This Protein Powder Is Made Out of Air and Uses 600 Times Less Water Than Beef
The Finnish startup Solar Foods has received a "Generally Recognized as Safe" designation from the FDA.

Thanks to innovations in food science and agriculture, the world is producing more food than ever before. While this has significantly reduced global hunger since the 1970s, it has impacted the environment; in 2023, food production generated about 26 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to Our World in Data.
Now scientists at the Finnish startup Solar Foods are turning air and electricity into food. The result? A mustard-colored protein powder made from naturally occurring microbes that could reshape how the world is fed.
Inside a bioreactor, a single microbe plucked from the Finnish dirt is fed a cocktail of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, and potassium. Renewable electricity powers the process, which the company says is "20 times more efficient than photosynthesis," and accelerates the growth of the microorganism into a protein-rich slurry.
After drying, what's left is Solein: a fine powder packed with all nine essential amino acids, unsaturated fats, dietary fiber, and vitamin B12. According to Food & Wine, 100 grams of the powder yields 75 grams of protein, which is comparable to many whey protein powders on the market.
Solein, which the company describes as having a "pleasant note of umami flavor," requires 600 times less water and 200 times less land to produce one kilogram of protein than is required to produce one kilogram of beef. The protein is also more efficient than other available vegan and plant proteins.
As of July 2024, the company had raised $47 million in equity funding and has been listed on the Nasdaq's First North Growth Market in Finland. It recently received a $10.6 million grant from the European Commission.
In May, Solar Foods' pilot facility ramped up its production 100-fold, reaching industrial scale and proving its ability to commercialize. It is currently in the pre-engineering phase of a second industrial production facility, with a third and fourth one possibly on the way.
The Food and Drug Administration has given the company a "Generally Recognized as Safe" designation, allowing Solein to be commercialized in the United States. In March, Solar Foods announced its first multimillion-dollar supply agreement with Superb Food, "a startup with a mission to advance community health through smart functional foods." In 2024, the company was selected as one of the winners of NASA's Deep Space Food Challenge, which was launched to develop food innovations for space travel.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good grief. The green is deep.
CAGW is a hoax.
Jeff Luse appears to be one of those useful idiots who thinks electricity comes out of a wall socket as if by magic. No, Jeff Luse, it comes from sources you'd shrivel up in horror from if you knew about -- fossil fuels, pollution from solar cells and windmills and concrete and metal and rare earths and all sorts of nasty evil things.
Did you just copy paste a press release, no thinking required?
Photosynthesis and cattle don't require any electricity, nor any of the pollution associated with unreliable renewables, nor any government subsidies.
Are these the same figures always trotted out by greens, which include rainfall and neglect to mention that cattle can graze pasture land which otherwise has no agricultural use?
Looks like it's so efficient and promising that it needs government subsidies ... after already using government-subsidized renewable electricity.
Commercialize, with government subsidies and government-subsidized electricity.
I bet those new NYC socialist grocery stores will stock right up on this shit. What the hell are "smart functional foods"? Grocery stores sell lots of real food at the lowest prices in history, thanks to free markets and lack of socialism and government subsidies.
Well, he believes "protein powder is made of air" so, I'm not sure what to think of Mr. Luse.
Sounds like a nitrogen fixing bacterium, or perhaps a yeast genetically modified to fix atmospheric nitrogen.
Expect the usual crowd (Ron DeSatan etc.) of pro-overregulation-from-Government-Almighty, Governors, to step right up to forthrightly protect farmers and ranchers from cumpetition! I will be curious twat the anti-cuntsumer-choice crowd will call this new stuff... Frankenfoods? Microbe-Monster-Feed? Monster Mash-Trash?
And swill the new FrankenFoods (if very affordable) be blamed for the obesity of the poor? Let them eat cake! And let them eat $25-per-pound beef steaks! $50 per pound if "organically raised", from Whole-Paycheck Foods! ... Of course, Ron DeSatan is SNOT gonna "pony up" for this beef (for the poor); He has a beef with that!
“What’s for dinner, hon?”
“Air microbes! They are generally recognized as safe.“
“Sounds dee-lish!”
I always enjoy how government "investment" is looked on fondly for green alarmist agenda work.
This must be just like the USG investing in Intel, which Reason reported on fondly.
Watermelons, all of them.
Have they made any sales yet or are they still in the bilking investors and fooling journalists phase?
Formed July 2024, so still the graft phase.
You think Jeff Luse has invested his own money in this?
