America Second
Plus: Feminization of the workplace, no National Guard in Chicago, public transit needs to be policed, and more...

Trump helps Milei: Doing away with "America First" for a second, President Donald Trump decided to throw $20 billion Javier Milei's way in bailout money. It comes in the form of a swap line, or a loan, with Argentina's central bank.
"We don't have to do it. It's not going to make a big difference for our country," Trump told reporters earlier this week, in front of the Argentine president. "The election is coming up very soon. Our approvals are somewhat subject to who wins the election."
"There's a midterm election coming up. We think he's going to do well and then continue his reform agenda," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Unfortunately, this decision has "been criticized by a couple of American Peronists," he added. Trump suggested elsewhere that the money could be revoked if the legislative composition post-election doesn't favor Milei.
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
"You can call it a bailout, you can call it a rescue, it is a credit line to a country that otherwise would be out of reserves," former Treasury official Brad Setser told ABC News.
"We are working on a $20 billion facility that would complement our swap line, with private banks and sovereign funds that, I believe, would be more focused on the debt market," Bessent told reporters Wednesday, calling this "a private-sector solution" and saying that "many banks are interested in it and many sovereign funds have expressed interest."
It's not especially shocking that Milei's extensive efforts to cure Argentina from decades of bankrupting Peronist rule have resulted in some amount of fiscal pain. This upcoming election—which is legislative, and thus affects what type of majority or coalition Milei will have to be able to push his agenda through—should be seen as the Argentine people deciding if they want to stay the course and continue through the temporary pain for long-term fiscal health. Milei did not promise it would be easy, but fixing Argentina's economic situation requires some amount of commitment to the program.
"Since taking office in December 2023, Milei slashed billions in spending, froze public works, and cut federal funding to provinces, among other austerity measures," writes Reason's César Báez. "University and health budgets were hit especially hard, leading to layoffs and reduced services. Retirees saw their benefits shrink as inflation eroded payments, while tighter rules limited access to pensions. As a result, Argentina reached its first primary surplus in more than a decade and its first full-year surplus in 123 years. But the cost was steep: Consumption plunged and poverty spiked above 50 percent before easing in recent months. The political backlash hit hardest in the province of Buenos Aires—home to nearly 40 percent of voters—where Milei's coalition suffered a defeat earlier this month. In response, Milei rolled out a 2026 budget that expands spending in areas he once vowed to shrink."
It looks a bit like Milei is contending with the fact that his program is unpopular—and of course it is, because people want free stuff (especially if they've received it for years under Peronist rulers)—and trying to figure out how to stay in office, with decent support in the legislature, to see all of these reforms through, as they'll require more than just two years to implement. (Milei himself is up for reelection in 2027.) The spending-expansion as well as the bailout are Milei embracing the practical realities of the situation, attempting to buy himself time, support, and peso stabilization to be able to more robustly fix Argentina's economy. (Of course, there's the separate question of why it's in Trump's best interest to do this, or how it could possibly align with any of the America First rhetoric Trump purports to believe in.)
"Without a congressional majority, Milei has relied on vetoes to block deficit-boosting bills," continues Báez. "By conceding targeted increases, he hopes to blunt those challenges while courting centrists who dislike Peronist populism but remain wary of his radical cures. The October 26 legislative elections will decide whether he grows his foothold in Congress or stays boxed in."
Scenes from New York: The mayoral debate was not especially enlightening, but produced plenty of beautiful Sliwaisms.
How do you get around when you can't take the subway?
Zohran: Cab or bike
Cuomo: Cab or Uber
Sliwa: "I try to avoid yellow cabs, as you know I was shot in the back of a yellow cab in 1992 by the Gottis and Gambinos. But I find my way around. If I have to, I Uber."
— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) October 17, 2025
QUICK HITS
- "Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field," writes Helen Andrews for Compact. "That is the Great Feminization thesis…Everything you think of as 'wokeness' is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization….The problem is not that women are less talented than men or even that female modes of interaction are inferior in any objective sense. The problem is that female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing the goals of many major institutions. You can have an academia that is majority female, but it will be (as majority-female departments in today's universities already are) oriented toward other goals than open debate and the unfettered pursuit of truth. And if your academia doesn't pursue truth, what good is it? If your journalists aren't prickly individualists who don't mind alienating people, what good are they? If a business loses its swashbuckling spirit and becomes a feminized, inward-focused bureaucracy, will it not stagnate?"
- "A federal appeals court on Thursday said that it would not let President Donald Trump deploy troops in Illinois for now, leaving in place a judge's ruling that blocked the administration from placing the National Guard in the Chicago area," reports The Washington Post.
- A mom was placed on the child abuse registry in Pennsylvania for letting a 13-year-old watch a 1-year-old, reports Reason's Lenore Skenazy. The "Reasonable Independence for Children" bill aims to prevent this type of overreach by the state.
- New polling data from the Associated Press/NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates that Americans blame Republicans, Democrats, and Trump somewhat equally for the government shutdown. (I take issue with the blame part but whatever.)
