Trump Orders Strike on Suspected Venezuelan Gang Boat in Caribbean
The attack follows the largest U.S. military buildup in Latin America since 1989, as Washington escalates its campaign against cartels tied to Nicolás Maduro’s regime.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump carried out a strike on a boat in the southern Caribbean that he claims was operated by members of the Tren de Aragua gang and en route to the United States with drugs on board. "The strike occurred while the terrorists were at sea in International waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States," Trump posted on Truth Social with a video of the strike. "Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE!"
The strike followed last week's deployment of eight U.S. warships, one nuclear-powered submarine, and thousands of Marines—the largest military buildup in Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama. Officially, Washington says it's fighting drug cartels by first designating them as global terrorists. Yet Trump "secretly signed a directive to the Pentagon" instructing the military to start targeting cartels. But the Venezuelan regime is no ordinary cartel.
In early August, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a reward of up to $50 million "for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction" of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro "for violating U.S. narcotics laws." Maduro is accused of being "a leader of Cartel de los Soles" (Cartel of the Suns), a powerful trafficking network that, like Tren de Aragua, has become a target of U.S. operations.
In 2024, Edmundo González Urrutia won Venezuela's presidential election with 67 percent of the vote, but Maduro's dictatorship refused to relinquish power and forced him into exile. Despite clinging to illegitimacy, Maduro denounced the U.S. deployment at the United Nations as "a serious threat to regional peace and security." At home, he attempted to project strength by launching a nationwide enlistment drive in mid-August, opening militia registration centers across the country, but the campaign seems to have been a failure.
The U.S., meanwhile, is building a coalition in Latin America to attack the Cartel of the Suns, getting other countries to also declare it a terrorist organization. So far, Ecuador, Paraguay, Argentina, and the Dominican Republic have joined the initiative. France has also reinforced its military presence in the Caribbean. A report detailing Operation Imeri, a plan Brazil had devised for a rescue operation of Maduro following the recent U.S. deployment, was ultimately rejected by sectors of the Brazilian Navy. However, despite the reports coming from reputable sources, its existence was later denied by Brazil's Defense Ministry.
But now, everything depends on how far Trump is willing to go. This is the first direct action that the administration has taken against an organization related to the regime in Caracas. Trump directly named Maduro as the mind behind the organization, and accused him of overseeing "mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States and Western Hemisphere." During his briefing, the president also hinted at future actions against the regime, saying, "There's more where that came from."
The equipment deployed is not suitable for simply carrying out an anti-drug operation. It includes boats such as the USS Jason Dunham, which can use Tomahawk cruise missiles to hit targets accurately from over 1,000 miles. The forces are also not enough to start an occupation, and an intervention risks entangling the U.S. in another costly foreign conflict. But it is possible that we will see more strikes on vessels, and potentially, strikes on Venezuelan soil against drug operations. Venezuela is one of the key transit countries for cocaine, with nearly 24 percent of all the cocaine in the world going through the country, with the protection of the Cartel of the Suns.
The White House has promised repeatedly to bring to justice those responsible for smuggling drugs into the country. The U.S. is capable of conducting such an operation on Venezuelan soil, as we saw a few months ago when asylum-seeking opposition leaders were rescued from the Embassy of Argentina in Caracas—considered the most guarded place in the country after the government palace—by U.S. and Italian government forces.
If Trump were to deploy such a military force and then pull back, it would be a political defeat for him and an easy victory for the dictatorship. He has political reasons to conduct a high-level operation, one of which is the mid-term elections. The president will need the support of the Hispanic community, the largest minority in the country, and their support for Trump has diminished following his punishing deportation campaign—support he could largely regain if he captured Maduro. Another reason is that Trump might be holding a meeting with the Chinese President Xi Jinping in October, and holding this meeting after suffering a political defeat to the Maduro regime would put the U.S. in a weak position. However, if Trump gets to the meeting with a political victory over one of China's allies, it could give him the upper hand.