If he did it was from a co funded LLC.
I kind of hope so.
I'm not fucking eating the bugs, living in a pod, or giving up ownership of anything.
You will be assimilated.
Look at the right-wing extremist.
Are you okay?
Is it possible for people to talk about any invention in the food field without going 'omg not eating the bugs'?
Sure, as long as we're not told to eat bugs.
Are you okay?
It's clear you aren't. Not even by your own precepts. You fake-care about some marginal risk of a completely survivable consequence to a humanity 200 yrs. down the line that all of us would barely recognize.
Maybe your Mom didn't love you enough. Maybe Dad didn't give you enough attention. Maybe he went for milk and smokes when you were four and never came back. Maybe you didn't get a pony for your 16th birthday or the boy you really wanted to go to prom with didn't ask you. It's not entirely clear why you need to proclaim your self-righteousness and try to make other people behave the way you want them to through attempted shame, force, or other manipulation, but it and you are not OK.
I want to eat normal natural food. You can eat whatever globalist water-saving powder you want. Good luck with that. Don't force it on anyone.
Bugs (in the very broad sense) are normal, natural food too. You don't eat shrimp, crab or lobster? I'll leave the crickets to the new-age hippies though, thanks.
This seems good news for those of us who take protein powder. The question I would have is how digestible is the protein powder? If it's too digestible, like hydrolysed powders, the body will use it as fuel, not to build muscle.
You take soy.
Soyppository. Might help keep his MAPedo urges down.
By the way, do you know how much fucking water we have ? Lots! Guess how much we use up? None! Using water doesn't destroy it.
Unless you live in a very dry environment like Southern California or the desert southwest, water 'savings' is just a retarded burden foisted upon us by busybodies.
If you do live in a place where it makes sense to be very prudent in your water usage, by all means, feel free to conserve as much as you like. Just don't make me do it when I don't have to.
The funny irony of alarmists is thst more carbon means less water is needed for farming. And there is much more risk to water supply (Scottsdale recently refused to connect a new suburb due to water shortages) than the global changes we have seen in temps.
In the region where I live, we spend billions getting RID of water so our farmland doesn't revert to swamp.
If this is Solein Yellow, when are we getting Solein Green?
Does it taste as good as cricket powder?
I tried protein bars made with cricket powder - no different from other bars, and so not worth the price.
Before the Streisand Effect:
This distinctive taste ([sic] "pleasant note of umami flavor") is represented in the marketing slogan: "Love it or hate it." Such is its prominence in British popular culture that Marmite is often used as a metaphor for something that is an acquired taste or polarises opinion.
While this has significantly reduced global hunger since the 1970s, it has impacted the environment; in 2023, food production generated about 26 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to Our World in Data.
Well, it was nice of you to say this at the start of the article so that I could safely ignore everything that came after it.
This is a boondoggle that only exists because of climate alarmism, I can read between the lines.
Turning air and electricity into food? Where is the electricity coming from? A fossil fuel power plant?
It says solar. So really the cost is a shit ton of mining and fab pollution and the energy cost making panels. Likely China sourced, so by coal.
It says solar as in 'this could be done with solar electricity' - but it was actually done with a gas-fired power plant providing power to the city the lab is in.
As it would be done if we were doing it on a large scale today.
Even with solar, we'd be what? Changing a ton of marginal land that has cattle grazing on it to useless land covered in solar panels? These people refuse to accept that solar is a pipe dream.
"Solar power." This means it's mostly fossil fuel but in good weather the solar cells may produce enough power for a few hours that boilers may be turned down. NOT off - the steam plant must be kept hot and ready to be tuned back on within a few seconds. Generally, industrial processes run 24 hours a day and any power interruption of more than a few seconds will ruin the batch, but a solar plant gets 6 hours of power at best.
Solein, which the company describes as having a "pleasant note of umami flavor," requires 600 times less water and 200 times less land to produce one kilogram of protein than is required to produce one kilogram of beef.
OK... and? I mean, what are we talking about here? The intentional global extermination of all livestock? Now that we have a protein powder?
Because if the cows are still going to live, they're still going to be using all that water and land. Only now they won't serve the useful purpose of becoming steak and milk and hamburgers and fine leather jackets and upholstery.
And what's the return if we go down this insane path of cattle extinction and powdered protein? A reduction in the "26 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions" caused by food production?