- "American governments have typically prioritized building roads over rail lines, and the needs of drivers over bus or subway riders," writes Charles Fain Lehman in The Atlantic. "And because the costs of constructing public transit are much higher in the United States than in other developed countries, new projects are rarer and more slowly built than they ought to be. Other problems flow from the cost issue, such as low service quality: Trains and buses make less frequent stops in the U.S. than in peer nations, and public transit tends to serve a much smaller area.…But an underappreciated factor in low ridership is crime—and fear of crime—on public buses, trains, and other mass transit.…Americans' sense that their transit systems are unsafe is perhaps one reason the recent killing of Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee, aboard a light-rail train in Charlotte, North Carolina, resonated with so many people. Charlotte has spent billions on its light-rail system. Nonetheless, ridership is anemic. It peaked in the third quarter of 2019, at roughly 30,600 riders on an average weekday. As of the most recent figures, it was down to 21,000, a trivial number considering that 2.9 million people live in the Charlotte metro area."
- Zohran watch:
The plan? All the people that assault bus drivers for $2.90, we let them sit next to you for free. https://t.co/fm122es98L pic.twitter.com/PUMrK7Tg0V
— Kane 謝凱堯 (@kane) October 16, 2025
- Insane to sign onto this:
NEW:
The @washingtonpost obtained a list of the 15 individuals who signed the Pentagon press policy.
The Federalist, the Epoch Times, and OAN signed it. The rest are freelancers, independent or work for media outfits based overseas.https://t.co/WZmNo7J02Q
— Scott Nover (@ScottNover) October 16, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A Bad Idea
A known Portland Antifa member, Kiley Delgado - who has a long history of crime including felony riot - allegedly records herself boxing in and physically obstructing ICE agents in Hillsboro, Oregon.
- Live Leak (with video)
Deport her antifa terrorist ass to Venezuela. Two can play that game, Caracas.
Did you see her membership card?
It's just, like, an idea.
Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field...
Me-ow.
Fat woke purple-haired Gorlocks cancel themselves ever getting laid by a high value man.
But still have clinical anxiety from fear of rape.
Well, high value men tend not to rape.
Great. Now you made them worry that they WON'T get raped.
they already worried that too.
False. They say sorry after.
To be accurate, I believe rape is more about control/pathology of the rapist and less about the comeliness of the victim.
Yeah, but............
Comeliness is in the eye of the beholder. Victims of serial rapists usually strongly resemble each other. The rapists definitely have a strong preference.
The serial rapist in the village I grew up in went after opportunity. One of the victims was a grandmother in her 70s whereas I believe others were women in their 20s. He needed to experience a woodchipper, feet first.
I believe this is why some have said you can’t have chicks in charge of anything.
That would be DLAM. He can combine that with another saying for when a chick is in charge:
More testes needed.
Is skin color not the most important thing?
Did not Katherine Maher (NPR Chief Exec) say
“Our reverence for the truth may be getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done?”
Yes, she did.
https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/taxpayers-will-no-longer-underwrite-nprs-battle-the-truth
Come on, guys. Our intellectual intersectional elite have proven that the truth does not exist, except as a white patriarchal colonial construct.
And war is peace and freedom is slavery.
2+2=5
2 40s = not enough
- sarc
Well said.
The Demperor Has No Clothes
Augusta, Maine. Man goes off on a Maine school board after they tried interjecting as parents began undressing in front of them in protest of a trans athlete policy.
Board: "Point of order. We've asked that..."
Parent Nick Blanchard: "Oh, so wait, wait, wait, wait... You feel uncomfortable? Because that's what these young girls feel like when a boy walks into the locker room and starts unchanging in front of them."
- Live Leak (also with video)
(D)isgusta is a woke shithole and I advise these non-TDS addled folks to move to red Maine then homeschool their kiddos. But kudos to them for demonstrating how bad rainbow cult hegemony is.
Secede!
Parts of Maine are exploring that.
...President Donald Trump decided to throw $20 billion Javier Milei's way in bailout money.
MARKET FAIL
Tariffs must have hit Argentina hard.
Muslims and their elected MPs celebrate banning Jewish fans of Maccabi Tel Aviv from match against Aston Villa.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cy9pjv59w95o
Also celebrate ruining Jewish owned businesses.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/11/israel-global-boycott
Charlie can’t wait for Mamdani (D) to bring the caliphate to NYC.
Hey, Jews are just asking to be tattooed, badged, and forced to live in ghettos.
Add Antifa to the list of groups who can't wait to finally fulfill Hitler's dream.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/17/the-ban-on-maccabi-tel-aviv-fans-is-a-moral-outrage/
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/04/19/is-it-now-a-crime-to-be-a-jew-in-london/
Sullums favorite vote machine company smartmatic indicted over bribery scandal.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/federal-prosecutors-accuse-smartmatic-executives-money-laundering-bribing
How do you get around when you can't take the subway?
None of them walk amongst the commoners.
On of the marks of true oppression is not enough parking at the welfare office.
Unlike many residents of NYC, Sliwa actually lives in NYC.
Fall is Here
83-year-old GOP Senator Mitch McConnell just FELL while walking and being asked questions by a reporter.
- Live Leak (Telegram has the video)
McConnell going all-in on preparing to be Joe Biden this Halloween. Method costuming apparently now a thing.
Repeal the law of gravity!
If a man can be a woman, why not?
No more "How's it hanging?"
Fetterman’s Lurch costume is amazing. Hopefully more senators get on board with celebrating Halloween.
I always saw him as Uncle Fester.
If a significant number of men want to be women, doesn't that undercut the feminist assertion that women are oppressed?
Penisless is the new black
What if it’s just detachable?
Is that the same thing as strap-on?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=byDiILrNbM4&list=RDbyDiILrNbM4&start_radio=1&pp=ygUXZGV0YWNoYWJsZSBraW5nIG1pc3NpbGWgBwE%3D
Jeff would sign on to the bill.
