Milei Coalition's Loss in Buenos Aires Calls Argentine Libertarian Movement's Strength Into Question
Argentina's left-populist movement held first place and widened its lead compared to the 2023 elections by two percentage points.

President Javier Milei suffered a stinging defeat in Buenos Aires. His coalition, La Libertad Avanza (LLA), finished nearly 14 percentage points behind the opposition in Sunday's local legislative elections. Because Buenos Aires accounts for 40 percent of Argentina's electorate, the race serves as a stress test for Milei's movement ahead of October's national legislative elections.
The Peronists, Argentina's dominant left-populist movement, not only held first place but widened its lead compared to the 2023 elections by two percentage points. Milei's coalition with the center-right Propuesta Republicana (PRO) improved on his solo run two years ago, but the combined forces still fell short. Both blocs gained seats, yet the anti-Peronist majority that once seemed within reach evaporated.
"We have suffered a clear defeat today….We must accept the results," Milei admitted. Yet he insisted that the outcome marked the opposition's "ceiling" and his coalition's "floor"—their best game, his worst.
"The course we were elected to follow in 2023 will not change, but rather will be redoubled," Milei said, promising to deepen austerity and market reforms. "Either freedom advances, or Argentina regresses." Finance Minister Luis Caputo reiterated the message on X: "Nothing will change economically. Not in terms of fiscal policy, monetary policy, or exchange rates."
Peronism's formidable machine once again proved decisive. Decades-old networks of mayors and local operators, motivated by jobs and budgets, can reliably mobilize voters in Buenos Aires Province. But, as Argentine journalist Eloy Vera tells Reason, the same incentive structure doesn't carry over to national elections. In provincial elections, "the mayors, the local leaders, have to secure their own governability—making sure people will vote for them, will renew their mandate, and that they'll obtain or maintain majorities in their respective municipal councils," he explains. Once they have secured reelection, it "means they may not mobilize with the same intensity, and won't deploy the whole clientelist machine—political operatives, poll watchers, buses, etc.—for the national elections."
LLA's poor performance can be traced to a mix of problems: corruption allegations involving Milei's inner circle, weeks of coalition infighting, and the president's abrasive style, which rallies loyalists but alienates swing voters. As Vera notes, even the movement itself disagrees over what went wrong. Was it the government's "brutal" austerity program? A chaotic campaign? Or simply poor execution? Each faction can claim a piece of the truth, making a sweeping course correction unlikely in the near future.
Markets registered the political shock in real time: The peso weakened, country risk spiked, and Argentine equities plunged in New York. Even before the election, the Argentine Treasury was considering intervening in the exchange market. As La Nación's Guillermo Idiart noted, markets are less interested in new fiscal promises than in political assurances that Milei's program can endure.
The defeat also reshuffled Peronist politics. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner—former president and longtime party leader whose legacy is now clouded by corruption charges—saw her influence fade. By splitting the Buenos Aires provincial election from the national vote in October, Buenos Aires Gov. Axel Kicillof bolstered his standing and positioned himself as the new face of Peronism. As political scientist Andrés Malamud told Infobae, Kicillof's success marks "the overcoming of the Kirchnerist stage of Peronism" and a return to the movement's core identity—popular appeal and a sharp instinct for power.
For now, Kicillof's reach is still provincial, but the broader lesson is clear: Peronism's obituary, written after Milei's rise, was premature.
This doesn't mean the opposition did something extraordinary, nor that Argentina's Libertarian moment is dead in the water. October's national elections will show where the rest of the country stands with Milei's administration.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I guess voters didn't like 100% inflation turning into 237% inflation under Milei.
Harris lost in part because of 8% inflation.
Unfortunately the Peronists' economic policies are pretty much what Trump is doing. Decades of that turned a prosperous country into a basket case. Make America Argentina (for the first time).
You are all kinds of fucked up.
You're so full of shit, you stink.
Same way democrats are trying to blame trump for high prices, led by Boehm.
I am not the one who is full of shit.
https://tradingeconomics.com/argentina/inflation-cpi
I regret that I understated the inflation rate under Milei. It reached 292 percent.
Note also that late 2023 was a year after Milei took office. The Peronists were disasters, Milei is a catastrophe. The middle class has beem destroyed.
"Inflation Rate in Argentina decreased to 36.60 percent in July from 39.40 percent in June of 2025. Inflation Rate in Argentina averaged 189.40 percent from 1944 until 2025, reaching an all time high of 20262.80 percent in March of 1990 and a record low of -7.00 percent in February of 1954"
Where's the "237%" inflation under Milei? What am I missing?
"Note also that late 2023 was a year after Milei took office. The Peronists were disasters, Milei is a catastrophe. The middle class has beem destroyed."
Jesus Christ, Charliehall is as bad as JFear. He can't even read a Wikipedia article correctly.
Hey fucking moron- next time you want to parachute into comments acting like you are an expert in shit you knew nothing about 20 minutes ago, try reading some source other than your commie propaganda.
Milei assumed office as President of Argentina in December of 2023. That was after the hockey stick of Inflation had begun. When he took office, inflation was at 211%, up from 98% a year prior. Inflation continued up over the next 4 months. But his reforms quickly tamed and reversed inflation. By a year after his start, it was at 112%.
Just to help you out here, 112% is almost half the inflation rate of 211%.
Jesus you people are clowns.
But he went to Harvard!
The political football in Argentina about to get messi.
Good thing the LP has put all of its effort into publicizing his wins in Argentina instead of running endless NYT fan fiction about Trump. Way to support the cause, fellas.
You can’t cure corrupt suicidal stupidity. Just like America and most of the world.
Argentinians will support any cause or government until they have to actually start working.
I have known numerous Argentinians who want to work hard. They have all emigrated!
99% of the time, I'd say Trump should learn from Milei. Milei is Trump without a lot of his bad sides. But this is a rare case where Milei could learn from Trump.
Trump went on top by making inroads with demographics that typically vote for the other side. Being a showman actually has less to do with Trump's ascension than his ability to connect with and represent middle of the road voters who will alienated by PC culture and the ingrained "multicultural" agenda that feels out of touch and despotic. Lots of people don't like being called racist for opposing illegal immigration or living in crime ridden cities, including non whites and immigrants.
There's no "infighting" in team Trump. The anti trump element of the GOP has been cast out of the party and will never be embraced by the center right electorate. Republicans with legitimate criticism of the president are sensible enough not to let their personal feud affect the good of the party. When it come to election day, they will support Trump and the GOP on the whole.
Milei is probably enjoyed his own tea party moment earlier, when the base more firmly embraced his libertarian agenda. But like the tea party it just couldn't quite expand the tentpole.
Milei did exactly what you suggest. This election was a city election. It is essentially what would happen if Chicago, LA and New York all voted together. There are no in-roads that Trump could make to keep that from being a loss.
This is a big year for Peronists. Not only are they making inroads in Argentina, their guy came to power in the US.
Hopefully the Peronist will loose ground and Argentina will not return to the Peronist to continue to drive Argentina into the ground. Milei is not perfect, however no politician ever is. He is far better for Argentina than the Peronist were and would be.