What is now clear is that this is not a mere show of force. Washington seems to be testing the limits of intervention. How this gamble plays out remains uncertain. For many Venezuelans, the possibility of outside pressure offers a fragile sense of hope after decades of repression, yet the risks of escalation and regional instability are just as real. However this plays out, the outcome will reverberate far beyond Caracas, shaping both Venezuela's future and the United States' role in the hemisphere.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Not distracted. Release the Epstein files.
34k documents were released dumdum. Just today. Wait for Maddow to tell you your next repeated narrative.
Did I stutter ? Did I say , "some" ? No, I said release the files ... all of it.
Lol. Wait for Maddow sweetheart.
Your cries are just the latest leftist shit to try to roil people up.
Ironically you never scream at the judges denying release of materials.
Goosestepping clown canot comprehend people thinking for themselves. MAGA wants the files too nitwit
It’s a start. Do you understand that DoJ lawyers have to review these documents prior to release? Do you think the DoJ can just drop everything else so you can get a few hundred thousand documents you will eve read a little faster?
And these documents have been available for years. Where were you during the four years of the Biden administration? Didn’t hear you clamoring for their release.
You’re just a partisan drone.
It's "the Epstein Files, Phase One" but in a snazzy new binder!
If retards want to use narcotics, it should not be illegal. But stop paying for those retards housing, food, education, or medical expenses. And no more Obamaphone.
If the US wants to attack the modern day Barbary pirates, TdA was found to have captured an American apartment complex.
Amerikkkan drug junkies NEED foreign despots to BLAME for THEIR victimhood!!!! And Dear Deep-Orange-Socialist Frumpty-Dumpty-Farter-Fuhrer SWILL step up to the plate, and BLAME said foreign despots for the junkie habits of Amerikkkan drug junkies!!!
Rah-rah-REEE for the latest and moist depraved of ALL of the Amerikkkan drug wars!!! They have never worked before, butt THIS time, they SWILL!!!! 'CAUSE WE'RE AMERIKKKANS, DAMN-SHIT-ALL!!! TEAM AMERIKKKA, WORLD POLICE, rah-rah-reeee!!!
(Kick 'em in the knee!!!)
Unread
Sqrlsy;dr
Sqrlsy; SNOT refuted!!! Certainly SNOT by Team [R]etrograde [R]ebels Without a Clue!!!
Sqrlsy is always refuted.
SNOT by Team [R]etrograde [R]ebels Without a Clue!!!
If a fed wanted to distract libertarian thought discussion could it do better than shitsy?
Strategically and reluctantly.
Yes. The fed could focus on somewhere with libertarian thought discussion instead of the self-deluded group of MAGA apologist authoritarian cognitive dissonance rationalization discussion here.
You are team-Fed now.
Nobody here defends -everything he does.
I’m not going to pretend that some posters give him a lot more leeway than others, but most of the “apologia” would be more accurately described as correcting, context, or regular disagreement with the article/comment. (I’m willing to admit to my biases though, so maybe I don’t see it the way you do.)
You're right.
It's not so much the defense of Trump here, it's more those that have an automatic declaration of someone as a retard, leftist, marxist or democrat if they criticize Trump. You don't fit that group, at least you never have to me.
So when I responded to RMac, who [redacted due to the golden rule], I often forget about the commenters like you and throw all you babies out with the bathwater.
The problem is that all I've seen is a boat with 4 motors cruising through the ocean. They most probably are up to ill intent but I didn't see any proof they were before getting blown up.
What proof did you see of Somali pirates? What proof did you see of any given site that was dronesassinated? What proof did you see of who blew up NS1 and NS2?
On the other side:
What proof have you seen of the IDF murdering Palestinian babies and blowing up hospitals? What proof have you seen of Azov Division soldiers murdering Russian "spies"?
If this were just a group of Reuters journalists who just happened to be embedded with Iraqi Insurgents, especially given Trump, we'd have already heard about it.