Next, give him some chewing gum and watch.
"83-year-old GOP Senator Mitch McConnell"
Cocaine Mitch is only 83???
I thought he was at least twice as old.
No, the only person who ever lived to 166 was Henry Kissinger.
I’m surprised it wasn’t 666.
Metal Methusaleh.
All I see is someone who probably needs another booster.
CNN KFile uncovers Maine "oyster farmer" dem candidates reddit account.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/16/politics/kfile-graham-platner-maine-senate-candidate-deleted-reddit-posts
Seems to be going for the sarc vote.
Family money funds his life.
Communist
Gun owner
Anti work
All white people are racist.
Claims he is a principled moderate
Thread on his posts.
https://x.com/reddit_lies/status/1978855525723873602
Sounds like a midcoast moonbat. Maybe Mainewire has this too (CNN has a paywall).
People pay for cnn?
CNN++ was just announced.
And... *NOW* it's end-of-life.
Still waiting for CNN X, although CNN After Dark was a bit of a disappointment.
Have you heard about the Young Republicans? They're literally the future of the party, it says so in the name.
A federal appeals court on Thursday said that it would not let President Donald Trump deploy troops in Illinois for now...
Our robed commanders-in-chief.
The President does not have the Constitutionsl authority to decide where and when to deploy troops.
Wanna bet? There’s a reason the President is Commander-in-Chief.
Article 1:
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
"...against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Fetterman has been on one this week. Posting fox articles. Pro American beef over GMO. Calling out democrats. And being truthful.
RNC Research
@RNCResearch
John Fetterman just blew up Democrats' shut down narrative.
FETTERMAN: "Shutting the government is really what the Democratic Party wants to do... [Obamacare subsidies were] designed by the Democratic Party to expire ... This is NOT something taken by the Republicans.”
He's the future of a resurgence of the D party. That's why those morons will run him out to go join the Rs.
It's funny, but if the Ds weren't such a dumpster fire right now, Lumpy would be their prime candidate for 2028 and they'd be grooming his arse.
Otto Penn could be back in charge?
If that's what they want they should run Bernie.
...Americans blame Republicans, Democrats, and Trump somewhat equally for the government shutdown.
There's a shutdown?
Poor sullum. All of jack smiths henchmen have been pleading the 5th in interviews for his claimed not a crime. They refuse to state what actions they took under the guise of the law.
https://www.declassified.live/p/while-his-henchmen-clam-up-jack-smith?r=4yy1i&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true
Judges order saying trump cant fire people during a shut down is even more batshit than you thought.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/10/17/judge-says-trump-cant-fire-democrat-bureaucrats-because-it-hurts-her-feelings/
Once you decide the purpose of government to to care for people, financially and emotionally, the nation turns into a preschool run by armed nannies.
Chicks.
You would know that is not true if you were not a MAGA dipshit.
Are your feelings hurt too? Do you need a safe space? Perhaps a non-Akita therapy animal?
Nah. Even those gay penguins would go Akita on Tony.
Do they come from tranarctica?
What is wrong in the article doc retard?
Nothing, but he's paid by the post.
Kill yourself.
Trannies pay tens of thousands for a hatchet attack.
But an underappreciated factor in low ridership is crime—and fear of crime—on public buses, trains, and other mass transit...
The left's soft-on-crime approach is scuttling their dreams of replacing personal automobiles with mass transit? Whatever it takes, I guess.
They're nibbling at it on the edges, but its way too oppressive to actually enforce the laws. The Atlantic is on it.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/10/subway-safety/684566/
It's not just fear of actual crime. It's not wanting to be exposed to obnoxious, offensive behavior, or being forced to interact with crazy people when you're just trying to get to work. It doesn't need to rise to the level of crime or violence to keep people off the bus or the train.
Well, you haven't been in a private automobile with me. That kind of obnoxious behavior doesn't just happen on public transportation.
The old “pull my finger” joke .
The Dodge Shart comes with a completely waterproof and IP68 rated spray washable interior.
Nah. I’m told this is all republican culture war bigotry driven by their hatred of the planet and minorities. They have no legitimate reasons to shun “mass transit and living in urban areas”.
Bro, don’t you even culture war? Jeff can help you understand this.
https://youtu.be/7zIcK8SKWn8?si=fplL-Ag7HA5fbOJ-
But an underappreciated factor in low ridership is crime—and fear of crime—on public buses, trains, and other mass transit...
There's a key difference between the American and European left, although it is minimizing as we speak. The American left is so wedded to their "everything is racist / oppression" model that it is incapable of effective governance. The Euros have traditionally been confident enough in themselves they were willing to sufficiently address public nuisances to make public services effective. By contrast American leftists allow people to shit in the street and assault bus drivers because the alternative - enforcing the law - has been deemed racist for decades and paralyzes them.
Of course we're now watching the Euro left succumb to the same delusional suicide only with Muslims as the catalyst instead of blacks. But if you want to know why the American left in control of our politics as they have been for decades doesn't result in the Danish results they claim to want this is the reason. They're more interested in punishing you than they are in creating a prosperous and livable country.
Whites Only busses and trains would definitely increase ridership.
I always thought the prominence of trains in Atlas Shrugged to just be a product of the time it was written, now I think trains are the only approved travel method plebes are to be allowed. So it was prescient in that regard.
trains are the only approved travel method plebes are to be allowed.
