Even Marjorie Taylor Greene Thinks Trump's Immigration and Trade Policies Go Too Far
“We have to do something about labor, and that needs to be a smarter plan than just rounding up every single person and deporting them,” the Georgia congresswoman said.
President Donald Trump's trade and immigration agenda is deeply unpopular with the general public. Now, even some of Trump's most loyal allies are voicing their frustrations with the president's policies.
During a recent appearance on comedian Tim Dillon's podcast, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.) criticized the Trump administration's hardline stance on immigration, warning that its crackdowns create more chaos than security. Although she said that she voted for stronger borders and stricter immigration enforcement, Greene warned that much of the American labor force relies on immigrants, many of whom didn't enter the country legally, and that mass deportations could cripple key industries. "We have to do something about labor, and that needs to be a smarter plan than just rounding up every single person and deporting them," she said.
Greene told Dillon that she still appreciates Trump's broader aims, saying, "He's trying to end wars. He's also trying to make it fair again for American trade." But she added that the reality on the ground tells a different story. In her conversations with business owners, Greene said many have grown frustrated with tariffs and other protectionist measures that, as she put it, "end up helping donors more than constituents." While they support Trump's long-term goal of fairer trade, Greene noted, many are struggling to get supplies and stay competitive amid the rising costs his policies have created.
Greene's frustrations with these Trump policies mirror broader public sentiment. While economic protectionism remains popular with parts of his base, most Americans say tariffs hurt the economy. A Pew Research survey from August found that 61 percent of Americans disapprove of the administration's tariff policies, with just 38 percent expressing support. These tariffs have already raised prices, and analysts at Yale's Budget Lab estimate that they could increase consumer prices in the short term by roughly 1.8 percent—or about $2,400 per household.
Meanwhile, while most Americans are in favor of deporting illegal immigrants, 52 percent disapprove of Trump's handling of the issue, according to a recent poll from The New York Times and Siena University. The same survey found that 53 percent of people "think the process of deporting people has not been fair," per the Times.
Indeed, much of the government's mass deportation agenda has been marred by civil rights abuses and due process violations. Recently, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over the agency's refusal to share records of its planned expansion of detention centers in Virginia. Detainees in these ICE centers have allegedly been denied access to counsel, food, and basic medical care. Last week, the ACLU also filed suit against Louisiana's newest state-run immigration detention center, "Louisiana Lockup." The suit alleges that immigrants in the facility are being held indefinitely and are being punished for the same crime twice, in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause.
Greene's comments mark a rare instance of a close Trump ally questioning the costs of the administration's agenda. It's a sentiment that could use more company in Congress, though few Republicans seem willing to provide it; most have gladly expanded Trump's tariff powers while defending the warrantless raids, prolonged detentions, and systemic rights violations that have come with his mass deportation campaign.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
>>Marjorie Taylor Greene Thinks
no. she does not.
It’s funny. MTG’s clone thinks Trump’s policies don’t go too fqr enough.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll3iyvbsRDM
lol produce your whatchamajigger ... long form earth certificate!
"Even"? You quote someone who you would otherwise despise, and pretend that backs your side?
"Even Hitler liked dogs, so cats are bad."
"Even Santa Claus gives toys away for free, so communism must be good."
You are appealing to authority. It ain't hard to show how idiotic Trump's tariffs are, but you had to appeal to an authority you don't like. Pathetic.
Do you even English? "Even" here doesn't mean the author otherwise despises or even disagrees with her. It means MTG otherwise agrees with Trump.
Rational people generally do. So not democrats.
We have to do something about labor
The RIFed federal employees can take over the jobs that the illegals being rightfully deported were staffing. Reason won’t be hardest hit since the ass sex should still be available due to those govt employees have abundant experience fucking the American taxpayer in the butt.
But we still need illegal immigrants to wipe their asses. That's work federal employees won't do.
Would you hire those people for a real job?
Seems picking who gets deported and who doesn't based on anything but the law would be injustice. MTG probably would be happy if we were deporting Jews over all others.
Hoo Boy! It's ACLU day at Reason! Can't wait for Antifa day!
"Antifa doesn't exist!" - Morons
Isn’t every day at Reason antifa day?
So people want something to be done but don't"t want there to be consequences, that's retarded from a policy standpoint, you have to choose.
Sure more needs to be done after and alongside the deportations of the lawbreakers but that's a legislative thing and I didn't see anywhere positive legislative changes were being proposed.
“We have to do something about labor, and that needs to be a smarter plan than just rounding up every single person and deporting them,” the Georgia congresswoman lied.
Only illegals, you lying sack of shit.
Of course, the reality is that they clearly are not "rounding up every single person and deporting them", they are only rounding up and deporting those who are here illegally.
You know, rule of law and all that jazz.
I always stop reading at the first lie, so I didn't make it past the first sentence.
Obviously Swartz hasn’t seen the epic clip of the CNN guy going over the numbers like he’s freaking Madden.
Madden would have made a great economic forecaster.
Jimmy The Greek would have been pretty good. We could hear about the intangibles for any given policy.
1. Not sure why I should care what “Jewish Space Lasers” lady says just because it happens to agree with Reason’s position on illegal immigration.
B. What did people think “deport all the illegals” actually meant as they campaigned last year? Or is this more a case of “the people with money in my district are pissed they’re losing their cheap labor and are threatening to primary me next year.”
1. MTG must have watched History of the World, Part 1 recently.
B. It’s like I always say; people are stupid.
President Donald Trump's trade and immigration agenda is deeply unpopular with the general public.
No it's not. It's deeply unpopular with the Bluesky echo chambers.
They are in no way comparable to the general public. You may as well say that the main characteristic of a hamburger is a piece of lettuce.
