrests, but was repeatedly released by local authorities.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) lodged a detainer for Wilmer Fuentes Mejia, a criminal illegal migrant who allegedly drove off after striking and killing a 61-year-old man in Durham in September, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revealed to the Daily Caller News Foundation. The Trump administration says Mejia should’ve been locked up long before the tragic accident.
“Wilmer Fuentes Mejia is a criminal illegal alien from Guatemala who has a history of driving while intoxicated and was previously deported by ICE in 2020,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement provided to the DCNF.
Expand article logo Continue reading
“A local DA allowed him to walk free after multiple DUIs only to then cause this fatal hit-and-run that killed an innocent 61-year-old man in North Carolina,” McLaughlin continued.
Mejia, a Guatemalan national, first unlawfully entered the U.S. in 2015 and was released by the Obama administration, according to DHS. Upon an immigration judge’s order, ICE deported him in 2020 during the Trump administration, but he illegally re-entered the U.S. again — a felony under U.S. law — at an unknown date and time.
Illegalkind is a threat to us all!