Right. The waiting, delays, and inconvenience are acceptable to keep the roads clear for our Dear Leaders.
Doing away with "America First" for a second
This is a kind read of events, Liz. I mean, The Donald was JUST in the Middle East celebrating work that had nothing to do with America.
America First doesn't mean america exclusively dumdum.
I think somebody's Mom took too much Tylenol when they were pregnant.
"...celebrating work that had nothing to do with America."
According to TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit here, peace is not a positive value.
The plan? All the people that assault bus drivers for $2.90, we let them sit next to you for free.
Someone's getting assaulted, so I guess it's you.
Hey, if DEI does not empower mentally-deranged violence, then why bother?
The @washingtonpost obtained a list of the 15 individuals who signed the Pentagon press policy.
As dumb as all this is, it's going to be hard to gin up outrage in the normies.
The papers that signed it are papers that would never leak an embarrassing Trump story.
A few that would never leak an embarrassing Trump story didn't sign it, either.
"Since taking office in December 2023, Milei slashed billions in spending, froze public works, and cut federal funding to provinces, among other austerity measures"
Just like Hitler!
Well, both are of an Austrian School. 😉
Very nice
Yeah, but only one was a vegan water color painter. Let's go with him.
Some say you're the Hitler of our time. What do you have to say to that?
Absolutely ridiculous. I don't paint.
"The problem is that female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing the goals of many major institutions. You can have an academia that is majority female, but it will be (as majority-female departments in today's universities already are) oriented toward other goals than open debate and the unfettered pursuit of truth. And if your academia doesn't pursue truth, what good is it? If your journalists aren't prickly individualists who don't mind alienating people, what good are they? If a business loses its swashbuckling spirit and becomes a feminized, inward-focused bureaucracy, will it not stagnate?"
And how about free societies?
Seriously, to whatever extent women (real ones with internal ovaries) think differently, due to biology and culture, are their inclinations compatible with core behaviors necessary for supporting a social and political system based on individual liberty and responsibility, open competition, free markets, and outcomes that might be, um, sad for some people?
You can’t have chicks in charge.
It turns out you were right all along...only about this ONE thing though...obviously.
I've had female bosses. Never had a problem with them. But female colleagues were always "I hate that bitch...".
If female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing goals, then they are inferior, by definition.
Except to those who prioritize social bonding and emotional support. You know, women.
Parallel parking is patriarchal toxic masculinity.
This has been portrayed frequently in science fiction—All-female societies that resemble beehives, with little individual initiative, creativity, or drive to progress.
You're right. Women should just submit to their husbands and let the men be in charge. Right?
If they would just stay out of government, that would make the world better.
Too late. Which is why we get more nanny state as more women rise to higher position in the gov.
No, Jeff. Women should acknowledge that they are not men, don't think like men and should stop expecting men to behave like them.
Then we might get somewhere.
Even girly-ass gay men make better men than women do.
Work in a predominantly male workplace and the focus is on getting stuff done. Not who likes who, whose birthday it is and who is going to get the cake and organize the inter-office party, not who wore what and why; get the work done first. We all benefit.
Or just get on a train and get stabbed. Unless they’re loathsome right wing culture warriors, right?
Hey jeff, what’s so great about trains?
Off topic, but has anyone noticed the dramatic rise in trunk bear attacks in Japan?
We didn’t listen! Haha.
Those little compact cars just can’t contain a bear like our big American SUVs can.
America. Fuck yeah.
"Women should just submit to their husbands and let the men be in charge. Right?"
What do you think we are, Muslims?
'A mom was placed on the child abuse registry in Pennsylvania for letting a 13-year-old watch a 1-year-old, reports Reason's Lenore Skenazy. The "Reasonable Independence for Children" bill aims to prevent this type of overreach by the state.'
What if next time the 13-year old attempts to change the gender of the 1-year old?
It would be literal genocide to try to stop that.
It hasn't been so long since 13-year-old mothers were not uncommon.
"A federal appeals court on Thursday said that it would not let President Donald Trump deploy troops in Illinois for now, leaving in place a judge's ruling that blocked the administration from placing the National Guard in the Chicago area"
Hmm, perhaps Trump needs to deploy troops in the federal appeals courts.
They do need to start impeachment of judges if they want to out a dent in these actions. Even scotus calling then out repeatedly hasn't changed their behaviors.
'New polling data from the Associated Press/NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates that Americans blame Republicans, Democrats, and Trump somewhat equally for the government shutdown.'
How many Americans, at least those eager to express political views, are not Republicans, Democrats, or Trump?
'"American governments have typically prioritized building roads over rail lines, and the needs of drivers over bus or subway riders," writes Charles Fain Lehman in The Atlantic.'
Perhaps because American people, outside of blue urban conclaves and elite college campuses, have preferred traveling by car?
Fuck off, Lehman.
But people are too stupid to know what they want!
"Preferred travelling by car?"
The US spent roughly 3% of GDP per year on highways in the 1950's. That is roughly the same as is spent now on defense. Multiples more than that (and continuing to today) on the subsidies for housing in places that wouldn't be populated without the highways that go from where their house is to where they want to go.
On the bright side - it doesn't matter what you or I think about what you 'prefer'. The cost of this debt-fueled 'preference' for growth is going to become very clear to Americans over the next decade. Nothing you can do about it either. Just remember - it was all your 'preference'.
"Preferred travelling by car?"
Too bad you can't force us all to travel by boxcar, amirite?
The existing highway system is mostly paid for via fuel taxes.