"We have to do something about labor, and that needs to be a smarter plan than just rounding up every single person and deporting them," she said.
I know of a whole bunch of bureaucratic leeches who are soon to be out of a job. Tell them to go pick the fruit.
These tariffs have already raised prices
Reason citing Reason! *drink*
Meanwhile, while most Americans are in favor of deporting illegal immigrants
Weird that you'd provide the percentage on everything except that.
The same survey found that 53 percent of people "think the process of deporting people has not been fair," per the Times.
It's not supposed to be fair. It's supposed to get them out of America because they do not belong here and have no right to be here.
Detainees in these ICE centers have allegedly been denied access to counsel, food, and basic medical care.
Literally nobody is keeping them there. They can self-deport at any time if they don't like their detention. We'll even pick up most of the cost.
Why isn't the ACLU encouraging them to do that, I wonder. Or, for that matter, MTG? Or, for that matter, Reason? You're worried about costs of detention, you're worried about building detention centers, you're worried food and medical care? Shut. Up.
If you cared anything beyond crocodile tears about ANY of that, you'd be full-throat encouraging self-deportation. We don't have to detain anyone who self-deports. We don't have to build detention centers for anyone who self-deports. They can have all the food and medical care they want if they self-deport, and access to counsel becomes moot because they no longer need it.
Why don't you advocate that, "libertarians?" Self-deportation is the SINGLE MOST libertarian approach to the illegals problem. But instead, you're wearing a libertarian skinsuit and just jumping on the same old Progressive/Marxist bandwagon.
Why don't you just admit what you are?
"President Donald Trump's trade and immigration agenda is deeply unpopular with the general public.
No it's not. It's deeply unpopular with the Bluesky echo chambers..."
Living in SF, it's not often I get asked or are willing to answer directly to that issue, but the shift is obvious in casual discussions; '...well, ya know, Trump might have a point...'
And this is SF with no prompting.
The D's might have a really big problem and it couldn't be better aimed. They have no issue other than 'I'm not Trump!'
The thing is. Illegal immigration has been a "major problem that we need to be concerned about" ever since I first started paying attention to Politics, in the Clinton administration.
The Republicans didn't have the spine to enforce the law and the Democrats didn't have the spine to change it. Obama made ignoring the law official policy.
Then Trump comes in, officially no longer caring about what the opposition thinks, and for all intents and purposes, fixes this decades-old problem in a matter of months simply by putting his foot down and enforcing the law as written.
JeffSarc will soon waddle/stagger by to bitch and lie about everything you just said.
Trump's immigration policy is enforcing the law as written. Congress can change the law at any time (and ought to.)
Trump's trade policies are far worse, because he's enacting them unilaterally. Tariffs are taxes and are constitutionally required to be set by Congress. The courts ought to be stopping petty tyranny before it runs amok.
They never did before.
Well, there's a first time for everything.
A tariff is not a tax, they are two separate things.
Huh. So Democrats can push over the edge with policies and then they can never be undone by following the actual law because it will be tough? Let millions of illegals bum rush the country and now we can't deport them because it's hard? Increase spending under the "Temporary Covid Emergency Spending" by $1.5 Trillion and now it has to be permanent because illegals won't get their free healthcare?
Trump was president in 2020. Derp derp derp.
Democrats controlled the House (edit: you know the people that control the purse) in 2020 and all of Congress in 2021 when they made the “one time covid spending” the baseline. Oops.
Yes we need to do something about labor. Fine the businesses who hire illegals and keep forcing Americans either, out of work or their pay reduced.
And stop trying to push your false opinions as if they are fact.
"President Donald Trump's trade and immigration agenda is deeply unpopular with the general public."
This could not be more incorrect. It is patently false. You should be ashamed.
FIFY...
"President Donald Trump's trade and immigration agenda is deeply unpopular with democrats and the main stream media including outlets like Reason and some GOP elected officials trying to stay relevant in a sea of misinformation."
There are other problems besides illegal immigrant labor. Particularly in construction and similar trades, low level American workers seem to be lazy, entitled and unreliable. I've heard many in the construction business say they prefer immigrant workers because they work hard and get shit done. That's not to say we should just ignore illegal immigration. But there are other problems with the American workforce besides artificial wage reduction due to illegals.
Americans would prefer to be personal trainers than work construction. So Americans will lift heavy shit but not to build anything. If a president can sustain a construction boom while keeping illegal immigration low then I will see that as a positive…but Trump has decreased illegal immigration by tanking the economy which even Bush did after illegal immigration spiked in the aftermath of 9/11 because of a residential construction boom.
Fuck off and die, asswipe. That's all.
"...I've heard many in the construction business say they prefer immigrant workers because they work hard and get shit done..."
At one time, it took real balls to get across the border, and (say 20 years back) contractors with whom I dealt (as a customer) went on about the effort it took to get here and how that sort of filled in a CV; HIRE that man!
Once Biden opened the gates to any and all, that self-selection fell by the wayside.
Biden is a disease upon humanity.
It is hard to find her position to be anything but self-serving, considering she runs a family owned construction business. This is why politicians are vile.
"...considering she runs a family owned construction business..."
Just a guess on my part, but she likely "runs" that business like the grease-bag Newsom "runs" his restaurant chain; he looks over the quarterlies or has someone summarize them for him.
I RUN a business; you do not spend time as a Congress-critter and also analyze/manage-inventory/demand/replenishment times for multiple products for anything like a successful, sizable, business.
Her family left her a functioning operation, and it's a good bet she doesn't even get involved in hire/fire decisions; her name shows as "owner".
"President Donald Trump's trade and immigration agenda is deeply unpopular with the general public."
"Meanwhile, while most Americans are in favor of deporting illegal immigrants"
Ok, care to take a shot and explain this contradiction?