Who cares. Earth can handle it. Like all things environmental, unless you're willing to say, "If we care about climate change, then the first order of business is that China and India have to be eliminated," then you're not actually being serious about the subject. This also illustrates a lack of seriousness:
That's ultimately the same 'ol hippy-dippy anti-humanity "undo the Industrial Revolution!" mentality at work. And never mind the fact that it then leaves 8B people 100% dependent on bioreactors to produce slurry as their replacement. What happens if an eco-terrorist decides to bomb it? Let's not forget the fact that at the root of Environmental Ideology is their (false) premise that the core of the problem is too many humans.
So... Jeff, what is it we're supposed to take from this? What's the endgame? Kill all the cows, make the humans reliant on one source of food production (controlled exclusively by people who hate humanity), and "save the planet" by engineering a slurry that wastes far far more energy to produce than giving a bunch of cows some sunlight, water, and a patch of grassland - all of which we have in abundance. Also, let's not forget that we wipe out a major portion of the world economy. Is Solein going to hire the 1.6 billion people who work directly in the livestock trade (from breeding to production for consumption)?
This is stupid. You're stupid for publishing it. Anybody that belongs to the Cult of Gaia needs to put their money where their mouth is and just take a suicide pill already.
Actually, yes, all those cattle would, literally, be exterminated. Happens all the time *normally* (industrial chicken flocks are culled every 3 years). Happened when horses were no longer cost-effective.
If cows are less profitable, people will breed less of them, not order more meat animals after the ones they have are sold off ,etc.
This is a pretty retarded take such that the only reason anything anywhere exists is because the market demands it despite both ends of the equation (natural biology and the inventions that need government funding and hype because nobody's asking for them) existing as objective proof of the premise's falsehood.
Now that we have a protein powder?
We've had more or less complete protein powders for over 2 centuries.
This is the protein/food equivalent of a Finnish car company saying they can build a car that's 75% as effective as Volvo Duett using less water and nothing but solar power for electricity and that the NHTSA has recognized their vehicle as "generally safe".
Altruist Totalitarian's been hitting up the confiscated meth again...
If “Generally Recognized as Safe" is prominently featured on the packaging/label this stuff is gonna fly off the shelves.
This is something almost straight out of Futurama or Idiocracy.
... like LSD, right?
They need to drop the "Made out of thin air" line. It is spectacularly stupid.
So why dont you support it then?
I suspect that's the whole point.
Solein Green is made of air!
It's funny how many Reason articles begin on a article of faith such as "diversity is our strength" and then try to make a libertarian case around that.
There was a libertarian case made for it? That’s new.
The whole point of a free market is that different people have different approaches to problems, yes, this is something you ought to have read in the textbook.
Diversity is our strength!
Problem: There's not enough diversity.
Libertarian Solution: Geoengineer diversity!
Your post hoc and correlation-not-causation fallacies aren't fooling anyone except the intellectually challenged. Is your cause, whatever it is, short on stupid people and you're seeking more and more diverse ways to recruit them? Because there are better and more honest ones than yours.
https://youtu.be/fmbZwxEnAFc?si=UG-e0yiqBvPawQBH
Anyone touting their “green energy” bonafides is either remarkably stupid or a grifter.
(For the record, I don’t really care how the energy is produced, just be honest with yourself and everyone else how much fossil fuels are used in the production of that green energy.)
"Pricing in" the 'cost' of water that's just it raining on grass seems a bit dishonest, to say the least. And people actually LIKE meat.
But, who knows, maybe it could be competitive with whey powder as a supplement. But I'd absolutely demand that all the subsidies be taken away, first.
It's not a free market when a subsidized product is competing with a regular product.
Ctrl+f 'vegem': 0 results.
Sigh. Single-cell proteins are not new. This is, once again, the standard selective nihilistic, hyper-reductionistic, dishonest "penny-efficient, pound-foolish/wasteful" and "how to lie with statistics" gimmickry that Greenies have been pulling for decades.
Renewable electricity powers the process, which the company says is "20 times more efficient than photosynthesis," and accelerates the growth of the microorganism into a protein-rich slurry.
"20X more efficient than photosynthesis" doesn't mean squat if it's 20 billion times less effective. "Penny-wise, pound-foolish" specifically; if there are a paucity of photos, 1 vs. 1-in-20 is a clear cut advantage. But if there are an infinite, or near-infinite number of photons and it's just about developing the capacity to catch and store them, 1/20th of a near infinite amount is immeasurably more "efficient" than just catching single photons. To say nothing of the fact that the 20X assumes perfection and not solar panels that get scratched, covered in dust, don't heal or self-regenerate, don't build themselves out of the soil, don't get blown up by the Ukrainian military, etc., etc., etc.