Eisenhower pushed the highway system in part to be modeled after seeing what Germany had done to facilitate moving troops and equipment in the event of an invasion. Romania gad done that too post 1968 Prague when Ceausescu bully the Transfagaras pass.
If you like your 15-minute city, you can keep your 15-minute city.
You know what else Germany was the model for?
Playmobil’s line of toys?
Putting contagious people in camps?
The Handmaid's Tale?
Heidi Klum?
The existing highway system isn't even MAINTAINED by fuel taxes. The purpose of that tax in the 1950's was to pay interest on the very long-term bonds issued then. Not to pay for the construction.
And Eisenhower's notion of the autobahn was about defense/infrastructure. Not about people commuting to/from work or enjoying cars/traffic.
He was pissed when Congress decided to bulldoze highways through city downtowns. Along the previously red-zoned areas that after a couple of decades of prohibited investment were now 'blighted' and cheap eminent domain. The autobahn doesn't go through cities. It goes around them on ring roads. That serves defense. It serves trucking/infrastructure traffic (more broadly interstate commerce). It does not serve commuting.
It mostly is. And should be 100%. Not sure about the electric vehicles free riding though. Probably just ban those coal burning spontaneous combustion magnets from public spaces.
That was Eisenhower’s vision. Doesn’t mean it couldn’t be used for other purposes. And it has.
The highways I have driven near urbia often have a bypass around the shitholes. Chumby exercises that option to avoid traveling through garbage.
Socialist Europe tends to corral people into more controllable spaces. Agree with you on that as well. Germany has a history of favoring trains.
Except that it wasn’t Eisenhower’s vision. See my comment below.
It mostly is. And should be 100%.
Maybe the fuel tax can possibly cover highway maintenance some day. But the reality is that 77% of lane-miles of roads in the US are local - and 19% are state. While there are some states that have a real gas tax - there ain't any states where the state/local tax is 25 times the federal tax.
That is actually the Ponzi scheme behind the sprawl model. Constructing those state/local roads often gets done via federal grants often during recessions and such. And for the first 20-25 years, there is no maintenance and hence taxes can also remain low. When that road lifetime ends, it is time for more sprawl - and some BS accounting/corruption to include federal funding (non gas-tax funded) to maintain older roads.
When that game ends - and it pretty much has now - the cost for suburbs to maintain their own roads will kill them.
"The existing highway system isn't even MAINTAINED by fuel taxes..."
That's because the money is pissed away on bicycle paths, mass transit, ferries and the like; the sort of shit you favor.
You are really a dishonest asswipe.
Bicyclists do not go to heaven.
It just takes them longer to get there.
Hell opened up a 10th layer for bicyclist
^ this. Even has a bike lane to get there but they drive in the vehicle lane anyways.
It should be legal to gently nudge 60 year old dudes in spandex off the road with a car.
And pass on the right, while you're signaling a right turn.
And Eisenhower's notion of the autobahn was about defense/infrastructure. Not about people commuting to/from work or enjoying cars/traffic.
That’s a load of bullshit. The interstate system was always meant for commerce and people driving to places and jobs. And all Eisenhower did was campaign for and sign the funding mechanism for them. The interstates had been planned for at least 17 years before Ike signed that bill. They’d already been planned by the Roosevelt Administration and Bureau of Public Roads (now FHWA) director Thomas MacDonald.
https://fieldman.co/public-works/visionary-engineer-thomas-h-macdonald-the-mastermind-behind-interstate-highway-system
The system was MacDonald’s idea from inception to the realization of where the system would go and serve. Here’s the various systems planned well prior to Ike becoming President.
http://www.ajfroggie.com/roads/yellowbook/
Note that the first was a paper on Toll Roads and Free Roads in 1938, prior to World War Two.
Who made it happen? Da Vinci and possibly Tesla, amongst others, had concepts for powered flight. The Wright Brothers made it happen. Not discounting contributions by others but Blue Star highways have Ike’s stamp on them.
Several people made it reality, including MacDonald who designed the system, Ike who campaigned for and signed the funding mechanism (a 90/10 split between the feds and the states), Francis Turner who spearheaded the building of them (a protege of MacDonald), and a lot of state highway officials who worked on the design of the system and the toll roads that had been build by 1956 (including the Pennsylvania Turnpike and Maine Turnpike).
You didn’t build that.
Not really. That’s Ike’s story. The real story goes back prior to WWII when they were first conceived in 1938. What’s interesting is that the Germans came over here prior to designing their system to look at roads such as the Merritt Parkway in Connecticut (opened 1938). And the autobahn idea predated the Nazis. The German government originally wanted them for commerce.
"...on the subsidies for housing in places that wouldn't be populated without the highways that go from where their house is to where they want to go..."
Notice the dishonesty JFucked is attempting here; the subsidies (mortgage deduction, I'm guessing) are ONLY for housing where JFucked doesn't like it?
You idiot. I guess the US population was never dominantly rural, and struggled to travel even 10 miles in a day for business or personal reasons.
The US was mostly urban or small-town even before WW2. WW2 did lead to the last significant migration from rural-to-urban but note the word last. Veterans from truly rural areas moved to small towns (considered 'urban' by the census bureau) or the city after the war and not back to the farm (or the suburbs - also considered 'urban' by the census bureau - in that step).
But the suburb itself is a very centrally planned development. As is obvious when you look at a map. Far more centrally planned than even a grid-pattern layout. Whatever YOU think of it as some organic bottom-up 'return to the land of our forefathers' comes directly from a marketing brochure.