“Fuck those guys”, right sarc?
If you don't want war with Venezuela then you support rape and murder.
If you don't want war with Venezuela then... Then... Then you're a war-monger!!! Yeah, THAT'S shit, no Sherlock!!! No Spermy Daniels Love-Lock, either!!!
Make LOVE to Spermy Daniels, SNOT war!!! War?! Twat is shit good for?!?!!? Absolutely NOTHIN!!!!
Good God, y'all!
Poor retardleftistbot.
Sarc has great reverence for regimes like Maduro’s and the Iranian mullahs. They are his heroes.
The White House has promised repeatedly to bring to justice those responsible for smuggling drugs into the country.
What the White House doesn't say is - there is no evidence outside the White House that Tren de Agua is significantly involved in bringing drugs from Colombia into Venezuela and then across the Caribbean into where and where else.
Or that Maduro/VZ govt has any significant coordination with Tren de Agua. Except of course the pervasive and perpetual involvement of ALL Latin American govts throughout history - from Castro to Milei - with violent prisoners and corruption. And the pervasive desire of various Latin Americans to get the US involved in perpetual war/revolution/coup throughout Latin America.
Since when did Trump need evidence?
You don't believe anything until Maddow tells you too.
I hear Steven Colbert is another source for unbiased news.
Jimmy Kimmel
John Liebowitz Stewart
Keith Olbermann
Damn staight! Trump does need evidence because he's right about everything.
Eating pets; The times-new roman MS-13 tattoo; the $8 trillion tariff revenue; the 200 trade deals; Zelensky starting the Ukraine war; the $100 million for Gaza condoms: and of course, the biggest evidence free thing he was right about: the 2020 stolen election.
Where can I buy one of those "Trump was right about everything" hats to support the Peace President's missiles of libertarian peace?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-supports-claims-of-maduro-regimes-role-in-tren-de-aragua-migration-to-us-in-interagency-dispute-with-cia-nsa/ar-AA1FNXqc
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/venezuelan-government-uses-tren-de-aragua-proxies-undermine-us-public-safety-fbi-assessment-finds
There are also numerous Latin American newspapers that have posted the evidence.
But since the deep state resistance leaning memos they created to NYT says there isnt, you buy it. Never change retard.
We need to see notarized membership cards!
But Kyle Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there.
JewFree: a steadfast supporter of Hamas, the ChiComs, and now Central American narcoterrorists.
We should be bombing the Mexican cartels. Having them based right next door causes much more harm than a few Venezuelans selling coke.
Dropping bombs causes much more harm than doing anything with coke.
Depending on who you drop them on, bombs can be beneficial.
124,704 deaths from fentanyl for the years 2023 &2024.
Attacking a foreign civilian vessel in international waters is a war crime.
You pretty much just outsource your brain to Bluesky, don't you.
No thinking whatsoever on your own. Just download the latest NPC instructions. This is like the singular narrative coming from those lemmings. And here you are just repeating it verbatim.
You think it is totally cool for navies to go sink any ships and boats they want?
You never heard of pirates?
They were drug smugglers, not pirates.
And drug smugglers are better than pirates?
Tony will take up their cause. These murderous thugs are very precious to him. Just like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Yes, drug smugglers are better than pirates. Smugglers provide a good in demand. Pirates steal other people's property.
They are whatever Trump says, duh.
Delivering death.
You have no common sense, only leftist talking points.
That depends entirely on why "they want".
Are descendants of the Barbary pirates due compensation?
Where in the hell did the MAGAs get the idea that these were pirates?
You are the one who expanded the conversation to include all naval action against hostiles:
You think it is totally cool for navies to go sink any ships and boats they want?
Attacking a foreign civilian vessel in international waters
- Tony
If they are working for the government, they are more like privateers (as were the Barbary Corsairs).
Do you think the US Navy should surrender to the TdA?
MAGAs really are the dumbest shits.
We’re not dumb enough to let a narcoterrorist vessel go.