If we're starting a civilization from scratch at the bottom of the ocean or on an asteroid, a 1-shot type of situation, this *might* have some sort of use. Since we already have a civilization, it's almost certainly more efficient to ship what we already produce in abundance wherever we need it... like we already do. I figured Reason "BORDURS IZ KONSTRUKTS" Magazine would understand this.
After drying, what's left is Solein: a fine powder packed with all nine essential amino acids, unsaturated fats, dietary fiber, and vitamin B12. According to Food & Wine, 100 grams of the powder yields 75 grams of protein, which is comparable to many whey protein powders on the market.
And a Hyundai is comparable to a Ferrari too. Virtually no food contains none of the 9 essential amino acids. Even plants, except maybe strawberries and some more exotic fruits, contain all 9. You'd just have to consume (and ship) pounds of them a day to get enough. To wit, there are 9 essential, but 6 conditionally-essential, meaning you can produce some but not reliably enough and generally need to eat them too. The common analogy is a house or a building. You have 9 ingredients that all houses or buildings use, but if you need to build a data center, car factory, or nuclear power plant you need more than the basic 9 and if you can't produce or find the others quickly enough, you can't build, operate, and sustain your data center, car factory, or power plant even with a sufficient amount of the essentials.
Between the above two statements: if you've got a composition that's 75% protein (which is low-budget grade even for whey) but it's only 50% as rich in the amino acids you need the most, then it's really only about 38% useable. You can provide more protein and essential amino acids than whey, but they're not balanced, you're just wasting the 20X as many photons you lied about capturing relative to photosynthesis. If you need steel, but not concrete to build a car factory or a data center, it doesn't matter how efficiently make the steel if you have to ship 20 tons of concrete with every ton of steel. Even if the steel is 100% cost free, a data center with sufficient concrete is going to incur cost to get rid of the extra. (This is/was an actual problem with early yeast-based single-celled proteins, people would build up excess urea from all the excess nucleic acids that came along with the protein and other nutrients).
Solein, which the company describes as having a "pleasant note of umami flavor," requires 600 times less water and 200 times less land to produce one kilogram of protein than is required to produce one kilogram of beef.
Again, this has continually been debunked. The "cellular protein" crowd counts only the water that goes into the bio reactor and the protein that comes out on the one hand and will does stupid shit like counting rain that falls onto cropland but not water that flows out of rivers and streams on the other. They will then do it again for the carbon calculations, measuring CO2 from every running truck on the farm, but ignoring all the automated monitoring and environmental controls that go into not just the bioreactor but the housing of the bio reactor. The farm, which is self-contained with regard to water-collection and plumbing and sewage, will have those costs added in while the bioreactor will just magically get water and sewage hookups that don't cost anything at the curb.
Ultimately, Vegemite, peanut butter, soy protein... they've all been around for decades if not millennia. There's nothing specifically magical about them or solien being more less suitable for anything simply by virtue of being slapped together. If mankind had critical need of a pure-protein source for the next 10, 100, or 1000 yrs. it would already exist. The assumption that it doesn't is a (dishonest and bad) myth.
If NASA blasts some people to an asteroid and they have need of the Ferrari of nutrition (whether that's filet mignon, whey protein, or soy protein, or freaking molasses) and we ship them a Hyundai made from sunshine and rainbows it's actually going to set back, if not end space exploration pretty quickly.
This feels like a long-winded way of saying, "The free market will solve the impending climate change process by pumping 12 trillion gigajoules of energy into a chamber which will produce protein milkshakes!"
We could save more time and energy by figuring out an actual solution to both the Ukrainian and Palestinian conflicts but that's complicated.
Instead, we decided to go with the simple solution of rebranding a product that was invented over 100 yrs. ago for a modern audience. Those old fuddy-duds used coal to make their "Vegemite" and "Marmite" foodstuffs. *Our* single-cell plant protein is made using photovoltaics!!!
100%safe with no side effects?
An FDA endorsement is practically a guarantee the thing is a quack nostrum or placebo. Gracie warned us against "the ones that mother gives you.."
FFS the comments here are hilariously "pro innovation." You can test to see if the protein and nutrient claims are warranted. Oh no vegans might have more options?! We LOVE innovation just not LIBRUL innovation.
Stereotypes exist because they are true. Libertarians typically are seriously overweight, divorce incels with asymmetrical faces.