Not as centrally planned as you make it out to be. Most of those were merely approved by either municipal or county governments and planned by developers who had an interest in making a profit off selling houses.
And those who moved into Levittown were more than satisfied.
The interstates were a defense project.
No, they were not. That’s how they were presented to Congress to get the 90/10 funding mechanism passed.
I'd say American businesses and governments have prioritized their own needs and the needs of customers over listening to retarded media talking heads like Lehman.
How do you build a road for busses that doesn't accommodate cars. It's a road either way and arguably a larger road for the busses.
And railroads, for two centuries, have been *the* prototype of private industry building something useful, government interests seizing control of them, and turning them into public make-work turd polishing projects.
Even fairly generously, it's like saying TSA has typically prioritized building airplanes and the needs of passengers over building airports.
Fucking "wet roads cause rain, governments cause markets for people to demand goods and service" retard.
How do you build a road for busses that doesn't accommodate cars. It's a road either way and arguably a larger road for the busses.
Well ignoring buses - the streetcar history of LA points to how those two modes fail when slammed together. LA had the most extensive streetcar system in the world in the 1920's. Once cars developed to the point where drivers felt safe interfering with streetcars, then that's exactly what happened. They would drive wherever and force the streetcars (and peds and cyclists) to start and stop. Once streetcars can no longer maintain an effective schedule, they start losing passengers in large numbers. Who then have to drive - rinse repeat.
IDK whether the remnants of the streetcar system still exist in LA. Grandfathered 'multi-use' zones - or right-of-ways that are now highways - etc. At any rate - bus systems retain the worst of both worlds - the routing of streetcars, the prioritization of cars - and can't even change/rethink their ops because it is now unpossible for people to think about how to separate traffic.
And re railroads. You obviously have no concept of what land grants were and how that real estate speculation play worked - from the first days of independnence long before the 'railroad'.
It looks a bit like Milei is contending with the fact that his program is unpopular—and of course it is, because people want free stuff
No it isn't. It is because Milei has all the problems of a purist ideologue not because 'other people' are the problem.
Maybe things would have worked if he had spent a bit more time figuring out how to undo the decades of tangle - and a bit less time stroking his chainsaw.
On the bright side - the lack of self-awareness here is funny. An ideology that pretends to know how markets work and how markets can solve all sorts of problems needs - a fucking bailout from Uncle Sugardaddy. I doubt there will be that self-awareness from the commentariat either. A bailout of Argentina will be accepted much more readily than some mother getting food stamps for her kid.
He needed approval from Congress!
I would quibble with your characterization of the libertarian/an-cap free market ideology. They don't claim to know how markets work but rather presume (based on evidence and experience) that they do work to solve all kinds of problems. And that those who presume that they know with great precision how markets work are the problem as they think they know how to best interfere with markets to optimize outcomes.
I think the wielding of a chainsaw - and damn the consequences - IS a core part of ancap ideology. A pragmatist would tie themselves in knots trying to figure out the difference between how an Estonia/Czechia v a Russia gets out from Soviet nonsense. But the difference does matter.
Yes, of course tearing down government institutions is a core part of an-cap ideology.
And making a show of that is what is really important.
Usual democrat/leftist whining claiming if you cant fix the problems they caused over decades in 2 years while they keep fighting you, you've failed.
Lol. The “ideology” that fucked things up so badly in the first place is the one getting “a bailout”. Not the one trying to fix it.
Idiot.
People are calling it a bailout, but they are saying it's a loan. Maybe the US is gambling on getting a better return on the payback if Milei continues to turn things around and increases the value of their peso?
We should demand golden shares.
"No Kings protests in US, San Francisco Bay Area: What to expect"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/no-kings-protests-in-us-san-francisco-bay-area-what-to-expect/ar-AA1OFqQS?ocid=BingNewsSerp
The claim in the Chron is that "you didn't hear us!"
Nope. You were saying nothing of value.
"The problem is not that women are less talented than men or even that female modes of interaction are inferior in any objective sense. The problem is that female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing the goals of many major institutions. You can have an academia that is majority female, but it will be (as majority-female departments in today's universities already are) oriented toward other goals than open debate and the unfettered pursuit of truth. And if your academia doesn't pursue truth, what good is it? If your journalists aren't prickly individualists who don't mind alienating people, what good are they? If a business loses its swashbuckling spirit and becomes a feminized, inward-focused bureaucracy, will it not stagnate?""
Every sentence after the first one contradicts the premise laid out in the first sentence. If female modes of interaction prevent institutions from being fit for purpose, then they are objectively inferior.
I wouldn't say it necessarily contradicts what follows, but it could have been clearer. The argument does suggest that feminine modes of interaction are inferior for those types of institutions. But that doesn't mean they are inferior in general, just for those purposes. There are reasons why feminine tendencies exist and it's not because women suck. Running a household and raising young children, for example, probably work better with a strong feminine influence (though the masculine is needed there as well). It's almost like men and women (in general) are different and complementary. Which I'm pretty sure was obvious to everyone until not that long ago.
Female modes of interaction are inferior to running vital institutions if they prevent those institutions from fulfilling their purpose. They may be good in other areas, but they are destructive there.
Statistically, for almost all metrics, - women cluster more around the median than a truly 'normal' distribution. Men are much less median and far more tail-distributed. It actually does derive from the evolutionary functions of the X and the Y chromosome and what they each 'bring to the table' from one generation to the next.
