I Listened to Over 7 Hours of Peter Thiel's Leaked Antichrist Lectures. They're Surprisingly Libertarian.
The PayPal and Palantir co-founder warns about the dangers of government overreach and a one-world state.

Who is the Antichrist, the biblical antagonist whose rise marks the beginning of the end-times? Peter Thiel recently took a stab at answering this age-old question.
The billionaire and co-founder of PayPal and surveillance company Palantir recently delivered a series of four lectures on behalf of ACTS 17 Collective—a nonprofit dedicated to Acknowledging Christ in Technology and Society (ACTS)—about the Antichrist. Reason acquired recordings of the lectures, which ran the gamut from theology and history to science and economics. While Thiel does not explicitly identify who the Antichrist is, he outlines an Antichrist-like system he fears will arise this century.
Thiel kicks off the lecture series by identifying himself as two things in his private life: "A small-o orthodox Christian" and a "humble classical liberal." Thiel claims his fears about the Antichrist are his only "deviation from classical liberal orthodoxy," and his analogy between the Antichrist and one-worldism, one of the central motifs of his lectures, is unmistakably libertarian.
While the rapid rise in AI and other advanced technologies has led many to believe that the Antichrist will use technology to accomplish his goals—the New York Times opinion columnist Ross Douthat has even suggested to Thiel that the surveillance technology provided by Palantir could be a tool for the Antichrist—Thiel says in his first lecture that, "in the 21st century, the Antichrist is a Luddite who wants to stop all science." In his second lecture, Thiel goes on to identify "the legionnaires of the Antichrist [as people] like Eliezer Yudkowsky, Nick Bostrom, and Greta Thunberg [who] argue for world government to stop science."
Although Thiel doesn't explicitly reference Crisis and Leviathan (1987)—the celebrated book by American historian and economist Robert Higgs—he warns that the former precipitates the latter. In his first lecture, Thiel cites Matthew 24:6 to insist that "the Antichrist will come to power by talking about Armageddon non-stop" and 1 Thessalonians 5:3 as evidence that the Antichrist will rise to power by promising "peace and safety." In his second lecture, Thiel explains how "a new, reformed government called 'Leviathan,'" as described by political philosopher Thomas Hobbes in his 1651 political treatise, that wields supreme power to cow men into peaceful cooperation, will be ridden by the Antichrist "to take over the world."
Opposition to totalitarianism aside, not all of Thiel's comments fit comfortably within the libertarian worldview. Thiel criticizes "zombie liberalism" and "lame libertarian abstractions," preferring an anti-communist ideology where "you could do some pretty bad stuff because the communists were so much worse." For example, Thiel praises the CIA of the '60s, '70s, and '80s, for being "sort of this rogue thing outside the State Department," which he says was full of communists.
Still, Thiel recognizes state power as a double-edged sword, identifying the American empire as simultaneously "the natural candidate for Katechon"—the entity that delays the emergence of the Antichrist—"and Antichrist; ground zero of the one-world state, ground zero of the resistance to the one-world state." In his third lecture, Thiel names "tax treaties, financial surveillance, and sanctions architecture" as defining features of the international "Antichrist-like system" of international governance. Thiel explains how "it's become quite difficult to hide one's money" in the wake of the Patriot Act, the "extensive" administrative state (the Treasury Department, in particular), and the centralization of payments on the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications system—an international messaging network better known as SWIFT, which banks use to process global payments. All of these factors make it impossible to "escape from global taxation if you're a U.S. citizen," he says. Thiel links this erosion of financial freedom to Revelation 13:16-17, which prophesies about a society where an individual's ability to engage in commerce is contingent upon brandishing the mark of the beast on one's body.
Thiel also identifies a "caesaropapist one-world state" as another possible Antichrist-like system. A watered down version of caesaropapism that has been embraced by the political right in recent years is Catholic integralism, which advocates for the state to enforce "duties of community and solidarity in the use and distribution of resources," according to Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard Law School professor whom Thiel says "dream[s] about a unified caesaropapist empire that never was in the Middle Ages." Thiel's opposition to this illiberal political philosophy is evidenced by his concern about Vice President J.D. Vance being "too close to the Pope." Regarding reports of conflicts between Vance and the Pope, Thiel says he hopes "there are a lot more because it's the caesaropapist fusion that I always worry about."
Yet, for all of his hand wringing that the Antichrist will come to power this century and bring about total destruction, Thiel refuses to prescribe a "systematic formula" to fight this figure, which might be the most libertarian aspect of his lectures. Instead, he encourages the audience "to think for [themselves] for a little bit." Thiel returns to the importance of free will in his final lecture, saying that there "are choices we have to make" to resist the rise of the Antichrist and that "it's for people here to make choices; to decide."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Billionaire libertarian is concerned about global financial controls, but not a global surveillance system.
Why might that be?
Because surveillance tech cannot be put back in the bottle.
