Brickbat: Pay for the Privilege

In the United Kingdom, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is launching a plan to increase the amount private schools pay for required inspections by the government's Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services, and Skills. The government currently pays the majority—effectively two-thirds—of inspection expenses, but Phillipson argues that taxpayers who send their children to state schools should not have to subsidize what she calls "private businesses." The change could potentially triple the fees private schools pay for inspections.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tits for tats and tots, and tats for tits for tots! If the Almighty State shall issue tattoos (bar codes?) to the private-schools tots (kids) to certify that they have been properly inspected, at great costs to the private schools, then the private-school owners should be able to do the exact same expensive things to the pubic-school tots! Tits for tats, twat's good for the goose is good for the gander, and all that! Let's snot just pander to the gander, let's also pander to the goose, AND the moose, and everyone else! Either twat's fair is fair, or get OUT of my hair!
The Labour Party ideologically does not want private schooling to exist. Putting extra costs on such schools is a passive-aggressive way to accomplish that.
Non-pubic schools SNOT sufficiently cuntrolled by Government Almighty might snot sufficiently instill in the students, a Deep Love of, and Yearning For More of, Government Almighty, and THAT is something up with which we swill snot put!
Putting extra costs on such schools is a passive-aggressive way to accomplish that.
There's an alternative interpretation that's not passive-aggressive. The LP is instrumental in setting the standards that require these orgs making this a damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-don't situation (just like teacher's unions in the US). A cat toying with a mouse isn't being passive-aggressive when it doesn't kill it outright. After all, without standards for private schooling, how is the state supposed to fail to vet Muslims and immigrants who weren't taught by the British school system that it's illegal to rape little girls?
It's taxpayer money all the way down.
Parents that send their kids to private schools aren’t paying into the system funding said inspections?