Effectively what it means is that both geniuses AND morons are far more likely to be men - a fat-tailed distribution. Whereas women are more clustered around median than even a normal distribution. To the degree that an institution needs to existentially change, it is more likely men who can effectively drive that change. To the degree that an institution needs to persist, it is more likely women who can assure that persistence.
IMO - that is really all that 'feminization' means in the real world. Is a culture focused more on preserving - or changing. It's a kind of shallow characterization - but shallow/lazy is what we mostly do.
So, those more or less clustered means for men and women are the same? No differences, on average, in how the two genders view risk, competition, emotional caring, toys with wheels (and careers in IT), romance novels, etc.?
"Almost all" doing a lot of work there.
No. I'm saying that any distribution of one of those things will:
for women, cluster around the mean (call it normal)
for men, have much fatter tails (call it higher kurtosis).
And I'm talking about real stuff - not the stupid cultural stuff re who likes blue pajamas v pink pajamas.
The median for antisemitic leftists is far to the left.
There are also areas like preferences for types of work that seem to show real differences between the sexes. Not just favorite colors or dolls vs. toy trucks.
Edit: and dolls vs. toy trucks is probably closely related to the work preference thing.
Mere preferences for types of work is a very cultural thing. The underlying skills that may be genetic - eg spatial awareness - have the distribution I described. The stuff that is cultural is purely taught and can always be taught a different way.
Is it though? Are there cultures where most social workers, HR managers and childcare providers are men and most engineers and mechanics are women? In some fields it may be down to culture, but there are some (even excluding work that requires male physical strength and ability) that seem to be pretty universal.
Those first group of jobs are generally low-paid with no particular premium for 'the most skilled at doing X Y or Z'. So they are perfectly ok filling those jobs with people who are completely average. Certainly the CULTURAL emphasis re communications, empathy, etc will tend to guide women towards that sort of job and steer men away from that. But my point is - those are not jobs that place a premium on an extreme skill level.
As for countries where engineers are women - Denmark and Spain are both roughly 50-50. 70% of STEM grads in Iran are women, Saudi and UAE are 60%. In those latter - there are cultural differences that favor women LEARNING math/science even though there are barriers to them working in those fields. That said however - when it DOES come to the extremes - eg Nobel Prize winners in chemistry - those tails will be mostly men even in those countries where it may happen that more women than men work in STEM .
I completely agree that physical strength is not a matter where the means/medians are comparable between men and women. Obviously men are much stronger and the tail of those distributions are irrelevant - but that is because of testosterone/hormones. The genetics force the increase in testosterone but it is that hormone that produces the strength change.
Municipal bailouts now as well, from a broke state?
https://x.com/pekalalaw/status/1979133701117092113?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
ABC 7 story linked in tweet: https://abc7chicago.com/post/city-harvey-illinois-holds-special-council-meeting-discuss-declaring-financially-distressed-state-law/18021940/
Due to the highway system.
- JFree
Funny thing is, Harvey is very well served by freeways (and a tollway), and even had its own mall (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixie_Square_Mall) which sat as a ruin for longer than it was open.
The urban planner caste has all sorts of wonderful ideas how to spend the money of others and make decisions for those people.
I will agree with them that stroads suck.
Insane to sign onto this
Would it make you feel better if I said, "We're all in this together."?
As long as it's limited to two weeks.
The problem is that female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing the goals of many major institutions.
The mistake in both this analysis and the feminist analysis it responds to is the underlying belief the traditional institutional mode of interaction reflects natural male behavior. It does not. Professionalism evolved because it advanced institutional goals, not because it was natural. The feminist demand that professionalism must change is a demand that institutions accept failure in order to ensure the feminists do not have to adapt themselves to becoming more effective.
This is why any organization which does adopt these measures will fail in competition to those who do not, which in turn is why feminists take over government institutions which effectively cannot fail.
Isn’t Reason subsidized by a man?
is there a Mrs. Koch to answer that question?
Perhaps Mrs. Koch is what Tony names the limp piece of flesh dangling above where his death nuggets used to be.
Even when there is a woman in control do we believe she's likely to be a feminist supportive of the idiotic ideas inherent to that designation?
Virginia Postrel?
>>Doing away with "America First" for a second
you'd be much more cool if you didn't take cues from Boehm and Sullum
I took it as a rhetorical segue than any sort of biting indictment.
An earnest "Trump promised MAGA voters 126,144,000 non-stop seconds of America First!" is a level of TDS *and* autism beyond even Boehm and Sullum.
lol yes ... typing it out & not erasing it from the sentence for any reason was an unnecessary toe into D-bag Pond
>>The problem is that female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing the goals of many major institutions.
yes. banshees who never learn the rules of the playground should never be allowed on the playground.
>>A mom was placed on the child abuse registry in Pennsylvania for letting a 13-year-old watch a 1-year-old
anyone not living in a cave the last 20 years would know never to live in Pennsylvania
So much for just being an idea and it doesn’t really exist.
https://x.com/fischerking64/status/1978897620174278804?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
DOJ indictment in link.
thrilled my nephew-niece was not named.
including high-power rifles with "binary triggers" allowing for more rapid fire
LOL No.
Or, there's the new TransTrigger—looks like a trigger but doesn't function at all.
>>A federal appeals court on Thursday said that it would not let President Donald Trump deploy troops in Illinois for now
keep trying guys but all your bases are belong to us.