You really just instinctively rush to the defense of the most evil people in the world, don’t you?
Indeed. Just as they defend ILLEGAL ALIEN child molesters, rapists, gang bangers and other criminals.
Liberals are clueless.
I’m not MAGA but find many of them reasonable. That complete and utter single digit IQ retard Tony, OTOH, he was the dumbest motherfucker here. Or brotherfucker. Or whatever.
Here’s Tony:
https://tenor.com/view/head-deformed-deformed-head-gif-12063868
When they're filled with bunch of drugs and crewed by a hyper-violent rape gang openly intent on brazen trafficking and spreading poison, abuses, and death to your own countrymen?
You don't think it's cool to sink those ships?
But again, your reply - word for word - is just parroting what you heard at Bluesky. Literally the exact same talking points.
Our leftist assholes all reflexively jump to the defense of narcoterrorists.
That image of assholes reflexively jumping might be more accurate than you intended.
Unless they're irregulars engaged in hostilities against your country, in which case it is legal to kill them.
cite?
What happened? Did they destroy your expected fentanyl delivery?
The USS Jason Dunham (a guided-missile destroyer) is a "boat"?
Get a journalist.
I thought this was an interesting take. I don't see anything about this in this article. As always, follow the money.
https://mises.org/mises-wire/venezuela-military-deployment-about-cronyism-not-national-security
That may not be cronyism, but plain old geopolitics (maybe there’s not a difference). Don’t let your enemy control valuable natural resources, especially the kind they can use to prop up their totalitarian commie government.
Have the drug gangs been declared “A Clear And Present Danger”?
Jack Ryan was asking
They are irregular forces engaged in hostilities against our country. Not sure what needs to be "declared" or by whom.
The sinking was enough of a declaration. Russian navy does that to Somali pirates to where when a Russian vessel is near, the pirates leave the area.
We’ve done that to Somali pirates as well.
The pirates leave the area in pieces. LOL!
Well done Russia!
I love watching Russian naval ships deal with those pirates.
That's how it's done people.
I love watching the Russians having to tow their aircraft carrier around with tug boats.
Trump seems to be playing “Patriot Games”, though probably on console and not PC.
Anybody else remember when Trump tweeted "I'm meeting with the Joint Chiefs..." and ENB lost her shit because she was sure Trump was starting WWIII and it turns out that Trump was just barring service and/or "gender affirming" benefits to transgender soldiers?
Or when the Kyle Rittenhouse footage came out and significant parts of Reason were of the opinion that "He shouldn't have been there."?
This feels like one of those baiting/facepalm moments where there will be footage of the people, guns, drugs leaving a government warehouse, going to the dock, departing from the port... any amounts/manifests/shipping labels/call signs/etc. will all line up. Unlike NS1 and 2 where we know both Biden and Zelensky were aware of the attack beforehand, there's almost certainly not evidence that Maduro personally approved this shipment, but there's probably a paper trail that indicates that the boat was critically narco-involved and potentially government related. To just go randomly blowing up boats in and around C. and S. America is too risky, especially to go bragging on Social Media about it.
Either way, the sensationalist "This is war!" out-of-pocket reaction from Reason and the media once again poisons the well with regard to any objective analysis or free speech discussion about what actually happened and/or what should be done.
The interception of drug traffickers includes the sinking of any such vessels involved, when possible.
In this case it is time we sent a message to the cartels, we aren't foolin' around anymore.
This is a matter of life and death as far too many Americans have died because of the drugs.
I have no problem with this. Now do the same to those drug submarines. A few charges sent their way will do the trick.
The Navy could use the practice. ASW has gone by the wayside for too long.
HOW MANY tons of drugs could a boat that size carry along with eleven people? Enough to keep America stoned for ... five minutes? Let's ask Pam Bondi! SHE knows stuff like that.
Trump saved another 500 million Americans' lives.
How many deaths and ruined lives should a drug pusher be permitted? 1? 20? 100? Show your work.