The problem is not license plate scanners; it is government requiring license plates. If governments are forbidding from scanning license plates, private companies will do it. The technology is simple, now; every smart phone has apps which can pick out license plates.
The problem is always government. Thinking that banning technology and progress can tame government is delusional wishful thinking.
I challenge you to visit and read the content on SSqrlsy’s Church of SSqrls website. Do it!
If'n ye want the serious stuff, start here...
http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Trigger warning!!! Yer Precious Baby Feelings might get hurt!!! Humans ARE defective; ALL of us!!! Even all of the Pervfected, Mind-Infected ideological idiots that cumment on these here pages!!!
Makes sense that a doom goblin would be a legionnaire of the AC; seriously, from a Christian perspective, evil will use any means available to promote itself, and it has a LOT at its disposal in the 21st Century: promoting trans ideology, and mainstreaming it, is a good example. For no purpose other than ruining lives and destroying society and its mores.
Welcome to the great trans scare of 2025. Don’t you realize this is just another way of conditioning you to accept authority?
The lesson jack still won't learn. The left and media lie to him.
Even after discovering the lie in this case, he will believe the next one.
Like tariffs being domestic taxes, and trade deficits being a measure of foreign investment?
Hey Jesse, does the government ever lie?
If the Anti Christ is a political system it would be one that disavows religion and/or God. It would be a collective system, not individual. It would be 100% authoritarian. It would be deceiving in having it's subjects believe they have a choice but they really do not. Illusion would carry the reality of it's subjects. Seems like I am describing North Korea or China in today's forms.
The idea of a World Government being the Anti Christ would be dependent on the type of system used for World Governance?
If, for example, the world government was based on the USA system as designed by the founding fathers with the constitution and individual rights existing then it couldn't be considered the Anti-Christ?
If Protestants want to know what caesaroppapism is, they shouldn't look at the Pope, they should look closer to home.
From an article in the Encyclopedia Britannica:
"caesaropapism, political system in which the head of the state is also the head of the church and supreme judge in religious matters. The term is most frequently associated with the late Roman, or Byzantine, Empire." However, the Britannica article doesn't think this characterization of the Byzantine empire was entirely fair.
The article goes on to say:
"Caesaropapism was more a reality in Russia, where the abuses of Ivan IV the Terrible went practically unopposed and where Peter the Great finally transformed the church into a department of the state (1721), although neither claimed to possess special doctrinal authority.
"The concept of caesaropapism has also been applied in Western Christendom—for example, to the reign of Henry VIII in England, as well as to the principle cujus regio, ejus religio (“religion follows the sovereign”), which prevailed in Germany after the Reformation."
https://www.britannica.com/topic/caesaropapism
Also, Thiel chose to name his surveillance system after the Palantir system in the Lord of the Rings, a system which was hijacked by Sauron (he's the chief bad guy, for all you non-nerds).
It seems ending cash and forcing digital currency would align with Rev13.
Hmmm...
"Thiel, who is gay, has supported mostly conservative gay rights causes such as the American Foundation for Equal Rights and GOProud. He invited conservative columnist and friend Ann Coulter to Homocon 2010 as a guest speaker....In 2012, Thiel donated $10,000 to Minnesotans United for All Families, in order to fight Minnesota Amendment 1 that proposed to ban marriage between same-sex couples there."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel
If he's Christian, then he sounds like a liberal kind of Christian, the kind who doesn't get too literal about the Bible's passages regarding sexual sins.
There is nothing to stop a liberal Christian giving a seven-hour speech speculating about the Antichrist, it's just that many people associate such Antichrist talk with "right-wing" Christians.
Anagram of Peter Thiel is: The Reptile
He's an Archon.
Hey, it makes as much sense as taking Revelations literally.
^+1.
If you really believe in an Antichrist, then those like Thiel who worship technology, money and power are the leading candidates. Also, per Revelation, there is no political solution. Resistance is futile and only the return of Jesus will defeat the Beast.
^? How long have you harbored your superstitions?
Yeah, it's just too and you want no borders and a one world state, Nicastro.
“I Listened to Over 7 Hours of Peter Thiel's Leaked Antichrist Lectures. They're Surprisingly Libertarian.”
No shit? Maybe it’s because he’s a small “l”
libertarian?
Nah, he’s obviously an authoritarian fascist who just happened to say some libertarianish things.
(I can’t even with these headlines.)
"...Thiel links this erosion of financial freedom to Revelation 13:16-17, which prophesies about a society where an individual's ability to engage in commerce is contingent upon brandishing the mark of the beast on one's body..."
As an atheist, I have to wonder regarding the sanity of anyone crediting something written in a confab hundreds of years after the supposed life of this mystical person.
Hint: no miracles, no Jesus. Except the guy working on the roof next door, and he's only miraculous in the number of shingles he nails down. No fish and loaves, no rising from the dead, none of that bullshit; sorry.
You're welcome to your superstitions, but please do not assume the rest of us grant them any credibility at all. None earned, none granted.