Heartless Act
In Myanmar, a 26-year-old Belarusian singer was murdered and sold for her organs
Belarusian singer Vera K. had traveled to Thailand to work as a model, but scammers tricked her into going to Myanmar, where she was forced to work in a scam center — flirting with men on dating sites and extorting money from them.
Later, her relatives were contacted by the kidnappers, who initially demanded $500,000 for her body. A few days later, they claimed she had been sold for organ trafficking and that her body had been cremated.
- Live Leak
>>American governments have typically prioritized building roads over rail lines, and the needs of drivers over bus or subway riders
buena.
Where is Trump getting the money to give to Argentina? Did Congress authorize it?
Here you go doc retard.
https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/committee-approves-fy24-state-foreign-operations-and-related-programs-bill
>>Insane to sign onto this:
this is the wear a badge stay where you belong don't commit crimes within the Pentagon and you can come inside thing?
The thing to notice about Mamdani, and all socialists really, is how utterly insipid their ideas are. "Make it free". "We'll buy in bulk".
What could go wrong?
The left likes to claim the right refuses to accept expert opinion. Maybe so. But the left's refusal to learn from previous experience and insistence no one anywhere has ever thought of anything until they came along is both idiotic and disastrous.
Insane to sign onto this
[The @washingtonpost obtained a list of the 15 individuals who signed the Pentagon press policy.
The Federalist, the Epoch Times, and OAN signed it. The rest are freelancers, independent or work for media outfits based overseas.]
Two comments:
First, we might conclude it's "insane" because it's a career limiting move. No mainstream media organization is going to hire any of these people or anyone from these organizations. But let's be serious, they were never going to hire any of these people anyway. The worst kept secret in Western Civilization is that every entity controlled by the left, even those who claim to be centrists, discriminates against anyone to their right.
The second question is what exactly is so objectionable? The main objection publicized so far, a demand that the Pentagon approve their stories, has already been proven a lie. The item cited was edited to imply this but the full quote shows it refers to Pentagon employees needing prior approval to release information. So what exactly are you objecting to?
"I take issue with the blame part but whatever"
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you.
Umm...Deloitte is an accounting firm, WTF kind of chemicals did they dump in a river? And imagine the media if Trump had ever uttered the words "having air that is drinkable" no matter how quickly he fixed his mistake.
Scenes from NYC:
AOC "Rivers in rural areas were on fire because of corporations poisoning the people who lived in those areas. Poor, middle-class communities getting poisoned and dumped on by corporations — like Deloitte and 3M — pouring chemicals into these places."
She followed that up with a small verbal bobble but recovered quickly...
“Instead of talking about healthcare; Instead of talking about wages; Instead of talking about having air that is drinkable – I mean, air that is breathable and water that is drinkable,”
She then lashed out...
"Well, you know what? You're damn well right that it's a Democratic priority to keep people from getting poisoned by identifying dangerous chemicals that are being dumped and causing cancer in people without their knowledge. You're damn right that it's a Democratic priority to bring down the cost of housing, and mortgages, and rent. And you're damn right that it's a Democratic priority to raise the minimum wage in this country to allow people to get a fair shot at the American dream,"
So Democrats are to blame for Prop 65 warnings on everything?
Winsome Sears thunderclaps Democrats, Spanberger still sputtering word salads about individual campaigns...
https://x.com/winwithwinsome/status/1978597074967949420
Winsome Earle-Sears
@winwithwinsome
Easy, they absolutely must step down.
Now it’s your turn, Abigail.
Quote
Julia Manchester
@JuliaManch
·
Oct 15
INBOX from the Virginia Democratic Party
“Sears Must Call on All Young Republicans Implicated in Racist Text Scandal to Step Down from Their Positions” #vapol
Meanwhile, the YR Board called for the resignation of their own members.
https://x.com/yrnational/status/1978188660915777973
We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today. Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents. Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations. We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.
- Board of Directors
All the while, Democrats and Media still propping up Jay "2 to the head" Jones.
No shit they should resign they did not say they "do not look down on niggers kiks wops or greesers. In my mine you are all equally worthless. "
What did those rascally little Young Republican porch monkeys say this time?
Seeing more speculation that Schumer is flexing what he can while he can in an effort to stave of being primaried by AOC.
P.S., I'd support a Constitutional amendment that disallowed running for a different office without resigning from any current office. So no Senators could run for House (not that they would) or President unless they first resigned from the Senate. No House member could run for Senate or President unless the first resigned their House seat. Tired of seeing people campaign for a new job while they're supposed to be representing the people.
I agree with this.
How about serving Governors?
That's because Americans have demonstrated that their preferences lie in self-reliance, and the comfort and convenience of owning their own vehicles. Outside of densely packed metro areas (e.g. New York City), demand for public transit is anemic because people prefer the convenience of their own, private transit options that are: available exactly when they are ready to go; go exactly where they want; follow the route(s) they want to follow; afford them the flexibility of running errands on their way to or from work; are set up for their own comfort and taste (i.e. "nested"); and etceteras.
The fatal mistake of public transportation is assuming that, if you build it, they will come. Very, very few people with the option to drive their own vehicle will choose public transportation.
Also... well, duh.
There are far more drivers than bus/subway/light-rail riders. It makes much more sense to prioritize resources to the meet the greater demand (roads) than the lesser. The former is a less wasteful allocation of resources.
Linking to an anti-feminist article in *Compact*?
What have you done with the Reason that we used to know?